页岩气井复合暂堵泵压数学模型及影响因素

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2023.04.019

特种油气藏 ›› 2023, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 156-162.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2023.04.019

页岩气井复合暂堵泵压数学模型及影响因素

孔祥伟^1,2, 卾玄吉³, 齐天俊³, 陈青^1,2, 任勇³, 王素兵³, 李亭^1,2, 刘宇^1,2

1.长江大学石油工程学院,湖北武汉 430000;
2.长江大学油气钻完井技术国家工程研究中心,湖北武汉 430000;
3.中国石油川庆钻探工程有限公司,四川成都 610000

收稿日期:2022-12-10 修回日期:2023-04-17 出版日期:2023-08-25 发布日期:2023-09-18
通讯作者: 李亭(1978—),男,副教授,1998年毕业于石油大学(华东)石油工程专业,2014年毕业于成都理工大学油气田开发工程专业,获博士学位,现从事油气藏增产方面的教学与研究工作。
作者简介:孔祥伟(1982—),男,副教授,2005年毕业于黑龙江科技大学信息与计算科学专业,2014年毕业于西南石油大学油气井工程专业,获博士学位,现从事油气井力学及储层改造方面的教学与科研工作。
基金资助:
中国石化科技部“十三五”重点规划项目“川西中浅层致密砂岩气藏体积压裂关键技术”(P22047);国家自然科学基金“超深裂缝地层溢流多相流动机理及气体侵入类型识别研究”(52274001);校企合作项目“压裂靶向暂堵关键施工参数优化设计技术及现场试验”(CQCJ-2001-06)

Study on Mathematical Model and Influencing Factors of Composite Temporary Plugging Pump Pressure in Shale Gas Wells

Kong Xiangwei^1,2, E Xuanji³, Qi Tianjun³, Chen Qing^1,2, Ren Yong³, Wang Subing³, Li Ting^1,2, Liu Yu^1,2

1. School of Petroleum Engineering, Yangtze University, Wuhan, Hubei 430000, China;
2. National Engineering Research Center for Oil and Gas Drilling and Completion Technology, Yangtze University, Wuhan, Hubei 430000, China;
3. CNPC Chuanqing Drilling Engineering Co., Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan 610000, China

Received:2022-12-10 Revised:2023-04-17 Online:2023-08-25 Published:2023-09-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目前页岩气井压裂的泵压预测主要依靠商业软件拟合,预测暂堵剂用量与泵压的数学模型较少。为此,考虑暂堵剂运移终速度、缝宽、暂堵剂阻力等因素,提出了复合暂堵泵压预测数学模型,分析了复合暂堵参数对泵压的影响。结果表明:随复合暂堵剂用量增大,泵压升高;复合暂堵剂同单一暂堵剂相比,复合暂堵剂用量对泵压影响更敏感;随暂堵粒径增大,泵压峰值呈现增大趋势;复合暂堵剂的起压及升压时间较单一暂堵剂明显减小,暂堵效果更佳;复合暂堵剂用量为180 g时,升压时间为31 s,泵压峰值可达到17.5 MPa,与粒径为0.8 mm的暂堵剂相比,升压时间缩短51 s,泵压峰值增大2.7 MPa,升压速度增大63.09%。室内实验和现场应用表明,泵压计算值与实测值最大误差分别为6.76%和6.27%。复合暂堵泵压预测数学模型对暂堵剂用量设计以及暂堵效果评价具有指导意义。

