松辽盆地南部大安地区青山口组一段页岩储层微观孔隙结构

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2023.05.008

特种油气藏 ›› 2023, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5): 58-66.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2023.05.008

松辽盆地南部大安地区青山口组一段页岩储层微观孔隙结构

张玥¹, 汤济广^1,2, 胡美玲³, 秦德超¹, 冯涛¹

1.长江大学,湖北武汉 430100;
2.非常规油气省部共建协同创新中心,湖北武汉 430100;
3.中国石油华北油田分公司,河北任丘 062552

收稿日期:2022-12-19 修回日期:2023-06-18 出版日期:2023-10-25 发布日期:2023-12-25
通讯作者: 汤济广(1978—),男,教授,2002年毕业于中国地质大学(武汉)石油天然气地质专业,2007年毕业于该校矿产普查与勘探专业,获博士学位,现从事油气构造与成藏、非常规油气资源评价教学与科研工作。
作者简介:张玥(1998—),女,2020年毕业于山西师范大学地理科学专业,现为长江大学地质工程专业在读硕士研究生,主要从事非常规油气地质勘探方面的研究。
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项“大型油气田及煤层气开发”子课题“我国含油气盆地深层油气分布规律与资源评价”(2017ZX05008-006);非常规油气省部共建协同创新中心开放基金项目“复杂构造区页岩气双向封闭评价体系构建与保存-逸散模型建立”(UOG2022-16)

Microscopic Pore Structure of Shale Reservoir in Member 1 of Qingshankou Formation, Daan Area of southern Songliao Basin

Zhang Yue¹, Tang Jiguang^1,2, Hu Meiling³, Qin Dechao¹, Feng Tao¹

1. Yangtze University, Wuhan, Hubei 430100, China;
2. Cooperative Innovation Center of Unconventional Oil and Gas, Wuhan, Hubei 430100, China;
3. PetroChina North China Oilfield Company, Renqiu, Hebei 062552, China

Received:2022-12-19 Revised:2023-06-18 Online:2023-10-25 Published:2023-12-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 储层的微观孔隙结构特征是评价页岩储层储集性能、资源丰度和“甜点”的重要因素。针对松辽盆地南部大安地区青一段页岩微观孔隙结构特征不明确的问题,利用氩离子剖光—扫描电镜、高压压汞、恒速压汞、CT扫描和核磁共振等测试方法,联合表征研究区青一段页岩储层储集空间类型、孔喉半径分布、连通性及流体可动性特征。研究结果表明:大安地区青一段页岩储层属于黏土质页岩相及混合质页岩相,平均孔隙度为5.95%,平均渗透率为0.041 6 mD,属于特低孔超低渗、超低孔超低渗致密型及超致密型储集空间。划分出8种储集空间类型,微裂缝、喉道连通了储集空间,改善了储层物性,储层可动流体百分比为27%～47%。结合储层含油性特征,预测研究区I类有利储层面积约为300 km²,Ⅱ类有利储层面积约为650 km²,具有良好的勘探开发前景。研究成果可为研究区页岩储层微观孔隙结构评价提供技术支撑。

关键词: 页岩储层, 青山口组, 微观孔隙结构, 储集空间, 松辽盆地, 大安地区

Abstract: The microscopic pore structure characteristics of reservoirs are important factors in evaluating the reservoir performance, resource abundance and "sweet spot" of shale reservoirs. To address the problem of unclear microscopic pore structure characteristics of the shale in Member 1 of Qingshankou Formation, Daan Area of southern Songliao Basin, argon ion polishing and scanning electron microscope, high-pressure mercury injection, constant-speed mercury injection,CT scanning and nuclear magnetic resonance were used to jointly characterize the reservoir space type, pore throat radius distribution, connectivity and fluid mobility of the Member 1 of Qingshankou Formation. The results of the study show that the reservoir in Member 1 of Qingshankou Formation, Daan Area belongs to clay shale facies and mixed shale facies, with an average porosity of 5.95% and an average permeability of 0.041 6 mD, and belongs to extra-low pore ultra-low permeability, ultra-low pore ultra-low permeability tight and ultra-tight reservoir space. Eight types of reservoir space types are divided.Micro-fractures and throats connect the reservoir space, improving the reservoir physical properties, and the percentage of mobile fluid in the reservoir ranges from 27% to 47%. Combined with the oil-bearing characteristics of the reservoir, it is predicted that the area of favorable reservoir of Class I in the study area is about 300 km², and that of Class Ⅱ is about 650 km², which has good prospect of exploration and development. The study results can provide a more accurate scheme for microscopic pore structure evaluation of shale reservoirs in the study area.

