CO2驱气溶性降混剂提高采收率机理实验

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2022.01.020

特种油气藏 ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1): 134-140.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2022.01.020

CO₂驱气溶性降混剂提高采收率机理实验

孙大龙¹, 张广东¹, 彭旭², 敬豪¹, 吕华³, 任超峰⁴, 王宁¹

1.西南石油大学,四川成都 610500;
2.四川省科源工程技术测试中心,四川成都 610091;
3.中国石油长庆油田分公司,陕西靖边 718500;
4.中国石油长庆油田分公司,陕西西安 710000

收稿日期:2020-05-11 修回日期:2021-11-04 出版日期:2022-02-25 发布日期:2023-01-10
通讯作者: 张广东(1980—),男,高级实验师,硕士生导师,2003年毕业于西南石油学院勘查技术与工程专业,2014年毕业于成都理工大学油气田开发工程专业,获博士学位,现主要从事油田开发、分子模拟等领域研究工作。
作者简介:孙大龙(1996—),男,2018年毕业于西南石油大学石油工程专业,2021年毕业于该校油气田开发工程专业,现主要从事储层保护方向研究工作。
基金资助:
国家青年科学基金项目“基于多场耦合的二氧化碳驱油机理研究”(51904252)

Experiment on the Mechanism of Enhancing Oil Recovery by CO₂ Flooding with Gas-soluble Demixing Agent

Sun Dalong¹, Zhang Guangdong¹, Peng Xu², Jing Hao¹, Lyu Hua³, Ren Chaofeng⁴, Wang Ning¹

1. Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China;
2. Keyuan Engineering Technology Testing Center of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, Sichuan 610091, China;
3. PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Jingbian, Shaanxi 718500, China;
4. PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi′an, Shaanxi 710000, China

Received:2020-05-11 Revised:2021-11-04 Online:2022-02-25 Published:2023-01-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对CO₂驱气溶性降混剂降低混相压力、提高采收率机理认识不清的问题,综合利用室内实验、数值模拟和权重分析法,通过分析原油组分、原油黏度、油气界面张力、原油相态特征的变化,明确了气溶性降混剂的降混机理。实验结果表明:注入体积分数为3%和20%的气溶性降混剂后,原油重质组分含量分别减少25.07%和48.21%,平均原油黏度分别降低61.51%和96.88%,相同压力下的原油与CO₂界面张力分别降低30.36%和91.16%,饱和压力分别降低6.22%和15.90%;气溶性降混剂的主要降混机理为裂解原油的重质组分、降低原油的黏度和降低油气界面张力。对气溶性降混剂与CO₂混合注入和段塞注入2种方式的提高采收率驱油机理进行了分析,明确了地层中不同波及区域的渗流特征:混合带区域主要为CO₂或气溶性降混剂与地层原油的两相渗流,混相带区域主要为CO₂、气溶性降混剂与地层原油的三相渗流。该研究为CO₂驱气溶性降混剂优化和矿场实践提供了依据。

关键词: 气溶性降混剂, CO₂驱, 提高采收率, 渗流特征, 机理

Abstract: In view of unclear understanding of the mechanism of reducing mixed-phase pressure and enhancing oil recovery by CO₂ flooding with soluble demixing agent, the demixing mechanism of gas-soluble demixing agent was clarified by analyzing the changes in crude oil composition, crude oil viscosity, oil-gas interfacial tension and crude oil phase characteristics in combination with laboratory experiment, numerical simulation and weight analysis. The experimental results showed that after injecting the gas-soluble demixing agents of 3% and 20% volume fraction, the content of heavy components in crude oil was reduced by 25.07% and 48.21%, the average crude oil viscosity reduced by 61.51% and 96.88%, the interfacial tension between crude oil and CO₂ reduced by 30.36% and 91.16% at the same pressure, and the saturation pressure reduced by 6.22% and 15.90%, respectively. The dominant demixing mechanism of gas-soluble demixing agent was to crack the heavy components of crude oil, reduce the crude oil viscosity and decrease the oil-gas interfacial tension. The study also analyzed the oil displacement mechanism for oil recovery enhancement by mixed injection and plug injection of gas-soluble demixing agent and CO₂, and clarified the seepage characteristics of different affected areas in the formation, namely there was two-phase seepage of CO₂ or gas-soluble demixing agent and formation crude oil in the mixed injection area, and three-phase seepage of CO₂, gas-soluble demixing agent and formation crude oil in the mixed-phased area. This study provides a basis for the optimization and field practice of the gas-soluble demixing agent for CO₂ flooding.

