高盐条件下羟磺基甜菜碱表面活性剂起泡性能评价

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2024.05.013

特种油气藏 ›› 2024, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 110-118.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2024.05.013

高盐条件下羟磺基甜菜碱表面活性剂起泡性能评价

李隆杰^1,2, 葛际江^1,2, 潘妍³, 陈鹏飞^1,2, 储鹏举^1,2, 张天赐⁴

1.中国石油大学(华东),山东青岛 266580;
2.山东省油田化学重点实验室,山东青岛 266580;
3.山东石油化工学院,山东东营 257061;
4.中国石化江苏油田分公司,江苏扬州 225009

收稿日期:2023-07-20 修回日期:2024-06-12 出版日期:2024-10-25 发布日期:2024-12-24
通讯作者: 葛际江(1972—),男,教授,1994年毕业于石油大学(华东)应用化学专业,2005年毕业于中国石油大学(华东)油气田开发工程专业,获博士学位,现主要从事油田化学方向的研究工作。
作者简介:李隆杰(1995—),男,2018年毕业于常州大学石油工程专业,现为中国石油大学(华东)油气田开发工程专业在读博士研究生,主要研究方向为化学法提高采收率理论与技术。
基金资助:
中国石油重大科技项目“深层碎屑岩油藏气窜调控技术研究”(2019-ZD-183-007-003)

Foaming Performance Evaluation of Hydroxysulfobetaine Surfactant under High Salt Conditions

Li Longjie^1,2, Ge Jijiang^1,2, Pan Yan³, Chen Pengfei^1,2, Chu Pengju^1,2, Zhang Tianci⁴

1. China University of Petroleum (East China,Qingdao, Shandong 266580, China;
2. Shandong key Laboratory of Oilfield Chemistry,Qingdao, Shandong 266580, China;
3. Shandong Institute of Petroleum and Chemical Technology,Dongying, Shandong 257061, China;
4. Sinopec Jiangsu Oilfield Company, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225009, China

Received:2023-07-20 Revised:2024-06-12 Online:2024-10-25 Published:2024-12-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对高温高盐油藏注气开发过程中易发生气窜,严重影响开发效果的问题,将长碳链羟磺基甜菜碱和短碳链羟磺基甜菜碱按照2∶1的质量比复合构建耐温耐盐起泡剂MHSB12,利用该起泡剂产生的泡沫调控气体流度。通过临界胶束质量分数测定、界面流变性测定、静态吸附量测定、体相泡沫性能评价以及在多孔介质中的生泡能力评价等实验,全面对比了MHSB12在盐含量为11.19×10⁴、22.38×10⁴ mg/L的2种模拟地层水中的性能。研究表明:在高盐条件下,MHSB12临界胶束质量分数更低,表面扩张模量更高,起泡性能及稳定泡沫能力更强;当MHSB12质量分数为1%时,起泡剂溶液满足提高采收率用表面活性剂吸附标准,适用于塔里木油田深层碎屑岩及同类油藏;在MHSB12质量分数相同的条件下,含盐量较高的起泡剂溶液吸附能力略低;与低盐条件相比,高盐条件下MHSB12在岩心中的流度调控能力明显弱。该研究对起泡剂的筛选与评价以及油气田提高采收率具有实践指导意义。

