钻采工程

多尺度页岩储层岩石应力敏感因素与流固耦合渗流模型

  • 亓倩 ,
  • 朱维耀
展开
  • 北京科技大学,北京 100083
亓倩(1990—),女,工程师,2020年毕业于北京科技大学流体力学专业,获博士学位,现从事页岩力学性能测试及缝网压裂研究、页岩气藏多物理场耦合渗流方面的研究工作。

收稿日期: 2024-09-19

  修回日期: 2025-12-07

  网络出版日期: 2026-09-04

基金资助

国家自然科学基金联合基金“储层结构与注采动态渗流智能适配多物理场耦合机制研究”(U23B2083);中央高校基本科研业务项目“页岩力学性能测试及人工缝网压裂新技术”(FRF-TP-22-146A1);北京科技大学课程思政特色示范课程建设项目“力学实验(材料力学、工程力学D等)”(KC2024SZ12)

Study of multi-scale stress-sensitive factors of shale reservoir rocks and a fluid-solid coupling seepage model

  • QI Qian ,
  • ZHU Weiyao
Expand
  • University of Science and Technology Beijing,Beijing 100083,China

Received date: 2024-09-19

  Revised date: 2025-12-07

  Online published: 2026-09-04

摘要

针对页岩储层流固耦合作用影响多尺度流体流动规律认识不清的问题,运用应力敏感实验和Biot系数测定方法,分别研究页岩基质与裂缝的固有特征对其应力的敏感程度,分析微观渗流与宏观有效应力的相互作用关系;基于有效应力原理,建立了页岩储层基质-裂缝孔隙度和渗透率在有效应力作用下的数学模型,分析了不同流固耦合参数对页岩储层多尺度渗流运动的影响。研究表明:基质和裂缝的平均应力敏感系数分别为0.220和0.081,基质的应力敏感性强于裂缝的应力敏感性;基质和裂缝的平均Biot系数分别为0.310和0.710,基质的Biot系数小于裂缝的Biot系数,裂缝发育的储层孔隙压力对储层产能的影响不能忽略;法向刚度、弹性模量、泊松比、初始孔隙度越小,Biot系数越大,基质和缝网的流固耦合作用越强,渗透率下降越明显;解吸附膨胀作用造成页岩骨架颗粒的变形,页岩基质流固耦合作用增强;有支撑剂填充的人工裂缝,支撑颗粒越大、铺砂层数越多,裂缝的法向刚度越大,裂缝导流能力越强,流固耦合作用越弱。该渗流模型更全面地考虑流固耦合力学参数的影响,能更精确地分析流固耦合作用对不同尺度页岩渗流规律的影响,极大地简化计算分析且提升计算速度。研究成果可为页岩储层的有效开发提供理论依据。

本文引用格式

亓倩 , 朱维耀 . 多尺度页岩储层岩石应力敏感因素与流固耦合渗流模型[J]. 特种油气藏, 2026 , 33(3) : 158 -165 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2026.03.018

Abstract

In response to the insufficient understanding of multi-scale fluid flow behavior under fluid-solid coupling in shale reservoirs,stress sensitivity experiments and Biot coefficient measurements were employed to study the inherent characteristics of shale matrix and fractures and their sensitivity to stress respectively.The interactions between micro-scale seepage and macro-scale effective stress were analyzed.Based on the effective stress principle,mathematical models were established for shale reservoir matrix-fracture porosity and permeability under effective stress,and the impacts of various fluid-solid coupling parameters on multi-scale flow in shale reservoirs were analyzed.The results show that the average stress sensitivity coefficients of the matrix and fractures are 0.220 and 0.081 respectively,indicating the matrix is more stress-sensitive than fractures.The average Biot coefficients of the matrix and fractures are 0.310 and 0.710 respectively,indicating the matrix's Biot coefficient is smaller than that of the fractures,thus pore pressure in fracture-developed reservoirs has a non-negligible impact on reservoir productivity.The smaller the normal stiffness,elastic modulus,Poisson's ratio,and initial porosity,the larger the Biot coefficient,and the stronger the fluid-solid coupling interaction between the matrix and fracture network,resulting in more obvious permeability reduction.Gas desorption-induced expansion causes deformation of shale matrix grains,enhancing fluid-solid coupling in the matrix.In proppant-filled fractures,larger proppant size and more layers of sand increase the normal stiffness of fractures,thereby improving fracture flow conductivity and weakening fluid-solid coupling effects.The proposed seepage model more comprehensively considers the influence of fluid-solid coupling mechanical parameters and can more accurately analyze the impact of fluid-solid coupling on multi-scale seepage behavior in shale,greatly simplifying calculations and improving computation speed.The findings provide a theoretical basis for the effective development of shale reservoirs.