Key words: gas-soluble demixing agent, CO₂ flooding, enhance oil recovery, seepage characteristics, mechanism

中图分类号:

TE345

孙大龙, 张广东, 彭旭, 敬豪, 吕华, 任超峰, 王宁. CO₂驱气溶性降混剂提高采收率机理实验[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(1): 134-140.

Sun Dalong, Zhang Guangdong, Peng Xu, Jing Hao, Lyu Hua, Ren Chaofeng, Wang Ning. Experiment on the Mechanism of Enhancing Oil Recovery by CO₂ Flooding with Gas-soluble Demixing Agent[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2022, 29(1): 134-140.

参考文献

[1] 张志强,郑军卫.低渗透油气资源勘探开发技术进展[J].地球科学进展,2009,24(8):854-864.
ZHANG Zhiqiang,ZHENG Junwei.Advances in exploration and exploitation technologies of low-permeability oil and gas[J].Advances in Earth Science,2009,24(8):854-864.
[2] 胡文瑞.中国低渗透油气的现状与未来[J].中国工程科学,2009,11(8):29-37.
HU Wenrui.The present and future of low permeability oil and gas in China[J].The Chinese Academy of Engineering,2009,11(8):29-37.
[3] 甘森林.低渗透油田开发的难点与挖潜研究[J].中国石油和化工标准与质量,2019,39(18):167-168.
GAN Senlin.Research on difficulties and potential digging strategies of low-permeability oilfield development[J].China Petroleum and Chemical Standard and Quality,2019,39(18):167-168.
[4] 王保华,周玉辉,夏承莉.低渗透油藏二氧化碳混相驱的现状与展望[J].内蒙古石油化工,2016,42(10):126-131.
WANG Baohua,ZHOU Yuhui,XIA Chengli.Current situation and prospect of CO₂ miscible flooding for low permeability reservoir[J].Inner Mongolia Petrochemical Industry,2016,42(10):126-131.
[5] 徐勇.低渗透油藏注气驱现状及发展趋势[J].化工设计通讯,2017,43(2):24,58.
XU Yong.Present Situation and development trend of gas injection in low permeability reservoir[J].Chemical Engineering Design Communications,2017,43(2):24,58.
[6] 彭龙,尹恒飞,仲崇明.二氧化碳驱油的现状与发展的调研[J].广东化工,2017,44(12):143-144.
PENG Long,YIN Hengfei,ZHONG Chongming.A search of application and development of carbon dioxide flooding[J].Guangdong Chemical Industry,2017,44(12):143-144.
[7] 杨勇.胜利油田特低渗透油藏CO₂驱技术研究与实践[J].油气地质与采收率,2020,27(1):11-19.
YANG Yong.Research and application of CO₂ flooding technology in extra-low permeability reservoirs of Shengli Oilfield[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2020,27(1):11-19.
[8] 王高峰,郑雄杰,张玉,等.适合二氧化碳驱的低渗透油藏筛选方法[J].石油勘探与开发,2015,42(3):358-363.
WANG Gaofeng,ZHENG Xiongjie,ZHANG Yu,et al.A new screening method of low permeability reservoirs suitable for CO₂ flooding[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2015,42(3):358-363.
[9] 贾凯锋,计董超,高金栋,等.低渗透油藏CO₂驱油提高原油采收率研究现状[J].非常规油气,2019,6(1):107-114.
JIA Kaifeng,JI Dongchao,GAO Jindong,et al.The existing state of enhanced oil recovery by CO₂ flooding in low permeability reservoirs[J].Unconventional Oil & Gas,2019,6(1):107-114.
[10] DUPONT A,EASTOE J,MARTIN L.Hybrid fluorocarbon-hydrocarbon CO₂-philic surfactants formation and properties of water-in-CO₂ microemulsions[J].Langmuir,2004,20(23):9960-9967.
[11] EASTOE J,YAN Ci,MOHAMED A.Microemulsions with CO₂ as a solvent[J].Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science,2012,17(6):266-273.
[12] 葛际江,张贵才,蒋平,等.驱油用表面活性剂的发展[J].油田化学,2007,24(3):287-292.
GE Jijiang,ZHANG Guicai,JIANG Ping,et al.Development of surfactants as chemicals for EOR[J].Oilfield Chemistry,2007,24(3):287-292.
[13] 张广东,刘建仪,柳燕丽,等.混相溶剂法降低CO₂驱混相压力研究[J].特种油气藏,2013,20(2):115-117,157.
ZHANG Guangdong,LIU Jianyi,LIU Yanli,et al.Study on reducing miscibility pressure in CO₂ flooding by miscible solvent[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2013,20(2):115-117,157.
