稠油开采技术现状与发展方向初步探讨

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2020.06.004

特种油气藏 ›› 2020, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6): 30-39.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2020.06.004

稠油开采技术现状与发展方向初步探讨

蒋琪¹, 游红娟², 潘竟军², 王中元³, 盖平原⁴, Ian Gates⁵, 刘佳丽¹

1.西南石油大学,四川成都 610500;
2.中国石油新疆油田分公司,新疆克拉玛依 834000;
3.中国石油辽河油田分公司,辽宁盘锦 124010;
4.中国石化胜利油田分公司,山东东营 257000;
5.University of Calgary, Calgary Alberta T₂N 1N4

收稿日期:2020-06-11 修回日期:2020-09-12 出版日期:2020-12-25 发布日期:2022-02-18
作者简介:蒋琪(1963—),男,教授,1983年毕业于西南石油学院采油工程专业,1997年毕业于加拿大卡尔加里大学化学工程专业,获博士学位,现从事稠油开采前沿技术方面的理论研究和现场应用工作。
基金资助:
四川省教育厅重点研发项目“溶剂辅助SAGD改善稠油开采效率技术研究”(2018FZ0070)

Preliminary Discussion on Current Status and Development Direction of Heavy Oil Recovery Technologies

Jiang Qi¹, You Hongjuan², Pan Jingjun², Wang Zhongyuan³, Gai Pingyuan⁴, Ian Gates⁵, Liu Jiali¹

1. Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China;
2. PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Karamay, Xinjiang 834000, China;
3. PetroChina Liaohe Oilfield Company, Panjin, Liaoning 124010, China;
4. Sinopec Shengli Oilfield Company, Dongying, Shandong 257000, China;
5. University of Calgary, Calgary Alberta T₂N 1N4, Canada

Received:2020-06-11 Revised:2020-09-12 Online:2020-12-25 Published:2022-02-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 世界上已发现的原油资源中,稠油储量占比超过2/3。由于稠油黏度高、流动性差,开采难度大,对技术要求高。针对中国稠油油藏类型多和深度变化大的特点,分析总结了国内外稠油开采现状和提高开采效率的主要技术方向,结合现场生产动态,探讨了现有商业化开采技术对不同类型稠油油藏的适应性、应用潜力和面临的主要技术挑战。研究结果表明,蒸汽吞吐仍然是中国稠油开采的主要方式,但大部分油田已经进入到蒸汽吞吐开采的末期,开采效率低,目前成熟接替技术(蒸汽驱、SAGD和火烧油层)的适用油藏范围有限,急需研发新的接替技术;中深层稠油开发技术系列较为成熟,但针对深层、超深层和复杂类型(如裂缝/溶洞性)稠油油藏的提高采收率技术尚不成熟,加强井下产生蒸汽、溶剂辅助、原位改质和气化等前沿技术的研究更具现实意义和应用前景。研究成果对拓展稠油开采技术研究领域和方向具有借鉴和指导作用。

关键词: 稠油开采, 技术现状, 综述, 接替方式, 发展方向

Abstract: Heavy oil reserves account for more than 2/3 of the discovered crude oil resources in the world. Due to the high viscosity and poor fluidity of heavy oil, its recovery is difficult, with high technical requirements. According to the characteristics of many types and large depth changes of heavy oil reservoirs in China, the current status of heavy oil recovery at home and abroad and the main technical direction of improving recovery efficiency were analyzed and summarized; combining with the field production performance, the adaptability, application potential and main technical challenges of existing commercial recovery technologies to different types of heavy oil reservoirs were discussed. The results show that steam huff and puff is still the main method of heavy oil recovery in China. However, most of the oil fields have entered the end period of production, and the recovery efficiency is low. At present, the application scope of mature replacement technologies (steam flooding, SAGD and in-situ combustion) is limited, so it is urgent to develop new replacement technologies. The series of heavy oil development technologies in the middle and deep layers are relatively mature, but the EOR technologies for deep, ultra-deep and complex types (such as fractured/karst cave) of heavy oil reservoirs are not yet mature. It is of more practical significance and application prospect to strengthen the research on frontier technologies such as generating steam downhole, solvent assisted, in-situ upgrading and gasification. The research results can be used for reference and guidance to expand the research field and direction of heavy oil recovery technologies.

