特种油气藏 ›› 2024, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (4): 19-26.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2024.04.003

• 综述 • 上一篇    下一篇

不稳定试井技术研究进展及发展趋势

王玮淇1,2, 管英柱1,2, 张金发3, 汪沪亮4, 纪国法1,2   

  1. 1.长江大学,湖北 武汉 430100;
    2.油气钻采工程湖北省重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430100;
    3.中国石油大学(北京),北京 102249;
    4.中国石油新疆油田分公司,新疆 克拉玛依 834000
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-03 修回日期:2024-04-11 出版日期:2024-08-25 发布日期:2024-09-20
  • 通讯作者: 管英柱(1972—),男,副教授,1996年毕业于江汉石油学院采油工程专业,2007年毕业于成都理工大学油气田开发工程专业,获博士学位,现从事油气开采理论与应用技术方面的教学与研究工作。
  • 作者简介:王玮淇(2000—),女,2022年毕业于沈阳航空航天大学市场营销专业,现为长江大学油气田开发专业在读硕士研究生,现从事油气开采理论与应用技术方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金“基于分形理论及多尺度方法的页岩体积改造压裂液滤失机理研究”(51804042)

Research Progress and Development Tendency of Transient Well Testing Technology

Wang Weiqi1,2, Guan Yingzhu1,2, Zhang Jinfa3, Wang Huliang4, Ji Guofa1,2   

  1. 1. Yangtze University, Wuhan, Hubei 430100, China;
    2. Hubei Key Laboratory of Drilling and Production Engineering for Oil and Gas, Wuhan, Hubei 430100, China;
    3. China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;
    4. PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Karamay, Xinjiang 834000, China
  • Received:2023-07-03 Revised:2024-04-11 Online:2024-08-25 Published:2024-09-20

摘要: 为更好监测油气藏生产动态,提升油气田试井产能,梳理了4种常用不稳定试井技术的原理、解释方法及应用效果,分析了不稳定试井技术存在的问题,并提出了未来的重点攻关方向。结果表明:目前常用的不稳定试井技术主要存在井间干扰现象严重、试井曲线特征复杂、试井解释准确率低且复杂断块油藏常规试井效率低和损耗大等问题;数值试井、垂向干扰试井及低频脉冲试井等新型试井技术可解决常规不稳定试井技术存在的问题;不稳定试井技术下步发展趋势是深层超深层测试工艺、低渗致密储层测试资料评价、压裂效果评价及资料的综合应用等方面,可着重于数值试井、多分层试井等方面的技术攻关。通过对不稳定试井技术的综合剖析,可对现场测试提供技术参考,并为后续技术发展提供新视角。

关键词: 不稳定试井, 压力恢复试井, 压力降落试井, 干扰试井, 脉冲试井

Abstract: In order to better monitor the production performance of oil and gas reservoirs and improve the production capacity of oil and gas fields, this paper reviews the principles, interpretation methods, and application effects of four commonly used transient well testing technologies. It analyzes the problems existing in transient well testing technology and proposes future key research directions. The results show that the currently commonly used transient well testing technologies mainly suffer from serious inter-well interference, complex characteristics of testing curves, low accuracy of testing interpretation, and low efficiency and high losses in conventional testing of complex fault block reservoirs. While new types of testing technologies such as numerical well testing, vertical interference testing, and low-frequency pulse testing can address these issues. The future development trends of transient well testing technology lie in deep and ultra-deep testing processes, evaluation of low-permeability tight reservoir testing data, assessment of fracturing effects, and integrated application of data. Emphasis can be placed on technical breakthroughs in numerical well testing and multi-layer testing. Through a comprehensive analysis of transient well testing technology, this study can provide technical references for on-site testing and offer new perspectives for subsequent technological developments.

Key words: transient well testing, pressure buildup testing, pressure drawdown testing, interference testing, pulse testing

中图分类号: