综述

蒸汽驱机理再认识及全生命周期开发研究

  • 李相方 ,
  • 马宏斌 ,
  • 杨戬 ,
  • 符永江 ,
  • 郑利民
展开
  • 1.中国石油大学(北京),北京 102249;
    2.中国石油辽河油田分公司,辽宁 盘锦 124010;
    3.中国石油勘探开发研究院,北京 100083
李相方(1955—),男,教授,博士生导师,1982年毕业于华东石油学院电子技术专业,1992年毕业于石油大学(北京)油气井工程专业,获博士学位,现主要从事油气田开发工程领域的教学和研究工作。

收稿日期: 2020-05-31

  修回日期: 2020-09-10

  网络出版日期: 2022-02-18

基金资助

国家科技重大专项“油砂SAGD开发物理模拟实验研究国际自然科学基金项目”(2016ZX05031003004)

Re-understanding of Steam Flooding Mechanism and Research on Full Life Cycle Development

  • Li Xiangfang ,
  • Ma Hongbin ,
  • Yang Jian ,
  • Fu Yongjiang ,
  • Zheng Limin
Expand
  • 1. China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;
    2. Liaohe Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Panjin, Liaoning 124010, China;
    3. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China

Received date: 2020-05-31

  Revised date: 2020-09-10

  Online published: 2022-02-18

摘要

针对目前辽河油田齐40块蒸汽驱开发面临的含水率高、热利用率有待提高等问题,运用油藏工程分析与数值模拟,提出了蒸汽驱全生命周期的评价方法,并得到了蒸汽驱各阶段注采参数设计方法。研究结果表明:基于稠油黏度与温度的关系特征,将目前的蒸汽驱“三场”修正为“四场”,可以更加直观地评价蒸汽驱的开发效果;基于蒸汽驱过程中的不同机理,将目前蒸汽驱的“3个阶段”划分为“4个阶段”,能够更准确地评价蒸汽驱的全过程。结合黏度场特征及热利用情况,对蒸汽驱各阶段的注采参数进行设计:热连通建立温度场阶段和蒸汽驱替阶段的最优注汽强度分别为200 m3/(d·m·km2)和150 m3/(d·m·km2);蒸汽较明显突破调整注采参数阶段的最优注汽强度为120 m3/(d·m·km2),干度控制在0.2左右,有利于阶段的开发效果。蒸汽驱全面汽窜后,通过分析蒸汽-热水交替注入和间歇汽驱的开发机理,对比二者与继续蒸汽驱开发效果,认为蒸汽-热水交替注入和间歇汽驱是全面汽窜后较好的接替方式。研究成果对辽河油田齐40块的蒸汽驱开发具有一定的指导意义,可为类似的稠油油田开发提供参考。

本文引用格式

李相方 , 马宏斌 , 杨戬 , 符永江 , 郑利民 . 蒸汽驱机理再认识及全生命周期开发研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2020 , 27(6) : 67 -74 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2020.06.009

Abstract

In view of the high water content and the low heat utilization rate faced by the steam flooding development of Qi 40 Block in Liaohe Oilfield, a full life cycle evaluation method of steam flooding was proposed, and a design method of injection-production parameters for each flooding stage was established. The research results show that: based on the correlation between viscosity and temperature of heavy oil, the current "three fields" of steam flooding can be modified to "four fields", which can more intuitively evaluate the development effect of steam flooding. Based on the different mechanisms during the steam flooding process, the current "3 stages" of steam flooding was divided into "4 stages", which can more accurately evaluate the whole process of steam flooding.Combining the characteristics of viscosity field and heat utilization situations, design the injection-production parameters for each steam flooding stage: in the establishment stage of temperature field for heat connection and the steam displacement stage, the optimal steam injection intensity was 200 m3/(d·m·km2) and 150 m3/(d·m·km2), respectively; in the injection-production parameter adjustment stage when the steam broke through obviously, the optimal steam injection intensity was 120 m3/(d·m·km2), and the dryness was controlled at about 0.2, which was beneficial to the development effect of this stage. After the full steam channeling of steam flooding, the development mechanism of steam-hot water alternate injection and development mechanism of intermittent steam flooding were analyzed. The two development patterns were compared with continuous steam flooding, and the development effects indicated that steam-hot water alternate injection and intermittent steam flooding were the better freplacement methods after full steam channeling. The research results have certain guiding significance for the steam flooding development of Qi 40 block in Liaohe Oilfield, which can provide a reference for the development of similar heavy oil fields.