关键词: 深层页岩气, 复合暂堵, 泵压, 暂堵剂

Abstract: At present, the pump pressure prediction of shale gas well fracturing mainly relies on commercial software fitting, and there are few mathematical models for predicting the amount of temporary plugging agent and pump pressure. To this end, a mathematical model for pump pressure prediction of composite temporary plugging was proposed by taking into account the final speed of temporary plugging agent migration, fracture width, temporary plugging agent resistance and other factors, and the effect of composite temporary plugging parameters on pump pressure was analyzed. The result shows that with the dosage increase of composite temporary plugging agent dosage, the pump pressure increases; compared with the single temporary plugging agent, the dosage of composite temporary plugging agent dosage is more sensitive to the pump pressure; with the increase of temporary plugging particle size, the peak pump pressure shows an increasing trend; the pressure starting and boosting time of composite temporary plugging agent is significantly reduced compared with the single temporary plugging agent, and the temporary plugging effect is better; when the dosage of composite temporary plugging agent is 180 g, the pressure boosting time is 31 s, and the peak pump pressure can reach 17.5 MPa, compared with the temporary plugging agent with the particle size of 0.8 mm, the boosting time is shortened by 51 s, the peak pump pressure is increased by 2.7 MPa, and the boosting speed is increased by 63.09%. Indoor experiments and field applications show that the maximum errors between the calculated and measured pump pressure values are 6.76% and 6.27% respectively. It has guidance significance of the mathematical model of composite temporary plugging pump pressure prediction to the dosage of temporary plugging agent and the evaluation of temporary plugging effect.

Key words: deep shale gas, composite temporary plugging, pump pressure, temporary plugging agent

中图分类号:

TE357

孔祥伟, 卾玄吉, 齐天俊, 陈青, 任勇, 王素兵, 李亭, 刘宇. 页岩气井复合暂堵泵压数学模型及影响因素[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(4): 156-162.

Kong Xiangwei, E Xuanji, Qi Tianjun, Chen Qing, Ren Yong, Wang Subing, Li Ting, Liu Yu. Study on Mathematical Model and Influencing Factors of Composite Temporary Plugging Pump Pressure in Shale Gas Wells[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2023, 30(4): 156-162.

