渤海湾盆地秦皇岛32-X油田决口扇储层的沉积特征与区分标准

陈薪凯; 陈程; 汪虎

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2020.05.004

特种油气藏 >

2020 , Vol. 27 >Issue 5: 22 - 29

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2020.05.004

地质勘探

渤海湾盆地秦皇岛32-X油田决口扇储层的沉积特征与区分标准

陈薪凯 ,
陈程 ,
汪虎

展开

1.中国地质大学(北京),北京 100083;
2.中国石油大港油田分公司,天津 300280

陈薪凯(1990—),男,2013年毕业于重庆科技学院地质学专业,现为中国地质大学(北京)矿产普查与勘探专业在读博士研究生,主要从事油气田开发地质工作。

收稿日期: 2020-01-14

修回日期: 2020-07-22

网络出版日期: 2022-02-18

基金资助

国家科技重大专项“大型油气田及煤层气开发及勘探评价”(2016ZX05060-002)

收起

Sedimentary Characteristics and Distinguishing Criteria of Crevasse Splay Reservoir in QHD 32-X Oilfield, Bohai Bay Basin

Chen Xinkai ,
Chen Cheng ,
Wang Hu

Expand

1. China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China;
2. CNPC Dagang Oilfield Company, Tianjin 300280, China

Received date: 2020-01-14

Revised date: 2020-07-22

Online published: 2022-02-18

Fold

摘要

河流相沉积中蕴藏了大量以决口扇为代表的潜在储层,但有关决口扇的单独论述较少。该文以渤海湾盆地秦皇岛32-X油田为例,结合岩心、测井、分析化验等资料,对决口扇的沉积特征与储层物性进行详细研究。结果表明:在定性识别方面,决口扇粒度以细砂、粉-细砂为主,悬移质含量多为20%～50%,分选较差,磨圆为棱角状—次棱角状,岩相类型以块状层理细砂岩、沙纹层理细砂岩/粉砂质细砂岩、水平层理粉砂岩为主,成因序列以反韵律为主,单砂体厚度为0.2～3.0 m,砂体展布呈平面朵叶状、剖面楔状的特点;研究区决口扇的深双侧向电阻率值为1.8～7.5 Ω·m,自然伽马值为68～82 API,且饱含油或富含油的决口扇其深双侧向电阻率值多为4.0～7.5 Ω·m,并可以此作为定量识别的初步标准;研究区决口扇孔隙度平均值为29.26%,渗透率平均值为207.72 mD,属于高孔、中渗储层,为有利储层,但决口扇储层渗透性要远差于点坝与废弃河道。对决口扇进行深入研究有利于老油田挖潜增储并延长衰竭性老井的开采寿命。

关键词： 河流相; 决口扇; 沉积特征; 岩相类型; 成因序列; 储层物性; 渤海湾盆地

本文引用格式

陈薪凯 , 陈程 , 汪虎 . 渤海湾盆地秦皇岛32-X油田决口扇储层的沉积特征与区分标准[J]. 特种油气藏, 2020 , 27(5) : 22 -29 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2020.05.004

Abstract

Fluvial deposits contain a large number of potential reservoirs represented by crevasse splay, but there are few separate discussions on crevasse splay. Taking QHD 32-X Oilfield in the Bohai Bay Basin as an example, the sedimentary characteristics and reservoir physical properties of crevasse splays were studied in detail in combination with core, well logging, and laboratory data. The results show that: in terms of qualitative identification, the grain size of crevasse splays is mainly fine sandstone, and silty-fine sandstone; the content of suspended loads is mostly 20%-50%; the gradation is worse; the roundness is angular to sub-angular; the lithofacies types are mainly massive bedding fine sandstone, sandy bedding fine sandstone/silty fine sandstone and horizontal bedding siltstone; the genetic sequence is mainly reverse rhythm; the thickness of single sand body is 0.2-3.0 m, and the distribution of sand bodies is lobe shaped on plane and wedge shaped on section;deep dual laterolog resistivity (Rd) values of the crevasse splays in the study area are between 1.8-7.5 Ω·m, with GR of 68-82 API; a crevasse splay that is saturated with oil or rich in oil has Rd values between 4.0-7.5 Ω·m, which can be used as a preliminary criterion for quantitative identification;the crevasse splays in the study area have average porosity of 29.26% and average permeability of 207.72 mD, belonging to high-porosity and medium-permeability reservoir, with excellent reservoir potential;however, the permeability of crevasse splay reservoirs is much lower than that of point bar and abandoned channel. In-depth study of crevasse splays is conducive to tapping potential and increasing reserves in old oil fields and prolonging the production life of depleted old wells.

