基于低场核磁共振技术的煤储层孔裂隙分形模型适用性分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2024.05.010

特种油气藏 ›› 2024, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 85-94.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2024.05.010

基于低场核磁共振技术的煤储层孔裂隙分形模型适用性分析

任海鹰^1,2,3, 温书鹏⁴, 侯建军⁴, 孔令飞⁴, 周泽妮³, 郭志军^1,2

1.自然资源部复杂构造区非常规天然气评价与开发重点实验室,贵州贵阳 550000;
2.贵州省油气勘查开发工程研究院,贵州贵阳 550000;
3.贵州大学,贵州贵阳 550025;
4.贵州省煤田地质局,贵州贵阳 550025

收稿日期:2023-05-08 修回日期:2024-06-01 出版日期:2024-10-25 发布日期:2024-12-24
通讯作者: 温书鹏(1982—),男,高级工程师,2007年毕业于河南理工大学地理信息系统专业,2015年毕业于中国矿业大学(徐州)地质工程专业,获硕士学位,现从事煤炭及煤层气开发研究。
作者简介:任海鹰(1984—),男,高级工程师,2007年毕业于中国矿业大学(徐州)地质工程专业,2015年毕业于中国地质大学(北京)地质工程专业,获硕士学位,现从事煤炭及煤层气开发研究。
基金资助:
贵州省地质勘查资金项目“毕节试验区煤层气资源调查评价与开发技术研究”(52000021MGQSE7S7K6PRP)

Applicability Analysis of Fractal Model with Poricidal Fracture in Coal Bed Based on Low-field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Technology

Ren Haiying^1,2,3, Wen Shupeng⁴, Hou Jianjun⁴, Kong Lingfei⁴, Zhou Zeni³, Guo Zhijun^1,2

1. Key Laboratory of Evaluation and Development of Unconventional Natural Gas in Complex Structure Zone, Ministry of Natural Resources of the People′s Republic of China, Guiyang, Guizhou 550000, China;
2. Research Institute of Oil & Gas Exploration and Development, GuiYang, Guizhou 550000, China;
3. Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou 550025,China;
4. Guizhou Administration of Coal Geology, Guiyang, Guizhou 550025,China

Received:2023-05-08 Revised:2024-06-01 Online:2024-10-25 Published:2024-12-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了研究煤储层孔裂隙分布非均质性,揭示煤层气藏赋存状态和传输特性,以黔西多煤层发育区9块二叠统龙潭组中高阶煤样为例,利用饱和-离心测试方法进行煤样核磁共振(NMR)测试,明确样品可动水、束缚水分布及孔裂隙结构特征;通过单重和多重分形理论进行煤样孔裂隙分布非均质性的定量表征,探讨不同分维值与孔隙结构参数的相关性。研究表明:单重分形模型能够更好地表征不同流体状态或孔隙分布的非均质性,而多重分形模型则更适用于表征孔裂隙分布的非均质性;单重分形参数中,渗流孔分维值(D₂)和总分维值(D_T)表现为弱负相关性;多重分形参数中,随着吸附孔孔隙体积增加,谱宽D_-10—D₁₀呈线性增大,谱宽D_-10—D₀变化较小;样品可划分为吸附孔发育型和渗流孔发育型2类,前者普遍发育小孔,孔径分布呈“双峰态”,后者普遍发育大孔,孔径分布呈“单峰或双峰态”;随着渗流孔孔隙体积减小,渗流孔和孔隙总体分布非均质性增加;吸附孔孔隙是影响孔裂隙分布的主要因素,对煤储层孔裂隙结构的多重分形特征具有明显的控制作用。单重分形模型和多重分形模型在物理意义上存在一定的差异,但都对研究煤储层的孔裂隙结构提供了重要的理论支持。