关键词: 羟磺基甜菜碱, 起泡剂, 耐温耐盐, 流动实验, 泡沫

Abstract: In order to address the issue of gas channeling during the development of high-temperature and high-salinity oil reservoirs, which seriously affects the development effect, the long carbon chain hydroxysulfobetaine and the short carbon chain hydroxysulfobetaine were compounded according to the mass ratio of 2∶1 to construct a temperature-resistant and salt-resistant foaming agent MHSB12, and the gas mobility was controlled by the foam generated by this foaming agent. The performance of MHSB12 in two kinds of simulated formation water with salt content of 11.19×10⁴ and 22.38×10⁴ mg/L was comprehensively compared by conducting experiments such as determination of critical micelle mass fraction, interfacial rheology and static adsorption capacity, evaluation of bulk phase foam performance foaming capacity in porous media. The results show that under high salt conditions, MHSB12 has lower critical micelle mass fraction, higher surface expansion modulus, stronger foaming performance and foam stability. When the mass fraction of MHSB12 is 1%, the foaming agent solution meets the surfactant adsorption standard for enhanced oil recovery, which is suitable for deep clastic rocks in Tarim Oilfield and other similar reservoirs. Under the same mass fraction of MHSB12, the adsorption capacity of foaming agent solution with higher salt content is slightly lower. Compared with low salt conditions, the mobility control ability of MHSB12 in the core under high salt conditions is significantly weaker. Hence the evaluation of flow experiment should be paid attention to when screening foaming agents for field use. The study has practical guiding significance for screening foaming and evaluating foaming agents forenhancing oil/gas recovery.

Key words: hydroxysulfobetaine, foaming agent, temperature and salt tolerance, flow test, foam

中图分类号:

TE357

李隆杰, 葛际江, 潘妍, 陈鹏飞, 储鹏举, 张天赐. 高盐条件下羟磺基甜菜碱表面活性剂起泡性能评价[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(5): 110-118.

Li Longjie, Ge Jijiang, Pan Yan, Chen Pengfei, Chu Pengju, Zhang Tianci. Foaming Performance Evaluation of Hydroxysulfobetaine Surfactant under High Salt Conditions[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2024, 31(5): 110-118.