Key words： fluvial facies; crevasse splay; sedimentary characteristics; lithofacies type; genetic sequence; reservoir physical properties; Bohai Bay Basin

参考文献

[1] TOORENENBURG K A V,DONSELAAR M E,NOORDIJK N A,et al.On the origin of crevasse-splay amalgamation in the Huesca fluvial fan(Ebro Basin, Spain):implications for connectivity in low net-to-gross fluvial deposits[J].Sedimentary Geology,2016,343:156-164.
[2] 张红薇,赵翰卿,麻成斗.泛滥—分流平原相储层中河间砂体的精细描述[J].大庆石油地质与开发,1998,17(6):22-24.
ZHANG Hongwei,ZHAO Hanqing,MA Chengdou.Fine description of interchannel sandbody in flood-distributary pain reservoir[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,1998,17(6):22-24.
[3] 马世忠,王再山,王渝明.决口水道沉积模式及其砂体内剩余油形成与富集[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2000,19(6):9-11,14.
MA Shizhong,WANG Zaishan,WANG Yuming.Residual oil formation and enrichment within crevasse channel sedimentary pattern and its sandbody[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2000,19(6):9-11,14.
[4] 陈薪凯,刘景彦,陈程,等.砂质辫状河心滩构型4种工程模式的综述与探讨[J].特种油气藏,2019,26(2):1-9.
CHEN Xinkai,LIU Jingyan,CHEN Cheng,et al.Summarization and discussion on the four engineering patterns of sandy braided river island configuration[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2019,26(2):1-9.
[5] 龙明,许亚南,刘彦成,等.砂质辫状河储层构型对流体运动的控制作用[J].特种油气藏,2019,26(1):116-121.
LONG Ming,XU Yanan,LIU Yancheng, et al.Effect of sandy braided river reservoir configuration on fluid migration[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2019,26(1):116-121.
[6] 张善义.辫状水道和心滩坝规模定量研究[J].特种油气藏,2018,25(4):29-32.
ZHANG Shanyi.Quantitatively researches for scales of braided channels and channel bars[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2018,25(4): 29-32.
[7] 马世忠,杨清颜.曲流点坝沉积模式、三维构形及其非均质模型[J].沉积学报,2000,18(2):241-247.
MA Shizhong,YANG Qingyan.The depositional model,3-D architecture and heterogeneous model of point bar in meandering channels[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2000,18(2):241-247.
[8] 赵汉卿,郭诚,陈晓明,等.垦利A油田辫状河三角洲前缘优质储层特征[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2019,41(5):21-32.
ZHAO Hanqing,GUO Cheng,CHEN Xiaoming,et al.Characteristics of high-quality reservoirs in the braided river delta in Kenli-A Oilfield[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition),2019,41(5):21-32.
[9] 高白水,金振奎,李燕,等.河流决口扇沉积模式及演化规律——以信江府前村决口扇为例[J].石油学报,2015,36(5):564-572.
GAO Baishui,JIN Zhenkui,LI Yan,et al.Sedimentary model and evolutionary process of crevasse splays:a case of crevasse splays around Fuqiancun village along Xinjiang River[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(5):564-572.
[10] SMITH N D,CROSS T A,DUFFICY J P,et al.Anatomy of an avulsion[J].Sedimentology, 1989,36(1):1-23.
[11] PEREZ-ARLUCEA M,SMITH N D.Depositional patterns following the 1870s avulsion of the Saskatchewan River(Cumberland Marshes, Saskatchewan,Canada)[J].Journal of Sedimentary Research,1999,69(1):62-73.
[12] DONSELAAR M E,GOZALO M C C,MOYANO S.Avulsion processes at the terminus of low-gradient semi-arid fluvial systems:lessons from the Río Colorado,Altiplano Endorheic Basin,Bolivia[J].Sedimentary Geology,2013,283:1-14.
