长宁背斜龙马溪组页岩裂缝发育特征及期次解析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2021.01.008

特种油气藏 ›› 2021, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (1): 59-66.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2021.01.008

长宁背斜龙马溪组页岩裂缝发育特征及期次解析

万远飞^1,2, 秦启荣^1,2, 范宇³, 吴建发³, 赵圣贤³, 季春海³, 范存辉^1,2

1.西南石油大学,四川成都 610500;
2.天然气地质四川省重点实验室,四川成都 610500;
3.中国石油西南油气田分公司,四川成都 610056

收稿日期:2020-05-02 修回日期:2020-11-02 出版日期:2021-02-25 发布日期:2021-04-27
通讯作者: 秦启荣(1964—),男,教授,1985年毕业于成都地质学院地质学专业,2001年毕业于成都理工大学地质工程专业,获博士学位,现从事构造地质及地质工程研究工作。
作者简介:万远飞(1996—),男,2018年毕业于长江大学资源勘查工程专业,现为西南石油大学地质资源与地质工程专业在读硕士研究生,主要从事构造地质研究工作。
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项“长宁—威远页岩气开发示范工程”(2016ZX05062);中国工程院重点咨询研究项目“中国页岩气规模有效开发途径研究”(2018-XZ-20);中国石油重大科技专项“西南油气田天然气上产300亿立方米关键技术研究与应用”(2016E-0611)

Development Characteristics of Shale Fractures in Longmaxi Formation of Changning Anticline and the Stage Analysis

Wan Yuanfei^1,2, Qin Qirong^1,2, Fan Yu³, Wu Jianfa³, Zhao Shengxian³, Ji Chunhai³, Fan Cunhui^1,2

1. Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China;
2. Natural Gas Geology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China;
3. PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gasfield Company, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China

Received:2020-05-02 Revised:2020-11-02 Online:2021-02-25 Published:2021-04-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 裂缝特征及形成期次对页岩气有利区优选具有重要意义。以川南地区长宁背斜龙马溪组地层为例,通过对野外露头裂缝的观测分析,结合构造解析、构造反演等手段,对裂缝发育特征及期次展开研究。研究结果表明,长宁背斜以平面剪切缝和剖面剪切缝为主,裂缝发育程度高、倾角大、充填程度高。区内龙马溪组裂缝可分为3套,分别形成于3期构造运动:第1套为NNW、NE向平面剪切缝和近EW向剖面剪切缝,形成于燕山运动中—晚期,以方解石全充填为主;第2套为NW、近EW向平面剪切缝和NE向剖面剪切缝,形成于燕山运动末期—喜山运动早期,裂缝充填物包括方解石及少量泥质、黄铁矿;第3套为近SN、NEE向平面剪切缝和NW向剖面剪切缝,形成于喜山运动中期至现今,裂缝充填程度低,充填物为少量方解石。研究结果为下一步勘探开发提供了一定的理论参考。

关键词: 页岩, 裂缝, 构造分期, 构造演化, 长宁背斜, 龙马溪组

Abstract: Fracture characteristics and formation stages are of great significance for the optimization of shale gas favorable area. For example, we researched the fracture development characteristics and stages of Longmaxi Formation of Changning Anticline in southern Sichuan based on the observation and analysis of outcrop fractures in the field by means of tectonic analysis and tectonic inversion. Results show that the Changning Anticline is dominated by plane shear fractures and sectional shear fractures with high development degree, large dip angle and high filling degree. In this area, fractures in Longmaxi Formation can be divided into 3 types that are formed in 3 stages of tectonic movement. The first type is NNW and NE plane shear fractures and near-EW sectional shear fractures, formed in middle and late stages of Yanshan Movement and fully filled by calcite; the second type is NW and near EW plane shear fractures and NE sectional shear fractures, formed in the final stage of Yanshan Movement-early stage of Himalayan Movement with fracture fillers including calcite and a small amount of clay and pyrite, the third type is near SN and NEE plane shear fractures and NW sectional shear fractures, formed in middle stage of Himalayan Movement-now with a low fracture filling degree and fracture fillers of small amount of calcite. The research results provide some theoretical references for further exploration and development.

