钻采工程

迪那2凝析气田全生命开采周期纵横向出砂规律探索

  • 刘洪涛 ,
  • 文章 ,
  • 涂志雄 ,
  • 张宝 ,
  • 景宏涛 ,
  • 易俊 ,
  • 孔嫦娥 ,
  • 于小童
展开
  • 中国石油塔里木油田分公司,新疆 库尔勒 841000
刘洪涛(1983—),男,高级工程师,2006年毕业于西南石油大学石油工程专业,现从事试油完井、采油气工艺方面的研究工作。

收稿日期: 2022-06-05

  修回日期: 2023-02-20

  网络出版日期: 2023-07-13

基金资助

中国石油科技重大专项“勘探配套综合研究与新技术应用”(油计划【2020】20号文件)

Exploration of the Longitudinal and Transverse Sand Production Law in the Full Life Production Cycle of Dina 2 Condensate Field

  • Liu Hongtao ,
  • Wen Zhang ,
  • Tu Zhixiong ,
  • Zhang Bao ,
  • Jing Hongtao ,
  • Yi Jun ,
  • Kong Chang'e ,
  • Yu Xiaotong
Expand
  • PetroChina Tarim Oilfield Company, Korla, Xinjiang 841000, China

Received date: 2022-06-05

  Revised date: 2023-02-20

  Online published: 2023-07-13

摘要

塔里木油田迪那2凝析气田属于高温高压、低孔低渗、中—高胶结强度裂缝性砂岩气藏,具有低孔低渗特点,传统观点均认为该类型储层不存在出砂问题,但自2009年投产至今,21口井取到砂样,出砂情况普遍,已成为影响气田稳产的一个关键技术难题。为此,建立了多孔弹塑性3D出砂流固耦合模型,利用数值模拟方法,对迪那2气田开展全方位出砂量预测。研究表明:迪那2气田出砂过程可划分为少量出砂、出砂递增、出砂加剧及稳定出砂4个阶段;重度出砂区域在X-6、X-7、X-8井周围,出砂量从气田中部往四周逐步降低,重点出砂层位在库姆格列木群E1-2km2组。经现场实测数据验证,出砂量预测误差在15%以内,说明该出砂量预测方法具有实用性。该研究可为油田制订合理防砂对策和高效开发提供技术支持。

本文引用格式

刘洪涛 , 文章 , 涂志雄 , 张宝 , 景宏涛 , 易俊 , 孔嫦娥 , 于小童 . 迪那2凝析气田全生命开采周期纵横向出砂规律探索[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023 , 30(3) : 148 -154 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2023.03.019

Abstract

The Dina 2 condensate field in Tarim Oilfield is a fractured sandstone gas reservoir with characteristics such as high temperature and high pressure, low porosity and low permeability, and medium-high cementation strength, and the traditional view is that there is no sand production problem for this type of reservoir, but since the start of production in 2009, sand samples have been taken from 21 wells and the sand production is common, which has become a key technical problem affecting the stable production of the gas field. To this end, a porous elastic-plastic 3D sand production fluid-solid coupling model was established, and a numerical simulation method was adopted to carry out a full range of sand production rate prediction for the Dina 2 Gasfield. The study shows that the sand production process in Dina 2 Gasfield can be divided into four stages according to the sand production rate: small amount of sand production, incremental sand production, intensifying sand production and stable sand production; the area of heavy sand production is around Wells X-6, X-7 and X-8, and the amount of sand production gradually decreases from the middle of the gas field to the surrounding area, and the key sand production layer is located in E1-2 km2 Formation of Kumugeliemu Group. It was verified on the basis of the field measurement data that the prediction error of the sand production rate is within 15%, indicating the practicality of the prediction method. This study can provide technical support for the formulation of reasonable sand control measures and efficient development of the oilfield.

参考文献

[1] LU Jingsheng,LI Dongliang,HE Yong,et al.Experimental study of sand production during depressurization exploitation in hydrate silty-clay sediments[J].Energies,2019,12(22):1-14.
[2] JIN Yurong,LI Yanlong,WU Nengyou,et al.Characterization of sand production for clayey-silt sediments conditioned to openhole gravel-packing:experimental observations[J].SPE Journal,2021,26(6):3591-3608.
[3] JIN Yurong,WU Nengyou,LI Yanlong,et al.Characterization of sand production for clayey-silt sediments conditioned to hydraulic slotting and gravel packing:experimental observations,theoretical formulations,and modeling[J].SPE Journal,2022,27(6):3704-3723.
[4] LI Yanlong,HU Gaowei,LIU Changling,et al.et al.Gravel sizing method for sand control packing in hydrate production test wells[J].Petroleum Exploration & Development,2017,44(6):1016-1021.
[5] SONG Yuqi,RANJITH P G,WU Bailin,et al.A microscopic study of sand arches and sand skeletons under hydrodynamic force based on the CFD-DEM model[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2021,92:104017.
[6] DONG Changyin,ZHOU Bo,HUANG Fansheng,et al.Microscopic sand production simulation and visual sanding pattern description in weakly consolidated sandstone reservoirs[J].Petroleum Science,2022,19(1):279-295.
[7] ABDUL Asad,ABEEB Awotunde,JAMAL Mohammad.Simulation of wellbore erosion and sand transport in long horizontal wells producing gas at high velocities[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2021,89:103890.
[8] ZHANG Rui,WANG Junhao,LIU Shujie,et al.Modeling and durability behavior of erosion-corrosion of sand control screens in deep water gas wells[J].Acs Omega,2021,37(6):23943-23951.
[9] 李占东,庞鸿,徐金泽,等.基于井周应力作用下气井出砂定量预测[J].中国矿业大学学报,2020,49(3):523-529.
LI Zhandong,PANG Hong,XU Jinze,et al.A quantitative prediction of sand production from gas wells based on the effect of stress field around the borehole[J].Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2020,49(3):523-529.
[10] WANG Haotian,MUKUL Sharma.The role of elasto-plasticity in cavity shape and sand production in oil and gas wells[J].SPE Journal,2019,24(2):744-756.
[11] WANG Haotian,HWANG Jongsoo,MUKUL Sharma.Sand production caused by water hammer events:implications for shut-in protocols and design of water injection wells[J].SPE Production & Operations,2019,34(3):461-472.
文章导航

/