深层脆性页岩力学性能及井壁稳定性研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2020.05.026

特种油气藏 ›› 2020, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (5): 167-174.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2020.05.026

• 钻采工程 • 上一篇

深层脆性页岩力学性能及井壁稳定性研究

韩正波^1,2, 刘厚彬^1,2, 张靖涛³, 杨华建⁴, 沈欣宇⁴, 阳强⁵

1.油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室,四川成都 610500;
2.西南石油大学,四川成都 610500;
3.中国石油长庆油田分公司,甘肃庆阳 745000;
4.中国石油西南油气田分公司,四川成都 610017;
5.四川页岩气勘探开发有限责任公司,四川成都 610051

收稿日期:2019-07-04 修回日期:2020-07-10 出版日期:2020-10-25 发布日期:2022-02-18
通讯作者: 刘厚彬(1980—),男,副教授,2003年毕业于西南石油学院勘查技术与工程专业,2009年毕业于西南石油大学油气井工程专业,获博士学位,现从事油气井工程与岩石力学方面的研究工作。
作者简介:韩正波(1993—),男,2018年毕业于兰州城市学院石油工程专业,现为西南石油大学油气井工程专业在读硕士研究生,现从事岩石力学与井壁稳定方面的研究。
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项“页岩气三维丛式水平井优快钻井技术试验与应用”(2016ZX05062-003);中国石油西南油气田公司科研项目“自201井区3500m以深页岩气水平井优快钻井技术研究”(20180302-08-01)

Research on the Mechanical Properties and Borehole Stability of Deep Brittle Shale

Han Zhengbo^1,2, Liu Houbin^1,2, Zhang Jingtao³, Yang Huajian⁴, Shen Xinyu⁴, Yang Qiang⁵

1. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China;
2. Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China;
3. PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Qingyang, Gansu 745000, China;
4. PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company, Chengdu, Sichuan 610017, China;
5. Sichuan Shale Gas Exploration and Development Co., Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan 610051, China

Received:2019-07-04 Revised:2020-07-10 Online:2020-10-25 Published:2022-02-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 四川盆地中部龙马溪组页岩地层硬度高、脆性强,钻井过程中井壁坍塌严重,阻卡频发。为解决钻井过程中井壁坍塌问题,测试了以四川盆地自201井为代表的深层页岩微细观组构、水理化性能及力学性能参数各向异性特征,并考虑井眼轨迹、层理缝产状、井筒-地层耦合渗流效应、层理缝力学弱面效应等因素,建立了深层脆性页岩水平井井壁稳定理论模型。实验结果表明:深层页岩脆性矿物含量高达70%,水化膨胀性极低,页岩基质力学强度高,但层理缝间强度低,页岩容易沿层理缝滑移崩落。模型计算结果表明:层理缝力学弱面效应影响明显,当井眼轨迹与层理缝面法向之间夹角满足一定角度,井壁倾向沿层理缝剪切滑移垮塌;井筒-地层间渗流效应不可忽略,压力穿透效应降低钻井液的有效径向支撑力,诱发层理缝起裂、延伸至崩落,合理的钻井液密度及有效封堵性可提高深层页岩水平井井壁稳定性。研究成果揭示了深层脆性页岩井壁坍塌作用机理,可为深层脆性页岩水平井关键工程参数设计提供理论依据。

关键词: 深层脆性页岩, 井壁稳定, 各向异性, 弱面效应, 龙马溪组, 四川盆地

Abstract: The shale strata of Longmaxi Formation in the central part of Sichuan Basin are highly hard and strongly brittle. During the drilling process, the borehole wall collapses seriously and the pipe is stuck frequently. In order to solve the problem of borehole collapse during drilling, the anisotropy characteristics of deep shale, such as microstructure, physical and chemical properties of water, and mechanical properties, were tested, which was represented by Well Zi201 in Sichuan Basin. Theoretical model of horizontal well borehole stability in deep brittle shale was established considering the factors such as wellbore trajectory, bedding fracture occurrence, wellbore-stratum coupling seepage effect, and the mechanical weak plane effect of bedding fracture. The experimental results show that the content of brittle minerals in deep shale is as high as 70%, the hydration expansibility is extremely low, and the mechanical strength of shale matrix is high. While the strength among bedding fractures is low, so the shale is easy to slip and fall along the bedding fracture. The calculation results of the model show that the influence of mechanical weak plane effect of bedding fracture is obvious. When the angle between the wellbore trajectory and the normal direction of the bedding fracture surface meet a certain degree, collapse and shear slip of the wellbore will tend to occur. The wellbore-stratum effect cannot be ignored. The pressure penetration effect will reduce the effective radial support force of the drilling fluid, which may cause the initiation, extension and even collapse of bedding fracture. So reasonable drilling fluid density and effective plugging property can improve horizontal wellbore stability in deep shale. The research results reveal the collapse mechanism of deep brittle shale wellbore, which can provide a theoretical basis for the design of key engineering parameters of deep brittle shale horizontal wells.

