油藏工程

碳酰胺辅助SAGD提高超稠油Ⅲ类油藏采收率技术

  • 赵长虹 ,
  • 王丽 ,
  • 王攀 ,
  • 王立龙 ,
  • 姜丹 ,
  • 张宝真
展开
  • 中国石油新疆油田分公司,新疆 克拉玛依 834000
赵长虹(1983—),男,高级工程师,2005年毕业于中国地质大学(武汉)资源勘查工程专业,现从事油气田开发研究工作。

收稿日期: 2021-11-15

  修回日期: 2022-06-02

  网络出版日期: 2023-01-09

基金资助

国家科技重大专项“稠油多介质蒸汽驱技术研究与应用”(2016ZX05012-001);中国石油重大专项“改善蒸汽驱及SAGD效果新技术研究与应用”(2019B-1408)、“新疆油田浅层稠油稳产提效技术研究与应用”(2017E-0408)

Carbamide-assisted SAGD Technology for Enhanced Oil Recovery of Class Ⅲ Super-heavy Oil Reservoirs

  • Zhao Changhong ,
  • Wang Li ,
  • Wang Pan ,
  • Wang Lilong ,
  • Jiang Dan ,
  • Zhang Baozhen
Expand
  • PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Karamay, Xinjiang 834000, China

Received date: 2021-11-15

  Revised date: 2022-06-02

  Online published: 2023-01-09

摘要

超稠油Ⅲ类油藏原油黏度高、渗透率低、夹层发育,在蒸汽辅助重力泄油(SAGD)生产中存在蒸汽腔扩展慢、泄油阻力大、产量与油汽比“双低”等现象,针对该问题,提出了碳酰胺辅助SAGD技术,采用室内实验与数值模拟结合的方法,揭示其机理并进行关键参数优化。研究表明,碳酰胺注入蒸汽腔后具有乳化降黏、提高驱油效率和改善水敏等作用。以地质条件和采出程度为依据,制订油藏筛选标准,优选出风城油田Z井区试验井组,并开展优化设计,设计碳酰胺注入质量分数为60%,注入温度为60~100 ℃,注入量为42 t,注入井焖井时间为60 min,后续蒸汽顶替段塞为10 t,生产井焖井时间90 min后转正常SAGD操作。与纯蒸汽SAGD相比,1 a期内平均日产油提高3.8 t/d,油汽比提高0.04,按照油价1 988 元/t测算阶段投入产出比为1∶5,预测最终采收率提高9.4个百分点,最终达到55.7%。研究成果对提高超稠油Ⅲ类油藏SAGD开发效果具有重要意义。

本文引用格式

赵长虹 , 王丽 , 王攀 , 王立龙 , 姜丹 , 张宝真 . 碳酰胺辅助SAGD提高超稠油Ⅲ类油藏采收率技术[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022 , 29(4) : 107 -113 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2022.04.015

Abstract

Class Ⅲ super-heavy oil reservoirs are featured by high crude oil viscosity, low permeability and well-developed interlayers. In the production with steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD), there are slow steam chamber expansion, high oil drainage resistance, low production and low oil-steam ratio. In order to solve these problems, a carbamide-assisted SAGD technology was proposed. Its working principle was discovered and key parameters were optimized by the combination of laboratory tests and numerical simulation. The study showed that the carbamide injected into the steam chamber could bed emulsified to reduce the viscosity, enhance oil displacement efficiency and improve water sensitivity. On the basis of the geological conditions and recovery percent, reservoir selection standards were developed and a test well cluster was selected for Well Block Z in Fengcheng Oilfield. An optimal design was developed, with carbamide injection concentration of 60%, injection temperature of 60-100 ℃, injected amount of 42 t, shut-in duration of 60min for injection well, and subsequent steam displacement slug of 10 t. SAGD was then conducted in the production well after 90 min shut-in. Compared with SAGD with pure steam, the average daily oil production increased by 3.8 t/d during the one-year period, the oil-steam ratio was increased by 0.04, the input-output ratio was 1∶5 at an oil price of 1 988 yuan/t in the calculation stage, and the predicted final recovery efficiency was increased by 9.4 percentage points to reach 55.7%. The study results are of great significance to improve the SAGD development effect of Class Ⅲ super-heavy oil reservoirs.

