微粉支撑剂运移铺置规律及应用

李亭; 吴清苗; 羊丹; 曾思佳; 赵佳乐; 何美琪; 周卓; 杨佳昊

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2025.01.018

特种油气藏 >

2025 , Vol. 32 >Issue 1: 153 - 160

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2025.01.018

钻采工程

微粉支撑剂运移铺置规律及应用

李亭 ,
吴清苗 ,
羊丹 ,
曾思佳 ,
赵佳乐 ,
何美琪 ,
周卓 ,
杨佳昊

展开

1.长江大学,湖北武汉 430100;
2.油气钻采工程湖北省重点实验室(长江大学),湖北武汉 430100;
3.中国石化江汉油田分公司江汉采油厂,湖北潜江 433100;
4.中国石化江汉油田分公司石油工程技术研究院,湖北武汉 430035;
5.凯泽未来(无锡)新材料研究院有限公司,江苏无锡 214123

李亭(1977—),男,教授,1998年毕业于石油大学(华东)石油工程专业,2014年毕业于成都理工大学油气田开发工程专业,获博士学位,现从事油气储层增产改造技术研究工作。

收稿日期: 2024-08-03

修回日期: 2024-11-26

网络出版日期: 2025-05-13

基金资助

中国石化科技部项目“高应力储层全支撑压裂技术研究”(SINOPEC24017)

收起

Transport and placement patterns and application of micronized proppant

LI Ting ,
WU Qingmiao ,
YANG Dan ,
ZENG Sijia ,
ZHAO Jiale ,
HE Meiqi ,
ZHOU Zhuo ,
YANG Jiahao

Expand

1. Yangtze University, Wuhan, Hubei 430100, China;
2. Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Drilling and Production Engineering (Yangtze University), Wuhan, Hubei 430100, China;
3. Jianghan Oil Production Plant, Sinopec Jianghan Oilfield Company, Qianjiang, Hubei 433100, China;
4. Research Institute of Petroleum Engineering and Technology,Sinopec Jianghan Oilfield Company, Wuhan, Hubei 430035, China;
5. Kaize Future (Wuxi) New Material Research Institute Co., Ltd., Wuxi, Jiangsu 214123, China

Received date: 2024-08-03

Revised date: 2024-11-26

Online published: 2025-05-13

Fold

摘要

针对储层体积压裂过程中大量微裂缝未得到充分有效支撑的问题,优选出具有更小粒径、更优悬浮性能的微粉支撑剂,通过Fluent软件研究该支撑剂在复杂裂缝中的运移铺置规律,利用FracMan软件对比70/140目陶粒支撑剂和微粉支撑剂的压裂效果。研究表明:微粉支撑剂主要铺置在次级裂缝中,总体呈现出“前高后低”的分布形态;在一级分支缝中大量微粉支撑剂处于悬浮运移状态,仅200目微粉支撑剂发生了沉降,且沙堤平衡高度和面积较小,未形成有效沙堤;微粉支撑剂的铺置规律受粒径影响较大,当支撑剂目数从200目增加至600目时,在二级和三级分支缝中的砂堤平衡高度和砂堤面积逐渐增加,当支撑剂目数达到800目时,由于其粒径过小,大量支撑剂颗粒处于悬浮运移状态,不能沉降堆积成有效砂堤,容易造成近井端微裂缝支撑不充分的情况;与70/140目陶粒支撑剂相比,微粉支撑剂的运移距离更远,更容易进入次级裂缝和微裂缝中;微粉支撑剂可使压裂改造缝网更加复杂,页岩储层改造体积可增加17.71%,储层改造效果显著。该研究可为微粉支撑剂的应用提供借鉴。

关键词： 微裂缝; 体积压裂; 支撑剂运移; 导流能力; 微粉支撑剂; 页岩

本文引用格式

李亭 , 吴清苗 , 羊丹 , 曾思佳 , 赵佳乐 , 何美琪 , 周卓 , 杨佳昊 . 微粉支撑剂运移铺置规律及应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2025 , 32(1) : 153 -160 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2025.01.018