参考文献

[1] ZHANG Q,WANG D W,SU L Y,et al.A semi-analytical model for coupled flow in stress-sensitive multi-scale shale reservoirs with fractal characteristics[J].Petroleum Science,2024,21(1):327-342.
[2] 张志强,师永民,李鹤.致密油气藏储层应力敏感各向异性及其微观机制——以鄂尔多斯盆地安塞油田长6油层为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2016,37(1):117-124.
ZHANG Zhiqiang,SHI Yongmin,LI He.Stress sensitivity anisotropy and its microscopic mechanism of tight oil and gas reservoirs:a case from Chang 6 Reservoir in Ansai Oilfield of Ordos Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2016,37(1):117-124.
[3] 慎国强,刘浩杰,王振涛,等.致密储层复杂缝网流固耦合渗流规律及产能模拟[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2023,42(4):157-165.
SHEN Guoqiang,LIU Haojie,WANG Zhentao,et al.Fluid-solid coupling seepage law and productivity simulation of complex fracture networks in tight reservoirs[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2023,42(4):157-165.
[4] LIU W R,LIU P.Novel shale permeability model considering the internal dependencies of effective stress, gas sorption, and flow-regime effects[J].Energy and Fuels,2023,37(8):5777-5791.
[5] SINHA S,BRAUN E M,DETERMAN M D,et al.Steady-state permeability measurements on intact shale samples at reservoir conditions-effect of stress,temperature,pressure,and type of gas[C].SPE164263,2013:1-11.
[6] HAN Z,PIDHO J J,YAN C,et al.Study on multiscale fluid-solid coupling theoretical model and productivity analysis of horizontal well in shale gas reservoirs[J].Energy and Fuels,2023,37(7):5059-5077.
[7] 赵谦平,王博涛,姜磊,等.页岩气多场耦合渗透率计算模型[J].特种油气藏,2017,24(2):125-130.
ZHAO Qianping,WANG Botao,JIANG Lei,et al.Computational model for multi-field coupling permeability of shale gas[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2017,24(2):125-130.
[8] 吴建发,朱维耀,张德良,等.页岩气藏两相流固耦合无网格数值模拟[J].特种油气藏,2023,30(4):96-103.
WU Jianfa,ZHU Weiyao,ZHANG Deliang,et al.Non-grid numerical simulation of two-phase fluid-solid coupling for shale gas reservoir[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2023,30(4):96-103.
[9] YANG Y,APLIN A C.Permeability and petrophysical properties of 30 natural mudstones[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,2007,112(B03206):1-14.
[10] CHALMERS G R L,ROSS D J K,BUSTIN R M.Geological controls on matrix permeability of Devonian gas shales in the Horn River and Liard Basins,Northeastern British Columbia,Canada[J].International Journal of Coal Geology,2012,103(23):120-131.
[11] 马东旭.页岩气藏多重介质流-固耦合渗流规律研究[D].北京:北京科技大学,2019.
MA Dongxu.Study on fluid-solid coupling in multiple medium and its influence on seepage law for shale gas reservoirs[D].Beijing:University of Science and Technology Beijing,2019.
[12] WALSH J B,GROSENBAUGH M A.A new model for analyzing the effect of fractures on compressibility[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,1979,84(B7):3532-3536.
[13] 乔丽苹,王者超,李术才.基于Tight gas致密砂岩储层渗透率的有效应力特性研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2011,30(7):1422-1427.
QIAO Liping,WANG Zhechao,LI Shucai.Effective stress law for permeability of Tight gas reservoir sandstone[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2011,30(7):1422-1427.
[14] 朱维耀,马东旭,亓倩,等.复杂缝网页岩压裂水平井多区耦合产能分析[J].天然气工业,2017,37(7):60-68.
ZHU Weiyao,MA Dongxu,QI Qian,et al.Multi-zone coupling productivity of horizontal well fracturing with complex fracture networks in shale gas reservoirs[J].Natural Gas Industry,2017,37(7):60-68.
[15] 朱维耀,陈震,宋智勇,等.中国页岩气开发理论与技术研究进展[J].工程科学学报,2021,43(10):1397-1412.
ZHU Weiyao,CHEN Zhen,SONG Zhiyong,et al.Research progress in theories and technologies of shale gas development in China[J].Chinese Journal of Engineering,2021,43(10):1397-1412.
[16] 张宏学.页岩储层渗流-应力耦合模型及应用[D].北京:中国矿业大学,2015.
ZHANG Hongxue.Seepage and stress coupling model for shale reservoir and its application[D].Beijing:China University of Mining and Technology,2015.
[17] 陈更生, 石学文, 刘勇, 等. 四川盆地南部地区五峰组-龙马溪组深层页岩气富集控制因素新认识[J]. 天然气工业, 2024, 44(1): 58-71.
CHEN Gengsheng, SHI Xuewen, LIU Yong, et al. New understandings of the factors controlling of deep shale gas enrichment in the Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation of the southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2024, 44(1): 58-71.
[18] 吴永辉, 姜振学, 吴建发, 等. 渝西地区高含水页岩气藏特征、形成机理及地质意义[J]. 天然气工业, 2024, 44(8): 58-71.
WU Yonghui, JIANG Zhenxue, WU Jianfa, et al. Characteristics, formation mechanism and geological implications of high water-cut shale gas reservoirs in western Chongqing Area[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2024, 44(8): 58-71.
文章导航

/