Key words: shale, fracture, tectonic stages, tectonic evolution, Changning Anticline, Longmaxi Formation

中图分类号:

TE133

万远飞, 秦启荣, 范宇, 吴建发, 赵圣贤, 季春海, 范存辉. 长宁背斜龙马溪组页岩裂缝发育特征及期次解析[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(1): 59-66.

Wan Yuanfei, Qin Qirong, Fan Yu, Wu Jianfa, Zhao Shengxian, Ji Chunhai, Fan Cunhui. Development Characteristics of Shale Fractures in Longmaxi Formation of Changning Anticline and the Stage Analysis[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2021, 28(1): 59-66.

参考文献

[1] 杨武年.川南区域构造变形及应力场遥感图像定量解析[J].遥感学报,2001,5(1):62-68.
YANG Wunian. Quantitative analysis of remote sensing images on tectonic deformation and stress fields, southern Sichuan, China [J].Journal of Rmeote Sensing, 2001, 5 (1): 62-68.
[2] 唐鑫. 川南地区龙马溪组页岩气成藏的构造控制[D].徐州:中国矿业大学,2018.
TANG Xin. Tectonic control of shale gas accumulation in the Longmaxi Formation in south Sichuan[D].Xuzhou:China University of Mining,2018.
[3] 黄金亮,邹才能,李建忠,等.川南志留系龙马溪组页岩气形成条件与有利区分析[J].煤炭学报,2012,37(5):782-787.
HUANG Jinliang, ZOU Caineng, LI Jianzhong, et al. Shale gas accumulation conditions and favorable zones of Silurian Longmaxi Formation in south Sichuan Basin, China[J].Journal of China Coal Society, 2012, 37 (5): 782-787.
[4] 李忠权,刘顺.构造地质学[M].第3版.北京:地质出版社,2010:96-117.
LI Zhongquan, LIU Shun.Structural Geology[M].3rd.Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2010: 96-117.
[5] 聂海宽,汪虎,何治亮,等.常压页岩气形成机制、分布规律及勘探前景——以四川盆地及其周缘五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J].石油学报,2019,40(2):131-143,164.
NIE Haikuan, WANG Hu, HE Zhiliang, et al. Formation mechanism, distribution and exploration prospect of normal pressure shale gas reservoir:a case study of Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation in Sichuan Basin and its periphery[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019, 40 (2): 131-143, 164.
[6] 杨振恒,韩志艳,李志明,等.北美典型克拉通盆地页岩气成藏特征、模式及启示[J].石油与天然气地质,2013,34(4):463-470.
YANG Zhenheng, HAN Zhiyan, LI Zhiming, et al. Characteristics and patterns of shale gas accumulation in typical north American Cratonic Basins and their enlightenments[J].Oil & Gas Geology, 2013, 34 (4): 463-470.
[7] 何顺,秦启荣,周吉羚,等.川东南DS地区龙马溪组页岩裂缝发育特征及期次解析[J].地质科技情报,2019,38(2):101-109.
HE Shun, QIN Qirong, ZHOU Jiling, et al. Shale fracture characteristics and its application of the Longmaxi Formation in DS Area, southeast Sichuan[J].Geological Science and Technology Information, 2019, 38 (2): 101-109.
[8] 石学文,佟彦明,刘文平,等.页岩储层地震尺度断裂系统分析及其石油地质意义——以四川盆地长宁地区宁201井区为例[J].海相油气地质,2019,24(4):97-106.
SHI Xuewen, TONG Yanming, LIU Wenping, et al. Analysis of seismic scale fault system of shale reservoirs and its petroleum geological significance: a case study of Ning 201 well area in Changning Area, Sichuan Basin [J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2019, 24 (4): 97-106.
[9] 乐光禹,杜思清,黄继钧,等.构造复合原理——川黔构造组合叠加分析[M].成都:成都科技大学出版社,1996.
LE Guangyu, DU Siqing, HUANG Jijun, et al.Tectonic compound principle:analysis of Sichuan-Guizhou tectonic combination[M].Chengdu: Chengdu University of Science and Technology Press, 1996.
[10] 贾梦瑶,唐洪明,陆燕萍,等.川南地区龙马溪组页岩有机质非均质性研究[J].特种油气藏,2019, 26(6):29-34.
JIA Mengyao, TANG Hongming, LU Yanping, et al. Study on organic matter heterogeneity of Longmaxi Formation Shale in South Sichuan[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2019, 26 (6): 29-34.
[11] 杨宝刚,潘仁芳,赵丹,等.四川盆地长宁示范区龙马溪组页岩岩石力学特性及脆性评价[J].地质科技情报,2015,34(4):183-188.
