济阳坳陷页岩油储层矿物组分最优化反演方法

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2022.02.003

特种油气藏 ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2): 16-23.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2022.02.003

济阳坳陷页岩油储层矿物组分最优化反演方法

赖富强^1,2, 李仕超¹, 王敏³, 刘粤蛟², 钟路路², 黄兆辉², 王海涛²

1.宜宾学院,四川宜宾 644007;
2.重庆科技学院复杂油田勘探开发重庆市重点实验室,重庆 401331;
3.中国石化胜利油田分公司,山东东营 257000

收稿日期:2021-03-24 修回日期:2022-01-05 出版日期:2022-04-25 发布日期:2023-01-10
作者简介:赖富强(1982—),男,教授,2004年毕业于石油大学(华东)热能与动力工程专业,2011年毕业于中国石油大学(华东)地质资源与地质工程专业,获博士学位,现从事页岩油等非常规储层测井评价方法研究工作。
基金资助:
国家青年科学基金项目“基于成像测井的泥页岩储层可压裂性评价方法研究”(41402118);重庆市基础研究与前沿探索项目“页岩储层多组分多尺度数字岩心构建及脆性微观成因机理模拟研究”(cstc2018jcyjAX0503)

Optimal Retrieval Method for Mineral Constituents of Shale Oil Reservoirs in Jiyang Sag

Lai Fuqiang^1,2, Li Shichao¹, Wang Min³, Liu Yuejiao², Zhong Lulu², Huang Zhaohui², Wang Haitao²

1. Yibin College, Yibin, Sichuan 644007, China;
2. Chongqing Key Laboratory of Complex Oil and Gas Field Exploration and Development, Chongqing University of Science and Technology, Chongqing 401331, China;
3. Sinopec Shengli Oilfield Company, Dongying, Shandong 257000, China

Received:2021-03-24 Revised:2022-01-05 Online:2022-04-25 Published:2023-01-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对页岩油储层矿物组分复杂多样、矿物体积含量模型不统一、矿物组分准确定量评价困难等问题,以济阳坳陷陆相页岩油储层的岩心X衍射全岩矿物岩心分析和薄片鉴定等实验资料为基础,引入有机骨架,构建页岩油储层“双骨架”矿物组分岩石物理体积模型,在经过储层三孔隙度校正之后,采用最小二乘法-奇异值分解最优化反演方法计算页岩油储层有机骨架和无机骨架矿物组分体积含量。研究表明,采用最优化反演方法计算得到的矿物体积含量与X衍射测量结果相关性达到0.60以上,并在实际井中得到验证应用。研究成果可为页岩油储层精细评价提供有力支撑。

关键词: 页岩油, “双骨架”矿物组分模型, 反演, 测井识别, 济阳坳陷

Abstract: To address the problems of complex and diverse mineral constituents in shale oil reservoirs, inconsistent mineral volume and content models, and difficulties in accurate quantitative evaluation of mineral constituents, the organic framework was introduced to build a petrophysical volume model of "dual-framework" mineral constituents in shale oil reservoirs based on the experimental data of core analysis by X-ray diffraction on all minerals in the rock and thin slice identification of continental shale oil reservoirs in Jiyang Sag, and the optimal retrieval method with least-squares and singular value decomposition was used to calculate the volume and content of mineral constituents of organic and inorganic framework in shale oil reservoirs after the correction of reservoir triple porosity. The research shows that the correlation between the mineral volume content calculated by the optimal inversion method and the X-ray diffraction measurement results is more than 0.60, which has been verified and applied in actual wells. The study results provide strong support for the accurate evaluation of shale oil reservoirs.

Key words: shale oil, "dual-framework" mineral assemblage model, inversion, log identification, Jiyang Sag

中图分类号:

TE135

赖富强, 李仕超, 王敏, 刘粤蛟, 钟路路, 黄兆辉, 王海涛. 济阳坳陷页岩油储层矿物组分最优化反演方法[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(2): 16-23.

Lai Fuqiang, Li Shichao, Wang Min, Liu Yuejiao, Zhong Lulu, Huang Zhaohui, Wang Haitao. Optimal Retrieval Method for Mineral Constituents of Shale Oil Reservoirs in Jiyang Sag[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2022, 29(2): 16-23.