参考文献

[1] 刘文章.稠油注蒸汽热采工程[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1997:23-24.
LIU Wenzhang.Heavy oil thermal recovery engineering by steam injection[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1997:23-24.
[2] 王倩,高祥录,罗池辉,等.超稠油Ⅲ类油藏夹层发育模式及SAGD提高采收率技术[J].特种油气藏,2020,27(4):105-112.
WANG Qian,GAO Xianglu,LUO Chihui,et al.Interlayer development patterns and SAGD enhanced oil recovery technology in super heavy oil Category-Ⅲ reservoir[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2020,27(4):105-112.
[3] 孙新革,罗池辉,徐斌,等.强非均质超稠油油藏SAGD储层升级扩容研究[J].油气地质与采收率,2021,28(6):38-45.
SUN Xin'ge,LUO Chihui,XU Bin,et al.Study on upgraded dilation of SAGD reservoirs with strong heterogeneity and ultra-heavy oil[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2021,28(6):38-45.
[4] 赵睿,孙新革,徐斌,等.SAGD快速启动技术现状及前景展望[J].石油钻采工艺,2020,42(4):417-424.
ZHAO Rui,SUN Xin'ge,XU Bin,et al.Status and prospect of SAGD quick start technology[J].Drilling & Production Technology,2020,42(4):417-424.
[5] 马鹏,卢迎波,张志鹏,等.超稠油油藏多介质复合吞吐关键参数研究与应用[J].中国石油和化工标准与质量,2020,40(17):153-154.
MA Peng,LU Yingbo,ZHANG Zhipeng,et al.Research and application of key parameters of multi-media composite huff and puff in super-heavy oil reservoirs[J].China Petroleum and Chemical Standard and Quality,2020,40(17):153-154.
[6] 霍进,吕柏林,杨兆臣,等.稠油油藏多元介质复合蒸汽吞吐驱油机理研究[J].特种油气藏,2020,27(2):93-97.
HUO Jin,LYU Bolin,YANG Zhaochen,et al.Displacement mechanism of multi-component compound steam stimulation in heavy-oil reservoir[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2020,27(2):93-97.
[7] 刘帆.超稠油油藏注蒸汽和气体复合开采技术研究[J].化工管理,2017,32(16):184.
LIU Fan.Study on steam injection and gas composite recovery technology in super-heavy oil reservoirs[J].Chemical Enterprise Management,2017,32(16):184.
[8] 姚凯,王史文,孙明磊,等.井下自生气复合泡沫技术在稠油热采中的研究与应用[J].特种油气藏,2002,9(1):61-63,85.
YAO Kai,WANG Shiwen,SUN Minglei,et al.Study and application of downhole authigenic gas compound foam in heavy oil thermal recovery[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2002,9(1):61-63,85.
[9] 王福顺,牟珍宝,刘鹏程,等.超稠油油藏CO2辅助开采作用机理实验与数值模拟研究[J].油气地质与采收率,2017,24(6):86-91.
WANG Fushun,MU Zhenbao,LIU Pengcheng,et al.Experiment and numerical simulation on mechanism of CO2 assisted mining in super heavy oil reservoirs[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2017,24(6):86-91.
[10] 朱锰飞.热-CO2-化学复合驱提高稠油采收率实验研究[D].青岛:中国石油大学(华东),2015.
ZHU Mengfei.Experimental research on mechanism of thermal-chemical flooding for enhancing heavy oil recovery[D].Qingdao:China University of Petroleum(East China),2015.
[11] 丁雪莹.聚合物驱提升驱油效率的机理分析及效果分析[J].中国石油和化工标准与质量,2021,41(11):97-98.
DING Xueying.Mechanism of enhancing oil displacement efficiency by polymer flooding and driving effectiveness analysis[J].China Petroleum and Chemical Industry Standard and Quality,2021,41(11):97-98.
[12] 何辉,周永强,龙卫江,等.低—特低渗透储层微观孔喉结构特征及对水驱油特征的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地渭北油田长3油层组储层为例[J].油气地质与采收率,2021,28(4):23-34.
HE Hui,ZHOU Yongqiang,LONG Weijiang,et al.Pore throat microstructures of low-ultra-low permeability reservoirs and their influence on water displacement characteristics:taking the Chang3 reservoir of Weibei Oilfield in Ordos Basin as an example[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2021,28(4):23-34.