YANG Baogang, PAN Renfang, ZHAO Dan, et al. Mechanical properties and brittleness evaluation of Longmaxi shale rock of Changning demonstration area in Sichuan Basin[J].Geological Science and Technology Information, 2015, 34 (4): 183-188.[12] 胡明. 构造地质学[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社,2015:70-109.
HU Ming. Structural geology[M].Beijing: Petroleum industry Press, 2015: 70-109.
[13] GUO Peng, REN Desheng, XUE Yanhui. Simulation of multi-period tectonic stress fields and distribution prediction of tectonic fractures in tight gas reservoirs: a case study of the Tianhuan Depression in western Ordos Basin, China[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2019, 109: 530-546.
[14] 陶佳丽,杨成,文佳,等.重庆北碚鹰耳岩节理的构造特征解析[J].科学技术与工程,2013,13(23):6671-6675.
TAO Jiali, YANG Cheng, WEN Jia, et al. Related issues on joints of Ying' eryan in Beibei, Chongqing Province[J].Science Technology and Engineering, 2013, 13 (23): 6671-6675.
[15] 杨蓉,尊珠桑姆,许长海,等.四川盆地东部华蓥山断裂滑动分析与古应力重建[J].内蒙古石油化工,2010,36(4):97-100.
YANG Rong, ZUNZHU Sangmu, XU Changhai, et al. Fault sliding analysis and paleostress reconstruction of Huayingshan Faults to east Sichuan Basin[J].Inner Monner Mongulia Petrochemical Industry, 2010, 36 (4): 97-100.
[16] Baotang, Shen, Jingyu, et al. An approximate nonlinear modified Mohr-Coulomb shear strength criterion with critical state for intact rocks[J].Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2018,10(4): 37-44.
[17] 高金栋,周立发,冯乔.鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬—元城地区构造裂缝特征与形成期次的划分[J].大地测量与地球动力学,2018,38(8):811-817.
GAO Jindong, ZHOU Lifa, FENG Qiao. The characteristics and formation phase of structural fracture of the Jiyuan - Yuancheng Area in the Ordos Basin[J].Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2018, 38 (8): 811-817.
[18] 朱新春.大牛地气田多簇压裂产能影响因素分析及裂缝参数优化[J].油气藏评价与开发, 2018, 8(2): 58-62.
ZHU Xinchun.Analysis of productivity influencing factors and optimization of fracture parameters for multi-cluster fracturing[J].Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2018, 8(2): 58-62.
[19] 田巍,邓瑞健,朱维耀,等.页岩压裂缝网储层应力敏感性及对产能的影响[J].油气藏评价与开发,2017,7(6):71-77.
TIAN Wei, DENG Ruijian, ZHU Weiyao, et al. Stress sensitivity of shale reservoir fracture network and its effect on productivity[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2017, 7(6): 71-77.
[20] 李岳桐,王文庆,王刚,等. 渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷新构造运动特征及其控藏作用[J]. 东北石油大学学报,2019,43(6):94-104.
LI Yuetong,WANG Wenqing,WANG Gang,et al. Neotectonism and its control on hydrocarbon accumulation in Huanghua Depression of the Bohai Bay Basin[J].Journal of Northeast Petroleum University,2019,43(6):94-104.
[21] 王纯,张研,吴小洲,等. 辽河滩海地区东部构造演化与潜山带内幕油气聚集[J]. 东北石油大学学报,2017,41(1):43—51.
WANG Chun,ZHANG Yan,WU Xiaozhou,et al. Tectonic evolution of eastern Liaohe offshore and hydrocarbon accumulation of interior buried hill[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University,2017,41(1):43—51.
[22] 赵玉涛,邵明礼,贾可心,等. 松辽盆地德惠断陷华家构造带深层储层油气成藏期次——来自流体包裹体证据[J]. 东北石油大学学报,2017,41(1):73—81.
ZHAO Yutao,SHAO Mingli,JIA Kexin,et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation stages of deep reservoir in Huajia tectonic zone of Dehui depression of Songliao Basin based on evidence of fluid inclusions[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University,2017,41(1):73—81.

