气水两相下降流中泡状流与段塞流转换边界研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2024.02.020

特种油气藏 ›› 2024, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 166-174.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2024.02.020

• 钻采工程 • 上一篇

气水两相下降流中泡状流与段塞流转换边界研究

冯一波¹, 石书强², 王建海¹, 丁保东¹, 李婷婷¹, 徐梓然², 王珍², 韩宇飞²

1.中国石化缝洞型油藏提高采收率重点实验室,新疆乌鲁木齐 830011;
2.重庆科技学院,重庆 401331

收稿日期:2022-12-13 修回日期:2024-01-20 出版日期:2024-04-25 发布日期:2024-07-26
通讯作者: 石书强(1990—),男,讲师,2014年毕业于哈尔滨石油学院石油工程专业,2019年毕业于西南石油大学油气田开发工程专业,获博士学位,现从事采油采气理论与技术研究工作。
作者简介:冯一波(1983—),男,高级工程师,2007年毕业于成都理工大学资源勘查工程专业,2010年毕业于该校油气田开发地质专业,获硕士学位,现从事气驱提高采收率技术研究工作。
基金资助:
重庆市自然科学基金面上项目“入口结构对垂直管气液两相向下流流型影响规律研究”(cstc2020jcyj-msxmX0896)

Study on the Transition Boundary between Bubbly Flow and Slug Flow in Gas-Water Two-Phase Descending Flow

Feng Yibo¹, Shi Shuqiang², Wang Jianhai¹, Ding Baodong¹, Li Tingting¹, Xu Ziran², Wang Zhen², Han Yufei²

1. Sinopec Key Laboratory of Enhanced Recovery from Fractured-Vuggy Reservoirs, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830011, China;
2. Chongqing University of Science and Technology, Chongqing 401331, China

Received:2022-12-13 Revised:2024-01-20 Online:2024-04-25 Published:2024-07-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对塔河油田气水混注驱替“阁楼油”过程中泡状流与段塞流转换边界不清的问题,利用数值模拟方法对气水两相下降流中泡状流与段塞流进行了模拟分析。结果表明:在气相表观流速为0.01～1.00 m/s、液相表观流速为0.03～2.00 m/s、管径为76 mm的模拟条件下,管道中主要为泡状流和段塞流;与模拟结果相比,Barnea、Kokal、薛玉卿模型预测的转换边界偏小,Bhagwat和Yijun模型预测的转换边界偏大;随着气相表观流速增加,泡状流向段塞流转换时所需液量逐渐增大;在低液量条件下,越靠近管道中心,气泡数量越多,空隙率越大;随液量增加,单个小气泡体积减小,气泡在整个管道横截面上分布越均匀。基于漂移模型,考虑气泡群滑脱速度,建立了新的泡状流与段塞流转换边界模型,216组文献数据验证结果显示,新模型准确率为95.37%,准确度较高。建立的泡状流—段塞流转换边界模型,不仅可提高井筒压力、温度模型的计算精度,同时对塔河油田现场注入井井口参数优化、注入设备优选和提高“阁楼油”驱替效率有很好的理论指导意义。

关键词: 泡状流, 段塞流, 转换边界, 气水混注, 阁楼油, 缝洞型油藏

Abstract: To address the problem of unclear transition boundary between bubbly flow and slug flow in the process of gas-water mixed injection to displace the "attic oil" in the Tahe Oilfield, the numerical simulation method was used to simulate and analyze the bubbly flow and slug flow in the gas-water two-phase descending flow. The results show that: under the simulation conditions of gas-phase apparent flow rate of 0.01-1.00 m/s, liquid-phase apparent flow rate of 0.03-2.00 m/s, and pipe diameter of 76 mm, the pipeline is mainly characterized by bubbly flow and slug flow; compared with the simulation results, the transition boundary predicted by the Barnea, Kokal, and Xue Yuxing models is small, and that predicted by the Bhagwat and Yijun models is large; with the increase of the gas-phase apparent flow rate, the liquid volume required for the transition from bubbly flow to slug flow gradually increases; under the condition of low liquid volume, the closer to the center of the pipeline, the higher the number of bubbles and the larger the void ratio; with the increase of liquid volume, the volume of individual small bubbles decreases, and the more uniformly the bubbles are distributed throughout the cross-section of the pipeline. Based on the drift model, a new bubbly flow-slug flow transition boundary model was established by considering the bubble group slipping velocity, and 216 sets of literature data validation results show that the accuracy of the new model is 95.37%, which is high. The established bubbly flow-segment plug flow transition boundary model cannot only improve the calculation accuracy of the wellbore pressure and temperature model, but also has a good theoretical significance for the optimization of wellhead parameters, the selection of injection equipment, and the improvement of the efficiency of "attic oil" displacement in the field of Tahe Oilfield.

Key words: bubbly flow, slug flow, transition boundary, gas-water mixed injection, attic oil, fractured-vuggy reservoirs

中图分类号:

TE371.12

冯一波, 石书强, 王建海, 丁保东, 李婷婷, 徐梓然, 王珍, 韩宇飞. 气水两相下降流中泡状流与段塞流转换边界研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(2): 166-174.

Feng Yibo, Shi Shuqiang, Wang Jianhai, Ding Baodong, Li Tingting, Xu Ziran, Wang Zhen, Han Yufei. Study on the Transition Boundary between Bubbly Flow and Slug Flow in Gas-Water Two-Phase Descending Flow[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2024, 31(2): 166-174.

参考文献

[1] 王修武,罗威,刘捷,等.油气水多相管流预测方法研究[J].特种油气藏,2018,25(2):70-75.
WANG Xiuwu,LUO Wei,LIU Jie,et al.Oil-gas-water multiphase flow prediction[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2018,25(2):70-75.
[2] 石书强.塔河油田稠油吞吐开采井筒压力模型研究[D].成都:西南石油大学,2019.
SHI Shuqiang.Research on wellbore pressure modeling of heavy oil huff-n-puff recovery in Tahe Oilfield[D].Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University,2019.
[3] 蔺嘉昊,孟海龙,郭永强,等.气井节流生产过程中天然气水合物生成风险模拟研究[J].非常规油气,2023,10(2):88-93,106.
LIN Jiahao,MENG Hailong,GUO Yongqiang,et al.Simulation study on the risk of gas hydrate formation in the process of gas well throttling production[J].Unconventional Oil & Gas,2023,10(2):88-93,106.
[4] WANG Bin,HU Jianguo,CHEN Weixiong,et al.Flow pattern and resistance characteristics of gas-liquid two-phase flow with foam under low gas-liquid flow rate[J].Energies,2021,14(13):3722.
[5] 王付勇,程辉,侯贤沐.裂缝性油藏注气多相流动机理与气窜数学模型分析[J].非常规油气,2022,9(4):58-64,122.
WANG Fuyong,CHENG Hui,HOU Xianmu.Mathematical model analysis of multiphase flow and gas channeling of in gas injection fractured oil reservoirs[J].Unconventional Oil & Gas,2022,9(4):58-64,122.
[6] SARKODIE K,FERGUSSON-Rees A.Flow regime identification in vertical upward gas-liquid flow using an optical sensor with linear and quadratic discriminant analysis[J].Journal of Fluids Engineering,2021,143(2):021401.
[7] BHAGWAT S M,GHAJAR A J.Experimental investigation of non-boiling gas-liquid two phase flow in downward inclined pipes[J].Experimental thermal and fluid science,2017,89:219-237.
[8] RAEISZADEH F,HAJIDAVALLOO E,BEHBAHABINEJAD M,et al.Effect of pipe rotation on downward co-current air-water flow in a vertical pipe[J].International Journal of Multiphase Flow,2016,81:1-14.
[9] 薛颖,石立华,曹跃,等.一种新的非线性渗流数值模拟模型[J].非常规油气,2022,9(5):103-116.
XUE Ying,SHI Lihua,CAO Yue,et al.A new nonlinear seepage numerical simulation model[J].Unconventional Oil & Gas,2022,9(5):103-116.
[10] COUTINHO R P,TORNISIELLO L,WALTRICH P J.Experimental investigation of vertical downward two-phase flow in annulus[J].Journal of Energy Resources Technology,2020,142(7):1-27.
[11] LOKANATHAN M,HIBIKI T.Flow regime,void fraction and interfacial area transport and characteristics of co-current downward two-phase flow[J].Nuclear Engineering & Design,2016,307:39-63.
[12] CHAUHAN B,SINGH V P,SAYYED I,et al.Flow pattern determination for circular staggered cylinders in cross flow using CFD[J].Civil Engineering,2020,5(4):82-95.
[13] DEENDARLIANT O,ANDRIANTO M,WIDYAPARAGA A,et al.CFD studies on the gas-liquid plug two-phase flow in a horizontal pipe[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2016,147:779-787.
[14] PAO W,SAM B,NASIF M S,et al.Numerical validation of gas-liquid slug flow inside horizontal pipe[J].Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences,2018,9(5S):662-672.
[15] 卢坤铭,周领,曹波,等.起伏管道内水流冲击滞留气团的三维动态特性模拟[J].排灌机械工程学报,,2020,38(4):384-389,402.
LU Kunming,ZHOU Ling,CAO Bo,et al.Three-dimensional simulations on dynamic characteristics of flow impacting entrapped air pocket in undulating pipeline[J].Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering,2020,38(4):384-389,402.
[16] EKAMBARA K,SANDERS R S,NANDAKUMAR K,et al.CFD modeling of gas-liquid bubbly flow in horizontal pipes:influence of bubble coalescence and breakup[J].International Journal of Chemical Engineering,2012,2012:1-20.
[17] 张赫铭,李文昊,何新林,等.不同管径水平管道气液两相流动数值模拟[J].排灌机械工程学报,2021,39(5):488-494.
ZHANG Heming,LI Wenhao,HE Xinlin,et al.Numerical simulation of gas-liquid two-phase flow in horizontal pipeline with different diameters[J].Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering,2021,39(5):488-494.
[18] 杨通,邓豪,王倩.不同管径水平管气液两相流流动特性数值模拟[J].山东化工,2022,51(1):40-43,47.
YANG Tong,DENG Hao,WANG Qian.Numerical simulation of two-phase pressure drop characteristics of different pipe diameters[J].Shandong Chemical Industry,2022,51(1):40-43,47.
[19] 李州.向振动状态下水平管内气液两相流型数值模拟[D].吉林:东北电力大学,2021.
LI Zhou.Numerical simulation of gas-liquid two-phase flow pattern in a horizontal tube under transverse vibration state[D].Jilin:Northeast Power University,2021.
[20] 俞强强,施红辉,董若凌,等.竖直上升圆管内气液两相流流型特性的数值模拟[J].浙江理工大学学报(自然科学版),2022,47(3):397-404.
YU Qiangqiang,SHI Honghui,DONG Ruoling,et al.Numerical simulation of flow pattern characteristics of gas-liquid two-phase flow in vertical rising pipes[J].Journal of Zhejiang Sci-Tech University(Natural Sciences Edition),2022,47(3):397-404.
[21] BHAGWAT S M.Study of flow patterns and void fraction in vertical downward two phase flow[D].Whitehurst:Oklahoma State University,2011.
[22] BHAGWAT S M,GHAJAR A.Similarities and differences in the flow patterns and void fraction in vertical upward and downward two phase flow[J].Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science,2012,39:213-227.
[23] GHAJAR A J,TANG Void.Fraction and flow patterns of two-phase flow in upward and downward vertical and horizontal pipes[J].Advances in Multiphase Flow & Heat Transfer,2012,4:175-201.
[24] KOKAL S L,STANISLAV J F.An experimental study of two-phase flow in slightly inclined pipes-I:flow patterns[J].Chemical Engineering Science,1989,44(3):665-679.
[25] BARNEA D,SHOHAM O,TAITEL Y.Flow pattern transition for downward inclined two phase flow; horizontal to vertical[J].Chemical Engineering Science,1982,37(5):735-740.
[26] BARNEA D,SHOHAM O,TAITEL Y.Flow pattern transition for vertical downward two phase flow[J].Chemical Engineering Science,1982,37(5):741-744.
[27] JIANG Yijun,REZKALLAH K S.A study on void fraction in vertical co-current upward and downward two-phase gas-liquid flow-I:experimental results[J].Chemical Engineering Communications,1993,126(1):245-259.
[28] 薛玉卿,李会雄,姚超,等.垂直向下管内两相流泡状-弹状流型转换研究[J].应用力学学报,2017,34(4):603-609.
XUE Yuqing,LI Huixiong,YAO Chao,et al.Investigation of flow pattern transition of bubbly flow-slug flow for two-phase flows in the vertical downwards pipes[J].Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics,2017,34(4):603-609.
[29] HARMATHY T Velocity of large drops and bubbles in media of infinite or restricted extent[J].AIChE Journal,1960,6(2):281-288.
[30] HASAN A R.Void fraction in bubbly and slug flow in downward two-phase flow in vertical and inclined wellbores[J].SPE Production & Facilities,1995,10(3):172-176.
[31] ZUBER N,FINDLAY J A.Average volumetric concentration in two-phase flow systems[J].Journal of heat transfer,1965,87(4):453-468.
[32] RAEISZADEH F,HAJIDAVALLOO E,BEHBAHANINEJAD M,et al.Effect of pipe rotation on downward co-current air-water flow in a vertical pipe[J].International journal of multiphase flow,2016,81:1-14.
[33] MUKHERJEE H.An experimental study of inclined two-phase flow[D].Tulsa:University of Tulsa,1979.
[34] USUII K,SATO K.Vertically downward two-phase flow(I):void distribution and average void fraction[J].Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology,1989,26(7):670-680.

气水两相下降流中泡状流与段塞流转换边界研究

Study on the Transition Boundary between Bubbly Flow and Slug Flow in Gas-Water Two-Phase Descending Flow

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王志兴, 侯吉瑞, 杨宇昊, 朱桂良. 缝洞型油藏填充介质含水饱和度对CO₂和N₂溶解扩散影响实验[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(1): 91-98.
[2]	耿甜, 吕艳萍, 巫波, 张晓, 文欢. 缝洞型油藏储量评价方法及开发对策[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(6): 129-136.
[3]	朱桂良，刘中春，宋传真，张慧. 缝洞型油藏不同注入气最小混相压力计算方法[J]. 特种油气藏, 2019, 26(2): 132-.
[4]	尹洪军，邢翠巧，计秉玉，钟会影，Perapon Fakcharoenphol. 大尺度溶洞发育的缝洞型油藏试井解释模型研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2018, 25(5): 84-.
[5]	吕铁. 缝洞型油藏注氮气吞吐参数优化研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2018, 25(5): 119-.
[6]	郑松青，崔书岳，牟雷. 缝洞型油藏物质平衡方程及驱动能量分析[J]. 特种油气藏, 2018, 25(1): 64-.
[7]	熊陈微，林承焰，任丽华，韩长城，范卓颖. 缝洞型油藏剩余油分布模式及挖潜对策[J]. 特种油气藏, 2016, 23(6): 97-.
[8]	梁尚斌. 多轮次压降试井求取含油饱和度研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2016, 23(5): 82-.
[9]	蒲万芬，孙波帅，李一波，郭臣，刘元爽. 塔河缝洞型超稠油油藏二氧化碳驱实验研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2016, 23(4): 123-.
[10]	巫波，李正民，荣元帅. 不同岩溶缝洞油藏剩余油类型及开发对策[J]. 特种油气藏, 2016, 23(2): 93-.
[11]	吕铁，刘中春. 缝洞型油藏注氮气吞吐效果影响因素分析[J]. 特种油气藏, 2015, 22(6): 114-.
[12]	王建海，焦保雷，曾文广，李娣，葛际江. 塔河缝洞型油藏水驱后期开发方式研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2015, 22(5): 125-.
[13]	乞迎安，汪小平，杨　开，田　鑫，陈志会. 非常规岩性油藏氮气驱技术研究与试验[J]. 特种油气藏, 2015, 22(1): 134-.
[14]	何星，欧阳冬，马淑芬，李淑杰. 塔河油田缝洞型碳酸盐岩油藏漏失井堵水技术[J]. 特种油气藏, 2014, 21(1): 131-.
[15]	谭捷唐海李娜吕渐江海涛. 塔河六区缝洞型油藏水体及水侵量计算[J]. , 2011, 18(3): 1-.