Key words: deep brittle shale, wellbore stability, anisotropy, weak plane effect, Longmaxi Formation, Sichuan Basin

中图分类号:

TE142

韩正波, 刘厚彬, 张靖涛, 杨华建, 沈欣宇, 阳强. 深层脆性页岩力学性能及井壁稳定性研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2020, 27(5): 167-174.

Han Zhengbo, Liu Houbin, Zhang Jingtao, Yang Huajian, Shen Xinyu, Yang Qiang. Research on the Mechanical Properties and Borehole Stability of Deep Brittle Shale[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2020, 27(5): 167-174.

参考文献

[1] 王东明,陈勉,罗玉财,等.华北古近系及潜山内幕地层井壁稳定性研究[J].钻井液与完井液,2016,33(6):33-39.
WANG Dongming,CHEN Mian,LUO Yucai,et al.Borehole stability in drilling the paleogene system and inner buried hill in Huabei Oilfield[J].Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2016,33(6):33-39.
[2] 董才源,谢增业,朱华川,等.川中地区中二叠统气源新认识及成藏模式[J].西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2017,32(4):18-23,31.
DONG Caiyuan,XIE Zengye,ZHU Huachuan,et al.New insight for gas source and gas accumulation modes of Middle Permian in central Sichuan Basin[J].Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition),2017,32(4):18-23.
[3] 刘鑫,曾乙洋,文龙,等.川中地区洗象池组有利沉积相带分布预测[J].天然气勘探与开发,2018,41(2):15-21.
LIU Xin,ZENG Yiyang,WEN Long,et al.Distribution prediction on favorable sedimentary-facies in Xixiangchi Formation,central Sichuan Area[J].Natural Gas Exploration and Development,2018,41(2):15-21.
[4] 李炎军,萧林,黄熠.井壁稳定技术在涠洲11-1油田的应用[J].石油钻采工艺,2007,29(6):19-21.
LI Yanjun,XIAO Lin,HUANG Yi.Application of sidewall stability technology in Weizhou 11-1 Oilfield[J].Oil Drilling & Production Technology,2007,29(6):19-21.
[5] OKLAND D,COOK J M.Bedding-related borehole instability in high-angle wells[C].SPE47285,1998:413-422.
[6] 刘志远,陈勉,金衍,等.裂缝性储层裸眼井壁失稳影响因素分析[J].石油钻采工艺,2013,35(2):39-43.
LIU Zhiyuan,CHEN Mian,JIN Yan,et al.Analysis on wellbore stability of open hole in fractrued formation[J].Oil Drilling & Production Technology,2013,35(2):39-43.
[7] 刘向君,陈一健,肖勇.岩石软弱面产状对井壁稳定性的影响[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2001,42(6):12-13,20.
LIU Xiangjun,CHEN Yijian,XIAO Yong.Effect of weak plane dip angle and dip azimuth angle on wellbore stability[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Natural Science Edition),2001,42(6):12-13.
[8] 陈平,马天寿,范翔宇,等.基于井壁稳定分析的井眼轨迹优化方法[J].天然气工业,2015,35(10):84-92.
CHEN Ping,MA Tianshou,FAN Xiangyu,et al.Wellbore path optimization based on wellbore stability analysis[J].Natural Gas Industry,2015,35(10):84-92.
[9] 李双建,金之钧,袁玉松,等.模拟地层条件下泥岩三轴应力实验及其油气意义[J].石油与天然气地质,2016,37(4):598-605.
LI Shuangjian,JIN Zhijun,YUAN Yusong,et al.Triaxial stress experiment of mudstone under simulated geological conditions and its petroleum significance[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2016,37(4):598-605.
[10] 杨宝刚,潘仁芳,赵丹,等.四川盆地长宁示范区龙马溪组页岩岩石力学特性及脆性评价[J].地质科技情报,2015,34(4):183-188.
YANG Baogang,PAN Renfang,ZHAO Dan,et al.Mechanical properties and brittleness evaluation of Longmaxi shale rock of Changning demonstration area in Sichuan Basin[J].Geological Science and Technology Information,2015,34(4):183-188.
[11] 原园,姜振学,喻宸,等.柴北缘中侏罗统湖相泥页岩储层矿物组成与脆性特征[J].高校地质学报,2015,21(1):117-123.
YUAN Yuan,JIANG Zhenxue,YU Chen,et al.Mineral composition and brittleness of middle Jurassic Iacustrine shale reservoir in northern Qaidam Basin[J].Geological Journal of China Universities,2015,21(1):117-123.
[12] 徐赣川,钟光海,谢冰,等.基于岩石物理实验的页岩脆性测井评价方法[J].天然气工业,2014,34(12):38-45.
XU Ganchuan,ZHONG Guanghai,XIE Bing,et al.Petrophysical experiment-based logging evaluation method of shale brittleness[J].Natural Gas Industry,2014,34(12):38-45.
[13] 赖锦,王贵文,范卓颖,等.非常规油气储层脆性指数测井评价方法研究进展[J].石油科学通报,2016,1(3):330-341.
LAI Jin,WANG Guiwen,FAN Zhuoying,et al.Research progress in brittleness index evaluation methods with logging data in unconventional oil and gas reservoirs[J].Petroleum Science Bulletin,2016,1(3):330-341.
[14] 李金磊,李文成.涪陵页岩气田焦石坝区块页岩脆性指数地震定量预测[J].天然气工业, 2017,37(7):13-19.
LI Jinlei,LI Wencheng. A quantitative seismic prediction technique for the brittleness index of shale in the Jiaoshiba Block, Fuling shale gas field in the Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2017,37(7):13-19.
[15] 颜磊,何传亮,侯克均.基于成像矿物谱的页岩气储层脆性指数计算方法——以四川盆地南部下志留统龙马溪组为例[J].天然气工业,2019,39(2):54-60.
YAN Lei,HE Chuanliang,HOU kejun.A calculation method for brittleness index of shale gas reservoirs based on the imaging spectroscopy mineral maps:a case study of the Lower Silurian Longmaxi shale gas reservoir in the southern Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2019,39(2):54-60.
[16] 刘向君,罗平亚.岩石力学与石油工程[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2004:67.
LIU Xiangjun,LUO Pingya.Rock mechanics and petroleum engineering[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2004:67.
[17] 董清源,田建华,王锦喜,等.黔江区块龙马溪组页岩气保存条件研究[J].特种油气藏,2018,25(2):25-30.
DONG QingYuan,TIAN Jianhua,WANG Jinxi,et al.Shale gas preservation condition of Longmaxi Formation in Qianjiang[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2018,25(2):25-30.

