特低渗油藏水驱后二氧化碳气水交替驱见效特征

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2020.05.017

特种油气藏 ›› 2020, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (5): 113-117.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2020.05.017

特低渗油藏水驱后二氧化碳气水交替驱见效特征

雷欣慧^1,2, 郑自刚^1,2, 余光明^1,2, 张康^1,2

1.中国石油长庆油田分公司,陕西西安 710018;
2.低渗透油气田勘探开发国家工程实验室,陕西西安 710018

收稿日期:2019-11-20 修回日期:2020-07-06 出版日期:2020-10-25 发布日期:2022-02-18
作者简介:雷欣慧(1984—),女,工程师,2006年毕业于四川大学生物技术专业,2010年毕业于西安石油大学石油工程专业,获硕士学位,现主要从事低渗透油藏提高采收率方面的研究工作。
基金资助:
中国石油重大科技专项“特/超低渗油藏CO₂驱油与埋存油藏工程技术方法研究”(2014E-3602);国家科技重大专项“大型油气田及煤层气开发”子课题“CO₂捕集、驱油与埋存技术示范工程”(2016ZX05056)

Response Characteristics of Gas-water Alternate Flooding with CO₂ after Water Flooding in Ultra-low Permeability Reservoirs

Lei Xinhui^1,2, Zheng Zigang^1,2, Yu Guangming^1,2, Zhang Kang^1,2

1. PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710018, China;
2. Low-permeability Oil & Gas Exploration and Development of National Engineering Laboratory, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710018, China

Received:2019-11-20 Revised:2020-07-06 Online:2020-10-25 Published:2022-02-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为明确特低渗透油藏水驱后CO₂气水交替驱见效特征,通过动静结合的方法,结合物理模拟实验获得的驱替动态数据和高温高压相态系统测定的CO₂在油水中的溶解度静态数据,开展水驱后CO₂气水交替驱动态特征研究。结果表明,CO₂驱过程中适当增加气油比可产出溶解CO₂的油气,在油藏条件下为单相油带,该阶段对驱油效果的贡献率为71.98%。建议油藏方案设计时可适当增大第1周期CO₂段塞的尺寸,并选择在气窜临界点交替水驱,可有效提高CO₂的利用率,并改善驱油效果。该研究结果对气水交替驱注入参数的优选具有一定的指导意义。

关键词: CO₂驱, 特低渗, 气水交替, 驱替特征赋存状态, 相带分布

Abstract: In order to clarify the response characteristics of gas-water alternate flooding with CO₂ after water flooding in ultra-low permeability reservoirs, the research on dynamic characteristics of gas-water alternate flooding with CO₂ was carried out. In the research, through the combination of dynamic and static methods, the dynamic data obtained by physical simulation experiments and the static data of CO₂ solubility in oil-water solution measured in high-temperature and high-pressure phase system were used. The results show that appropriately increasing the gas-oil ratio during the CO₂ flooding process can produce oil and gas to dissolve CO₂, forming a single-phase oil zone under reservoir conditions, and the contribution rate of this stage to the oil displacement effect is 71.98%. It is suggested to appropriately increase the size of the CO₂ slug in the first cycle when designing the reservoir plan, and to select the critical point of gas channeling to inject water, which can effectively increase the utilization rate of CO₂ and improve the oil displacement effect. The research results have a certain guiding significance for the optimization of injection parameters for gas-water alternate flooding.

Key words: CO₂ flooding, ultra-low permeability, gas-water alternation, occurrence state of displacement characteristic, facies zone distribution

中图分类号:

TE357.7

雷欣慧, 郑自刚, 余光明, 张康. 特低渗油藏水驱后二氧化碳气水交替驱见效特征[J]. 特种油气藏, 2020, 27(5): 113-117.

Lei Xinhui, Zheng Zigang, Yu Guangming, Zhang Kang. Response Characteristics of Gas-water Alternate Flooding with CO₂ after Water Flooding in Ultra-low Permeability Reservoirs[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2020, 27(5): 113-117.

