四川盆地天府地区上三叠统须家河组四段致密储层砂体刻画及有利储层预测

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2024.03.003

特种油气藏 ›› 2024, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 18-26.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2024.03.003

四川盆地天府地区上三叠统须家河组四段致密储层砂体刻画及有利储层预测

邱玉超^1,2,3, 许强^1,2, 李一博^1,2, 邓伟^1,2, 郑超³, 赵正望³, 金值民³, 谭秀成^1,2*

1.西南石油大学天然气地质四川省重点实验室,四川成都 610500;
2.西南石油大学,四川成都 610500;
3.中国石油西南油气田分公司,四川成都 610041

收稿日期:2023-07-03 修回日期:2024-03-28 出版日期:2024-06-25 发布日期:2024-07-26
通讯作者: 许强(1981—),男,研究员,博士生导师,2005年毕业于吉林大学资源勘查专业,2010年毕业于中国科学院构造地质学专业,现从事大地构造学、地热学方面的教学与研究工作。
作者简介:邱玉超(1982—),男,高级工程师,2005年毕业于吉林大学地质勘探专业,2012年毕业于东北石油大学地质工程专业,获硕士学位,现主要从事油气地质综合研究工作。* 参加此研究的还有厚刚福、于童、陈于飞、吴冠桦、谢瑶
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金“林周盆地晚白垩世从海到山对冈底斯俯冲-碰撞隆升过程的制约”(42272257);中国石油西南油气田分公司科技项目“四川盆地须家河组致密储层特征和成藏规律研究”(20230301-09)

Characterization of Tight Sandstone Reservoirs and Prediction of Favorable Reservoirs in the Fourth Member of the Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in the Tianfu Area of the Sichuan Basin

Qiu Yuchao^1,2,3, Xu Qiang^1,2, Li Yibo^1,2, Deng Wei^1,2, Zheng Chao³, Zhao Zhengwang³, Jin Zhimin³, Tan Xiucheng^1,2*

1. Sichuan Province key Laboratory of Natural Gas Geology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China;
2. Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China;
3. PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China

Received:2023-07-03 Revised:2024-03-28 Online:2024-06-25 Published:2024-07-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 四川盆地天府地区上三叠统须家河组四段(简称须四段)厚层砂岩夹薄层泥岩发育,为当前致密砂岩气的重要勘探层系。但受限于地震纵向分辨率,常规方法难以区分薄层泥岩,对该层段砂岩的精细刻画一直缺乏有效的手段,制约了对盆地砂体展布规律和有利目标区的认识。针对上述问题,建立钻井资料与地震相映射关系,在自然伽马曲线约束下,寻找最佳反演频率参数,提高井间砂体预测精度。采用波形指示模拟的方法精细刻画了上三叠统须家河组四段砂岩的展布特征。结果表明:须四段砂岩具有西厚(55.0～100.0 m)、东薄(15.0～50.0 m)的特征;与须三段相比,砂体厚薄变化转换带(坡折带)向克拉通内部迁移。统计地震工区内22口井数据,坡折带以西砂岩平均孔隙度高(8.0%)、储层厚度大(45.4 m)。结合构造演化、沉积相带展布、砂岩厚度和孔隙度变化,认为四川盆地天府地区上三叠统须家河组四段具有构造控坡折带、坡折带控储层的规律。坡折带以西的储层物性好、厚度大,为勘探有利区。研究结果对须四段勘探深入具有借鉴作用。

关键词: 致密砂岩, 砂体刻画, 波形指示模拟, 井震结合, 储层预测, 须家河组, 四川盆地

Abstract: The fourth member of the Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in the Tianfu Area of the Sichuan Basin (referred to as the T₃x₄) is characterized by thick sandstone layers interbedded with thin mudstone layers,making it a crucial exploration target for tight sandstone gas reservoirs.However,due to limitations in seismic vertical resolution,thin mudstone layers are hard to be determined by conventional methods,hindering the precise characterization of sandstone in this interval.This limitation has impeded the understanding of the distribution patterns of sand bodies in the basin and identification of favorable target areas.To address these issues, this study integrates drilling data with seismic facies and establishes a mapping relationship between the two.Under the constraint of natural gamma-ray curves,optimal inversion frequency parameters were sought to enhance the accuracy of inter-well sand body prediction.The distribution characteristics of the T₃x₄ sandstone in the Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation were well characterized with waveform indication simulation method.The results indicate that the T₃x₄ sandstone exhibits characteristics of being thick in the west (55.0 to 100.0 m) and thin in the east (15.0 to 50.0 m).Compared to the third member of the Xujiahe Formation,the transition zone of sand body thickness variation (slope break zone) has migrated towards the interior of the craton.Analyzing data from 18 wells within the seismic working area,it was observed that beneath the slope break zone,the sandstone has a high average porosity (8.0%) and a large reservoir thickness (45.4 m).Considering tectonic evolution, sedimentary facies distribution,sandstone thickness,and porosity variations,it is proposed that the T₃x₄ follows a pattern of structures control slope break zones,and slope break zones control reservoirs.Regions below the slope break zones exhibit favorable reservoir properties with good physical characteristics and significant thickness,making them promising exploration areas.The study results provide valuable insights for the in-depth exploration of the T₃x₄.