Abstract

To address the issue of inadequate support for numerous micro-fractures during reservoir volumetric fracturing, this study has identified micronized proppant with smaller particle sizes and superior suspension performance as the preferred choice. The transport and placement patterns of this proppant within complex fractures were investigated using Fluent software, and the fracturing effects were compared between 70/140-mesh ceramic proppant and micronized proppant using FracMan software. The study shows that: micronized proppant is predominantly placed within secondary fractures, exhibiting a distribution pattern characterized by a "high in the front and low in the back" morphology. In primary branch fractures, a significant amount of micronized proppant remains in suspension, with only the 200-mesh micronized proppant undergoing sedimentation. The equilibrium height and area of the sandbanks formed are relatively small, failing to create effective sandbanks. The placement pattern of micronized proppant is significantly influenced by particle size. As the mesh size of the proppant increases from 200 to 600 meshes, the equilibrium height and area of sandbanks in secondary and tertiary branch fractures gradually increase. When the mesh size reaches 800 mesh, the particle size is so small that a large number of proppant particles remain in suspension and do not settle to form effective sandbanks, leading to potential under-support in the near-well micro-fractures. Compared to 70/140 mesh ceramic proppant, micronized proppant travels a greater distance and more readily penetrates into secondary and micro-fractures. The use of micronized proppant can increase the complexity of the fracture network, enhancing the shale reservoir stimulation volume by 17.71%, resulting in a significant improvement in reservoir stimulation effectiveness. This study can provide valuable insights for the application of micronized proppant.

Key words： micro-fracture; volumetric fracturing; proppant transport; conductivity; micronized proppant; shale

