油藏工程

不同驱油方式下提高页岩油采收率实验评价

  • 刘秀婵 ,
  • 张添锦 ,
  • 赵帮胜 ,
  • 王雨欣
展开
  • 延安大学石油学院,陕西 延安 716000
刘秀婵(1985—),女,副教授,2008年毕业于西北大学资源勘查工程专业,2011年毕业于该校矿物学、岩石学、矿床学专业,获硕士学位,现从事油气藏勘探与开发方面的研究工作。

收稿日期: 2025-01-08

  修回日期: 2025-12-27

  网络出版日期: 2026-09-04

基金资助

国家自然科学基金地区科学基金项目“矿物脉体示踪富有机质页岩中烃类流体形成与演化:以大巴山构造带下寒武统为例”(4236020162);2023年省级大学生创新创业训练计划项目“鄂尔多斯盆地中南部长7页岩储层在单渗透条件下内部构型分析及页岩油赋存机理研究”(S202310719118)

Experimental evaluation of improving shale oil recovery efficiency under different displacement patterns

  • LIU Xiuchan ,
  • ZHANG Tianjin ,
  • ZHAO Bangsheng ,
  • WANG Yuxin
Expand
  • School of Petroleum Engineering and Environmental Engineering,Yan'an University,Yan'an,Shaanxi 716000,China

Received date: 2025-01-08

  Revised date: 2025-12-27

  Online published: 2026-09-04

摘要

鄂尔多斯盆地长7页岩油具有初始产量高、递减快、衰竭采收率低等特点,亟需探索提高页岩油采收率的有效方法。基于高压压汞(HPMI)、扫描电镜(SEM)、铸体薄片(CTS)和低场核磁共振(NMR)等分析结果,对储层孔隙结构进行分类评价,开展压裂液渗吸驱油、压裂液+表面活性剂渗吸驱油和CO2吞吐驱油实验,研究3种驱油方式下不同孔径孔隙原油动用特征及提高采收率效果,提出了压裂与驱替结合的提高页岩油采收率方法。实验结果表明:目标页岩储层孔隙结构可划分为Ⅰ~Ⅲ类,对应的储层物性参数依次变差;3种驱油方式中,CO2吞吐采收率最高,压裂液+表面活性剂驱油次之,压裂液渗吸驱油采收率最低;当驱油方式相同时,Ⅰ类页岩采收率最高,Ⅱ、Ⅲ类页岩依次降低;Ⅰ类页岩可采用普通滑溜水作为压裂液,Ⅱ类页岩可在压裂液中添加表面活性剂,Ⅲ类页岩可将CO2作为压裂液的前置段塞;与普通滑溜水相比,在压裂液中添加阴离子表面活性剂(LAS)后,单井平均日产油提高了2.4倍。该研究成果可为改善页岩储层开采效果提供借鉴。

本文引用格式

刘秀婵 , 张添锦 , 赵帮胜 , 王雨欣 . 不同驱油方式下提高页岩油采收率实验评价[J]. 特种油气藏, 2026 , 33(3) : 79 -88 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2026.03.009

Abstract

Chang 7 shale oil in Ordos Basin is characterized by high initial output,rapid decline and low depletion development recovery efficiency,thus requiring urgent and effective enhanced oil recovery(EOR) methods.Based on core analysis results from high-pressure mercury intrusion(HPMI),scanning electron microscopy(SEM),casting thin sections(CTS),and low-field nuclear magnetic resonance(NMR),the pore structure of the target reservoir was classified and evaluated.Experiments were then carried out on oil displacement by fracturing fluid imbibition,fracturing fluid+surfactant imbibition displacement,and CO2 huff-and-puff displacement,to investigate the crude oil production characteristics in different pore size ranges and the EOR effectiveness of the three patterns.An EOR method integrating fracturing and displacement was proposed to improve shale oil recovery.The experimental results show that the pore structure of the target shale reservoir can be classified into types I-Ⅲ,with reservoir physical properties deteriorating sequentially from I to Ⅲ.Among the three oil displacement patterns,CO2 huff-and-puff achieves the highest recovery efficiency,followed by fracturing fluid+surfactant imbibition,and fracturing fluid imbibition the lowest.For a given pattern,type I shale yields the highest recovery,with types Ⅱ and Ⅲ decreasing in turn.For type I shale,ordinary slickwater can be used as the fracturing fluid;for type Ⅱ,adding a surfactant to the fracturing fluid is recommended;for type Ⅲ,CO2 can be used as a pre-slug in the fracturing fluid.Compared with ordinary slickwater,adding an anionic surfactant(LAS) to the fracturing fluid increases the average daily oil output per well by 2.4 times.The research results can provide reference for improving shale reservoir development efficiency.

