基于核磁共振和恒速压汞的致密砂岩孔喉结构表征新方法

刘客

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2025.01.016

特种油气藏 >

2025 , Vol. 32 >Issue 1: 135 - 143

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2025.01.016

油藏工程

基于核磁共振和恒速压汞的致密砂岩孔喉结构表征新方法

刘客

展开

中国石油吉林油田分公司,吉林松原 138000

刘客(1995—),男,工程师,2017年毕业于长江大学石油工程专业,2020年毕业于该校地质工程专业,获硕士学位,现主要从事CCUS技术方面的研究工作。

收稿日期: 2023-11-23

修回日期: 2024-09-20

网络出版日期: 2025-05-13

基金资助

国家自然科学基金“页岩油储层纳微米孔喉中油-CO₂-水多元体系相行为与流动机制研究”(52074319)

收起

A new method for characterizing the pore-throat structure of tight sandstone based on nuclear magnetic resonance and constant-rate mercury intrusion

LIU Ke

Expand

Petrochina Jilin Oilfield Company,Songyuan,Jilin 138000, China

Received date: 2023-11-23

Revised date: 2024-09-20

Online published: 2025-05-13

Fold

摘要

致密砂岩孔喉细小、孔隙结构复杂、非均质性严重。为准确表征致密砂岩储层的孔喉结构特征,以松辽盆地长岭断陷营城组营3储层致密砂岩为例,采用场发射扫描电镜、铸体薄片、恒速压汞和核磁共振方法对致密砂岩孔隙结构进行了多尺度研究,通过将NMR与CMP实验相联合,有效识别了孔隙与喉道半径分布,明确了可动流体孔喉半径下限。实验表明:经过NMR与CMP联合识别,目标储层的平均喉道半径为0.331～0.824 μm,平均孔隙半径为17.600～24.290 μm,平均孔喉连通比为27.62～53.17;可动流体孔喉半径下限是一个范围,下界限r₁和上界限r₂可将赋存流体划分为束缚区、过渡区和可动区;随着渗透率降低,r₁逐渐增大,r₂逐渐降低,束缚区范围变大,过渡区和可动区范围变小;r₁增大会导致吸附孔孔隙度增大,渗流孔孔隙度降低,储层质量变差;r₁可作为评价储层流动能力界限的指标。该研究成果可为优选致密砂岩优质储层提供依据。

关键词： 致密砂岩; 孔隙结构; 喉道; 恒速压汞; 核磁共振

本文引用格式

刘客 . 基于核磁共振和恒速压汞的致密砂岩孔喉结构表征新方法[J]. 特种油气藏, 2025 , 32(1) : 135 -143 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2025.01.016

Abstract

Tight sandstone features small pore throats,a complex pore structure and severe heterogeneity.To accurately characterize the pore throat structure characteristics of tight sandstone reservoirs,taking the tight sandstone of the third member of Yingcheng Formation in Changling Fault Depression,Songliao Basin as an example,the pore structure of tight sandstone was investigated by means of field emission scanning,casting thin section,constant-rate mercury injection and nuclear magnetic resonance method.Through the combination of NMR with CMP experiment,the distribution of pore and throat radius was effectively identified,and the lower limit of pore throat radius of movable fluid was defined.The experimental results indicate that the average throat radius of the target reservoir ranges from 0.331 to 0.824 μm,the average pore radius ranges from 17.600 to 24.290 μm,and the average pore-throat connectivity ratio ranges from 27.62 to 53.17.The lower limit of the pore throat radius of movable fluid is within a range.The lower limit r₁ and the upper limit r₂ can divide the fluid into the bound zone,the transition zone and the movable zone.As the permeability decreases,r₁ gradually increases,r₂ gradually decreases,the range of the bound zone becomes larger,and the range of the transition zone and the movable zone becomes smaller.The increase of r₁ will lead to the increase of adsorption pore porosity,the decrease of seepage pore porosity and the deterioration of reservoir quality.r₁ can be used as an index to evaluate the boundary of reservoir flow capacity.The research results can provide a basis for optimizing high-quality tight sandstone reservoirs.

Key words： tight sandstone; pore structure; throat; constant-rate mercury injection; nuclear magnetic resonance