参考文献

[1] 陈作,刘红磊,李英杰,等.国内外页岩油储层改造技术现状及发展建议[J].石油钻探技术,2021,49(4):1-7.
CHEN Zuo,LIU Honglei,LI Yingjie,et al.The current status and development suggestions for shale oil reservoir stimulation at home and abroad[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2021,49(4):1-7.
[2] 刘均一,柴金鹏,李光泉,等.准噶尔盆地硬脆性页岩强化致密封堵水基钻井液技术[J].石油钻探技术,2022,50(5):50-56.
LIU Junyi,CHAI Jinpeng,LI Guangquan,et al.Enhanced tight plugging water-based drilling fluid technology for hard and brittle shales in Junggar Basin[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2022,50(5):50-56.
[3] 田伟志.威远构造W202井区龙马溪组页岩气储层微观孔隙结构特征[J].录井工程,2022,33(2):141-146.
TIAN Weizhi.Microscopic pore texture characteristics of shale gas reservoirs in Longmaxi Formation of Wellblock W202,Weiyuan Structure[J].Mud Logging Engineering,2022,33(2):141-146.
[4] 周博成,熊炜,赖建林,等.武隆区块常压页岩气藏低成本压裂技术[J].石油钻探技术,2022,50(3):80-85.
ZHOU Bocheng,XIONG Wei,LAI Jianlin,et al.Low-cost fracturing technology in normal-pressure shale gas reservoirs in Wulong Block[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2022,50(3):80-85.
[5] 孙欢,朱明明,王伟良,等.长庆页岩油水平井华H90-3井超长水平段防漏堵漏技术[J].石油钻探技术,2022,50(2):16-21.
SUN Huan,ZHU Mingming,WANG Weiliang,et al.Lost circulation prevention and plugging technologies for the ultra-long horizontal section of the horizontal shale oil Well Hua H90-3 in Changqing Oilfield[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2022,50(2):16-21.
[6] 苏良银,庞鹏,达引朋,等.低渗透油田暂堵重复压裂堵剂用量优化与现场试验[J].断块油气田,2014,21(1):114-117.
SU Liangyin,PANG Peng,DA Yinpeng,et al.Usage optimization and field test of blocking agent for temporal-blocked re-fracturing in low permeability oilfield[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2014,21(1):114-117.
[7] 杨恒林,吕嘉昕,谭鹏,等.基于三维扫描技术的页岩暂堵压裂物理模拟实验[J].断块油气田,2022,29(1):118-123.
YANG Henglin,LYU Jiaxin,TAN Peng,et al.Physical simulation experiment on shale temporary plugging and fracturing based on 3D scanning technology[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2022,29(1):118-123.
[8] 王海涛,仲冠宇,卫然,等.降低深层页岩气井压裂施工压力技术探讨[J].断块油气田,2021,28(2):162-167.
WANG Haitao,ZHONG Guanyu,WEI Ran,et al.Discussion on technology of reducing fracturing operation pressure in deep shale gas well[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2021,28(2):162-167.
[9] 方裕燕,冯炜,张雄,等.炮眼暂堵室内实验研究[J].钻采工艺,2018,41(6):102-105.
FANG Yuyan,FENG Wei,ZHANG Xiong,et al.Experimental study on temporary plugging of perforations[J].Drilling & Production Technology,2018,41(6):102-105.
[10] 张健,张国祥,王金意,等.基于真三轴压裂实验的页岩损伤研究[J].合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版),2020,43(10):1404-1409.
ZHANG Jian,ZHANG Guoxiang,WANG Jinyi,et al.Study on shale damage based on true triaxial hydraulic fracturing test[J].Journal of Hefei University of Technology(Natural Science),2020,43(10):1404-1409.
[11] 吕刚,王凯.压裂施工中泵压的控制措施[J].化学工程与装备,2019,48(12):105-106.
LYU Gang,WANG Kai.Control measures of pump pressure in fracturing construction[J].Chemical Engineering & Equipment,2019,48(12):105-106.
[12] 陈波,李勇明,刘福建,等.聚酯纤维-多粒径暂堵剂裂缝暂堵试验[J].长江大学学报(自然科学版),2020,17(4):39-45.
CHEN Bo,LI Yongming,LIU Fujian,et al.Experimental study on fracture temporary plugging of fiber-multiparticle temporary plugging agent[J].Journal of Yangtze University(Natural Science Edition),2020,17(4):39-45.
[13] 孔祥伟,刘祚才,靳彦欣.川渝裂缝性地层自动压井环空多相压力波速特性研究[J].应用数学和力学,2022,43(12):1370-1379.
KONG Xiangwei,LIU Zuocai,JIN Yanxin.Study on multiphase pressure wave velocity characteristics of automatic kill annulus in Chuanyu fractured formation[J].Applied Mathematics and Mechanics,2022,43(12):1370-1379.
[14] 蔡依娜,彭雪飞,肖洒,等.炮眼暂堵实验及数值模拟研究[J].中国石油和化工标准与质量,2022,42(14):46-48.
CAI Yina,PENG Xuefei,XIAO Sa,et al.Temporary plugging experiment and numerical simulation research of perforations[J].China Petroleum and Chemical Standard and Quality,2022,42(14):46-48.
[15] 吴宝成,周福建,王明星,等.绳结式暂堵剂运移及暂堵规律实验研究[J].钻采工艺,2022,45(4):61-66.
WU Baocheng,ZHOU Fujian,WANG Mingxing,et al.Experimental study on migration and plugging pattern of knot temporary plugging agent[J].Drilling & Production Technology,2022,45(4):61-66.
[16] ZHANG Lufeng,ZHOU Fujian,MOU Jianye,et al.An integrated experimental method to investigate tool-less temporary-plugging multistage acid fracturing of horizontal well by using self-degradable diverters[J].SPE Journal,2020,25(3):1204-1219.
[17] WANG Bo,ZHOU Fujian,YANG Chen,et al.Experimental study on injection pressure response and fracture geometry during temporary plugging and diverting fracturing[J].SPE Journal,2020,25(2):573-586.
[18] ZHONG Ying,ZHANG Hao,FENG Yunhui,et al.A composite temporary plugging technology for hydraulic fracture diverting treatment in gas shales:using degradable particle/powder gels (dpgs) and proppants as temporary plugging agents[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2022,216:110851.
[19] 吴国涛,薛世杰,王永贤,等.复合暂堵剂暂堵技术[J].油气井测试,2018,27(6):51-56.
WU Guotao,XUE Shijie,WANG Yongxian,et al.Research on temporary plugging technology of composite temporary plugging agent[J].Well Testing,2018,27(6):51-56.
[20] 周双君,朱立鑫,杨森,等.吉木萨尔页岩油区块防漏堵漏技术[J].石油钻探技术,2021,49(4):66-70.
ZHOU Shuangjun,ZHU Lixin,YANG Sen,et al.Technology for preventing and controlling circulation loss in the Jimusar shale oil block[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2021,49(4):66-70.
[21] 于欣,张振,郭梦扬,等.抗高温油基钻井液堵漏剂的研制与应用——以龙马溪组页岩气井W204H为例[J].断块油气田,2021,28(2):168-172.
YU Xin,ZHANG Zhen,GUO Mengyang,et al.Development and application of high temperature resistant oil-based drilling fluid plugging agent:taking shale gas well W204H of Longmaxi Formation as an example[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2021,28(2):168-172.
[22] 咸玉席,陈超峰,封猛,等.页岩油藏裂缝网络多相渗流数值模拟研究[J].石油钻探技术,2021,49(5):94-100.
XIAN Yuxi,CHEN Chaofeng,FENG Meng,et al.Numerical simulation of multiphase flow in fracture networks in shale oil reservoir[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2021,49(5):94-100.
[23] 刘嘉.纤维颗粒复合暂堵转向技术优化研究[D].北京:中国石油大学(北京),2017.
LIU Jia.Research on optimization of fiber particle composite temporary plugging diversion technology[D].Beijing:China University of Petroleum(Beijing),2017.
[24] 韩慧芬,孔祥伟.页岩气储层暂堵转向压裂直井段暂堵球运移特性研究[J].应用力学学报,2021,38(1):249-254.
HAN Huifen,KONG Xiangwei.Study on migration characteristics of plugging balls in shale gas reservoir during plugging to fracturing vertical section[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics,2021,38(1):249-254.