参考文献

[1] 史成恩,万晓龙,赵继勇,等.鄂尔多斯盆地超低渗透油层开发特征[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2007,34(5):538-542.
SHI Cheng'en,WAN Xiaolong,ZHAO Jiyong,et al.Development characteristics of super-low permeability oil layers in Ordos Basin,China[J].Journal of Chendu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition),2007,34(5):538-542.
[2] 蔡玥,赵乐,肖淑萍,等.基于恒速压汞的特低—超低渗透储层孔隙结构特征——以鄂尔多斯盆地富县探区长₃油层组为例[J].油气地质与采收率,2013,20(1):32-35.
CAI Yue,ZHAO Le,XIAO Shuping,et al.Study on pore structure characteristics of super-low permeability and ultra-low permeability reservoirs by means of constant-speed mercury intrusion technique-case of oil layers of Chang₃ of the Yanchang Formation in Fuxian exploration area of the Ordos Basin[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2013,20(1):32-35.
[3] 吴忠宝,曾倩,李锦,等.体积改造油藏注水吞吐有效补充地层能量开发的新方式[J].油气地质与采收率,2017,24(5):78-83.
WU Zhongbao,ZENG Qian,LI Jin,et al.New effective energy-supplement development method of waterflood huff and puff for the oil reservoir with stimulated reservoir volume fracturing[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2017,24(5):78-83.
[4] 李晓骁,任晓娟,罗向荣.低渗透致密砂岩储层孔隙结构对渗吸特征的影响[J].油气地质与采收率,2018,25(4):115-120.
LI Xiaoxiao,REN Xiaojuan,LUO Xiangrong.Influence of pore structures on the characteristic of spontaneous imbibition in low-permeability tight sandstone reservoir[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2018,25(4):115-120.
[5] 秦积舜,韩海水,刘晓蕾.美国CO₂驱油技术应用及启示[J].石油勘探与开发,2015,42(2):209-215.
QIN Jishun, HAN Haishui, LIU Xiaolei.Application and enlightenment of carbon dioxide flooding in the United States of America[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2015,42(2):209-215.
[6] 文静,杨明,齐韦林,等.三塘湖盆地牛圈湖油田低孔特低渗储集层特征及形成机理[J].石油实验地质,2018,40(2):141-148.
WEN Jing, YANG Ming, QI Weilin,et al.Characteristics and formation mechanism of low porosity and extra-low permeability reservoirs in the Niujuanhu Oil field, Santanghu Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2018,40(2):141-148.
[7] 罗二辉,胡永乐,李保利,等.中国油气田注CO₂提高采收率实践[J].特种油气藏,2013,20(2):1-7,42.
LUO Erhui,HU Yongle,LI Baoli,et al.Practices of CO₂ EOR in China[J].Special Oil ＆ Gas Reservoirs,2013,20(2):1-7,42.
[8] 赵福麟.EOR原理[M].东营:石油大学出版社,2001:155-161.
ZHAO Fulin.EOR principles[M].Dongying:China University of Petroleum Press,2001:155-161.
[9] 欧阳思琪,孙卫,黄何鑫.多方法协同表征特低渗砂岩储层全孔径孔隙结构:以鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区砂岩储层为例[J].石油实验地质,2018,40(4):595-604.
OUYANG Siqi,SUN Wei,HUANG Hexing.Multi-method synergistic characterization of total pore structure of extra-low permeability sandstone reservoirs: a case study of the Heshui Area of Ordos Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2018,40(4):595-604.
[10] 谷丽冰,李治平,欧瑾.利用二氧化碳提高原油采收率研究进展[J].中国矿业,2007,16(10 ):66-69.
GU Libing,LI Zhiping, OU Jin.The existing state of enhanced oil recovery by utilizing carbon dioxide[J].China Mining Magazine,2007,16(10):66-69.
[11] 张继芬,赵明国,刘中春.提高石油采收率基础[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1992:110-112.
ZHANG Jifen,ZHAO Mingguo,LIU Zhongchun.Foundation of enhance oil recovery efficiency[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1992:110-112.
[12] 吕洲,王玉普,李莉,等.油气储层岩心实验的样本量设计[J].石油实验地质,2018,40(4):589-594.
LYU Zhou,WANG Yupu,LI Li,et al.Sample size design for oil and gas reservoir core-plug experiments[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2018,40(4):589-594.
[13] 郭省学.高温高压条件下CO₂驱稠油微观运移特征[J].油气地质与采收率,2019,26(3):99-104.
GUO Xingxue.Study on microscopic migration characteristics of heavy oil by CO₂ flooding at high temperature and high pressure[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2019,26(3):99-104.
[14] 杜朝锋,武平仓,邵创国,等.长庆油田特低渗透油藏二氧化碳驱提高采收率室内评价[J].油气地质与采收率,2010,17(4):63-64,76.
DU Zhaofeng,WU Pingcang,SHAO Chuangguo,et al.Laboratory study on EOR by CO₂ in extra-low permeability reservoirs,Changqing Oilfield[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2010,17(4):63-64,76.
[15] 付美龙,叶成,熊帆,等.茨34块CO₂驱参数优化与方案设计[J].钻采工艺,2011,34(1):56-58.
FU Meilong,YE Cheng,XIONG Fan,et al.Parameter optimization and recovery scheme of carbon dioxide flooding in Ci-34[J].Drilling ＆ Production Technology,2011,34(1):56-58.
[16] 白索,宋考平,杨二龙,等.CO₂驱水气交替注入参数正交试验设计参数[J].特种油气藏,2011,18(1):105-108.
BAI Suo,SONG Kaoping,YANG Erlong,et al.Optimization of water alternating gas injection parameters of CO₂ flooding based on orthogonal experimental design[J].Special Oil ＆ Gas Reservoirs,2011,18(1):105-108.
[17] 张俊,周自武,王伟胜,等.葡北油田气水交替驱提高采收率矿场试验研究[J].石油勘探与开发,2004,31(6):85-88.
ZHANG Jun,ZHOU Ziwu,WANG Weisheng,et al.EOR field test of gas-water alternative injection in Pubei Oilfield[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2004,31(6):85-88.
[18] SONG Chengyao,YANG Daoyong.Optimization of CO₂ flooding schemes for unlocking resources from tight oil formations[C].SPE162549,2012:1-5.
[19] 尚宝兵,廖新维,卢宁,等.CO₂驱水气交替注采参数优化——以安塞油田王窑区块长₆油藏为例[J].油气地质与采收率,2014,21(3):70-72.
SHANG Baobing,LIAO Xinwei,LU Ning,et al.Optimization design of injection and production parameters for water-alternating-CO₂ flooding:a case study of Chang₆ reservoir of Wangyao Block in Ansai Oilfield[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2014,21(3):70-72.

