地质勘探

四川盆地东北部三叠系飞仙关组迁移型鲕滩层序地层分析及相控储层预测

  • 陶夏妍 ,
  • 黄天俊 ,
  • 张艺华 ,
  • 边树涛 ,
  • 魏朋辉 ,
  • 韩嵩 ,
  • 邓惠 ,
  • 蔡强
展开
  • 1.中国石油西南油气田分公司,四川 成都 610051;
    2.中国石油工程建设有限公司,四川 成都 610041;
    3.北京源烃泰克科技有限公司,北京 100102
陶夏妍(1989—),女,高级工程师,2011年毕业于西南石油大学资源勘查工程专业, 2014年毕业于该校矿产普查与勘探专业,获硕士学位,现主要从事碳酸盐岩地质-地震综合研究。

收稿日期: 2023-01-25

  修回日期: 2023-09-12

  网络出版日期: 2024-01-19

基金资助

四川省自然科学基金“超高压特低孔强非均质碳酸盐岩气藏有效储层物性下限研究”(2023NSFSC0261)

Sequence Stratigraphical Analysis and Facies-Controlled Reservoir Prediction of Migratory Oolitic Beach in Triassic Feixianguan Formation, Northeastern Sichuan Basin

  • Tao Xiayan ,
  • Huang Tianjun ,
  • Zhang Yihua ,
  • Bian Shutao ,
  • Wei Penghui ,
  • Han Song ,
  • Deng Hui ,
  • Cai Qiang
Expand
  • 1. PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gasfield Company, Chengdu, Sichuan 610051, China;
    2. China Petroleum Engineering & Construction Corporation, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China;
    3. Geo Seismic Signal Company, Beijing 100102, China

Received date: 2023-01-25

  Revised date: 2023-09-12

  Online published: 2024-01-19

摘要

四川盆地东北部七里北—渡口河地区飞仙关组具有较大的油气勘探开发潜力,但高频旋回地震识别及追踪难度大,多期次滩体纵向叠置,储层横向非均质性强,未形成配套的迁移型鲕滩储层分期地震预测方法。针对高频旋回地震识别追踪和鲕滩储层分期地震预测难度大的问题,基于不同地震反射相带分区的方法,进行飞仙关组内部旋回横向精细追踪,精细预测飞仙关组多期次鲕滩储层。研究表明:基于不同地震反射相的层序地层地震反射界面追踪对比法,可以有效地解决高频层序界面识别难题,飞仙关组划分出双轴强反射、内部弱反射、单轴强反射、杂乱-亚平行反射和多轴强反射5类反射地震相;利用振幅和弧长敏感属性定性及神经网络反演定量预测成果,明确优质储层主要发育在Ⅱ旋回,从Ⅱ旋回到Ⅲ旋回,储层具有自东向西、从台地向海槽不断迁移进积发育的规律。实践表明,不同地震反射相的层序地层地震反射界面追踪对比,结合敏感属性控制的储层预测方法,针对迁移型鲕滩储层具有较好的适用性。该研究对同类型气藏储层精细预测具有一定的借鉴意义。

本文引用格式

陶夏妍 , 黄天俊 , 张艺华 , 边树涛 , 魏朋辉 , 韩嵩 , 邓惠 , 蔡强 . 四川盆地东北部三叠系飞仙关组迁移型鲕滩层序地层分析及相控储层预测[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023 , 30(6) : 62 -71 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2023.06.009

Abstract

A large potential for oil and gas exploration and development is found at the Feixianguan Formation in the Qilibei-Duokouhe area of the northeastern Sichuan Basin, but the high-frequency rotary seismic identification and tracking are difficult, the multi-stage beach body is vertically stacked, and the reservoir has strong lateral non-homogeneity, so a supporting staged seismic prediction method for the migratory oolitic beach reservoir has not been formed. In response to the difficulties of the high-frequency rotary seismic identification and tracking and the staged seismic prediction of oolitic beach reservoirs, the horizontal fine tracking of internal cycles in the Fixianguan Formation was carried out on the basis of the method of zoning different seismic reflection phase zones, to make a fine prediction of multi-stage oolitic beach reservoirs in the Fixianguan Formation. The study shows that the seismic reflection interface tracking and comparison method for the sequence stratum based on different seismic reflection phases can effectively solve the problem of identifying the interface of high-frequency stratigraphic sequences, and the Fixianguan Formation has been divided into five types of seismic reflection phases: biaxial strong reflection, internal weak reflection, uniaxial strong reflection, cluttered-subparallel reflection, and multiaxial strong reflection; the results of the qualitative prediction of amplitude- and arc length-sensitive attributes and the quantitative prediction of the neural network inversion make clear that the high-quality reservoirs mainly develop in the The results of the quantitative prediction using amplitude and arc length sensitive attributes and neural network inversion showed that the high-quality reservoirs are mainly developed in the Cycle Ⅱ, and from the Cycle Ⅱ to the Cycle Ⅲ, and the reservoirs have the pattern of migrating and accumulating from the east to the west, and from the plateau to the trough. The practice has shown that the seismic reflection interface tracking and comparison method for the sequence stratum of different seismic reflection phases, combined with the reservoir prediction method controlled by sensitive attributes, is suitable for the migratory oolitic beach reservoir. This study is also useful for the fine reservoir prediction in the same type of gas reservoirs.

