Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs >

2021 , Vol. 28 >Issue 4: 79 - 87

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2021.04.011

Geologic Exploration

Characteristics, Genesis and Distribution of Interlayers in E31 Reservoir of Gasikule Oilfield, Qaidam Basin

  • Yu Huimin ,
  • Song Yanchen ,
  • Peng Yuting ,
  • Liu Bo ,
  • Li Tong ,
  • Shi Kaibo
Expand
  • Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Received date: 2021-03-09

  Revised date: 2021-05-21

  Online published: 2022-02-18

Fold

Abstract

The interlayers developed in the reservoir restrict the distribution of remaining oil. In view of the difficulty in enhancing recovery efficiency of remaining oil by gas injection after long-term water-flooding development in E31 reservoir of Gasikule Oilfield, Qaidam Basin, in the study case of Ⅳ-3 to Ⅳ-5 sublayers in E31 reservoir, Gasikule Oilfield, a comprehensive study was conducted on core, logging, test and analysis to identify the types, characteristics and genesis of interlayers, establish the standards for interlayer identification, and characterize spatial distribution characteristics of interlayer on these standards. It was found in the study that argillaceous and calcareous interlayers were mainly developed in Gasikule E31 reservoir, with argillaceous interlayer dominated, whose genesis was mainly controlled by high-frequency cycles, and calcareous interlayer was distributed relatively less and mostly formed by cementation. Based on the analysis of stratigraphic architecture and stratigraphic texture, the interlayer of Gasikule E31 reservoir can be divided into three levels: interlayer between sublayers, interlayer between single sandbodies and interlayer in single sandbody. A quantitative identification standard of argillaceous interlayer and calcareous interlayer was established based on the normalization of log curves of GR, SP, AC and RLLD. The interlayer between sublayers was thick, high in continuity, and basically distributed in the whole area; the interlayer between single sandbodies was poor in continuity and continuously distributed in some places; the interlayer in single sandbody was sporadically distributed, with the thinnest thickness. The study results provide a certain geological basis for gas-flooding development of Gasikule E31 reservoir.

Key words： interlayer; stratigraphic texture analysis; logging identification; distribution law; Lower Ganchaigou Formation; Gasikule Oilfield

Cite this article

Yu Huimin , Song Yanchen , Peng Yuting , Liu Bo , Li Tong , Shi Kaibo . Characteristics, Genesis and Distribution of Interlayers in E31 Reservoir of Gasikule Oilfield, Qaidam Basin[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2021 , 28(4) : 79 -87 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2021.04.011