Key words: heavy oil recovery, technical status, summarization, replacement pattern, development direction

中图分类号:

TE345

蒋琪, 游红娟, 潘竟军, 王中元, 盖平原, Ian Gates, 刘佳丽. 稠油开采技术现状与发展方向初步探讨[J]. 特种油气藏, 2020, 27(6): 30-39.

Jiang Qi, You Hongjuan, Pan Jingjun, Wang Zhongyuan, Gai Pingyuan, Ian Gates, Liu Jiali. Preliminary Discussion on Current Status and Development Direction of Heavy Oil Recovery Technologies[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2020, 27(6): 30-39.

参考文献

[1] 刘文章.中国稠油热采技术发展历程回顾与展望[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2014:219-222.
LIU Wenzhang.Review and outlook on thermal recovery technology for heavy oil in China[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2014:219-222.
[2] 于连东.世界稠油资源的分布及其开采技术的现状与展望[J].特种油气藏,2001,8(2):98-103.
YU Liandong.Distribution of world heavy oil reserves and its recovery technologies and futrue[J].Special Oil & Gas Resevior,2001,8(2):98-103.
[3] 张庆茹.中国陆上稠油资源潜力及分布特征[J].中外科技情报,2007(1):2.
ZHANG Qingru.Potential and distribution characteristics of onshore heavy oil resources in China[J].China Science and Technology Information,2007(1):2.
[4] COCCO M J,ERNANDEZ J E.Reservoir characterization of Junin Area,Orinoco Oil Belt Region[C].SPE171136,2014:1-10.
[5] Alberta Energy Regulator.Primrose,Wolf Lake,and Burnt Lake annual directive 054 performance presenttation package,Canadian Natural Resources[EB/OL].(2020-02-05)[2020-03-05].https://www.aer.ca/providing-information/data-and-reports/activity-and-data/in-situ-performance-presentations.html.
[6] Alberta Energy Regulator.Imperial Cold Lake operations directive 54 annual submission [EB/OL].(2019-11-08)[2020-03-05].https://www.aer.ca/providing-information/data-and-reports/activity-and-data/in-situ-performance-presentations.html.
[7] STARK S D.Cold Lake commercialization of liquid addition to steam for enhancing recovery (LASER) process[C].IPTC16795,2013:1-15.
[8] 何万军,鲍海娟,马鸿,等.超稠油油藏小井距蒸汽吞吐转蒸汽驱先导试验[J].特种油气藏,2014,21(4):130-133.
HE Wanjun,BAO Haijuan,MA Hong,et al.Pilot test of steam drive after huff-puff for ultra-heavy oil reservoir with small well spacing[J].Special Oil & Gas Resevior,2014,21(4):130-133.
[9] ZHANG S L,ZHANG Y T,WANG S H,et al.Status of heavy-oil development in China[C].SPE97844,2005:1-5.
[10] STEVENSON J K,BEHRENS R A,CASSIDY S D.Using San Joaquin Valley oil fields as a technology test bed to mature steamflood technology[C].SPE154172,2012:1-9.
[11] SILALAHI H,AJI M,ELISA A,et al.Advancing steamflood performance through a new integrated optimization process:transform the concept into practical[C].SPE196249,2019:1-27.
[12] GAEL B T,GROSS S J,MCNABOE G J.Development planning and reservoir management in the Duri steam flood[C].SPE29668,1995:1-14.
[13] BUTLER R M,MCNAB G S,LO H Y.Theoretical studies on the gravity drainage of heavy oil during in-situ steam heating[J].Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering,1981,59(4):455-460.
[14] BUTLER R M.Thermal recovery of oil and bitumen[M].New Jersey:Prentice Hall Publishing Company,1991:232-289.
[15] SUHAG A,RANJITH R,BALAJI K,et al.Optimization of steamflooding heavy oil reservoirs[C].SPE185653,2017:1-35.
[16] Alberta Energy Regulator.Suncor firebag 2019 AER performance presentation commercial scheme approval No.8870 [EB/OL].(2018-03-01 to 2019-02-28)[2020-03-08].https://www.aer.ca/doc-uments/oilsands/insitu-presentations/2019AthabascaSuncorFirebag8870-Presentation.pdf.
[17] Alberta Energy Regulator.Cenovus Energy Inc.Foster Creek in-situ progress report scheme 8623 2018 update subsurface [EB/OL].(2019-03-15)[2020-04-02].https://www.aer.ca/providing-information/data-and-reports/activity-and-data/in-situ-performance-presentations.html.
[18] Alberta Energy Regulator.Cnrl jackfish in situ project directive 54 annual performance presentation,commercial scheme approval 10097 (as amended) [EB/OL].(2019-11)[2020-04-08].https://www.aer.ca/documents/oilsands/insitu-presentations/2019AthabascaCNRLJackfish10097.pdf.