Key words: thick Sandstone, Sandstone characterization, waveform indication simulation, well-seismic integration, reservoir prediction, Xujiahe Formation, Sichuan Basin

中图分类号:

TE121

邱玉超, 许强, 李一博, 邓伟, 郑超, 赵正望, 金值民, 谭秀成. 四川盆地天府地区上三叠统须家河组四段致密储层砂体刻画及有利储层预测[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(3): 18-26.

Qiu Yuchao, Xu Qiang, Li Yibo, Deng Wei, Zheng Chao, Zhao Zhengwang, Jin Zhimin, Tan Xiucheng. Characterization of Tight Sandstone Reservoirs and Prediction of Favorable Reservoirs in the Fourth Member of the Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in the Tianfu Area of the Sichuan Basin[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2024, 31(3): 18-26.

参考文献

[1] 李伟,邹才能,杨金利,等.四川盆地上三叠统须家河组气藏类型与富集高产主控因素[J].沉积学报,2010,28(5):1037-1045.
LI Wei,ZOU Caineng,YANG Jinli,et al.Types and controlling factors of accumulation and high productivity in the Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation gas reservoirs, Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2010, 28(5): 1037-1045.
[2] 赵文智,卞从胜,徐春春,等.四川盆地须家河组须一、三和五段天然气源内成藏潜力与有利区评价[J].石油勘探与开发,2011,38(4):385-393.
ZHAO Wenzhi,BIAN Congsheng,XU Chunchun,et al.Assessment on gas accumulation potential and favorable plays within the Xu-1, 3 and 5 Members of Xujiahe Formation in Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2011, 38(4): 385-393.
[3] 杨雨,文龙,周刚,等.四川盆地油气勘探新领域、新类型及资源潜力[J].石油学报, 2023,44(12):2045-2069.
YANG Yu,WEN Long,ZHOU Gang,et al.New fields,new types and resource potentials of hydrocarbon exploration in Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(12): 2045-2069.
[4] 晁彩霞,于俊峰,王玉,等.基于地震波形指示反演的东方B气田海底扇砂体精细刻画[J].海相油气地质,2021,26(3):281-288.
CHAO Caixia,YU Junfeng,WANG Yu,et al.Fine characterization of submarine fan sand body in Dongfang B Gas Field based on waveform indication inversion[J].Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2021,26(3):281-288.
[5] 陈祖庆,王静波.基于压缩感知的稀疏脉冲反射系数谱反演方法研究[J].石油物探,2015,54(4):459-466.
CHEN Zuqing,WANG Jingbo.A spectral inversion method of sparse-spike reflection coefficients based on compressed sensing[J].Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2015, 54(4): 459-466.
[6] 陈建江.AVO三参数反演方法研究[D].北京:中国石油大学(北京),2008.
CHEN Jianjiang.Research on AVO three-parameter inversion method[D].Beijing:China University of Petroleum( Beijing),2008.
[7] 陈彦虎.地震波形指示反演方法、原理及其应用[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2020.
CHEN Yanhu.Seismic waveform inversion method, principle and its application[D].Beijing:China University of Geosciences(Beijing),2020.
[8] 王新红.弹性波阻抗反演在稠油热采地震监测中的应用[J].地球物理学进展,2007,22(1):186-191.
WANG Xinhong.Application of elastic impendence inversion in seismic monitoring of the heavy-oil thermal recovery[J].Progress in Geophysics, 2007, 22(1): 186-191.
[9] XU Wenqiao,YIN Hongwei,JIA Dong,et al.Structural features and evolution of the northwestern Sichuan Basin:insights from siscrete numerical simulations[J].Frontiers in Earth Science,2021,9:653395.
[10] LIU Shugen,YANG Yu,DENG Bin,et al.Tectonic evolution of the Sichuan Basin,southwest China[J].Earth-Science Reviews,2021,213:103470
[11] 王金琪.安县构造运动[J].石油与天然气地质,1990,11(3):223-234.
WANG Jinqi.Anxian tectonic movement[J].Oil & Gas Geology,1990,11(3):223-234.
[12] 唐大海,谭秀成,王小娟,等.四川盆地须家河组致密气藏成藏要素及有利区带评价[J].特种油气藏,2020,27(3):40-46.
TANG Dahai,TAN Xiucheng,WANG Xiaojuan,et al.Tight gas accumulation elements and favorable zone evaluation of Xujiahe Formation in Sichuan Basin[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2020,27(3):40-46.
[13] 汪泽成,施亦做,文龙,等.用超级盆地思维挖掘四川盆地油气资源潜力的探讨[J].石油勘探与开发, 2022,49(5):847-858.
WANG Zecheng,SHI Yizuo,WEN Long,et al.Exploring the potential of oil and gas resources in Sichuan Basin with super basin thinking[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2022, 49(5): 847-858.
[14] 林良彪,余瑜,南红丽,等.四川盆地川西坳陷上三叠统须家河组四段储层致密化过程及其与油气成藏的耦合关系[J].石油与天然气地质,2021,42(4):816-828.
LIN Liangbiao,YU Yu,NAN Hongli,et al.Reservoir tightening process and its coupling relationship with hydrocarbon accumulation in the Fourth Member of Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in the western Sichuan Depression,Sichuan Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2021,42(4):816-828.
[15] 孙衍鹏,何登发.四川盆地北部剑阁古隆起的厘定及其基本特征[J].地质学报,2013,87(5):609-620.
SUN Yanpeng,HE Dengfa.Discovery of the Jiange Paleo-uplift in north Sichuan Basin and its basic characteristics[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2013,87(5):609-620.
[16] 魏国齐,杨威,金惠,等.四川盆地上三叠统有利储层展布与勘探方向[J].天然气工业,2010,30(1):11-14,135.
WEI Guoqi,YANG Wei,JIN Hui,et al.Distribution of favorable reservoirs and exploration targets in the Upper Triassic of the Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2010,30(1):11-14,135.
[17] 李双建,李智,张磊,等.四川盆地川西坳陷三叠系盐下超深层油气成藏条件与勘探方向[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2023,44(6):1555-1567.
LI Shuangjian,LI Zhi,ZHANG Lei,et al.Hydrocarbon accumulation conditions and exploration targets of the Triassic subsalt ultra-deep sequences in the western Sichuan Depression, Sichuan Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2023,44(6):1555-1567.
[18] 赵向原,游瑜春,胡向阳,等.基于成因机理及主控因素约束的多尺度裂缝“分级-分期-分组”建模方法——以四川盆地元坝地区上二叠统长兴组生物礁相碳酸盐岩储层为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2023,44(1):213-225.
ZHAO Xiangyuan,YOU Yuchun,HU Xiangyang,et al."Classified-staged-grouped" 3D modeling of multi-scale fractures constrained by genetic mechanisms and main controlling factors:a case study on biohermal carbonate reservoir of the Upper Permian Changxing Fm. in Yuanba Area,Sichuan Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2023,44(1):213-225.