Key words: shale reservoir, Qingshankou Formation, microscopic pore structure, reservoir space, Songliao Basin, Daan Area

中图分类号:

TE122.2

张玥, 汤济广, 胡美玲, 秦德超, 冯涛. 松辽盆地南部大安地区青山口组一段页岩储层微观孔隙结构[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(5): 58-66.

Zhang Yue, Tang Jiguang, Hu Meiling, Qin Dechao, Feng Tao. Microscopic Pore Structure of Shale Reservoir in Member 1 of Qingshankou Formation, Daan Area of southern Songliao Basin[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2023, 30(5): 58-66.

参考文献

[1] 赵文智,胡素云,侯连华,等.中国陆相页岩油类型、资源潜力及与致密油的边界[J].石油勘探与开发,2020,47(1):1-10.
ZHAO Wenzhi,HU Suyun,HOU Lianhua,et al.Types and resource potential of continental shale oil in China and its boundary with tight oil[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2020,47(1):1-10.
[2] 赵文智,朱如凯,刘伟,等.我国陆相中高熟页岩油富集条件与分布特征[J].地学前缘,2023,30(1):116-127.
ZHAO Wenzhi,ZHU Rukai,LIU Wei,et al.Lacustrine medium-high maturity shale oil in onshore China:enrichment conditions and occurrence features[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2023,30(1):116-127.
[3] 马永生,蔡勋育,赵培荣,等.中国陆相页岩油地质特征与勘探实践[J].地质学报,2022,96(1):155-157.
MA Yongsheng,CAI Xunyu,ZHAO Peirong,et al.Geological characteristics and exploration practices of continental shale oil in China[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2022,96(1):155-157.
[4] 柳波,孙嘉慧,张永清,等.松辽盆地长岭凹陷白垩系青山口组一段页岩油储集空间类型与富集模式[J].石油勘探与开发,2021,48(3):521-535.
LIU Bo,SUN Jiahui,ZHANG Yongqing,et al.Reservoir space and enrichment model of shale oil in the first member of Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation in the Changling Sag,southern Songliao Basin,NE China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2021,48(3):521-535.
[5] 朱国文,王小军,张金友,等.松辽盆地陆相页岩油富集条件及勘探开发有利区[J].石油学报,2023,44(1):110-124.
ZHU Guowen,WANG Xiaojun,ZHANG Jinyou,et al.Enrichment conditions and favorable zones for exploration and development of continental shale oil in Songliao Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2023,44(1):110-124.
[6] 邢济麟.松辽盆地南部青一段页岩油“甜点”评价[J].矿产勘查,2019,10(9):2286-2290.
XING Jilin.“Dessert” evaluation of shale oil in Qingyi Formation of southern Songliao Basin[J].Mineral Exploration,2019,10(9):2286-2290.
[7] 张冰.松辽盆地北部页岩储层地质评价及关键技术研究[J].特种油气藏,2022,29(5):72-79.
ZHANG Bing.Study on geological evaluation and key technologies for shale reservoirs in northern Songliao Basin[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2022,29(5):72-79.
[8] 张安达,王继平,王永超,等.松辽盆地古龙页岩储集空间类型及油赋存状态[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2021,40(5):68-77.
ZHANG Anda,WANG Jiping,WANG Yongchao,et al.Reservoir space types and oil occurrence of Gulong shale in Songliao Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2021,40(5):68-77.
[9] 张君峰,徐兴友,白静,等.松辽盆地南部白垩系青一段深湖相页岩油富集模式及勘探实践[J].石油勘探与开发,2020,47(4):637-652.
ZHANG Junfeng,XU Xingyou,BAI Jing,et al.Enrichment and exploration of deep lacustrine shale oil in the first member of Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation,southern Songliao Basin,NE China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2020,47(4):637-652.
[10] 柳波,石佳欣,付晓飞,等.陆相页岩层系岩相特征与页岩油富集条件——以松辽盆地古龙凹陷白垩系青山口组一段富有机质页岩为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2018,45(5):828-838.
LIU Bo,SHI Jiaxin,FU Xiaofei,et al.Lithofacies characteristics and shale oil enrichment conditions of continental shale strata series:a case study of organic matter-rich shale in the first member of Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation in Gulong Sag,Songliao Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2018,45(5):828-838.
[11] 张鑫.松辽盆地南部中浅层沉积演化与油气分布[D].青岛:中国海洋大学,2009.
ZHANG Xin.Sedimentary evolution and oil/gas distribution in the middle and shallow layers in southern Songliao Basin[D].Qingdao:Ocean University of China,2009.
[12] 鲁洪江,邢正岩,王永诗.压汞和退汞资料在储层评价中的综合应用探讨[J].油气采收率技术,1997,4(2):53-58.
LU Hongjiang,XING Zhengyan,WANG Yongshi.Comprehensive application of intrusive mercury and mercury ejection data to reservoir evaluation[J].Oil and Gas Recovery Efficiency Technology,1997,4(2):53-58.