特低渗油藏水驱后二氧化碳气水交替驱见效特征

Response Characteristics of Gas-water Alternate Flooding with CO₂ after Water Flooding in Ultra-low Permeability Reservoirs

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张金发, 李亭, 吴警宇, 管英柱, 徐摩, 但植华, 周明秀. 特低渗透砂岩储层敏感性评价与酸化增产液研制[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(5): 166-174.
[2]	孙挺, 史海东, 郑建军, 钟小刚, Watheq J, Al-Mudhafar. 页岩储层CO₂驱沥青质沉淀特征及影响因素分析[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(2): 83-90.
[3]	孙大龙, 张广东, 彭旭, 敬豪, 吕华, 任超峰, 王宁. CO₂驱气溶性降混剂提高采收率机理实验[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(1): 134-140.
[4]	石立华, 王维波, 王成俊, 陈龙龙. 基于裂缝径向流物理模型的CO₂驱注入方式研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(3): 112-117.
[5]	周翔, 周丹, 邓家胜, 邓靖译, Ray Rui, 姜哲人. 超临界CO₂驱提高致密油藏采收率实验研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(3): 118-123.
[6]	高冉, 吕成远, 伦增珉, 王锐. 二氧化碳驱替与埋存一体化数值模拟[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(2): 102-107.
[7]	李承龙, 迟博. 一种新型二氧化碳驱特征曲线的建立与应用 [J]. 特种油气藏, 2020, 27(2): 98-102.
[8]	李承龙，苗志国，李照永，张宇. 大庆长垣外围特低渗透油藏开发效果综合评价方法[J]. 特种油气藏, 2019, 26(4): 97-.
[9]	王文涛,刘鹏超,李标,钟家峻,舒杰. 特低渗储层产能模糊综合评价方法研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2019, 26(2): 127-.
[10]	李承龙. 特低渗透油藏二氧化碳驱气窜影响因素及规律[J]. 特种油气藏, 2018, 25(3): 82-.
[11]	黄兴龙，徐阳，曾彦强，徐尚鸿. 玛131井区低渗透砂砾岩油藏水平井优化设计研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2018, 25(3): 97-.
[12]	倪军，王成俊，高怡文. 特低渗表面活性剂驱潜力评价新模型[J]. 特种油气藏, 2018, 25(1): 68-.
[13]	王东琪，殷代印. 特低渗透油藏水驱开发效果评价[J]. 特种油气藏, 2017, 24(6): 107-110.
[14]	王雅春，赵振铎. 压力对二氧化碳驱油效果影响的实验研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2017, 24(4): 132-.
[15]	李志鹏，卜丽侠. 二氧化碳驱油及封存过程中的地质安全界限体系[J]. 特种油气藏, 2017, 24(2): 141-.

特低渗油藏水驱后二氧化碳气水交替驱见效特征

Response Characteristics of Gas-water Alternate Flooding with CO2 after Water Flooding in Ultra-low Permeability Reservoirs

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

Response Characteristics of Gas-water Alternate Flooding with CO₂ after Water Flooding in Ultra-low Permeability Reservoirs