[14] 王鑫.表面活性剂驱油技术提高采收率机理及影响因素分析[J].石油化工应用,2019,38(3):5-8.
WANG Xin.Improve recovery by surfactant flooding technology and analyze its influencing factors[J].Petrochemical Industry Application,2019,38(3):5-8.
[15] 王威,张云宝,王楠,等.表面活性剂驱油机理分析及现状研究[J].当代化工,2019,48(8):1850-1852,1861.
WANG Wei,ZHANG Yunbao,WANG Nan,et al.Mechanism analysis and current situation of surfactant flooding[J].Contemporary Chemical Industry,2019,48(8):1850-1852,1861.
[16] 王芳,罗辉,任玉飞,等.降低CO₂驱混相压力的发展现状[J].石油化工高等学校学报,2015,28(6):93-97.
WANG Fang,LUO Hui,REN Yufei,et al.Progress of miscibility pressure reduction of carbon dioxide flooding[J].Journal of Petrochemical Universities,2015,28(6):93-97.
[17] 齐桂雪,李华斌,谭肖,等.混相压力调节剂提高CO₂驱采收率室内研究[J].科学技术与工程,2016,16(24):167-170.
QI Guixue,LI Huabin,TAN Xiao,et al.Experimental study of miscible pressure modulator to improve the CO₂ flooding recovery efficiency[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2016,16(24):167-170.
[18] 杨思玉,廉黎明,杨永智,等.用于CO₂驱的助混剂分子优选及评价[J].新疆石油地质,2015,36(5):555-559.
YANG Siyu,LIAN Liming,YANG Yongzhi,et al.Molecular Optimization Design and Evaluation of Miscible Processing Aids Applied to CO₂ Flooding[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2015,36(5):555-559.
[19] 旷年杰,杨胜来,郭振阳,等.表面活性剂降低CO₂驱最小混相压力研究现状[J].石油化工应用,2020,39(1):1-3,27.
KUANG Nianjie,YANG Shenglai,GUO Zhenyang,et al.Surfactant reduces CO₂ flooding minimum miscibility pressure[J].Petrochemical Industry Application,2020,39(1):1-3,27.
[20] 董朝霞,崔波,李翼,等.超临界CO₂微乳液与烷烃的最小混相压力研究[J].石油化工高等学校学报,2013,26(1):40-44.
DONG Zhaoxia,CUI Bo,LI Yi,et al.MMP of supercritical carbon dioxide microemulsion and alkanes[J].Journal of Petrochemical Universities,2013,26(1):40-44.
[21] 张超.基于气溶性表面活性剂的CO₂泡沫稳定机理与渗流特征研究[D].青岛:中国石油大学(华东),2016.
ZHANG Chao.Research on stabilization mechanism and flow characteristics of CO₂ foam on the basis of gas-soluble surfactant[D].Qingdao:China University of Petroleum(East China),2016.
[22] 毕卫宇,张攀锋,章杨,等.低渗透油田用CO₂气溶性泡沫体系研发及性能评价[J].油气地质与采收率,2018,25(6):71-77.
BI Weiyu,ZHANG Panfeng,ZHANG Yang,et al.Development and performance evaluation on CO₂-soluble surfactant foam system for low permeability reservoir[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2018,25(6):71-77.
[23] 齐桂雪,周林波,龙冕,等.CO₂混相调节剂驱油机理室内研究[J].科学技术与工程,2016,16(35):180-183.
QI Guixue,ZHOU Linbo,LONG Mian,et al.Experimental study of the CO₂ miscible modulator oil-displacement mechanism[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2016,16(35):180-183.
[24] 贾连超,刘鹏飞,袁丹,等.注CO₂提高页岩吸附气采收率实验:以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长₇页岩气为例[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2021,40(2):153-159.
JIA Lianchao,LIU Pengfei,YUAN Dan,et al.Experiment of enhancing the recovery of the shale adsorbed gas by CO₂ injection:taking Yanchang Formation Chang₇ shale gas in Ordos Basin as an example[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2021,40(2):153-159.
[25] 闫方平,郭永伟,曹梦菁,等.异常高压致密油藏CO₂吞吐参数优化及微观孔隙动用特征:以准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组为例[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2021,40(6):158-166.
YAN Fangping,GUO Yongwei,CAO Mengjing,et al.Optimization of CO₂ huff-puff parameters and micro-pore producing characteristics of the tight oil reservoirs with abnormal-high pressure:taking Lucaogou Formation in Junggar-Basin Jimsar Sag as an example[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2021,40(6):158-166.