参考文献

[1] 黄兴,李天太,王香增,等.致密砂岩储层可动流体分布特征及其影响因素——以鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬油田延长组长8储层为例[J].石油学报,2019,40(5):557-567.
HUANG Xing,LI Tiantai,WANG Xiangzeng,et al.Distribution characteristics and its influence factors of movable fluid in tight sandstone reservoir:a case study from Chang 8 oil layer of Yanchang Formation in Jiyuan Oilfield,Ordos Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(5):557-567.
[2] 孟婧,张莉莹,李芮,等.致密砂岩储层微观孔隙结构特征及其分类评价[J].特种油气藏,2023,30(4):71-78.
MENG Jing,ZHANG Liying,LI Rui,et al.Microscopic pore structure characteristics of tight sandstone reservoirs and its classification evaluation[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2023,30(4):71-78.
[3] 刘翰林,杨友运,王凤琴,等.致密砂岩储集层微观结构特征及成因分析——以鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长6段和长8段为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2018,45(2):225-231.
LIU Hanlin,YANG Youyun,WANG Fengqin,et al.Micro pore and throat characteristics and origin of tight sandstone reservoirs:a case study of the Triassic Chang 6 and Chang 8 Members in Longdong Area,Ordos Basin,NW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2018,45(2):225-231.
[4] ZHANG L C,LU S F,XIAO D S,et al.Pore structure characteristics of tight sandstones in the northern Songliao Basin,China[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2017,88(3):170-180.
[5] LYU C,NING Z,WANG Q,et al.Application of NMR T₂ to pore size distribution and movable fluid distribution in tight sandstones[J].Energy & fuels,2018,32(2):1395-1405.
[6] LIU Y,YAO Y,LIU D,et al.Shale pore size classification:an NMR fluid typing method[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2018,96(5):591-601.
[7] 闫健,秦大鹏,王平平,等.鄂尔多斯盆地致密砂岩储层可动流体赋存特征及其影响因素[J].油气地质与采收率,2020,27(6):47-56.
YAN Jian,QIN Dapeng,WANG Pingping,et al.Occurrence characteristics and main controlling factors of movable fluid in tight sandstone reservoirs in Ordos Basin[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2020,27(6):47-56.
[8] 肖佃师,卢双舫,陆正元,等.联合核磁共振和恒速压汞方法测定致密砂岩孔喉结构[J].石油勘探与开发,2016,43(6):1049-1059.
XIAO Dianshi,LU Shuangfang,LU Zhengyuan,et al.Combining nuclear magnetic resonance and rate-controlled porosimetry to probe the pore-throat structure of tight sandstones[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(6):1049-1059.
[9] 田华,张水昌,柳少波,等.压汞法和气体吸附法研究富有机质页岩孔隙特征[J].石油学报,2012,33(3):419-427.
TIAN Hua,ZHANG Shuichang,LIU Shaobo,et al.Determination of organic-rich shale pore features by mercury injection and gas adsorption methods[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(3):419-427.
[10] 杨峰,宁正福,孔德涛,等.高压压汞法和氮气吸附法分析页岩孔隙结构[J].天然气地球科学,2013,24(3):450-455.
YANG Feng,NING Zhengfu,KONG Detao,et al.Pore structure of shales from high pressure mercury injection and nitrogen adsorption method[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(3):450-455.
[11] 全国石油天然气标准化技术委员会.岩石毛管压力曲线的测定:GB/T 29171—2012[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2012:11-13.
China Petroleum and Natural Gas Standardization Technical Committee.Rock capillary pressure measurement:GB/T 29171-2012[S].Beijing:China Standard Press,2012:11-13.
[12] 全国石油天然气标准化技术委员会.岩样核磁共振参数实验室测量规范:SY/T 6490—2014[S]. 北京:石油工业出版社出版,2014:7-10.
China Petroleum and Natural Gas Standardization Technical Committee.Specification for measurement of rock NMR parameter in laboratory:SY/T 6490-2014[S].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2014:7-10.
[13] ZHANG L,LU S,XIAO D,et al.Pore structure characteristics of tight sandstones in the northern Songliao Basin,China[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2017,88(4):170-180.
[14] 孟昆,王胜建,薛宗安,等.利用核磁共振资料定量评价页岩孔隙结构[J].波谱学杂志,2021,38(2):215-226.
MENG Kun,WANG Shengjian,XUE Zongan,et al.Quantitative evaluation of shale pore structure using nuclear magnetic resonance data[J].Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance,2021,38(2):215-226.
[15] 郎东江,伦增珉,吕成远,等.页岩油注二氧化碳提高采收率影响因素核磁共振实验[J].石油勘探与开发,2021,48(3):1-10.
LANG Dongjiang,LUN Zengmin,LYU Chengyuan,et al.Nuclear magnetic resonance experimental study of CO₂ injection to enhance shale oil recovery[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2021,48(3):1-10.
[16] 张添锦,王延峰,李军,等.注CO₂提高页岩吸附甲烷采收率核磁共振实验[J].特种油气藏,2023,30(5):113-120.
ZHANG Tianjin,WANG Yanfeng,LI Jun,et al.Nuclear magnetic resonance experiment for enhanced recovery of adsorbed methane from shale through carbon dioxide injection[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2023,30(5):113-120.
[17] YU Haiyang,XU Hang,FU Wenrui,et al.Extraction of shale oil with supercritical CO₂:effects of number of fractures and injection pressure[J].Fuel,2021,285:276-285.