页岩气井复合暂堵泵压数学模型及影响因素

Study on Mathematical Model and Influencing Factors of Composite Temporary Plugging Pump Pressure in Shale Gas Wells

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 10

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	周忠亚. 纹层型页岩油储层裂缝扩展机理及工艺对策[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(6): 141-149.
[2]	唐可, 赵勇, 李凯, 宁朦, 蒲万芬, 田开平. 致密油藏压裂井气驱暂堵调剖剂研制与评价[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(2): 161-167.
[3]	肖阳, 刘守昱, 何永志, 李志刚, 王家豪, 杨金元, 马中慧. 致密砂岩裂缝性气藏缝网压裂裂缝复杂程度评价方法[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(2): 157-163.
[4]	李伟, 肖阳, 陈明鑫, 刘会锋, 范文同, 黄龙藏, 彭芬, 曹科学. 深井转向压裂暂堵剂研究及应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(1): 154-159.
[5]	王纪伟, 康玉柱, 张殿伟, 冯动军, 陈刚, 田玲钰. 非常规储层压裂暂堵剂应用进展[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(5): 1-9.
[6]	李月丽, 徐铜浩, 龚郁峰. 致密气藏压裂停泵振荡压力数据降噪处理技术研究及应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(1): 142-147.
[7]	赵荣华, 刘文峥, 邹建敏, 黄庭刚, 王心怡. 复合暂堵转向酸化压裂技术在塔河油田的应用 [J]. 特种油气藏, 2019, 26(6): 146-150.
[8]	周珺，邓睿，韩旭，李成勇. 基于停泵压降分析的致密砂岩压裂效果评价[J]. 特种油气藏, 2017, 24(2): 165-.
[9]	张凤英鄢捷年林永学刘四海. 新型防塌钻井液体系在苏丹六区储层的应用[J]. , 2010, 17(5): 1-.
[10]	李绍泽李治龙王海元. THY 修井暂堵剂在稠油井中的试验研究与应用[J]. , 1995, 2(4): 1-.