[13] 张文凯,施泽进,田亚铭,等.联合高压压汞和恒速压汞实验表征致密砂岩孔喉特征[J].断块油气田,2021,28(1):14-20.
ZHANG Wenkai,SHI Zejin,TIAN Yaming,et al.The combination of high-pressure mercury injection and rate-controlled mercury injection to characterize the pore-throat structure in tight sandstone reservoirs[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2021,28(1):14-20.
[14] 卢双舫,李俊乾,张鹏飞,等.页岩油储层微观孔喉分类与分级评价[J].石油勘探与开发,2018,45(3):436-444.
LU Shuangfang,LI Junqian,ZHANG Pengfei,et al.Classification of microscopic pore-throats and the grading evaluation on shale oil reservoirs[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2018,45(3):436-444.
[15] 王静,郗兆栋,陆冬华.基于恒速压汞技术研究页岩气储层孔隙结构:以湘西北地区五峰组页岩为例[J].地质与勘探,2021,57(2):450-456.
WANG Jing,XI Zhaodong,LU Donghua.Porestructure of shale gas reservoirs revealed by constant-speed mercury injection experiments:a case study of Wufeng Formation shale from northwestern Hunan Province[J].Geology & Exploration,2021,57(2):450-456.
[16] 况晏,司马立强,瞿建华,等.致密砂砾岩储层孔隙结构影响因素及定量评价——以玛湖凹陷玛131井区三叠系百口泉组为例[J].岩性油气藏,2017,29(4):91-100.
KUANG Yan,SIMA Liqiang,QU Jianhua,et al.Influencing factors and quantitative evaluation for pore structure of tight glutenitereservoir:a case of the Triassic Baikouquan Formation in Ma 131 Well Field,Mahu Sag[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2017,29(4):91-100.
[17] 白斌,朱如凯,吴松涛,等.利用多尺度CT成像表征致密砂岩微观孔喉结构[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(3):329-333.
BAI Bin,ZHU Rukai,WU Songtao,et al.Multi-scale method of Nano(Micro)-CT study on microscopic pore structure of tight sandstone of Yanchang Formation,Ordos Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(3):329-333.
[18] 李易霖,张云峰,丛琳,等.X-CT扫描成像技术在致密砂岩微观孔隙结构表征中的应用——以大安油田扶余油层为例[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2016,46(2):379-387.
LI Yilin,ZHANG Yunfeng,CONG Lin,et al.Application of X-CT scanning technique in the characterization of micro pore structure of tight sandstone reservoir:an example from Fuyu Oil Layer in Daan Oilfield[J].Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2016,46(2):379-387.
[19] 李太伟,郭和坤,李海波,等.应用核磁共振技术研究页岩气储层可动流体[J].特种油气藏,2012,19(1):107-109.
LI Taiwei,GUO Hekun,LI Haibo,et al.Research on movable fluids in shale gas reservoirs with NMR technology[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2012,19(1):107-109.
[20] 姜在兴,张文昭,梁超,等.页岩油储层基本特征及评价要素[J].石油学报,2014,35(1):184-196.
JIANG Zaixing,ZHANG Wenzhao,LIANG Chao,et al.Characteristics and evaluation elements of shale oil reservoir[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2014,35(1):184-196.
[21] 赵明珠,杨威,王耀华,等.陆相页岩储层连通孔隙系统分布与形成机制——以川西坳陷上三叠统须家河组为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2022, 44(1): 170-179.
ZHAO Mingzhu, YANG Wei, WANG Yaohua, et al.Distribution and genetic mechanisms of connected pore systems in continental shale reservoirs: a case study of Xujiahe Formation of Upper Triassic, western Sichuan Depression[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2022, 44(1): 170-179.
[22] 杨振恒,陶国亮,鲍云杰,等.南方海相深层页岩气储集空间差异化发育及保持机理探讨[J]. 石油实验地质, 2022, 44(5): 845-853.
YANG Zhenheng, TAO Guoliang, BAO Yunjie, et al. Differential development and maintenance mechanism of reservoir space for marine shale gas in south China's deep strata[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2022, 44(5): 845-853.
[23] 郝绵柱,姜振学,聂舟,等.深层页岩储层孔隙连通性发育特征及其控制因素:以川南地区龙马溪组为例[J].断块油气田,2022,29(6):761-768.
HAO Mianzhu,JIANG Zhenxue,NIE Zhou,et al.Development characteristics of pore connectivity in deep shale reservoirs and its controlling factors: a case study of Longmaxi Formation in southern Sichuan Basin[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2022,29(6):761-768.
[24] 赵越, 李磊, 司运航,等.浅层页岩气储层孔隙分形特征及控制因素:以云南昭通地区龙马溪组为例[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(6):1813-1829.
ZHAO Yue, LI lei, SI Yunhang,et al. Fractal characteristics and controlling factors of pores in shallow shale gas reservoirs: a case study of Longmaxi Formation in Zhaotong Area, Yunnan Province[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2022, 52(6):1813-1829.