[19] Alberta Energy Regulator.ConocoPhillips annual surmont SAGD performance review approval 9426;Calgary,Alberta,Canada[EB/OL].(2019-04-24)[2020-04-12].https://www.aer.ca/documents/oilsands/insitu-presentations/2019AthabascaConocoSurmontSAGD94609426.pdf.
[20]Alberta Energy Regulator.Meg energy Christina Lake regional project,2018/2019 performance presentation commercial scheme approval No.10773[EB/OL].(2019-07-18)[2020-04-30].https://www.aer.ca/documents/oilsands/insitu-presentations/2019MEGChristinaLakeSAGD10773.pdf.
[21] NESPOR K,CHACIN J,ORTIZ J,et al.An overview of the field performance of tubing deployed flow control devices in the Surmont SAGD project[C].SPE198704,2019:1-17.
[22] HADVAND M,CAMICHAEL P,RODRIGUEZ M,et al.Integration of 4D seismic in steam-assisted-gravity-drainage reservoir characterization[J].SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering,2019,22(1):207-218.
[23] GUPTA S,GITTINS S,BENZVI A,et al.Feasibility of wilder well spacing with solvent aided process:a field test based investigation[C].SPE174411,2015:1-20.
[24] 王诗.氮气辅助SAGD在曙一区超稠油油藏的应用[J].中国石油和化工标准与质量,2017,37(13):102-103.
WANG Shi.Application of nitrogen-assisted SAGD in super heavy oil reservoir of Shu1 Area[J].China Petroleum and Chemical Standard and Quality,2017,37(13):102-103.
[25] 刘振宇,张明波,周大胜,等.曙光油田杜84块馆陶超稠油油藏SAGP开发研究[J].特种油气藏,2013,20(6):96-98.
LIU Zhenyu,ZHANG Mingbo,ZHOU Dasheng,et al.Study on SAGP for Guantao super heavy oil reservoir in Block Du84[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2013,20(6):96-98.
[26] 辛坤烈.烟道气辅助SAGD技术研究与现场试验[J].中外能源,2017,22(7):52-56.
XIN Kunlie.Study and field experiment of flue gas assisted SAGD[J].Sino-Global Energy,2017,22(7):52-56.
[27] TURTA A T,CHATTOPADHYAY S K,BHATTACHARYA R N,et al.Current status of commercial in situ combustion projects worldwide[J].Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology,2007,46(11):8-14.
[28] HUANG J H,TANG J S,XI C F,et al.Fire-flooding technologies in post-steam-injected heavy oil reservoir:a successful example of CNPC[C].SPE165436,2013:1-10.
[29] TENG L,SONG H,ZHANG S,et al.Investigation on in-situ combustion in Du66,a multilayered heavy oil reservoir,Liaohe Oilfield[C].SPE186173,2017:1-11.
[30] WU Y,WANG Z Y,HAN B,et al.Feasibility of SAGD as a follow-up process to CSS for a massive deep bitumen reservoir[C].SPE189750,2018:1-13.
[31] MINISH T M,YULE D J.Low cost production gains from CHOPS wells with extremely viscous oils[C].SPE157913,2012:1-9.
[32] DUSSEAULT M B, MA Y Q,XU B C, et al.CHOPS in Jilin Province,China[C].SPE79032,2002:1-7.
[33] 姚迪.稠油油藏聚合物驱潜力评价方法研究[D].大庆:东北石油大学,2018.
YAO Di.Study on evaluation method of polymer flooding potential in heavy oil reservoir[D].Daqing:Northeast Petroleum University,2018.
[34] LIU Y G,ZOU J,HAN X D,et al.Design and experimental study of new-type supercritical steam and flue gas generator for offshore oilfield[C]. IPTC19055,2019:1-8.
[35] ZHU J Y,SHI C L,DONG C R,et al.Ultra heavy oil production experience in China[C].SPE192302,2018:1-19.
[36] LI B Z,ZHANG J,KANG X D,et al.Review and prospect of the development and field application of China offshore chemical EOR technology[C]. SPE197181,2019:1-9.
[37] ESON R L.Downhole steam generator-field tests[C].SPE10745,1982:1-8.
[38] CASTROGIOVANNI A,FITZPATRICK A N,WARE C H.Benefits and technical challenges of downhole steam generation for enhanced oil recovery[C]. SPE149500,2011:1-11.
[39] HASCAKIR B,NOYNAERT S,PRENTICE J A.Heavy oil extraction on texas with a novel downhole steam generation method:a field-scale experiement[C]. SPE191392,2018:1-10.
[40]蒋琪,孙新革,郑南方.电加热辅助重力泄油装置:201821146620.6[P].2019-02-22.
JIANG Qi,SUN Xinge,ZHENG Nanfang.Electric heating assisted gravity drainage device:201821146620.6[P].2019-02-22.