参考文献

[1] 张帆, 张群, 周朝辉, 等.耐温抗盐甜菜碱表面活性剂的表征及性能研究[J].油田化学, 2011, 28(4):427-430.
ZHANG Fan,ZHANG Qun,ZHOU Chaohui,et al.Characterization and property of a heat-resistant and salt-tolerant Betaine Surfactant[J].Oilfield Chemistry,2011,28(4):427-430.
[2] ZHOU J M,SRIVASTAVA M,HAHN R,et al.Evaluation of an amphoteric surfactant for CO₂ foam applications: a comparative study[C].SPE200315-MS,2020:355-368.
[3] FUSENI A B,ALSOFI A M,ALJULAIH A H,et al.Development and evaluation of foam-based conformance control for a high-salinity and high-temperature carbonate[J].Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology,2018,8(4):1341-1348.
[4] 赵立艳, 樊西惊. 表面活性剂驱油体系的新发展[J]. 西安石油学院学报(自然科学版), 2000, 25(2):55-58.
ZHAO Liyan,FAN Xijing.The new development of surfactant oil displacement systems[J].Journal of Xi′an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition),2000,25(2):55-58.
[5] 方吉超, 戴彩丽, 由庆, 等. 塔中402CⅢ高温高盐油藏泡沫驱实验研究[J].油气地质与采收率, 2014, 21(4):84-88.
FANG Jichao,DAI Caili,YOU Qing,et al.Experimental study on foam flooding in Tazhong 402CⅢ high temperature and high salinity reservoir[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2014,21(4):84-88.
[6] DA C,ALZOBAIDI S,JIAN G,et al.Carbon dioxide/water foams stabilized with a zwitterionic surfactant at temperatures up to 150 ℃ in high salinity brine[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2018,166(33):880-890.
[7] SUFFRIDGE F E,RATERMAN K T,RUSSELL G C.Foam performance under reservoir conditions[C].SPE19691-MS,1989:1235-1252.
[8] REN G,SANDERS A,FRIESEN D,et al.Understanding the impact of condensate composition on performance of gas well deliquification surfactants[C].SPE192142-MS,2018:1563-1578.
[9] WEI P,PU W,SUN L,et al.Research on nitrogen foam for enhancing oil recovery in harsh reservoirs[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2017,157(3):27-38.
[10] 李振泉, 延辉, 宋新旺, 等.磺基甜菜碱两性表面活性剂的结构性质[J].化学学报, 2011, 69(8):49-55.
LI Zhenquan,YAN Hui,SONG Xinwang,et al.Structural properties of zwitterionic surfactant sulfobetaine[J].Acta Chimica Sinica,2011,69(8):49-55.
[11] 郭淑凤.耐温抗盐改性甜菜碱表面活性剂MBS16的合成及室内性能评价[J].油田化学, 2016, 33(3):477-480,486.
GUO Shufeng.Synthesis and properties of modified betaine surfactant MBS16[J].Oilfield Chemistry,2016,33(3):477-480,486.
[12] 葛际江, 张天赐, 郭洪宾, 等.一种高温高压泡沫评价装置及评价方法:112098602B[P].2023-02-28.
GE Jijiang,ZHANG Tianci,GUO Hongbin,et al.A high temperature and high pressure foam evaluation device and evaluation method:112098602B[P].2023-02-28.
[13] KOELSCH P,MOTSCHMANN H.Relating foam lamella stability and surface dilational rheology[J].Langmuir,2005,21(14):6265-6269.
[14] METIN C O,BARAN J R,NGUYEN Q P.Adsorption of surface functionalized silica nanoparticles onto mineral surfaces and decane/water interface[J].Journal of Nanoparticle Research,2012,14(11):1246.
[15] JIAN G,PUERTO M,WEHOWSKY A,et al.Characterizing adsorption of associating surfactants on carbonates surfaces[J].Journal of Colloid and Interface Science,2018,513(3):684-692.
[16] LI L J,GE J J,LI K X,et al.The evaluation of dodecyl hydroxy sulfobetaine as a high-temperature and high-salinity resistant foaming agent in sandstone reservoirs[J].Journal of Dispersion Science and Technology,2024,45(4):759-767.
[17] WANG C,FANG H,GONG Q,et al.Roles of catanionic surfactant mixtures on the stability of foams in the presence of oil[J].Energy & Fuels,2016,30(8):6355-6364.
[18] WANG Z,JIN Y,WANG T,et al.Effect of branched chain and polyoxyethylene group on surface dilational rheology of cationic surfactants[J].Colloids and Surfaces A:Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects,2019,577(2):249-256.
[19] SUN L,SUN X H,ZHANG Y C,et al.Stability of high-salinity-enhanced foam: surface behavior and thin-film drainage[J].Petroleum Science,2023,20(4):2343-2353.
[20] 中国石化集团胜利石油管理局.驱油用表面活性剂选择技术要求:Q/SH1020 2191—2013[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2013:1-12.
Shengli Petroleum Administration Bureau of China Petrochemical Group.Technical requirements for surfactant selection for oil displacement:Q/SH1020 2191—2013[S].Beijing:Standards Press of China,2013:1-12.
[21] 朱怀江,杨普华.化学驱中动态界面张力现象对驱油效率的影响[J].石油勘探与开发,1994,21(2):74-80.
ZHU Huaijiang,YANG Puhua.Effect of dynamic interfacial tension on displacement efficiency in chemical flooding[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,1994,21(2):74-80.
[22] KUEHNE D L,EHMAN D I,EMANUEL A S,et al.Design and evaluation of a nitrogen-foam field trial[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology,1990,42(4):504-512.
[23] TSAU J S,HELLER J P.Evaluation of surfactants for CO₂-foam mobility control[C].SPE24013-MS,1992:621-629.
[24] SVORSTØ L I,VASSENDEN F,MANNHARDT K.Laboratory studies for design of a foam pilot in the Snorre Field[C].SPE35400-MS,1996:563-573.
[25] SCHRAMM L L.Foams:fundations and applications in the petroleum industry[M].Washington DC:American Chemical Society,1994:270-272.
[26] BRODE Ⅲ P F.Adsorption of ultra-long-chain zwitterionic surfactants on a polar solid[J].Langmuir,1988,4(1):176-180.
[27] HU X,LI Y,SUN H,et al.Effect of divalent cationic ions on the adsorption behavior of zwitterionic surfactant at silica/solution interface[J].The Journal of Physical Chemistry B,2010,114(27):8910-8916.
[28] HANAMERTANI A S,SARAJI S,PIRI M.A comparative investigation of the effect of gas type on foam strength and flow behavior in tight carbonates[J].Chemical Engineering Science,2023,276(3):118798.
[29] HELLER J P,LIEN C L,KUNTAMUKKULA M S.Foamlike dispersions for mobility control in CO₂ floods[J].Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal,1985,25(4):603-613.
[30] NOVOSAD J J,IONESCU E F.Foam forming surfactants for Beaverhill Lake carbonates and Gilwood Sands Reservoirs[C].PETSOC-87-38-80,1987:1345-1368.