松辽盆地南部大安地区青山口组一段页岩储层微观孔隙结构

Microscopic Pore Structure of Shale Reservoir in Member 1 of Qingshankou Formation, Daan Area of southern Songliao Basin

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	赵晨旭, 李忠诚, 郭世超, 鲍志东, 魏兆胜, 李磊, 王海龙. 松辽盆地南部长岭断陷青一段陆相页岩地球化学和沉积环境特征[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(6): 55-61.
[2]	高微. 砂体油气输导优势路径分布预测方法及其应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(6): 92-98.
[3]	周志军, 张国青, 崔春雪, 王静怡, 王娟. 不同岩性页岩油储集空间及物性特征[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(5): 42-49.
[4]	秦迎峰. 松辽盆地三肇凹陷葡萄花油层油气成藏主控因素及成藏模式[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(4): 28-34.
[5]	张冰. 松辽盆地北部页岩储层地质评价及关键技术研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(5): 72-79.
[6]	谢佳彤, 付小平, 秦启荣, 范存辉, 倪楷, 黄曼宁. 丁山地区页岩储层裂缝分布预测及页岩气保存条件评价[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(1): 1-9.
[7]	张震, 万秀梅, 吴鹏程, 李郑涛, 文莉. 川南龙马溪组深层页岩井壁失稳原因分析及对策[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(1): 160-168.
[8]	王运增. 敖古拉断裂输导油气有利部位及其对萨葡高油层油气聚集规律的影响[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(4): 10-15.
[9]	卜春明. 松辽盆地北部三肇凹陷扶余致密油层浅水三角洲沉积特征及演化[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(4): 62-71.
[10]	江昱良, 秦启荣, 高瑞琪, 崔靖, 耿超, 范存辉. 蜀南地区二叠系火成岩特征及储集性研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(2): 11-19.
[11]	张盼盼, 刘小平, 关铭, 孙彪. 沧东凹陷孔二段低熟页岩纳米孔隙特征及主控因素[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(2): 20-26.
[12]	肖圣东. 松辽盆地葡萄花油层低阻特征及成因机理研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2020, 27(6): 108-113.
[13]	陈璐, 胡志明, 熊伟, 杨航, 端祥刚, 常进. 基于动量方程的页岩气体扩散能力表征模型与实验研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2020, 27(5): 132-138.
[14]	黄瑞, 陈军斌, 王佳部, 姚欢迎. 考虑水敏性的页岩黏土多相耦合甲烷吸附模型 [J]. 特种油气藏, 2019, 26(5): 92-99.
[15]	王有智,郑洪涛，田彦林. 方正断陷白垩系砂砾岩成岩作用及对储层物性的控制[J]. 特种油气藏, 2019, 26(4): 38-.