参考文献

[1] TOWSON D E.Canada′s heavy oil industry:atechnological revolution[C].SPE37972,1997:1-5.
[2] HYNDAN A W,LUHNING R W.Recovery and upgrading of bitumen and heavy oil in Canada[J].Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology,1991,30(2):63-73.
[3] CLINE V J,BASHAM M.Improvingproject performance in a heavy oil horizontal well project in the San Joaquin valley,California[C].SPE78981,2002:1-6.
[4] STEVEN S,MILLIND D.Strateties for optimal enhanced recovery of heavy oil by thermal methods,Midway Sunset Field,Southern San Joaquin Basin,California[C].SPE63295,2000:1-4.
[5] LOLLEY C S,FRAM J H,FORTIER J D,et al.Recipe for heating and recovering an 800 foot column of heavy oil,pottersands,Midway-sunset Field,California[C].SPE54074,1999:1-10.
[6] LAYRISSE I.Heavyoil production in venezuela:historical recap and scenarios for next century[C].SPE53464,1999:1-13.
[7] BRUNINGS C A,QUIJADA W A,GRISONI J C et al.Newcompletion developments for the production of heavy and extraheavy oil in eastern Venezuela (PDVSA)[C].SPE97914,2005:1-5.
[8] MENDOZA H A,FINOL J J,BUTLER R M.SAGD,polittest in Venezuela[C].SPE53687,1999:1-11.
[9] 任芳祥,孙洪军,户昶昊.辽河油田稠油开发技术与实践[J].特种油气藏,2012,19(1):1-8.
REN Fangxiang,SUN Hongjun,HU Changhao.Heavy oil development technology and practices in Liaohe Oilfield[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2012,19(1):1-8.
[10] 席长丰,关文龙,蒋有伟,等.注蒸汽后稠油油藏火驱跟踪数值模拟技术——以新疆H1块火驱试验区为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(6):715-721.
XI Changfeng,GUAN Wenlong,JIANG Youwei,et al.Numerical simulation of fire flooding for heavy oil reservoirs after steam injection:a case study on block H1 of Xinjiang Oilfield,NW China [J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(6):715-721.
[11] 石静,曹绪龙,王红艳,等.胜利油田高温高盐稠油油藏复合驱技术[J].特种油气藏,2018,25(4):129-133.
SHI Jing,CAO Xulong,WANG Hongyan,et al.Combination flooding technology used in high-temperature and high-salinity heavy oil reservoirs of Shengli Oilfield[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2018,25(4):129-133.
[12] FAROUQ-ALIS M.Practical heavy oil recovery[M].Edmonton:Monterey Resources Inc.,2006:26-56.
[13] BUTLER R M.Thermal recovery of oil and bitumen[M].Calgary:Prentice HallInc,1998:45-52
[14]胡常忠.稠油开采技术[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1998:45-52.
HU Changzhong.Heavyoil recovery technologies[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1998:45-52.
[15] BURGER J.Thermalmethods of oil recovery[M].Houston:Gulf Publishing Co.,1986:31-55.
[16] 陈明.海上稠油热采技术探索与实践[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2012:3-16.
CHEN Ming.Exploring and practice of thermal recovery for heavy oil offshore[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2012:3-16.
[17] 王胜,曲岩涛,韩春萍.稠油油藏蒸汽吞吐后转蒸汽驱驱油效率影响因素——以孤岛油田中二北稠油油藏为例[J].油气地质与采收率,2011,18(1):48-50.
WANG Sheng,QU Yantao,HAN Chunping.Influencing factors study on oil displacement efficiency after steam stimulation in heavy oil reservoir-a case study of heavy oil reservoirs in the middle two north of Gudao Oilfield[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2011,18(1):48-50.
[18]BLEVINS T R.Steamflooding in the U.S.:astatus report[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology,1990,42(5):448-454.
[19] 张锐.稠油热采技术[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1999:7-25.
ZHANG Rui.Thermalrecovery technology[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1999:7-25.
[20] 高明,王京通,宋考平,等.稠油油藏蒸汽吞吐后蒸汽驱提高采收率实验[J].油气地质与采收率,2009,16(4):77-79.
GAO Ming,WANG Jingtong,SONG Kaoping,et al.Research on enhancing oil recovery of steam flooding after huff and puff in general heavy oil reservoirs[J].Petroleum Geology and RecoveryEfficiency,2009,16(4):77-79.
[21] 郎成山,刘永建,姚帅旗,等.基于油藏参数的蒸汽驱干度确定方法[J].特种油气藏,2019,26(3):99-104.
LANG Chengshan,LIU Yongjian,YAO Shuaiqi,et al.Steamquality determination based on reservoir parameters[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2019,26(3):99-104.
[22] 范英才.蒸汽驱动态预测方法和优化技术研究[D].大庆:东北石油大学,2011.