参考文献

[1] 闫健,秦大鹏,王平平,等.鄂尔多斯盆地致密砂岩储层可动流体赋存特征及其影响因素[J].油气地质与采收率,2020,27(6):47-56.
YAN Jian,QIN Dapeng,WANG Pingping,et al.Occurrence characteristics and main controlling factors of movable fluid in tight sandstone reservoirs in Ordos Basin[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2020,27(6):47-56.
[2] 黄兴,李响,张益,等.页岩油储集层二氧化碳吞吐纳米孔隙原油微观动用特征[J].石油勘探与开发,2022,49(3):557-564.
HUANG Xing,LI Xiang,ZHANG Yi,et al.Microscopic production characteristics of crude oil in nano-pores of shale oil reservoirs during CO2 huff and puff[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2022,49(3):557-564.
[3] CAI J C,LI C X,SONG K P,et al.The influence of salinity and mineral components on spontaneous imbibition in tight sandstone[J].Fuel,2020,269:117087.
[4] LI C,SING H H,CAI J.Spontaneous imbibition in shale:a review of recent advances[J].Capillarity,2019,2(2):17-32.
[5] 杨正明,刘学伟,李海波,等.致密储集层渗吸影响因素分析与渗吸作用效果评价[J].石油勘探与开发,2019,46(4):739-745.
YANG Zhengming,LIU Xuewei,LI Haibo,et al.Analysis on the influencing factors of imbibition and the effect evaluation of imbibition in tight reservoirs[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2019,46(4):739-745.
[6] CHENG Z,NING Z,YU X,et al.New insights into spontaneous imbibition in tight oil sandstones with NMR[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2019,179:455-464.
[7] 刘继梓,巩联浩,卜广平,等.致密砂岩油藏高温高压动态渗吸特征及影响因素[J].特种油气藏,2021,28(4):142-147.
LIU Jizi,Gong Lianhao,BU Guangping,et al.Characteristics and influencing factors of dynamic imbibition at high temperature and high pressure in tight sandstone reservoir[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2021,28(4):142-147.
[8] 李晓骁,任晓娟,罗向荣.低渗透致密砂岩储层孔隙结构对渗吸特征的影响[J].油气地质与采收率,2018,25(4):119-124.
LI Xiaoxiao,REN Xiaojuan,LUO Xiangrong.Influence of pore structures on the characteristic of spontaneous imbibition in low-permeability tight sandstone reservoir[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2018,25(4):119-124.
[9] 王晨光.致密砂岩油藏不同边界条件下自发渗吸特征[J].西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2021,36(3):58-65,70.
WANG Chenguang.Spontaneous imbibition characteristics in tight sandstone reservoir under different boundary conditions[J].Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition),2021,36(3):58-65,70.
[10] 胡伟.水驱油藏注气驱油机理及渗流规律研究[D].北京:中国石油大学(北京),2018.
HU Wei.The mechanism study of gas injection and multiple phase flow in water flooding reservoir [D].Beijing:China University of Petroleum(Beijing),2018.
[11] 杨明,薛程伟,李朝阳,等.页岩油CO2吞吐影响因素及微观孔隙动用特征[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2023,42(4):148-156.
YANG Ming,XUE Chengwei,LI Chaoyang,et al.Influencing factors of CO2 huff and puff and micro-pores producing characteristics of shale oil[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2023,42(4):148-156.
[12] LIU Y,YAO Y,LIU D,et al.Shale pore size classification:an NMR fluid typing method [J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2018,96(3):591-601.
[13] 蒋天昊,宋方新,邓宝康,等.鄂尔多斯盆地吴起油田长6油层组沉积微相特征及其对储层的控制[J].西北地质,2020,53(4):130-139.
JIANG Tianhao,SONG Fangxin,DENG Baokang,et al.Sedimentary microfacies of Chang 6 Oil-Bearing Formation and its control on reservoir in Wuqi Oilfield,Ordos Basin[J].Northwestern Geology,2020,53(4):130-139.
[14] 付金华,牛小兵,淡卫东,等.鄂尔多斯盆地中生界延长组长7段页岩油地质特征及勘探开发进展[J].中国石油勘探,2019,24(5):601-614.
FU Jinhua,NIU Xiaobing,DAN Weidong,et al.The geological characteristics and the progress on exploration and development of shale oil in Chang 7 Member of Mesozoic Yanchang Formation,Ordos Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2019,24(5):601-614.
[15] 孟昆,王胜建,薛宗安,等.利用核磁共振资料定量评价页岩孔隙结构[J].波谱学杂志,2021,38(2):215-226.
MENG Kun,WANG Shengjian,XUE Zongan,et al.Quantitative evaluation of shale pore structure using nuclear magnetic resonance data[J].Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance,2021,38(2):215-226.