四川盆地天府地区上三叠统须家河组四段致密储层砂体刻画及有利储层预测

Characterization of Tight Sandstone Reservoirs and Prediction of Favorable Reservoirs in the Fourth Member of the Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in the Tianfu Area of the Sichuan Basin

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	石立华, 师调调, 廖志昊, 薛颖, 李禄胜. 低渗致密砂岩油藏水驱储层变化规律[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(3): 106-115.
[2]	郭顺, 周进松, 郭兰, 陈西泮, 赵子丹, 汶锋刚. 延安气田上古生界山西组致密砂岩储层微观特征及主控因素[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(2): 10-18.
[3]	徐少立, 马奎, 杨强, 谢长琼, 张新, 严威, 武鲁亚, 王文之. 四川盆地蓬莱气区震旦系灯影组二段储层特征及其控制因素[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(2): 47-56.
[4]	郑超, 邱玉超, 文龙, 李楠, 吴长江, 张晓丽, 陈双玲, 袁纯. 川中中台山地区致密砂岩储层层序特征及有利区优选[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(2): 84-92.
[5]	杜佳, 郭晶晶, 刘彦成, 张迎春. 临兴气田致密砂岩储层可动流体分布特征及主控因素[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(2): 152-158.
[6]	陶夏妍, 黄天俊, 张艺华, 边树涛, 魏朋辉, 韩嵩, 邓惠, 蔡强. 四川盆地东北部三叠系飞仙关组迁移型鲕滩层序地层分析及相控储层预测[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(6): 62-71.
[7]	赵辉, 齐怀彦, 王凯, 蔡涛, 孟利华, 周兵. 致密砂岩油藏测井响应特征及有利区评价[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(5): 35-41.
[8]	雷越, 黄嵌, 王旭丽, 杨涛, 田云英, 李洪林, 汤潇, 刘柏. 川西北地区须家河组二段致密砂岩储层特征及其主控因素[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(5): 50-57.
[9]	孟婧, 张莉莹, 李芮, 赵爱芳, 朱碧蔚, 黄佩, 沈世波. 致密砂岩储层微观孔隙结构特征及其分类评价[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(4): 71-78.
[10]	姚天星, 李忠诚, 郭世超, 宋鹏, 王海龙, 唐晓丹. 川南自贡地区海相页岩沉积环境及有机质富集主控因素研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(4): 79-86.
[11]	孙永鹏, 王传熙, 戴彩丽, 魏利南, 陈超, 谢孟珂. 致密砂岩气藏自支撑裂缝损伤机理及导流能力研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(3): 81-87.
[12]	贾泽江, 宁正福, 张文通, 毛柱, 王质鹏, 程志林. 致密油藏直流电提高采收率技术实验研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(3): 88-96.
[13]	肖杭州. CL区块登娄库组致密砂岩气藏压裂液体系适应性评价[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(3): 143-147.
[14]	孟大江, 路允乾, 张宝金, 王利杰. 叠前反演技术在天然气水合物储层预测中的应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(2): 51-57.
[15]	洪海涛, 张少敏, 张芮, 关旭. 四川盆地凉高山组层序地层格架及有利勘探区优选[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(2): 58-64.