FAN Yingcai.Research of dynamic prediction methods and optimization technique of steam flooding[D].Daqing:Northeast Petroleum Unversity,2011.
[23] 唐清山,廖广志.高升油田深层稠油油藏蒸汽驱跟踪数值模拟研究[J].特种油气藏,1996,3(1):21-28.
TANG Qingshan,LIAO Guangzhi.Study on numerical simulationtracing steam drive in deep heavy oil reservoir in Gaosheng oil field[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,1996,3(1):21-28.
[24] 王丹霞.稠油蒸汽驱开发动态评价方法及算法实现[D].荆州:长江大学,2014.
WANG Danxia.Dynamicevaluation methodology and algorithm implementation of steam flooding development[D].Jingzhou:Yangtze Unversity,2014.
[25] JONES J.Steamdrive model for hand-held programmable calculators[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology,1981,33(9):1583-1598.
[26] HONG K C.Guidelines for converting steamflood to waterflood[J].SPE Reservoir Engineering,1987,2(1):67-76.
[27] 赵洪岩.辽河中深层稠油蒸汽驱技术研究与应用[J].石油钻采工艺,2009,31(1):110-114.
ZHAO Hongyan.Study and application of heavy oil steam flooding in mid-deeplayers in Liaohe Oilfield[J].Oil Drilling and Production Technology,2009,31(1):110-114.
[28] HONG K C,STEVENSD E.Water-alternating-steam process improves project economics at west Coalinga Field[J].SPE Reservoir Engineering,1992,7(4):407-413.
[29] 蒋生健.齐40块注空气辅助蒸汽驱试验研究与应用[J].特种油气藏,2012,19(3):117-120.
JIANG Shengjian.Experimental study and application of air-assisted steam flooding in Qi40 Block[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2012,19(3):117-120.
[30] DILGREN R E,HIRASAKI G J,HILL H J,et al.Steam-channel-expanding steam form drive:US4086964[P].1978-05-02[2020-10-13].[31] CHENG L S,LIANG L,LANG Z X,et al.Mechanistic simulation studies on the steam-foam drive in superviscous oil reservoirs[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2004,41(1/3):199-212.
[32] 范杰,李相方.蒸汽辅助重力泄油(SAGD)注采参数分析及优化研究[J].中国科技论文,2016,11(9):988-994.
FAN Jie,LI Xiangfang.Analysis and optimization of injection-production parameters for steam assisted gravity drainage[J].China Sciencepaper.2016,11(9):988-994.
[33] 杨公鹏.齐40块蒸汽驱油藏深部调驱机理与实用技术研究[D].大庆:东北石油大学,2013.
YANG Gongpeng.Approach of steam flooding mechanisms & application ofdeep profile control technologies in Qi40 Reservoir[D].Daqing:Northeast Petroleum University,2013.
[34] 蒋生健.齐40块中深层稠油蒸汽驱技术研究及其应用[D].大庆:大庆石油学院,2008.
JIANG Shengjian.Research on steam flooding technologies for development heavy oil in medium depth reservoir of Qi40 Block and its application[D].Daqing:Daqing Petroleum Institute,2008.
[35] 刘名,姜丹,李婷,等.风城油田水平井辅助SAGD技术参数优化[J].特种油气藏,2017,24(4):122-126.
LIU Ming,JIANG Dan,LI Ting,et al.Technicalparameter optimization of SAGD technique for horizontal wells in Fengcheng Oilfield[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2017,24(4):122-126.
[36] 吴永彬,李秀峦,赵睿,等.双水平井SAGD循环预热连通判断新解析模型[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2016,38(1):84-91.
WU Yongbin,LI Xiuluan,ZHAO Rui ,et al.A new analytical model of heat communication judgement during heat circulation phase of dual-horizontal SAGD[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition),2016,38(1):84-91.
[37] 杨戬.稠油热采开发方式及注采参数设计方法研究[D].北京:中国石油大学(北京),2017.
YANG Jian.Development methods and injection and production parameters design for heavy oil reservoir[D].Beijing:China University of Petroleum(Beijing),2017.
[38] 杨戬,李相方,张保瑞,等.蒸汽驱三维物理模拟实验及汽窜后接替方式[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2016,35(1):114-119.
YANG Jian,LI Xiangfang,ZHANG Baorui,et al.3D physical simulation experiment of steam flooding and alternating method after the steam breakthrough[J].Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing,2016,35(1):114-119.
[39] 杨戬,李相方,张晓林,等.预测蒸汽驱后期转接替方式时机的新方法[J].油气地质与采收率,2015,22(2):83-87.
YANG Jian,LI Xiangfang,ZHANG Xiaolin,et al.A novel method to predict converting time in later steam flooding period[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2015,22(2):83-87.
[40] JOSEPH H K,FREDERICK G K.Thermodynamicproperties of steam including data for the liquid and solid phases[M].New York:John Wiley and Sons,1936:5-16.
文章导航

/