[13] BURNS C E,MOUNTNEY N P,HODGSON D M,et al.Anatomy and dimensions of fluvial crevasse-splay deposits:examples from the cretaceous castlegate sandstone and Neslen Formation,Utah,U.S.A.[J].Sedimentary Geology,2017,351:21-35.
[14] GULLIFORD A R,FLINT S S,HODGSON D M.Crevasse splay processes and deposits in an ancient distributive fluvial system:the lower beaufort group,South Africa[J].Sedimentary Geology,2017,358:1-18.
[15] 周连德,田晓平,时新磊,等.海上大井距条件下河流相窄薄储层预测——以渤中34-X油田北块1井区明化镇组下段Ⅴ油组为例[J].长江大学学报(自然科学版),2017,14(11):22-26,39.
ZHOU Liande,TIAN Xiaoping,SHI Xinlei,et al.The prediction of narrow-thin fluvial reservoirs under large well spacing condition in offshore oilfield—by taking Ⅴ oil formation in the low segment of Minghuazhen Formation (N1mL)in Block 1 of Bozhong 34-X Oilfield for example[J].Journal of Yangtze University (Natural Science Edition),2017,14(11):22-26,39.
[16] 殷代印,刘凯,孙业恒.考虑致密储层岩石特征参数的压敏效应计算新模型[J].特种油气藏,2019,26(5):71-75,117.
YIN Daiyin,LIU Kai,SUN Yeheng.A new pressure sensitivity calculation model Considering characteristic tight reservoir rock parameters[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2019,26(5):71-75,117.
[17] 徐春强,张新涛,姚城,等.渤海渤中2-1油田东营组二段低渗储层特征及物性主控因素[J].中国海上油气,2019,31(1):13-21.
XU Chunqiang,ZHANG Xintao,YAO Cheng,et al.Characteristics and physical properties controlling factors of low permeability reservoir of E₃d₂ in BZ2-1 Oilfield of Bohai Sea[J].China Offshore Oil and Gas,2019,31(1):13-21.[18] 梁宏伟,吴胜和,穆龙新,等.应用相控正演模拟方法精细描述河流相储层——秦皇岛32-6油田北区实例[J].石油地球物理勘探,2013,48(6):978-984.
LIANG Hongwei,WU Shenghe,MU Longxin et al.Fluvial reservoir characterization with phase-controlled forward modeling in the North Block of the Qinhuangdao 32-6 Oilfield,a case study[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2013,48(6):978-984.
[19] 庞小军,王清斌,代黎明,等.渤海海域北部秦南凹陷东南缘古近系断层活动及其对沉积的控制[J].石油与天然气地质,2017,38(6):1059-1067.
PANG Xiaojun,WANG Qingbin,DAI Liming,et al.Paleogene fault activities and their control over sedimentation at southeastern margin of Qinnan Sag,northern Bohai Sea[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2017,38(6):1059-1067.
[20] 张中巧,王军,于海波,等.石臼坨凸起低幅度构造-岩性圈闭识别及刻画技术[J].石油地质与工程,2013,27(3):15-19.
ZHANG zhongqiao,WANG Jun,YU Haibo,et al.Identification and description technology of lithologic traps on low amplitude structure,Shijiutuo Uplift in Bohai[J].Petroleum Geology and Engineering,2013,27(3):15-19.
[21] 马平华,霍梦颖,何俊,等.渤海湾盆地秦皇岛32-6油田曲流河沉积体系综合解剖[J].新疆石油地质,2017,38(5):567-574.
MA Pinghua,HUO Mengying,HE Jun,et al.Comprehensive dissection of meandering-river sedimentary system in Qinhuangdao 32-6 Oilfield,Bohai Bay Basin[J].XinJiang Petroleum Geology,2017,38(5):567-574.
[22] 赵春明,胡景双,霍春亮,等.曲流河与辫状河沉积砂体连通模式及开发特征——以渤海地区秦皇岛32-6油田为例[J].油气地质与采收率,2009,16(6):88-91.
ZHAO Chunming,HU Jingshuang,HUO Chunliang,et al.Sandbody interconnectivity architecture and development characteristics of meandering river and braided river deposits:a case study of Qinhuangdao 32-6 Oilfield,Bohai Area[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2009,16(6):88-91.
[23] 李振鹏,贾海松,潘广明,等.歧南断阶带明下段低阻油层地质成因[J].海洋地质前沿,2018,34(11):33-40.
LI Zhenpeng,JIA Haisong,PAN Guangming,et al.Geological genesis of low-resistivity oil layers of Minghuazhen Formation in Qinan fault step belt[J].Marine Geology Frontiers,2018,34(11):33-40.

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献