参考文献

[1] 匡立春,侯连华,杨智,等.陆相页岩油储层评价关键参数及方法[J].石油学报,2021,42(1):1-14.
KUANG Lichun,HOU Lianhua,YANG Zhi,et al.Key parameters and methods of lacustrine shale oil reservoir characterization[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2021,42(1):1-14.
[2] HU Xuetao,CHEN Lei,QI Lin,et al.Marine shale reservoir evaluation in the Sichuan Basin:a case study of the Lower Silurian Longmaxi marine shale of the B201 Well in the Baoluan Area,southeast Sichuan Basin,China[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2019,182:106339.
[3] 赖富强,罗涵,覃栋优,等.基于层次分析法的页岩气储层可压裂性评价研究[J].特种油气藏,2018,25(3):154-159.
LAI Fuqiang,LUO Han,QIN Dongyou,et al.Crushability evaluation of shale gas reservoir based on analytic hierarchy process[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2018,25(3):154-159.
[4] 曹涛涛,邓模,刘虎,等.川南-黔北地区龙潭组页岩气成藏条件分析[J].特种油气藏,2018,25(3):6-12.
CAO Taotao,DENG Mo,LIU Hu,et al.Shale gas accumulation condition analysis of Longtan Formation in southern Sichuan-northern Guizhou[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2018,25(3):6-12.
[5] 赵文智,朱如凯,胡素云,等.陆相富有机质页岩与泥岩的成藏差异及其在页岩油评价中的意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2020,47(6):1079-1089.
ZHAO Wenzhi,ZHU Rukai,HU Suyun,et al.Accumulation contribution differences between lacustrine organic-rich shales and mudstones and their significance in shale oil evaluation[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2020,47(6):1079-1089.
[6] 朱博远,张超谟,张占松,等.渤中19-6太古界潜山复杂岩性储层矿物组分反演[J].岩性油气藏,2020,32(4):107-114.
ZHU Boyuan,ZHANG Chaomo,ZHANG Zhansong,et al.Mineral component inversion of complex lithologic reservoirs in Bozhong 19-6 Archean buried hill[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2020,32(4):107-114.
[7] 邓涛,李勇.龙门山前陆盆地南段须五段页岩气富集条件及有利区评价[J].特种油气藏,2018,25(4):51-56.
DENG Tao,LI Yong.Shale gas enrichment condition and favorable area evaluation of the Xu5 Member in the southern Section of Longmenshan Foreland Basin[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2018,25(4):51-56.
[8] LIANG Xing,XU Zhengyu,ZHANG Zhao,et al.Breakthrough of shallow shale gas exploration in Taiyang anticline area and its significance for resource development in Zhaotong,Yunnan Province,China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2020,47(1):12-29.
[9] 闫建平,何旭,胡钦红,等.湖相泥页岩岩相类型划分及测井精细识别方法——以济阳坳陷沾化凹陷沙三下亚段为例[J].Applied Geophysics,2018,15(2):151-164,361.
YAN Jianping,HE Xu,HU Qinhong,et al.Lower Es₃ in Zhanhua Sag, Jiyang Depression:a case study for lithofacies classification in lacustrine mud shale[J].Applied Geophysics,2018,15(2):151-164,361.
[10] 李潮流,胡法龙,袁超,等.利用核磁共振与常规测井联合反演确定致密储层多矿物组分[J].石油学报,2018,39(9):1019-1027.
LI Chaoliu,HU Falong,YUAN Chao,et al.Multi-mineral components of tight reservoirs determined by joint inversion of nuclear magnetic resonance and conventional logs[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2018,39(9):1019-1027.
[11] 王濡岳,胡宗全,董立,等.页岩气储层表征评价技术进展与思考[J].石油与天然气地质,2021,42(1):54-65.
WANG Ruyue,HU Zongquan,DONG Li,et al.Advancement and trends of shale gas reservoir characterization and evaluation[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2021,42(1):54-65.
[12] 石玉江,胡琮,孙小平,等.鄂尔多斯盆地奥陶系马家沟组马五₆段沉积微相测井识别技术与应用[J].西北大学学报(自然科学版),2019,49(5):755-764.
SHI Yujiang,HU Cong,SUN Xiaoping,et al.Logging identification technique and application of sedimentary microfacies in the Ordovician Majigou Formation Member₆ Combination in the Ordos Basin[J].Journal of Northwest University(Natural Science Edition),2019,49(5):755-764.
[13] 俞保财,牟瑜,任小锋,等.致密碳酸盐岩储层矿物组分计算模型建立——以鄂尔多斯盆地东部马五_X亚段储层为例[J].石油地质与工程,2020,34(4):36-41.
YU Baocai,MU Yu,REN Xiaofeng,et al.Construction of mineral component calculation model for tight carbonate reservoirs:by taking Ma5_X sub member of Majiagou Formation in Ordos Basin as an example[J].Petroleum Geology & Engineering,2020,34(4):36-41.
[14] 王濡岳,聂海宽,胡宗全,等.压力演化对页岩气储层的控制作用——以四川盆地五峰组龙马溪组为例[J].天然气工业,2020,40(10):1-11.
WANG Ruyue,NIE Haikuan,HU Zongquan,et al.Controlling effect of pressure evolution on shale gas reservoirs:a case study of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in the Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2020,40(10):1-11.
[15] YANG Kang,JIANG Yuqiang,FU Yonghong.Study on shale reservoir characteristics of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in Wuxi Area,Sichuan Basin[J].International Core Journal of Engineering,2021,7(4): 106339.
[16] WANG Ruyue,HU Zongquan,LONG Shengxiang,et al.Differential characteristics of the Upper Ordovician-Lower Silurian Wufeng-Longmaxi shale reservoir and its implications for exploration and development of shale gas in/around the Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Geologica Sinica(English Edition),2019,93(3): 520-535.
[17] 刘致水,孙赞东,董宁,等.一种修正的Kuster-Toksz岩石物理模型及应用[J].石油地球物理勘探, 2018, 53(1):113-121.
LIU Zhishui,SUN Zandong,DONG Ning,et al.A modified Kuster-Toksz petrophysical model and its application[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2018,53(1):113-121.
[18] LIU Yuejiao,LAI Fuqiang,ZHANG Haijie,et al.A novel mineral composition inversion method of deep shale gas reservoir in western Chongqing[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2021,202:108528.
[19] 李琳,王培培,谷鹏,等.基于LU分解和交替最小二乘法的分布式奇异值分解推荐算法[J].模式识别与人工智能,2020,33(1):32-40.
LI Lin,WANG Peipei,GU Peng,et al.Distributed singular value decomposition recommendation algorithm based on LU decomposition and alternating least square[J].Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence,2020,33(1):32-40.
[20] 王民,马睿,李进步,等.济阳坳陷古近系沙河街组湖相页岩油赋存机理[J].石油勘探与开发,2019,46(4):789-802.
WANG Min,MA Rui,LI Jinbu,et al.Occurrence mechanism of lacustrine shale oil in the Paleogene Shahejie Formation of Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin,China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2019,46(4):789-802.
[21] 周立宏,陈长伟,韩国猛,等.陆相致密油与页岩油藏特征差异性及勘探实践意义:以渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷为例[J].地球科学,2021,46(2):555-571.
ZHOU Lihong,CHEN Changwei,HAN Guomeng,et al.Difference characteristics between continental shale oil and tight oil and exploration practice:a case from Huanghua Depression,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Earth Science,2021,46(2):555-571.