参考文献

[1] SHARMA M M,MANCHANDA R.The role of induced un-propped (IU) fractures in unconventional oil and gas wells[C].SPE174946-MS,2015:5-10.
[2] JI P,QU Q,VITTHAL S,et al.Improving propped SRV in the Longmaxi Shale:new concept trials and its performance[C].SPE181796-MS,2016:10-12.
[3] JIANG T X,ZENG Y J,ZHOU J,et al.Methodology and field application:multiple scale propped fractures to maximize ESRV in deep buried shale gas play with high tectonic stress in Sichuan Basin,China[C].ARMA2018-020,2018:5-7.
[4] 蒋廷学,王海涛,卞晓冰,等.水平井体积压裂技术研究与应用[J].岩性油气藏,2018,30(3):1-11.
JIANG Tingxue,WANG Haitao,BIAN Xiaobing,et al.Research and application of volume fracturing technology in horizontal wells[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2018,30(3):1-11.
[5] 时光耀.低渗储层裂缝表征及预测[D].青岛:中国石油大学(华东),2020.
SHI Guangyao.Characterization and prediction of fractures in low permeability reservoirs[D].Qingdao:China University of Petroleum(East China),2020.
[6] 曾联波,周天伟.塔里木盆地库车坳陷储层裂缝分布规律[J].天然气工业,2004,11(9):23-25.
ZENG Lianbo,ZHOU Tianwei.Reservoir fracture distribution law of Kuche Depression in Tarim Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2004,11(9):23-25.
[7] 李奔,李岩,周福建,等.微支撑剂对页岩油气的增产机理及选配原则[J].地质与勘探,2020,56(3):627-634.
LI Ben,LI Yan,ZHOU Fujian,et al.Production enhancement mechanism of micro-proppant and its selection principles for shale oil and gas[J].Geology and Exploration,2020,56(3):627-634.
[8] JOHNSON J,TURNER M,WEINSTOCK C,et al.Channel fracturing :a paradigm shift in tight gas stimulation[J].Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology,2011,3(4):33-41.
[9] 王卫国.微裂缝发育储层压裂技术研究[D].青岛:中国石油大学(华东),2009.
WANG Weiguo.Research of fracture techniques in micro-fractures developed reservoirs[D].Qingdao:China University of Petroleum(East China),2009.
[10] 王旭林,王鹏,李勇根,等.裂缝体积密度与页岩气产能关系探究[J].石油物探,2021,60(5):826-833.
WANG Xulin,WANG Peng,LI Yonggen,et al.Research on the relationship between fracture volume density and shale gas productivity[J].Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum,2021,60(5):826-833.
[11] 刘建坤,吴峙颖,吴春方,等.压裂液悬砂及支撑剂沉降机理实验研究[J].钻井液与完井液,2019,36(3):378-383.
LIU Jiankun,WU Zhiying,WU Chunfang,et al.Experiment study on the mechanisms of sand suspension and settling of proppant in fracturing fluids[J].Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2019,36(3):378-383.
[12] 杨兆中,李扬,李小刚,等.页岩气水平井重复压裂关键技术进展及启示[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2019,41(6):75-86.
YANG Zhaozhong,LI Yang,LI Xiaogang,et al.Key technology progress and enlightenment in refracturing of shale gas horizontal wells[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition),2019,41(6):75-86.
[13] 武安安.鄂尔多斯长7页岩油储层压裂裂缝扩展机理研究[D].北京:中国石油大学(北京),2021.
WU An′an.Research on the mechanism of hydraulic fracture extension in Chang 7 shale oil reservoirs of Ordos Basin[D].Beijing:China University of Petroleum(Beijing),2021.
[14] 林应之,林启才,邓世杨,等.深层砂岩裂缝性气藏缝网压裂裂缝导流能力分析[J].油气井测试,2021,30(5):9-17.
LIN Yingzhi,LIN Qicai,DENG Shiyang,et al.Analysis on fracture conductivity of fracture network fracturing in deep sandstone fractured gas reservoir[J].Well Testing,2021,30(5):9-17.
[15] MAXWELL S C,URBANCIC T I,FALLS S D,et al.Real-time microseismic mapping of hydraulic fractures in Carthage[M].Texas:Society of Exploration Geophysicists,2000:1449-1452.
[16] FISHER M K,HEINZE J R,HARRIS C D,et al.Optimizing horizontal completion techniques in the Barnett Shale using microseismic fracture mapping[C].SPE90051-MS,2004:26-29.
[17] KING G E.Thirty years of gas shale fracturing:what have we learned?[C].SPE133456-MS,2010:10-27.
[18] 方文超,刘传喜,苟斐斐,等.非常规油气藏水平井体积压裂改造体积计算方法[J].科学技术与工程,2021,21(5):1681-1689.
FANG Wenchao,LIU Chuanxi,GOU Feifei,et al.Calculation methods of reservoir volume stimulated by volume fracturing of horizontal well in unconventional reservoirs[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2021,21(5):1681-1689.
[19] 蒋晶晶.致密油藏非达西渗流模型及油井产能分析[D].舟山:浙江海洋大学,2023.
JIANG Jingjing.Non-Darcy flow model and productivity analysis of oil wells in tight reservoirs[D].Zhoushan:Zhejiang Ocean University,2023.
[20] 宋俊强,李晓山,王硕,等.致密油藏压裂水平井产量预测[J].新疆石油地质,2022,43(5):580-586.
SONG Junqing,LI Xiaoshan,WANG Shuo,et al.Production prediction of fractured horizontal wells in tight oil reservoirs[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2022,43(5):580-586.
[21] 罗睿乔.非常规气藏储层改造体积评价方法研究[J].能源与环保,2022,44(2):220-226.
LUO Ruiqiao.Research on evaluation method of stimulated reservoir volume of unconventional gas reservoirs[J].China Energy and Environmental Protection,2022,44(2):220-226.
[22] 杨炳祥,杨英涛,李榕,等.井下微地震裂缝监测技术在水平井分段压裂中的应用[J].钻采工艺,2014,37(4):48-50.
YANG Bingxiang,YANG Yingtao,LI Rong,et al.Application of downhole microseismic fracture monitoring technology in staged fracturing of horizontal wells[J].Drilling & Production Technology,2014,37(4):48-50.
[23] 张矿生,薛小佳,陶亮,等.页岩油水平井体积压裂缝网波及体积评价新方法及应用[J].特种油气藏,2023,30(5):127-134.
ZHANG Kuangsheng,XUE Xiaojia,TAO Liang,et al.New method for evaluating the volume fracturing fracture network sweep volume in shale oil horizontal wells and its application[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2023,30(5):127-134.
[24] 张艳博,徐加祥,刘哲,等.二级裂缝倾角对复杂缝网中支撑剂输送的影响[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2023,42(1):91-99.
ZHANG Yanbo,XU Jiaxiang,LIU Zhe,et al.Effect of secondary fracture dip on proppant transport in complex fracture network[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2023,42(1):91-99.
[25] 许冬进,熊齐,吴应松,等.基于支撑剂破碎率预测裂缝导流能力的新方法[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2023,42(5):67-73.
XU Dongjin,XIONG Qi,WU Yingsong,et al.New method for predicting fracture conductivity based on proppant crushing rate[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2023,42(5):67-73.

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献