稠油开采技术现状与发展方向初步探讨

Preliminary Discussion on Current Status and Development Direction of Heavy Oil Recovery Technologies

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	沈振振, 王铭伟, 高勇, 吴玟, 程欣, 冯晓伟, 邓圣学. 水平井找水方法及堵水技术综述[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(2): 10-19.
[2]	汪洋, 黄延明, 同鑫, 葛政廷, 陈峻, 吴頔, 吉少文, 肖飞. 剩余油研究方法综述[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(1): 14-21.
[3]	李相方, 马宏斌, 杨戬, 符永江, 郑利民. 蒸汽驱机理再认识及全生命周期开发研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2020, 27(6): 67-74.
[4]	贾晓飞，雷光伦，孙召勃. 不同泄油模式边水油藏水平井产能及见水规律研究进展[J]. 特种油气藏, 2018, 25(5): 1-.
[5]	明瑞卿，贺会群，唐纯静，胡强法. 连续管检测监控技术[J]. 特种油气藏, 2017, 24(3): 164-.
[6]	浮历沛，张贵才，葛际江，廖凯丽，李侠清. 高通道压裂非均匀铺砂技术研究进展[J]. 特种油气藏, 2016, 23(5): 1-.
[7]	王代刚,胡永乐,孙静静. 非均质油藏深部调驱技术数值模拟研究进展[J]. 特种油气藏, 2015, 22(3): 8-.
[8]	关宝文，郭建明，杨燕，赵恒，郑建京. 油气储层裂缝预测方法及发展趋势[J]. 特种油气藏, 2014, 21(1): 12-.
[9]	赵修太，付敏杰，王增宝，董林燕，唐金玉. 稠油热采调堵体系研究进展综述[J]. 特种油气藏, 2013, 20(4): 1-4.
[10]	邱正松，赵欣. 深水钻井液技术现状与发展趋势[J]. 特种油气藏, 2013, 20(3): 1-7.
[11]	阚亮李吉君宋方宇张文华张东伟. 油气包裹体实验分析现状和发展方向[J]. , 2012, 19(5): 1-.
[12]	张方礼. 火烧油层技术综述[J]. , 2011, 18(6): 1-.
[13]	汪双清沈斌孙玮琳. 稠油开采过程中储层内有机质分异研究[J]. , 2011, 18(3): 1-.
[14]	宋小勇. 重力流沉积研究综述[J]. , 2010, 17(6): 1-.
[15]	张大椿刘晓李远亮. 凝析气藏井筒积液的诊断及排除方法综述[J]. , 2009, 16(3): 1-.