苏里格气田岩石相控制的致密砂岩储层质量差异机理

李进步; 刘子豪; 徐振华; 李娅; 王艳

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2021.01.002

特种油气藏 >

2021 , Vol. 28 >Issue 1: 10 - 17

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2021.01.002

地质勘探

苏里格气田岩石相控制的致密砂岩储层质量差异机理

李进步 ,
刘子豪 ,
徐振华 ,
李娅 ,
王艳

展开

1.中国石油长庆油田分公司,陕西西安 710018;
2.中国石油大学北京,北京 102200

李进步(1974—),男,高级工程师,1998年毕业于西北大学地质学专业,2000年毕业于该校矿产普查与勘探专业,获硕士学位,现主要从事天然气开发地质方面的研究工作。

收稿日期: 2020-01-20

修回日期: 2020-11-12

网络出版日期: 2021-04-27

基金资助

国家科技重大专项“低渗—致密储层体系表征及评价新方法”(2017ZX05009-002);中国石油长庆油田分公司苏里格研究中心项目“苏南合作区与苏47区块盒₈—山₁段储层对比研究”(HX20150464)

收起

Quality Difference Mechanism of Tight Sandstone Reservoir Controlled by Lithofacies in Sulige Gasfield

Li Jinbu ,
Liu Zihao ,
Xu Zhenhua ,
Li Ya ,
Wang Yan

Expand

1. PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710018, China;
2. China University of Petroleum (Beijing, Beijing 102200, China

Received date: 2020-01-20

Revised date: 2020-11-12

Online published: 2021-04-27

Fold

摘要

针对致密砂岩储层非均质性极强、孔隙结构复杂、井间产能差异明显、储层质量差异机理不明确等问题,以苏里格西区南部下石盒子组盒₈段的致密砂岩储层为例,综合利用岩心、测井等资料,探讨岩石相控制的致密砂岩储层质量差异机理。结果表明:岩石相通过影响成岩演化序列控制储层质量,细砾岩-含砾粗砂岩相的储层质量最好,渗透率大于1.00 mD,主要发育粒间孔-缩颈型喉道,粗砂岩相的储层质量次之;根据岩石相及塑性岩屑含量,将储层成岩演化序列分为粗岩相(细砾岩-含砾粗砂岩相与粗砂岩相的统称)、富含刚性颗粒的中砂岩相、富含塑性颗粒的中砂岩相及细砂岩相4类;粗岩相经历了弱压实—强胶结—强溶解的成岩序列,物性最好,多呈孤立透镜状分布于条带状分流河道砂体中,这一分布特征是导致井间产能差异明显的主要原因。研究成果可为优质储层的预测及致密砂岩气藏的勘探开发提供理论指导。

关键词： 致密砂岩; 致密气; 岩石相; 储层质量; 成岩作用; 苏里格气田

本文引用格式

李进步 , 刘子豪 , 徐振华 , 李娅 , 王艳 . 苏里格气田岩石相控制的致密砂岩储层质量差异机理[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021 , 28(1) : 10 -17 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2021.01.002

Abstract

In view of the extremely strong heterogeneity, complex pore structure, significant productivity difference between wells and unclear reservoir quality difference mechanism of tight sandstone reservoir, the quality difference mechanism of tight sandstone reservoir controlled by lithofacies was discussed according to comprehensive core and logging data by taking the tight sandstone reservoir in the Member 8 of the lower Shihezi Formation in southern Sulige Gasfield. It is found in the study that the results show that the reservoir quality was controlled by lithofacies by affecting the diagenetic evolution sequence, and the reservoir quality of the fine conglomerate - pebbled coarse sandstone facies was the best, followed by that of the coarse sandstone facies, with a permeability greater than 1.00 mD, and mainly developed with intergranular pores - necked throats;according to the content of lithofacies and plastic debris, the diagenetic evolution sequence of reservoirs was classified by four categories: coarse lithofacies (collective term of fine conglomerate - pebbled coarse sandstone facies and coarse sandstone facies), medium sandstone facies rich in rigid particles, medium sandstone facies rich in plastic particles, and fine sandstone facies;after experienced diagenetic sequence of weak compaction, strong cementation and strong dissolution, the coarse lithofacies had the best physical properties, and were mostly distributed as isolated lenses in sand in striped distributary channel. This distribution feature is the main reason for the obvious difference in productivity between wells. The study results provide a theoretical basis and guidance for the prediction of high-quality reservoirs and the exploration and development of tight sandstone gas reservoirs.