[18] 胡伟,吕成远,王锐,等.水驱转CO₂混相驱渗流机理及传质特征[J].石油学报,2018,39(2):201-209.
HU Wei,LYU Chengyuan,WANG Rui,et al.Porous flow mechanism and mass transfer characteristics of CO₂ miscible flooding after waterflooding[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2018,39(2):201-209.
[19] 吴伟,梁志凯,郑马嘉,等.页岩储层孔隙结构与分形特征演化规律[J].油气地质与采收率,2022,29(4):35-45.
WU Wei,LIANG Zhikai,ZHENG Majia,et al.Pore structures in shale reservoirs and evolution laws of fractal characteristics[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2022,29(4):35-45.
[20] 刘永.基于核磁共振流态分析的页岩微纳米孔隙类型划分方法[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2018.
LIU Yong.Classification method of shale micro-nano pore types based on nuclear magnetic resonance flow analysis[D].Beijing:China University of Geosciences(Beijing),2018.
[21] 唐相路,姜振学,邵泽宇,等.第四系弱成岩泥页岩孔隙结构及物性特征[J].石油实验地质,2022,44(2):210-218.
TANG Xianglu,JIANG Zhenxue,SHAO Zeyu,et al.Pore structure and physical properties of Quaternary weak diagenetic shales[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2022,44(2):210-218.
[22] 王羽君,赵晓东,周伯玉,等.基于高压压汞-恒速压汞的低渗砂岩储层孔隙结构评价[J].断块油气田,2022,(6):824-830.
WANG Yujun,ZHAO Xiaodong,ZHOU Boyu,et al.Evaluation of pore structure in low permeability sandstone reservoir based on high pressure-constant velocity mercury injection[J].Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field,2022,(6):824-830.
[23] ZHANG F,JIANG Z,SUN W,et al.A multiscale comprehensive study on pore structure of tight sandstone reservoir realized by nuclear magnetic resonance,high pressure mercury injection and constant-rate mercury injection penetration test[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2019,109(4):208-222.
[24] CAO T,SONG Z,LIU G.,et al.Characteristics of shale pores,fractal dimension and their controlling factors determined by nitrogen adsorption and mercury injection methods[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2016,23(2):1-8.
[25] 张全培,吴文瑞,刘丽萍,等.鄂尔多斯盆地镇北地区延长组超低渗透储层孔隙结构及其分形特征[J].油气地质与采收率,2020,27(3):20-31.
ZHANG Quanpei,WU Wenrui,LIU Liping,et al.Pore structure and fractal characteristics of ultra-low permeability reservoirs in Yanchang Formation in Zhenbei Area,Ordos Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Recovery Efficiency,2020,27(3):20-31.
[26] WANG L,ZHANG Y F,ZOU R,et al.Molecular dynamics investigation of DME assisted CO₂ injection to enhance shale oil recovery in inorganic nanopores[J].Journal of Molecular Liquids,2023,385(3):122-138.
[27] 管全中,董大忠,孙莎莎,等.深层富有机质页岩孔隙结构分形特征及其地质意义——以四川盆地威远地区下志留统龙马溪组为例[J].天然气工业,2024,44(3):108-118.
GUAN Quanzhong,DONG Dazhong,SUN Shasha,et al.Fractal characteristics of organic-rich shale pore structure and its geological implications:a case study of the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the Weiyuan Block,Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2024,44(3):108-118.
[28] 董岩,肖佃师,彭寿昌,等.页岩油层系储集层微观孔隙非均质性及控制因素——以吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组为例[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报,2021,40(1):115-122.
DONG Yan,XIAO Dianshi,PENG Shouchang,et al.Heterogeneity of microscopic pores in shale oil reservoir and its controlling factors:taking the Lucaogou Formation in the Jimusar Sag as an example[J].Bulletin of Mineralogy,Petrology and Geochemistry,2021,40(1):115-122.
[29] WU H,ZHANG C,JI Y,et al.An improved method of characterizing the pore structure in tight oil reservoirs:integrated NMR and constant-rate-controlled porosimetry data[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2018,166(1):778-796.
[30] DONG X,SHEN L W,LIU X,et al.NMR characterization of a tight sand's pore structures and fluid mobility:an experimental investigation for CO₂ EOR potential[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2020,118(6):887-897.
[31] 夏玉磊,兰建平,姚伟.致密砂岩储层微观孔喉结构及可动流体分布特征——以鄂尔多斯盆地东部神木地区盒8段储层为例[J].地质科技通报,2024,43(2):41-51.
XIA Yulei,LAN Jianping,YAO Wei.Micropore structure and movable fluid distribution characteristics of tight sandstone reservoirs:taking the He 8 reservoir in the Shenmu Area of the eastern Ordos Basin as an example[J].Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology,2024,43(2):41-51.
[32] 董鑫旭,孟祥振,蒲仁海.基于致密砂岩储层孔喉系统分形理论划分的可动流体赋存特征认识[J].天然气工业,2023,43(3):78-90.
DONG Xinxu,MENG Xiangzhen,PU Renhai.Occurrence characteristics of movable fluids based on the division of pore throat system in tight gas reservoir by fractal theory[J].Natural Gas Industry,2023,43(3):78-90.

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献