关键词: 煤储层, 孔裂隙, 非均质性, 分形模型, 核磁共振, 黔西—滇东

Abstract: To study the heterogeneity of pore and fracture distribution in coal bed and reveal the occurrence state and transmission characteristics of coalbed methane reservoirs, taking the high-order coal samples of the Permian Longtan Formation at 9 Blocks in the multi-coal seam development zone of western Guizhou as an example, the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) test of coal samples is performed using saturation-centrifugation test method to define the distribution of movable water and irreducible water, and the characteristics of pore fracture structure. Quantitative characterization of the heterogeneity of pore fracture distribution in coal samples is conducted through single tractal theroy and multi-fractal theory, and the correlation between different fractal dimension values and pore structure parameters is discussed. The results show that the single-fractal model can better characterize the heterogeneity of different fluid states or pore distribution range, while the multi-fractal model is more suitable for characterizing the heterogeneity of pore fracture distribution. In the single-fractal parameters, the fractal dimension value (D₂) of the seepage pore and the total fractal dimension value (D_T) show a weak negative correlation; in the multi-fractal parameters, with the increase of the pore volume of the adsorption pore, the spectral width (D_-10-D₁₀) increases linearly and has a slight variance. The samples can be divided into two categories, that is, adsorption pore development and seepage pore development. The type of adsorption pore generally develops fine pores,with a "bimodal pore size" distribution, while the type of seepage pore generally develops large pores with a "uni-modal or bimodal pore size" distribution. As the volume of the seepage pore decreases, the heterogeneity of the seepage pores and the overall distribution of pores increases. The adsorption porosity is the main factor affecting the distribution of pore and fracture, and it plays a significant controlling role in the multi-fractal characteristics of pore and fracture structure in coal reservoirs. There are certain differences in physical significance between the single-fractal model and the multi-fractal model, but both provide important theoretical support for the study of the pore fracture structure of coal reservoirs.

Key words: coal bed, pore fracture, heterogeneity, fractal model, nuclear magnetic resonance, western Guizhou-eastern Yunnan

中图分类号:

TE122

任海鹰, 温书鹏, 侯建军, 孔令飞, 周泽妮, 郭志军. 基于低场核磁共振技术的煤储层孔裂隙分形模型适用性分析[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(5): 85-94.

Ren Haiying, Wen Shupeng, Hou Jianjun, Kong Lingfei, Zhou Zeni, Guo Zhijun. Applicability Analysis of Fractal Model with Poricidal Fracture in Coal Bed Based on Low-field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Technology[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2024, 31(5): 85-94.

