顶水水侵对SAGD开采效率的影响及顶水下窜速率预测

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2022.02.010

特种油气藏 ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2): 72-76.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2022.02.010

顶水水侵对SAGD开采效率的影响及顶水下窜速率预测

蒋琪¹, 王中元², 宫宇宁², 郑爱萍³, 孙洪安², 刘佳丽¹, 何杰¹, 黄思源¹

1.西南石油大学,四川成都 510000;
2.中国石油辽河油田分公司,辽宁盘锦 124010;
3.中国石油新疆油田分公司,新疆克拉玛依 834000

收稿日期:2021-04-28 修回日期:2021-12-22 出版日期:2022-04-25 发布日期:2023-01-10
作者简介:蒋琪(1963—),男,教授,《特种油气藏》编委,1983年毕业于西南石油学院采油工程专业,1997年毕业于卡尔加里大学化学工程专业,获博士学位,现从事稠油开采和提高采收率前沿技术研究工作。
基金资助:
中国石油重大专项“辽河油田千万吨稳产关键技术研究与应用”(2017E-1604)

Influence of Top Water Intrusion on SAGD Production Efficiency and Prediction of Downward Channeling Rate of Top Water

Jiang Qi¹, Wang Zhongyuan², Gong Yuning², Zheng Aiping³, Sun Hongan², Liu Jiali¹, He Jie¹, Huang Siyuan¹

1. Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 510000, China;
2. PetroChina Liaohe Oilfield Company, Panjin, Liaoning 124010, China;
3. PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Karamay, Xinjiang 834000, China

Received:2021-04-28 Revised:2021-12-22 Online:2022-04-25 Published:2023-01-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对辽河油田杜84块馆陶组油层SAGD开发存在顶水下窜风险,通过数值模拟与理论研究相结合的方式,研究顶水下窜对SAGD开发效果的影响,揭示了汽腔与顶水层沟通后汽腔发育程度、累计产油量、油汽比和汽腔压力的变化规律。在数值模拟研究的基础上,基于油藏中多相流体渗流和传热原理,建立了预测顶水下窜速率的理论模型。研究结果表明:当汽腔与顶水层沟通后,SAGD的累计产油量和油汽比将大幅下降,且顶水层压力越高,对SAGD生产效果的影响程度越大;在汽腔与顶水层之间维持一定的隔离段厚度是降低顶水对SAGD后期影响的最有效手段,在目前操作条件下,建议汽腔与顶水层之间的最小隔离段厚度为20 m。该研究为制订顶水稠油油藏SAGD操作技术界限提供了理论依据。

关键词: 稠油, 顶水油藏, SAGD, 水侵速率, 热效率, 隔离段厚度

Abstract: In response to the risk of downward channeling of top water in SAGD development of oil reservoirs in Guantao Formation, Block Du84, Liaohe Oilfield, the influence of the downward channeling of top water on the SAGD development effect was studied in combination with numerical modeling and theoretical studies to discover the changes in the development degree of steam chamber, cumulative oil production, oil-steam ratio and steam chamber pressure after the steam chamber is connected to the top water zone. On the basis of numerical modeling study, a theoretical model was established for predicting the channeling rate of the top water according to the principles of multiphase fluid seepage and heat transfer in oil reservoirs. The results of the study showed that the cumulative oil production and oil-steam ratio in SAGD production were decreased significantly after the steam chamber was connected to the top water zone, and the higher the pressure of the top water zone, the greater the influence on the production effect of SAGD; the most effective method of reducing the influence of top water on the later stage of SAGD was to maintain a certain isolator thickness between the steam chamber and the top water zone; therefore, the minimum isolator thickness is recommended to be 20 m between the steam chamber and top water zone under existing operating conditions. This study provides a theoretical basis for determining the technical limits of SAGD operation in heavy oil reservoirs with top water.

Key words: heavy oil, top-water reservoir, SAGD, water invasion rate, thermal efficiency, isolator thickness

中图分类号:

TE357

蒋琪, 王中元, 宫宇宁, 郑爱萍, 孙洪安, 刘佳丽, 何杰, 黄思源. 顶水水侵对SAGD开采效率的影响及顶水下窜速率预测[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(2): 72-76.

Jiang Qi, Wang Zhongyuan, Gong Yuning, Zheng Aiping, Sun Hongan, Liu Jiali, He Jie, Huang Siyuan. Influence of Top Water Intrusion on SAGD Production Efficiency and Prediction of Downward Channeling Rate of Top Water[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2022, 29(2): 72-76.