高盐条件下羟磺基甜菜碱表面活性剂起泡性能评价

Foaming Performance Evaluation of Hydroxysulfobetaine Surfactant under High Salt Conditions

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	甄贵男, 王健, 吴宝成, 王炜龙, 唐杨, 路宇豪. 稠油油藏水气交替诱导泡沫油冷采提高采收率实验[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(1): 101-108.
[2]	程涛, 张祎, 宋颖智, 党杨斌, 贾志伟, 朱秀雨, 濮兰天, 邵黎明. 尕斯区块高温高盐油藏减氧空气驱泡沫体系配方优化[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(5): 121-126.
[3]	程宏杰, 陈玉琨, 李铁栓, 张翰清, 张基朋, 吴永彬. 低渗透油藏再生氮气泡沫驱实验与应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(6): 104-110.
[4]	唐晓东, 凌思豪, 向城鑫, 李晶晶. 稠油采出水制备纳米颗粒及其泡沫驱油研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(4): 84-89.
[5]	黄斌, 王思琪, 郭轶闻, 丁琦, 张璐, 唐博强, 郭伟, 邹澈. 泡沫排水采气井强化排采装置优化设计[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(4): 156-163.
[6]	陈小东, 郭红霞, 陈霖, 王进, 曲春霞, 曹立坤, 陆建峰. 裂缝储层空气泡沫驱注入参数优化实验[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(3): 112-117.
[7]	刘子铭, 葛际江, 师小娟, 张天赐, 郭洪宾, 李隆杰. 高温高盐油藏空气驱起泡剂研制及性能评价[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(3): 118-123.
[8]	邓宏伟. 新型调驱一体化高温烟道气驱用泡沫剂室内评价[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(6): 105-112.
[9]	黄炜, 温柔, 庞进, 孙亚君, 杨文军. 低渗透非均质油藏空气泡沫驱替注入参数优化实验[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(3): 124-129.
[10]	陈璐, 胡志明, 熊伟, 杨航, 端祥刚, 常进. 基于动量方程的页岩气体扩散能力表征模型与实验研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2020, 27(5): 132-138.
[11]	李晶晶, 邓昌联, 唐晓东, 汪芳, 魏勇. 稠油减氧空气泡沫驱注入参数优化及现场应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2020, 27(4): 131-135.
[12]	李宛珊, 王健, 任振宇, 木合塔尔. 低渗透油藏二氧化碳气溶性泡沫控制气窜实验研究 [J]. 特种油气藏, 2019, 26(5): 136-141.
[13]	吴海俊，付美龙，孙晶，廖月敏，张瑶. 稠油油藏三元复合驱参数优化实验研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2018, 25(4): 138-.
[14]	牛保伦. 边底水气藏注二氧化碳泡沫控水技术研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2018, 25(3): 126-.
[15]	李洪生. 正韵律油藏聚合物驱后泡沫驱超覆作用研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2018, 25(1): 100-.