[16] 刘秀婵,陈西泮,刘伟,等.致密砂岩油藏动态渗吸驱油效果影响因素及应用[J].岩性油气藏,2019,31(5):114-120.
LIU Xiuchan,CHEN Xipan,LIU Wei,et al.Influencing factors of dynamic imbibition displacement effect in tight sandstone reservoir and application[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2019,31(5):114-120.
[17] 郎东江,伦增珉,吕成远,等.页岩油注二氧化碳提高采收率影响因素核磁共振实验[J].石油勘探与开发,2021,48(3):1-10.
LANG Dongjiang,LUN Zengmin,LYU Chengyuan,et al.Nuclear magnetic resonance experimental study of CO2 injection to enhance shale oil recovery[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2021,48(3):1-10.
[18] DONG X,SHEN L W,LIU X,et al.NMR characterization of a tight sand's pore structures and fluid mobility:an experimental investigation for CO2 EOR potential[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2020,118(6):104460.
[19] 王飞,潘子晴.化学势差驱动下的页岩储集层压裂液返排数值模拟[J].石油勘探与开发,2016,43(6):971-977.
WANG Fei,PAN Ziqing.Numerical simulation of chemical potential dominated fracturing fluid flowback in hydraulically fractured shale gas reservoirs[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(6):971-977.
[20] 李爱芬,何冰清,雷启鸿,等.界面张力对低渗亲水储层自发渗吸的影响[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2018,42(4):67-74.
LI Aifen,HE Bingqing,LEI Qihong,et al.Influence of interfacial tension on spontaneous imbibition in low-permeability water-wet reservoirs[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science),2018,42(4):67-74.
[21] 巩联浩,刘继梓,武兴,等.裂缝性致密油藏二氧化碳吞吐基质-裂缝间流体渗流特征研究[J].特种油气藏,2021,28(1):118-124.
GONG Lianhao,LIU Jizi,WU Xing,et al.Study on seepage characteristics of fluid between matrix and fracture in CO2 huff-and-puff process in fractured tight reservoirs[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2021,28(1):118-124.
[22] DAI C,CHENG R,SUN X,et al.Oil migration in nanometer to micrometer sized pores of tight oil sandstone during dynamic surfactant imbibition with online NMR[J].Fuel,2019,245:544-553.
[23] KONG S,FENG G,LIU Y,et al.Potential of dimethyl ether as an additive in CO2 for shale oil recovery[J].Fuel,2021,296:120643.
[24] 陈江,高宇,陈沥,等.页岩油CO2非混相吞吐与埋存实验及影响因素[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2023,42(2):143-147.
CHEN Jiang,GAO Yu,CHEN Li,et al.Experiment and influencing factors of CO2 immiscible huff-and-puff and sequestration for shale oil[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2023,42(2):143-151.
[25] 许天寒,赵文桦,王浩南,等.页岩油藏CO2吞吐过程中含油饱和度对孔渗演化与原油组分迁移的调控机制[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2025,44(6):158-166.
XU Tianhan,ZHAO Wenhua,WANG Haonan,et al.Regulation mechanisms of oil saturation on porosity-permeability evolution and oil component migration during CO2 huff-and-puff in shale oil reservoirs[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2025,44(6):158-166.
[26] 姚红生,高玉巧,郑永旺,等.CO2快速吞吐提高页岩油采收率现场试验[J].天然气工业,2024,44(3):10-19.
YAO Hongsheng,GAO Yuqiao,ZHENG Yongwang,et al.Field tests and effect of CO2 rapid huff-n-puff to enhance shale oil recovery[J].Natural Gas Industry,2024,44(3):10-19.
[27] 左名圣,陈浩,赵杰文,等.准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷页岩油藏注CO2吞吐提高采收率机理[J].天然气工业,2024,44(4):126-134.
ZUO Mingsheng,CHEN Hao,ZHAO Jiewen,et al.Mechanism of CO2 EOR in shale oil reservoirs in the Jimsar Sag,the Junggar Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2024,44(4):126-134.
[28] 杨坤,杨胜来,刘新月,等.页岩油储层渗吸及CO2吞吐提高采收率:以吉木萨尔芦草沟组为例[J].西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2024,39(5):1-9.
YANG Kun,YANG Shenglai,LIU Xinyue,et al,Enhancing oil recovery of shale oil reservoirs through spontaneous imbibition and CO2 huff-puff:a case study of Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar[J].Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition),2024,39(5):1-9.
文章导航

/