CO₂驱气溶性降混剂提高采收率机理实验

Experiment on the Mechanism of Enhancing Oil Recovery by CO₂ Flooding with Gas-soluble Demixing Agent

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	崔书姮, 孔杰, 鲁瑞彬, 郭敏灵, 王誉钧, 钟鸿鹏. 高碳气置换高烃气实验及机理评价[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(6): 114-119.
[2]	孟庆春, 何刚, 郭发军, 李华斌, 王莉. 支化预交联凝胶颗粒提高采收率机理实验[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(5): 105-112.
[3]	姚天星, 李忠诚, 郭世超, 宋鹏, 王海龙, 唐晓丹. 川南自贡地区海相页岩沉积环境及有机质富集主控因素研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(4): 79-86.
[4]	孙永鹏, 王传熙, 戴彩丽, 魏利南, 陈超, 谢孟珂. 致密砂岩气藏自支撑裂缝损伤机理及导流能力研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(3): 81-87.
[5]	贾泽江, 宁正福, 张文通, 毛柱, 王质鹏, 程志林. 致密油藏直流电提高采收率技术实验研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(3): 88-96.
[6]	张亮, 魏虎超, 张向峰, 史振鹏, 赵泽宗, 王晓燕, 章杨, 杨红斌. 二甲醚水驱提高稠油油藏采收率实验[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(3): 97-105.
[7]	曹长霄, 宋兆杰, 师耀利, 高阳, 郭佳, 常旭雅. 吉木萨尔页岩油二氧化碳吞吐提高采收率技术研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(3): 106-114.
[8]	刘薇薇, 陈少勇, 曹伟, 王力那, 刘振林, 王海考. 不同驱替阶段微观剩余油赋存特征及影响因素[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(3): 115-122.
[9]	李亮, 赵志红, 杨琦, 杨帆, 王鹏, 刘永兵. 层理页岩脆性破裂模式力学机理研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(3): 123-130.
[10]	刘刚, 曹涵, 朱爱国, 李宜强, 岳航. 稠油油藏多相协同蒸汽驱物理模拟实验[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(3): 131-136.
[11]	刘洪涛, 文章, 涂志雄, 张宝, 景宏涛, 易俊, 孔嫦娥, 于小童. 迪那2凝析气田全生命开采周期纵横向出砂规律探索[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(3): 148-154.
[12]	魏超平, 束青林, 吴光焕, 吴伟, 钟立国, 李迎春, 孙永权, 张彬. 敏感性普通稠油水驱油藏化学降黏实践[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(2): 109-115.
[13]	王哲, 曹广胜, 白玉杰, 王培伦, 王鑫. 低渗透油藏提高采收率技术现状及展望[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(1): 1-13.
[14]	温静, 肖传敏, 郭斐, 杨灿, 马静, 李晓风, 易文博. 微生物＋化学复合驱提高高凝油油藏采收率室内实验[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(1): 87-92.
[15]	罗强, 李明, 李凯, 宁朦, 贺伟, 杜代军. 砂砾岩油藏原位乳化提高采收率实验研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(1): 100-106.