参考文献

[1] 徐云龙,张洪安,李继东,等.渤海湾盆地东濮凹陷陆相页岩层系储集特征及其主控因素[J].断块油气田,2022,(6):729-735.
XU Yunlong,ZHANG Hongan,LI Jidong,et al.Reservoir characteristics and its main controlling factors of continental shale strata in Dongpu Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2022,(6):729-735.
[2] 余世新.兴隆场Ⅰ—Ⅱ期连片三维飞二段鲕滩储层预测及应用效果[J].江汉石油职工大学学报,2019,32(3):16-18.
YU Shixin.Feierduan oolitic reservoir prediction and its application[J].Journal of Jianghan Petroleum University of Staff and Workers,2019,32(3):16-18.
[3] 武丽,董宁,朱生旺.川东北通南巴构造带飞仙关组鲡滩储层预测[J].石油物探,2009,48(3):277-284.
WU Li,DONG Ning,ZHU Shengwang.The oolite beach reservoir prediction at Feixianguan Formation in Tongnanba structural belt,northeast Sichuan Province[J].Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum,2009,48(3):277-284.
[4] 张新,唐德海,汪建辉.古海相致密碳酸盐岩储层描述技术——以川东南涪陵南部地区飞仙关组三段鲕粒灰岩为例[J].海洋地质前沿,2017,33(9):60-65.
ZHANG Xin,TANG Dehai,WANG Jianhui.Reservoir description for marine carbonate rock:a case study of oolitic limestone in 3rd member of Feixianguan Formation in south Fuling Area of southeast Sichuan[J].Marine Geology Frontiers,2017,33(9):60-65.
[5] 熊晓军,王小平,贺振华.基于非线性能量分析的鲕滩储层预测方法[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2010,32(4):1-5.
XIONG Xiaojun,WANG Xiaoping,HE Zhenhua.Oolitic reservoir prediction method based on nonlinear energy analysis[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition),2010,32(4):1-5.
[6] 李嘉奇,鲜本忠,王剑,等. 四棵树凹陷清水河组测井成岩相识别与储层评价[J]. 东北石油大学学报,2022,46(1):1-13.
LI Jiaqi,XIAN Benzhong,WANG Jian,et al. Logging diagenetic facies identification and reservoir evaluation of Qingshuihe Formation in Sikeshu Sag[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University,2022,46(1):1-13.
[7] 何军,吴雪莎.地震相分析法在建南地区飞三段鲕滩储层预测中的运用[J].石油地质与工程,2009,23(6):43-44.
HE Jun,WU Xuesha.Seismic facies analysis in reservoir prediction in F3 oolitic shoal reservoir of Jiannan Area[J].Petroleum Geology & Engineering,2009,23(6):43-44.
[8] 彭才,张延充,梅燕,等.川中地区飞仙关组高能鲕滩储层地震预测[J].石油物探,2010,49(5):504-508.
PENG Cai,ZHANG Yanchong,MEI Yan,et al.Seismic prediction on high-energy oolitic-beach reservoir of Feixianguan Formation in central Sichuan Basin[J].Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum,2010,49(5):504-508.
[9] 何谦,熊高君.自然伽马反演在鲕滩储层预测中应用[J].长江大学学报(自然版),2014,11(31):101-102.
HE Qian,XIONG Gaojun.Application of natural gamma inversion in the prediction for oolitic beach reservoir[J].Journal of Yangtze University(Natural Science Edition),2014,11(31):101-102.
[10] 李梅,郗诚,张志让,等.虚拟井约束地震反演方法在台地斜坡带鲕滩储层预测中的应用——以四川盆地龙岗地区某单元为例[J].海相油气地质,2012,17(4):73-77.
LI Mei,XI Cheng,ZHANG Zhirang,et al.Application of virtual-well constrained seismic inversion in prediction of oolitic shoal reservoirs in platform slope zone:a case of application in Longgang Area,Sichuan Basin[J].Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2012,17(4):73-77.
[11] 刘宏,谭秀成,周彦,等.川东北黄龙场气田飞仙关组台缘滩型碳酸盐岩储层预测[J].石油学报,2009,30(2):219-221.
LIU Hong,TAN Xiucheng,ZHOU Yan,et al.Prediction of platform-edge bank carbonate reservoir in Feixianguan Formation of Huanglongchang Gas Field in the northeastern Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2009,30(2):219-221.
[12] 武丽,张永贵,姜大建,等.基于等时地层格架的储层预测——以四川通南巴构造带飞仙关组为例[J].石油地球物理勘探,2011,46(6):944-951.