参考文献

[1] 李松,汤达祯,许浩,等.应力条件制约下不同埋深煤储层物性差异演化[J].石油学报,2015,36(增刊1):68-75.
LI Song,TANG Dazhen,XU Hao,et al.Evolution of physical differences in various buried depth of coal reservoirs under constraint of stress[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(S1):68-75.
[2] 樊祺章,蔡益栋,贝金翰,等.煤岩演化程度对煤储层孔裂隙结构的控制作用[J].现代地质,2020,34(2):273-280.
FAN Qizhang,CAI Yidong,BEI Jinhan,et al.Pore and fracture structure of coal reservoir constrained by coal metamorphism[J].Geoscience,2020,34(2):273-280.
[3] 张军建.中高阶煤储层孔裂隙结构及多层合采孔渗动态研究[D].徐州:中国矿业大学(徐州),2020.
ZHANG Junjian.Pore-fracture system characterization and dynamic variation of porosity-permeability duirng multi-layer drainage in middle and high rank coal reservoirs[D].Xuzhou:China University of Mining and Technology(Xuzhou),2020.
[4] 何发岐,董昭雄.深部煤层气资源开发潜力——以鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2022,43(2):277-285.
HE Faqi,DONG Zhaoxiong.Development potential of deep coalbed methane:a case study in the Daniudi gas field,Ordos Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2022,43(2):277-285.
[5] 郭旭升,周德华,赵培荣,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地石炭系—二叠系煤系非常规天然气勘探开发进展与攻关方向[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2022,43(5):1013-1023.
GUO Xusheng,ZHOU Dehua,ZHAO Peirong,et al.Progresses and directions of unconventional natural gas exploration and development in the Carboniferous-Permian coal measure strata,Ordos Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2022,43(5):1013-1023.
[6] 程鸣,傅雪海,张苗,等.沁水盆地古县区块煤系“三气”储层覆压孔渗实验对比研究[J].天然气地球科学,2018,29(8):1163-1171.
CHENG Ming,FU Xuehai,ZHANG Miao,et al.Comparative study on porosity and permeability in net confining stress of “three natural gases” in coal series reservoirs in Guxian County, Qinshui Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2018,29(8):1163-1171.
[7] CHEN S, TANG D, TAO S, et al.Fractal analysis of the dynamic variation in pore-fracture systems under the action of stress using a low-field NMR relaxation method:an experimental study of coals from western Guizhou in China[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2019,173:617-629.
[8] 温兆翠. 构造煤储层非均质性层次—熵权法耦合评价模型研究[D].徐州:中国矿业大学(徐州),2022.
WEN Zhaocui.Study on AHP-EWM coupling model evaluation of heterogeneity in deformed coal reservoirs[D].Xuzhou:China University of Mining and Technology(Xuzhou),2022.
[9] 杨延辉,刘世奇,桑树勋,等.基于三维空间表征的高阶煤连通孔隙发育特征[J].煤炭科学技术,2016,44(10):70-76.
YANG Yanhui,LIU Shiqi,SANG Shuxun,et al.Interconnected pore development features of high rank coal based on 3D space characteristics[J].Coal Science and Technology,2016,44(10):70-76.
[10] 王俏,王兆丰,代菊花,等.高温高压吸附后焦煤的孔隙结构变化特性[J].安全与环境学报,2021,21(6):2602-2608.
WANG Qiao, WANG Zhaofeng,DAI Juhua,et al.Pore structure changing features of the coking coal due to the adsorption of high temperature and high pressure[J].Journal of Safety and Environment,2021,21(6):2602-2608.
[11] 刘怀谦,王磊,谢广祥,等.煤体孔隙结构综合表征及全孔径分形特征[J].采矿与安全工程学报,2022,39(3):458-469,479.
LIU Huaiqian, WANG Lei, XIE Guangxiang,et al.Comprehensive characterization and full pore size fractal characteristics of coal pore structure[J].Journal of Safety and Environment,2022,39(3):458-469,479.
[12] 张村,马健起,兰世勇,等.基于针入强度的不同含水率煤样强度弱化特征与微观机制[J].煤炭科学技术,2023,51(增刊1):40-49.
ZHANG Cun,MA Jianqi,LAN Shiyong,et al.Strength weakening characteristics and microscopic mechanism of coal samples with different water contents based on penetration strength[J].Coal Science and Technology,2023,51(S1):40-49.
[13] 徐吉钊,翟成,桑树勋,等.基于低场核磁共振技术的液态CO₂循环致裂煤体孔隙特征演化规律[J].煤炭学报, 2021, 46(11):3578-3589.
XU Jizhao,ZHAI Cheng,SANG Shuxun,et al.Pore evolution of coals affected by cyclical liquid CO₂ fracturing based on the low-field nuclear magnetic resonances[J].Journal of China Coal Society, 2021, 46(11):3578-3589.
[14] ZHANG J J.CHU X X,WEI C T. et al.Review on the application of low-field nuclear magnetic resonance technology in coalbed methane production simulation [J].ACS omega,2022,7(30):26298-26307.
[15] ZHANG J J.WEI C T,CHU X X,et al.Multifractal analysis in characterizing adsorption pore heterogeneity of middle- and high-rank coal reservoirs.[J].ACS omega,2020,5(31):19385-19401.
[16] 王民,焦晨雪,李传明,等.东营凹陷沙河街组页岩微观孔隙多重分形特征[J].油气地质与采收率,2019,26(1):72-79.
WANG Min,JIAO Chenxue,LI Chuanming,et al.Multi-fractal characteristics of micro-pores of Shahejie Formation shale in Dongying Sag[J].Petroleum Geology & Recovery Efficiency,2019,26(1):72-79.
[17] 全国煤炭标准化技术委员会.煤岩样品采取方法:GB/T 19222—2003[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2003:1-8.
China National Coal Standardization Technology Committee.Sampling of coal petrology:GB/T 19222—2003[S].Beijing:Standards Press of China,2003:1-8.
[18] 全国煤炭标准化技术委员会.煤的镜质体反射率显微镜测定方法:GB/T 6948—1998[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1998:1-9.
China National Coal Standardization Technology Committee.Microscopicopical determination of the reflectance of vitrinite in coal:GB/T 6948—1998[S].Beijing:Standards Press of China,1998:1-9.
[19] 全国煤炭标准化技术委员会.煤的工业分析方法:GB/T 212—2001[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2002:1-16.
China National Coal Standardization Technology Committee.Proximate analysis of coal:GB/T 212—2001[S].Beijing:Standards Press of China,2002:1-16.