[13] 孙宪阳.高压CO2/表面活性剂水溶液/风城稠油体系界面相互作用的研究[D].上海:华东理工大学,2018.
SUN Xianyang.Interfacial interactions of high-pressure CO2/surfactant solution/Fengcheng heavy oil system[D].Shanghai:East China University of Science and Technology,2018.
[14] 汪伟英,唐周怀,吕迎红,等.储层岩石水敏性影响因素研究[J].江汉石油学院学报,2001(2):49-50.
WANG Weiying,TANG Zhouhuai,LYU Yinghong,et al.Influencing factors of water sensitivity in reservoir rock[J].Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute,2001(2):49-50.
[15] 郑祥波.页岩气储层黏土矿物及水敏性测井评价[D].北京:中国石油大学(北京),2018.
ZHENG Xiangbo.Logging evaluation on clay minerals and water sensitivity of shale gas reservoirs[D].Beijing:China University of Petroleum(Beijing),2018.
[16] 汤文静,陈婧,袁肖肖,等.致密砂岩储层水敏感性实验研究[J].石化技术,2015,22(11):161-162.
TANG Wenjing,CHEN Jing,YUAN Xiaoxiao,et al.Experimental study of tight sandstone reservoir water sensitivity[J].Petrochemical Industry Technology,2015,22(11):161-162.
[17] 周杰.水敏性稠油油藏储层伤害机理室内实验评价[J].内蒙古石油化工,2008,8(10):263-265.
ZHOU Jie.Laboratory experimental evaluation of reservoir damage mechanism in water-sensitive heavy oil reservoirs[J].Inner Mongolia Petrochemical Industry,2008,8(10):263-265.
[18] 安申法.王庄水敏性稠油油藏储层伤害机理及保护技术研究[D].青岛:中国石油大学(华东),2007.
AN Shenfa.The formation damage simulations and protection techniques for Wangzhuang water sensitive reservoir[D].Qingdao:China University of Petroleum(East China),2007.
[19] 胡列圻,魏柏益,沈华民.尿素生产中高温高压条件下NH3-CO2-H2O-NH2CONH2体系的汽液平衡研究[J].化工学报,1990,68(6):740-744.
HU Lieqi,WEI Boyi,SHEN Huamin.Phase equilibrium of NH3-CO2-H2O-NH2CONH2 system at high temperature and pressure in urea synthesis[J].CIESC Journal,1990,68(6):740-744.
[20] 但松林,刘尚奇,罗艳艳,等.基于BP神经网络预测高含水层对 SAGD 开发效果的影响[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2019,38(2):73-80.
DAN Songlin, LIU Shangqi, LUO Yanyan,et al.Predicted SAGD development effects by BP neural network for the high-watercut reservoir[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2019,38(2):73-80.
[21] 李海波,李永会,姜瑜,等.多层砂砾岩油藏注烟道气提高采收率技术[J].断块油气田,2020,27(1):104-108.
LI Haibo,LI Yonghui,JIANG Yu,et al.Enhanced oil recovery technology through flue-gas injection in multi-layer sandy conglomerate reservoirs[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2020,27(1):104-108.
[22] 刘丽,马映雪,曹瑞波,等.聚驱后自适应驱油体系注入参数优化[J].石油化工高等学校学报,2021,34(5):56-61.
LIU Li,MA Yingxue,CAO Ruibo,et al.Optimization of injection parameters of adaptive flooding system after polymer flooding[J].Journal of Petrochemical Universities,2021,34(5):56-61.
[23] 莫爱国,李江涛.同层系两种驱油剂同驱压力干扰调整研究[J].石油化工高等学校学报,2020,33(4):92-96.
MO Aiguo,LI Jiangtao.Study on pressure interference and adjustment of flooding of two kinds of oil displacement agents in the same layer system[J].Journal of Petrochemical Universities,2020,33(4):92-96.
[24] 于海洋,杨中林,刘俊辉,等.致密油藏碳化水驱提高采收率方法[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2019,38(2):166-174.
YU Haiyang,YANG Zhonglin,LIU Junhui,et al.EOR method by the carbonated water injection (CWI) for tight oil reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2019,38 (2):166-174.
[25] 刘国超.注聚末期剩余潜力评价及提高采收率技术[J].断块油气田,2020,27(3):370-374.
LIU Guochao.Remaining potential evaluation and EOR method at the end of polymer flooding[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2020,27(3):370-374.
文章导航

/