WU Li,ZHANG Yonggui,JIANG Dajian,et al.Reservoir prediction based on isochronous stratigraphic framework:an example of Feixianguan Formation in Tongnanba Structural Belt[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2011,46(6):944-951.
[13] 刘建强,罗冰,谭秀成,等.川东北地区飞仙关组台缘带鲕滩分布规律[J].中国地质大学学报,2012,37(4):809-810.
LIU Jianqiang,LUO Bing,TAN Xiucheng,et al.Distribution of marginal-platform oolitic shoal in Feixianguan Formation,northeast Sichuan,China[J].Journal of China University of Geosciences,2012,37(4):809-810.
[14] 缪志伟,别静,季春辉.川东北元坝地区飞仙关组二段鲕滩储层预测[J].石油地球物理勘探,2014,49(2):329-337.
MIAO Zhiwei,BIE Jing,JI Chunhui.Reservoir prediction on the section of Feixianguan Formation in Yuanba Area,northeast Sichuan[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2014,49(2):329-337.
[15] 程奇,刘宗宾,王建立,等. 变质岩潜山储层结构及其生产动态响应——以渤海锦州25-1南油田为例[J]. 东北石油大学学报,2022,46(1):26-35.
CHENG Qi,LIU Zongbin,WANG Jianli,et al. Reservoir structure and production dynamic response of metamorphic buried hill:taking JZ25-1S Oilfield in Bohai Sea as an example[J].Journal of Northeast Petroleum University,2022,46(1):26-35.
[16] 赵虎,罗磊,杨天,等.少井区鲕滩储层敏感地震属性优选及预测[J].地球物理学进展,2017,32(2):827-833.
ZHAO Hu,LUO Lei,YANG Tian,et al.Oolitic reservoir sensitive seismic attributes optimization and prediction in less well work area[J].Progress in Geophysics,2017,32(2):827-833.
[17] 席文艳,谭秀成,彭军,等.黄龙场地区飞仙关组沉积相及其储层控制作用[J].断块油气藏 ,2008,15(4):16-19.
XI Wenyan,TAN Xiucheng,PENG Jun,et al.Sedimentary facies of Feixianguan Formation and its control on reservoir in Huanglongchang Region of northeast Sichuan[J].Fault Block Oil & gas Reservoir,2008,15(4):16-19.
[18] 冯林杰,蒋裕强,刘菲,等.川东地区开江—梁平海槽南段飞仙关组鲕滩储层特征及主控因素[J].石油学报,2021,42(10):267-269.
FENG Linjie,JIANG Yuqiang,LIU Fei,et al.Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of oolitic shoal reservoir in Feixianguan Formation in the southern part of Kaijiang-Liangping trough,eastern Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2021,42(10):267-269.
[19] 朱颜,李艳然,岳欣欣,等. 车排子凸起胜金口组沉积及主控因素[J]. 新疆石油地质,2021,42(1):10-20.
ZHU Yan, LI Yanran, YUE Xinxin, et al. Sedimentary facies and controlling factors of Shengjinkou formation in Chepaizi Swell[J]. Xinjiang Petroloeum Geology, 2021,42(1):10-20.
[20] 李嘉奇,鲜本忠,王剑,等. 四棵树凹陷清水河组测井成岩相识别与储层评价[J]. 东北石油大学学报,2022,46(1):1-13.
LI Jiaqi,XIAN Benzhong,WANG Jian,et al. Logging diagenetic facies identification and reservoir evaluation of Qingshuihe Formation in Sikeshu Sag[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University,2022,46(1):1-13.
[21] 单祥,郭华军,陈希光,等. 低渗透致密砂岩储集层致密化成因——以准噶尔盆地莫北—莫索湾凸起下侏罗统八道湾组为例[J]. 新疆石油地质,2021,42(1):29-37.
SHAN Xiang, GUO Huajun, CHEN Xiguang,et al. Genesis of densification of low-permeability tight sandstone reservoirs: a case study of lower Jurassic Badaowan Formation in Mobei-Mosuowan Swell, Junggar Basin[J].Xinjiang Petroloeum Geology, 2021,42(1):29-37.
[22] 张桓,陈亚军,伍宏美,等.三塘湖盆地马朗凹陷上石炭统卡拉岗组中基性火山岩储层地质特征及主控因素[J]. 东北石油大学学报,2022,46(3):25-44.
ZHANG Huan,CHEN Yajun,WU Hongmei,et al. Geological characteristics and influencing factors of intermediate basic volcanic reservoirs in Kalagang Formation of Upper Carboniferous in Malang Sag,Santanghu Basin[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University,2022,46(3):25-44.
文章导航

/