References

[1] 李延丽,王爱萍,郑红军,等.柴达木盆地昆北油田厚油层隔夹层研究[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2015,37(4):67-72.
LI Yanli,WANG Aiping,ZHENG Hongjun,et al.A study on the interlayer within thick reservoir in Kunbei Oilfield,Qaidam Basin[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition),2015,37(4):67-72.
[2] 刘元,尹艳树,陆琪.赵凹油田安棚主体区厚油层内部隔夹层研究[J].中国锰业,2016,34(5):19-22.
LIU Yuan,YIN Yanshu,LU Qi.A study on interlayers in thick oil reservoir in Anpeng Mainbody Area of Zhaowa Oilfield[J].China Manganese Industry,2016,34(5):19-22.
[3] 杨帆,廖茂杰,王谦,等.利用测井资料识别隔夹层——以塔中4油田为例[J].工程地球物理学报,2014,11(4):487-492.
Yang Fan,Liao Maojie,Wang Qian,et al.Identifying the interlayers with logging data in Tazhong 4 Oilfield[J].Chinese Journal of Engineering Geophysics,2014,11(4):487-492.
[4] 刘超,李云鹏,刘宗宾,等.渤海湾盆地S油田三角洲相储层隔夹层及剩余油挖潜研究[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2017,32(3):26-33.
LIU Chao,LI Yunpeng,LIU Zongbin,et al.Research on interlayers and remaining oil of delta facies reservoir in S Oilfield,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University(Natural Science),2017,32(3):26-33.
[5] 王腾飞,楚美娟,刘广林,等.鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区延长组长6油层组隔夹层研究[J]. 内蒙古石油化工,2017,43(9):100-102.
WANG Tengfei,CHU Meijuan,LIU Guanglin,et al.Study on interlayer of Chang6 oil-bearing formation of Yanchang Formation in Jiyuan Area,Ordos Basin[J].Inner Mongolia Petrochemical Industry,2017,43(9):100-102.
[6] 舒明媚,陈河青,王健,等.尕斯库勒E31油藏辫状河三角洲前缘亚相储层流动单元研究[J].复杂油气藏,2012,5(2):41-44.
SHU Mingmei,CHEN Heqing,WANG Jian,et al.The flow unit research of braided delta front subfacies reservoir in E31 oil reservoir of Gasikule Oilfield[J].Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs,2012,5(2):41-44.
[7] 黎明.尕斯库勒油田E31油藏水淹层测井识别方法研究[D].青岛:中国石油大学(华东), 2015.
LI Ming.Study on the identification method of water-flooded reservoir logging in E31 Reservoir of Gasikule Oilfield[D].Qingdao:China University of Petroleum(East China),2015.
[8] 刘雪,牟中海.尕斯库勒油田辫状河三角洲河口坝成因分析与相模式[J].化工设计通讯,2019,45(11):129-130.
LIU Xue,MOU Zhonghai.Genetic analysis and facies model of mouth bar in braided river delta of Gasikule Oilfield[J].Chemical Engineering Design Communications,2019,45(11):129-130.
[9] 王勇飞.尕斯库勒E31油藏动态建模与剩余油评价[D].成都:成都理工大学,2006.
WANG Yongfei.Dynamic modeling and remaining oil evaluation of E31 Reservoir of Gasikule Oilfield[D].Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology,2006.
[10] 董伟.尕斯库勒E31油藏相控建模与剩余油分布研究[D].成都:成都理工大学,2008.
DONG Wei.Facies control modeling and remaining oil distribution of E31 Reservoir of Gasikule Oilfield[D].Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology,2008.
[11] 吴千然,牟中海,丁晓军,等.尕斯库勒油田N21油藏砂质辫状河储层构型研究[J].地质科技情报,2019,38(2):151-160.
WU Qianran,MOU Zhonghai,DING Xiaojun,et al.Reservoir architecture of sandy braided river in N21 Reservoir of Gasikule Oilfield[J].Geological Science and Technology Information,2019,38(2):151-160.
[12] 王改云,杨少春,廖飞燕,等.辫状河储层中隔夹层的层次结构分析[J].天然气地球科学,2009,20(3):378-383.
WANG Gaiyun,YANG Shaochun,LIAO Feiyan,et al.Hierarchical structure of barrier beds and interbeds in braided river reservoirs[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2009,20(3):378-383.
[13] MIALL A D.Architectural-elements analysis:a new method of facies analysis applied to fluival deposits[J].Earth-science Reviews,1985,22:261-308.
[14] MIALL A D.Reservoir heterogeneity in fluvial sandstones:lessons from outcrop studies[J].AAPG Bulletin,1988,72(6):682-697.
[15] 柳成志,张雁,单敬福.砂岩储层隔夹层的形成机理及分布特征——以萨中地区PⅠ2小层曲流河河道砂岩为例[J].天然气工业,2006,26(7):15-17.
LIU Chengzhi,ZHANG Yan,SHAN Jingfu.Genetic mechanism and distribution features of barriers and baffles in sandstone reservoir[J].Natural Gas Industry,2006,26(7):15-17.
[16] 商晓飞,侯加根,刘钰铭,等.黄骅坳陷板桥地区湖相滩坝砂体内部隔(夹)层成因机制与分布样式[J].古地理学报,2014,16(5):581-596.
SHANG Xiaofei,HOU Jiagen,LIU Yuming,et al.Genetic mechanism and distribution patterns of inter (inner)-layers in lacustrine beach-bar sand bodies in Banqiao Area,Huanghua Depression[J].Journal of Palaeogeography,2014,16(5):581-596.
[17] 李云海,吴胜和,李艳平,等. 三角洲前缘河口坝储层构型界面层次表征[J]. 石油天然气学报,2007,29(6):49-52.
LI Yunhai,WU Shenghe,LI Yanping,et al.Hierarchical boundary characterization of delta front mouth bar reservoir architecture[J].Journal of Oil and Gas Technology,2007,29(6):49-52.
[18] 甄大庆,王波.测井中标准化和归一化的问题浅析[J].中国石油和化工标准与质量,2012,32(6):273.
ZHEN Daqing,WANG Bo.Analysis of standardization and normalization in logging[J].China Petroleum and Chemical Standard and Quality,2012,32(6):273.
[19] 袁瑞,朱锐,瞿建华,等. 微电阻率成像测井双属性岩石相划分方法——以准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷百口泉组为例[J]. 东北石油大学学报,2018,42(1):14-23.
YUAN Rui,ZHU Rui,QU Jianhua,et al. Division method of double property lithofacies based on microresistivity imaging logs: A case study of Baikouquan formation in Mahu sag,Junggar basin[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University,2018,42(1):14-23.
[20] 耿斌,闫华,周德志,等.疏松砂岩稠油层含油饱和度测井解释校正方法探讨——以济阳坳陷沾化凹陷馆陶组为例[J].油气地质与采收率,2020,27(4):45-51.
GENG Bin,YAN Hua,ZHOU Dezhi,et al.Correction method of oil saturation in unconsolidated sandstone heavy oil reservoirs:A case study of Guantao Formation in Zhanhua Sag,Jiyang Depression[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2020,27(4):45-51.
[21] 原俊红,付玉通,宋昱. 深部煤层气储层测井解释技术及应用[J].油气地质与采收率,2018,25(5):24-31.
YUAN Junhong,FU Yutong,SONG Yu. Logging interpretation technology and its application to deep coalbed methane reservoir[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2018,25(5):24-31.
[22] 舒志国, 关红梅, 喻璐,等.四川盆地焦石坝地区页岩气储层孔隙参数测井评价方法[J].石油实验地质,2018,40(1):38-43.
SHU Zhiguo, GUAN Hongmei, YU Lu,et al.Well logging evaluation of pore parameters for shale gas reservoirs in Jiaoshiba area, Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2018,40(1):38-43.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