Key words： tight sandstone; tight gas; lithofacies; reservoir quality; diagenesis; Sulige Gasfield

参考文献

[1] 邹才能,朱如凯,吴松涛,等.常规与非常规油气聚集类型、特征、机理及展望——以中国致密油和致密气为例[J].石油学报,2012,33(2):173-187.
ZOU Caineng,ZHU Rukai,WU Songtao,et al.Types,characteristics,genesis and prospects of conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon accumulations:taking tight oil and tight gas in China as an instance[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(2):173-187.
[2] 曹喆,柳广弟,柳庄小雪,等.致密油地质研究现状及展望[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(10):1499-1508.
CAO Zhe,LIU Guangdi,LIU Zhuangxiaoxue,et al.Research status on tight oil and its prospects[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(10):1499-1508.
[3] 贾承造,郑民,张永峰.中国非常规油气资源与勘探开发前景[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(2):129-136.
JIA Chengzao,ZHENG Min,ZHANG Yongfeng.Unconventional hydrocarbon resources in China and the prospect of exploration and development[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(2):129-136.
[4] 孟德伟,贾爱林,冀光,等.大型致密砂岩气田气水分布规律及控制因素——以鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田西区为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2016,43(4):607-614.
MENG Dewei,JIA Ailin,JI Guang,et al.Water and gas distribution and its controlling factors of large scale tight sand gas:a case study of western Sulige Gasfield,Ordos Basin,NW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(4):607-614.
[5] 毕明威,陈世悦,周兆华,等.鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田苏6区块盒₈段致密砂岩储层微观孔隙结构特征及其意义[J].天然气地球科学,2015,26(10):1851-1861.
BI Mingwei,CHEN Shiyue,ZHOU Zhaohua,et al.Characteristics and significance of microscopic pore structure in tight sandstone reservoir of the 8th Member of Lower Shihezi Formation in the Su6 Area of Sulige Gasfield[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2015, 26(10):1851-1861.
[6] 宫雪,沈武显,李文厚,等.苏里格气田苏77区块特低渗储层成岩相识别及分布规律研究[J].石油实验地质,2014,36(3):291-298.
GONG Xue, SHEN Wuxian, LI Wenhou, et al. Diagenetic facies identification and distribution study of ultra-low permeability reservoir in Su77 Block of Sulige Gasfield[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2014,36(3):291-298.
[7] 毕明威,陈世悦,周兆华,等.鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田苏6区块二叠系下石盒子组8段砂岩储层致密成因模式[J].地质论评,2015,61(3):599-613.
BI Mingwei,CHEN Shiyue,ZHOU Zhaohua,et al.Densification modes of sandstone reservoir in the 8th Member of the lower Shihezi Formation, Permian,in Su6 Area of Sulige Gasfield,Ordos Basin[J].Geological Review,2015,61(3):599-613.
[8] 王秀平,牟传龙,贡云云,等.苏里格气田Z30区块下石盒子组8段储层成岩演化与成岩相[J].石油学报,2013,34(5):883-895.
WANG Xiuping,MU Chuanlong,GONG Yunyun,et al.Diagenetic evolution and facies of reservoirs in Member 8 of Permian lower Shihezi Formation in the Z30 Block of Sulige Gasfield[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(5):883-895.
[9] 郝骞,张吉,路中奇,等.苏里格气田西区苏48区块储层微观特征及其对储层的影响作用[J].天然气地球科学,2012,23(6):1011-1018.
HAO Qian,ZHANG Ji,LU Zhongqi,et al.Microscopic characteristic and its influences on reservoirs from the Su48 Block in the west Sulige Gasfield[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2012,23(6):1011-1018.
[10] 郭智,贾爱林,薄亚杰,等.致密砂岩气藏有效砂体分布及主控因素——以苏里格气田南区为例[J].石油实验地质,2014,36(6):684-691.
GUO Zhi,JIA Ailin,BO Yajie,et al.Effective sand body distribution and its main controlling factors in tight sandstone gas reservoirs:a case study of southern Sulige Gasfield[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2014,36(6):684-691.