深层脆性页岩力学性能及井壁稳定性研究

Research on the Mechanical Properties and Borehole Stability of Deep Brittle Shale

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陶夏妍, 黄天俊, 张艺华, 边树涛, 魏朋辉, 韩嵩, 邓惠, 蔡强. 四川盆地东北部三叠系飞仙关组迁移型鲕滩层序地层分析及相控储层预测[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(6): 62-71.
[2]	王爱民, 王发明, 贺文卿, 王帅, 刘厚彬. 济阳坳陷油页岩力学性能特征实验[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(5): 144-150.
[3]	白立勋, 高之业, 魏维航, 杨弼鼎. 川南地区龙马溪组中深层与深层页岩孔隙结构对比研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(4): 54-62.
[4]	姚天星, 李忠诚, 郭世超, 宋鹏, 王海龙, 唐晓丹. 川南自贡地区海相页岩沉积环境及有机质富集主控因素研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(4): 79-86.
[5]	尹家峰, 王晓军, 鲁政权, 步文洋, 孙磊, 景烨琦, 孙云超, 闻丽. 辽河大民屯凹陷页岩油储层强封堵恒流变油基钻井液技术[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(4): 163-168.
[6]	洪海涛, 张少敏, 张芮, 关旭. 四川盆地凉高山组层序地层格架及有利勘探区优选[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(2): 58-64.
[7]	李鹏飞. 四川盆地页岩气立体开发缝控压裂技术应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(2): 168-174.
[8]	周安富, 谢伟, 邱峋晰, 吴伟, 蒋裕强, 戴赟, 胡曦, 尹兴平. 泸州区块龙一₁⁴小层页岩气勘探开发潜力[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(6): 20-28.
[9]	李素华, 贾霍甫, 胡昊, 李蓉, 余洋. 四川盆地井研地区火山岩岩相类型及储层分布[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(6): 39-46.
[10]	韩珊, 车明光, 苏旺, 肖毓祥, 吴忠宝, 陈建阳, 汪莉彬. 四川盆地威远区块页岩气单井产量预测方法及应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(6): 141-149.
[11]	武瑾, 李玮, 刘鑫, 徐浩, 邓乃尔, 任梓赫, 刘桂莹. 四川盆地海相页岩气碳同位素特征及指示意义[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(5): 36-41.
[12]	朱雯钊, 苗娟, 陈思韵, 雷蕾, 刘菊. 深层碳酸盐岩大斜度井及水平井纤维暂堵转向分段压裂参数优化[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(3): 170-174.
[13]	苗娟, 何旭晟, 王栋, 陈泓沅, 肖振华. 水平井精细分段深度酸化压裂技术研究与应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(2): 141-148.
[14]	张震, 万秀梅, 吴鹏程, 李郑涛, 文莉. 川南龙马溪组深层页岩井壁失稳原因分析及对策[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(1): 160-168.
[15]	高之业, 熊书苓, 成雨, 范毓鹏. 川南地区龙马溪组页岩储层水接触角及其稳定性影响因素[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(5): 10-16.