长宁背斜龙马溪组页岩裂缝发育特征及期次解析

Development Characteristics of Shale Fractures in Longmaxi Formation of Changning Anticline and the Stage Analysis

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	赵晨旭, 李忠诚, 郭世超, 鲍志东, 魏兆胜, 李磊, 王海龙. 松辽盆地南部长岭断陷青一段陆相页岩地球化学和沉积环境特征[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(6): 55-61.
[2]	袁飞宇, 唐潮, 张超, 付亚飞, 陈波. 团簇效应对裂缝连通性的影响[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(6): 107-113.
[3]	殷洪川, 胥良君, 吕泽宇, 庞进, 唐雯, 陈渝页. 页岩气井临界出砂产量预测方法[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(6): 135-140.
[4]	周忠亚. 纹层型页岩油储层裂缝扩展机理及工艺对策[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(6): 141-149.
[5]	俞天喜, 王雷, 陈蓓蓓, 孙锡泽, 李圣祥, 朱振龙. 基于盐溶和蠕变作用的含盐储层裂缝导流能力变化规律研究与应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(6): 157-164.
[6]	冯冰, 王胜, 李刚权, 蓝宝锋, 吴松, 李绍鹏. 动态速度迭代技术在复杂构造区随钻导向中的应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(5): 28-34.
[7]	周志军, 张国青, 崔春雪, 王静怡, 王娟. 不同岩性页岩油储集空间及物性特征[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(5): 42-49.
[8]	张玥, 汤济广, 胡美玲, 秦德超, 冯涛. 松辽盆地南部大安地区青山口组一段页岩储层微观孔隙结构[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(5): 58-66.
[9]	程林松, 杨晨旭, 曹仁义, 贾品, 蒲保彪, 时俊杰. 注水诱导裂缝动态特征及数值模拟研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(5): 84-90.
[10]	张亚雄, 吕心瑞. 基于控制单元的大尺度离散裂缝降维数值模拟方法[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(5): 98-104.
[11]	张添锦, 王延峰, 李军, 袁青. 注CO₂提高页岩吸附甲烷采收率核磁共振实验[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(5): 113-120.
[12]	张矿生, 薛小佳, 陶亮, 熊作为, 陈文斌, 武安安, 闫广. 页岩油水平井体积压裂缝网波及体积评价新方法及应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(5): 127-134.
[13]	王爱民, 王发明, 贺文卿, 王帅, 刘厚彬. 济阳坳陷油页岩力学性能特征实验[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(5): 144-150.
[14]	孟胡, 申颍浩, 朱万雨, 李小军, 雷德荣, 葛洪魁. 四川盆地昭通页岩气水平井水力压裂套管外载分析[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(5): 166-174.
[15]	钟红利, 卓自敏, 张凤奇, 张佩, 陈玲玲. 鄂尔多斯盆地甘泉地区长7页岩油储层非均质性及其控油规律[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(4): 10-18.