[11] 侯加根,唐颖,刘钰铭,等.鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田东区致密储层分布模式[J].岩性油气藏,2014,26(3):1-6.
HOU Jiagen,TANG Ying,LIU Yuming,et al. Distribution patterns of tight reservoirs in eastern Sulige Gasfield,Ordos Basin[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2014,26(3):1-6.
[12] 何顺利,兰朝利,门成全.苏里格气田储层的新型辫状河沉积模式[J].石油学报,2005,26(6):25-29.
HE Shunli,LAN Chaoli,MEN Chengquan.New braided river model in Sulige Gasfield of Ordos Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2005,26(6):25-29.
[13] 郭智,贾爱林,何东博,等.鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田辫状河体系带特征[J].石油与天然气地质,2016,37(2):197-204.
GUO Zhi,JIA Ailin,HE Dongbo,et al.Characteristics of braided river sedimentary system zones in Sulige Gasfield,Ordos Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2016,37(2):197-204.
[14] XI K L,CAO Y C,JAHREN J,et al.Diagenesis and reservoir quality of the Lower Cretaceous Quantou Formation tight sandstones in the southern Songliao Basin, China[J].Sedimentary Geology,2015,330:90-107.
[15] BJORLYKKE K.Relationships between depositional environments, burial history and rock properties:some principal aspects of diagenetic process in sedimentary basins[J].Sedimentary Geology,2014,301:1-14.
[16] LI Y,CHANG X C,YIN W,et al.Quantitative impact of diagenesis on reservoir quality of the Triassic Chang₆ tight oil sandstones,Zhenjing Area,Ordos Basin,China[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2017,86:1014-1028.
[17] 罗静兰,刘新社,付晓燕,等.岩石学组成及其成岩演化过程对致密砂岩储集质量与产能的影响:以鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界盒₈天然气储层为例[J].地球科学(中国地质大学学报),2014,23(5):537-545.
LUO Jinglan,LIU Xinshe,FU Xiaoyan,et al.Impact of petrologic components and their diagenetic evolution on tight sandstone reservoir quality and gas yield:a case study from He₈ gas-bearing reservoir of Upper Paleozoic in northern Ordos Basin[J].Earth Science,2014,23(5):537-545.
[18] ZHANG P H,LEE Y I,ZHANG J L.Diagenesis of tight gas sandstones in the lower cretaceous Denglouku Formation, Songliao Basin,NE China:implications for reservoir quality[J].Journal of Petroleum Geology,2015,38(1):99-114.
[19] 田伟超,卢双舫,王伟明,等.三塘湖盆地卡拉岗组火山岩风化壳储层微纳米孔隙演变机制及与含油性关系[J].石油与天然气地质,2019,40(6):1281-1294.
TIAN Weichao,LU Shuangfang,WANG Weiming,et al.Evolution mechanism of micro/nano-scale pores in volcanic weathering crust reservoir in the Kalagang Formation in Santanghu Basin and their relationship with oil-bearing property[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2019,40(6):1281-1294.
[20] 王成,张安达.海拉尔盆地乌尔逊—贝尔凹陷储层特征及其孔隙演化[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2019,38(5):151-159.
WANG Cheng,ZHANG Anda.Reservoir characteristics and pore evolution of Wuerxun-Beier Sag in Hailar Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2019,38(5):151-159.
[21] 张哨楠,黄柏文,隋欢,等.古城地区鹰山组储层特征及成岩孔隙演化[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(1): 33-46.
ZHANG Shaonan, HUANG Baiwen, SUI Huan, et al. The reservoir characteristics and the pore evolution of Yingshan Formation in Gucheng Region, Tarim Basin [J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2019, 41(1): 33-46.
[22] 黎雪,季汉成,王嗣敏,等. 太原地区中奥陶世上马家沟组岩溶储层成岩作用及孔隙演化[J].东北石油大学学报,2017,41(6):55-65.
LI Xue,JI Hancheng,WANG Simin,et al. Diagenesis and porosity evolution of karst reservoir of the middle Ordovician upper Majiagou Formation,Taiyuan Area[J].Journal of Northeast Petroleum University,2017,41(6):55-65.

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献