基于低场核磁共振技术的煤储层孔裂隙分形模型适用性分析

Applicability Analysis of Fractal Model with Poricidal Fracture in Coal Bed Based on Low-field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Technology

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李亚婷, 童长兵, 韩进, 师良, 钟高润, 赵帮胜. 致密砂岩储层可动流体分布特征及主控因素[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(4): 44-53.
[2]	杜佳, 郭晶晶, 刘彦成, 张迎春. 临兴气田致密砂岩储层可动流体分布特征及主控因素[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(2): 152-158.
[3]	师调调, 杜燕, 党海龙, 朱童童, 刘双双, 石立华, 张佳琪. 志丹油区长7页岩油储层CO₂吞吐室内实验[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(6): 128-134.
[4]	张添锦, 王延峰, 李军, 袁青. 注CO₂提高页岩吸附甲烷采收率核磁共振实验[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(5): 113-120.
[5]	钟红利, 卓自敏, 张凤奇, 张佩, 陈玲玲. 鄂尔多斯盆地甘泉地区长7页岩油储层非均质性及其控油规律[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(4): 10-18.
[6]	孟婧, 张莉莹, 李芮, 赵爱芳, 朱碧蔚, 黄佩, 沈世波. 致密砂岩储层微观孔隙结构特征及其分类评价[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(4): 71-78.
[7]	张丽华, 潘保芝, 单刚义, 王敏, 曹玥. 核磁共振频率对蚀变火山岩横向驰豫时间的影响[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(2): 20-25.
[8]	罗强, 李明, 李凯, 宁朦, 贺伟, 杜代军. 砂砾岩油藏原位乳化提高采收率实验研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(1): 100-106.
[9]	段波龙, 李垚银, 孙志雄, 常志勇, 党思思, 马艳清. 夏盐11井区剩余油分布特征与挖潜对策研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(4): 114-119.
[10]	孙挺, 史海东, 郑建军, 钟小刚, Watheq J, Al-Mudhafar. 页岩储层CO₂驱沥青质沉淀特征及影响因素分析[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(2): 83-90.
[11]	张冲, 萧汉敏, 肖朴夫, 崔茂蕾, 赵清民, 赵瑞明. 盐间页岩油CO₂-纯水吞吐开发机理实验及开采特征[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(1): 121-127.
[12]	何利, 肖阳, 孙宜成, 刘守昱, 刘利, 刘子龙. 车21井区裂缝性油藏地质建模与工程设计一体化研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(5): 23-29.
[13]	王伟, 崔丹丹, 严曦, 胡南, 庄永涛, 苑光宇, 闫云贵, 王欢. 聚合物表面活性剂与油藏匹配性及液流转向能力研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(1): 111-117.
[14]	巩联浩, 刘继梓, 武兴, 卜广平, 黄凡, 杨龙. 裂缝性致密油藏二氧化碳吞吐基质-裂缝间流体渗流特征研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(1): 118-124.
[15]	姚双宏, 李学元, 李澎, 王慧军, 陈尚斌. 巨鹿地区石炭系—二叠系富有机质页岩孔隙结构特征及微观非均质性[J]. 特种油气藏, 2020, 27(4): 41-48.