济阳坳陷页岩油储层矿物组分最优化反演方法

Optimal Retrieval Method for Mineral Constituents of Shale Oil Reservoirs in Jiyang Sag

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	赵晨旭, 李忠诚, 郭世超, 鲍志东, 魏兆胜, 李磊, 王海龙. 松辽盆地南部长岭断陷青一段陆相页岩地球化学和沉积环境特征[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(6): 55-61.
[2]	周忠亚. 纹层型页岩油储层裂缝扩展机理及工艺对策[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(6): 141-149.
[3]	周志军, 张国青, 崔春雪, 王静怡, 王娟. 不同岩性页岩油储集空间及物性特征[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(5): 42-49.
[4]	张矿生, 薛小佳, 陶亮, 熊作为, 陈文斌, 武安安, 闫广. 页岩油水平井体积压裂缝网波及体积评价新方法及应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(5): 127-134.
[5]	王爱民, 王发明, 贺文卿, 王帅, 刘厚彬. 济阳坳陷油页岩力学性能特征实验[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(5): 144-150.
[6]	钟红利, 卓自敏, 张凤奇, 张佩, 陈玲玲. 鄂尔多斯盆地甘泉地区长7页岩油储层非均质性及其控油规律[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(4): 10-18.
[7]	熊雄, 肖佃师, 雷祥辉, 李映燕, 卢双舫, 王猛, 彭悦, 郭雪燚. 吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组页岩油录井响应及“甜点”快速评价技术[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(4): 35-43.
[8]	文家成, 胡钦红, 杨升宇, 马斌玉, 王旭阳, 蒲秀刚, 韩文中, 张伟. 渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔二段页岩储层特征及页岩油可动性评价[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(4): 63-70.
[9]	罗红文, 张琴, 李海涛, 朱涵斌, 刘文强, 向雨行, 马寒松, 李颖. 基于分布式光纤测温的致密油水平井产出剖面解释方法[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(4): 104-112.
[10]	王涛, 于海洋, 赵鹏飞, 李敬松, 刘汝敏, 寇双燕, 王敬, 廖爽. 基于不稳定压力试井分析的致密气井压裂后产能评估[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(4): 122-130.
[11]	尹家峰, 王晓军, 鲁政权, 步文洋, 孙磊, 景烨琦, 孙云超, 闻丽. 辽河大民屯凹陷页岩油储层强封堵恒流变油基钻井液技术[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(4): 163-168.
[12]	曹长霄, 宋兆杰, 师耀利, 高阳, 郭佳, 常旭雅. 吉木萨尔页岩油二氧化碳吞吐提高采收率技术研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(3): 106-114.
[13]	孟大江, 路允乾, 张宝金, 王利杰. 叠前反演技术在天然气水合物储层预测中的应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(2): 51-57.
[14]	李素华, 贾霍甫, 胡昊, 李蓉, 余洋. 四川盆地井研地区火山岩岩相类型及储层分布[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(6): 39-46.
[15]	南金浩, 沙宗伦, 贾红兵, 刘少然, 熊向东, 林彤. 滚动扩边稀井区的沉积微相刻画方法研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(6): 56-64.