参考文献

[1] Alberta Energy Regulator.Cnrl jackfish in situ project directive 54 annual performance presentation[EB/OL].(2019-11-01)[2022-01-07].https://www.aer.ca/documents/oilsands/insitu-presentations/2019 Athabasca CNRL Jackfish10097.pdf.
[2] Alberta Energy Regulator.Cenovus energy Inc.Foster Creek In-situ progress report scheme 8623 2018 update subsurface[EB/OL].(2019-03-15)[2022-01-07].https://www.aer.ca/providing-information/data-and-reports/activity-and-data/in-situ-performance-presentations.html.
[3] MILLER K A,XIAO Y.Improving the performance of classic SAGD with offsetting vertical producers[J].Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology,2008,47(2):22-28.
[4] Alberta Energy Regulator.Conoco Phillips annual surmont SAGD performance review approval 9426[EB/OL].(2019-04-24)[2022-01-07].https://www.aer.ca/documents/oilsands/insitu-presentations/2019 Athabasca Conoco Surmont SAGD 94609426.pdf.
[5] WONG Yong,ALISON Ferrise,HUANG Yinghui.Study of temperature and pressure fall-off during shut-in and slow-down for SAGD wells with top water[C].SPE189720-MS,2018:1-10.
[6] NASR T N,LAW D H S,BEAULIEU G,et al.SAGD application in gas cap and top water oil reservoirs[J].Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology,2003,42(1): 32-38.
[7] ALTURKL A,GATES I D,MAINI B.On SAGD in oil sands reservoirs with no caprock and top water zone[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology,2011,50(3):21-33.
[8] ALTURKL A,GATES I D,MAINI B.Co-Injection of non-condensable gas improves ES-SAGD performance in shallow oil sands reservoirs with a small top water zone[J].SPE137092,2010:1-17.
[9] BAO X,CHEN Z J,WEI Y,et al.Geostatisitical modeling and numerical simulation of the SAGD process[J].SPE137435,2010:1-20.
[10] ZHOU X,ZENG F.Feasibility study of using polymer to improve SAGD performance in oil sands with top water[C].SPE170164-MS,2014:1-22.
[11] QIN Wenting,ANDREWK Wojtanowicz,LI Hongwei.Improved thermal heavy oil recovery from strong bottom-water-drive reservoir by combining SAGD with downhole water sink[C].SPE172894-MS,2014:1-13.
[12] YEE C T,STROICH A.Flue gas injection into a mature SAGD steam chamber at the dover project (Formerly UTF)[J].Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology,2004,43(1):54-61.
[13] Alberta Energy Regulator.Meg energy Christina Lake regional project[EB/OL].(2019-07-18)[2022-01-07].https://www.aer.ca/documents/oilsands/insitu-presentations/2019 MEG Christina Lake SAGD 10773.pdf.
[14] 王诗.氮气辅助SAGD在曙一区超稠油油藏的应用[J].中国石油和化工标准与质量,2017, 37(13):102-103.
WANG Shi.Application of nitrogen-assisted SAGD in ultra-heavy oil reservoirs in Block Shu 1[J].China Petroleum and Chemical Standard and Quality,2017,37(13):102-103.
[15] 刘振宇,张明波,周大胜.曙光油田杜84块馆陶超稠油油藏SAGP开发研究[J].特种油气藏, 2013,20(6):96-98.
LIU Zhenyu,ZHANG Mingbo,ZHOU Dasheng.Study on SAGP for guantao super heavy oil reservoir in Block Du84[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2013,20(6):96-98.
[16] 辛坤烈.烟道气辅助SAGD技术研究与现场试验[J].中外能源, 2017, 22(7): 52-56.
XIN Kunlie.Study and field experiment of flue gas assisted SAGD[J].Sino-Global Energy,2017,22(7):52-56.
[17] BUTLER R M.Horizontal wells for the recovery of oil,Gas & Bitumen[M].Calgary:Topline Printing,1996:172-183.
[18] BUTLER R M.Thermal recovery of oil and bitumen[M].New Jersey:Prentice Hall Press,1991:504-505.
[19] LI Q,CHEN Z.A new analysis on the convective heat transfer at the edge of the SAGD chamber[C].SPE175063-MS,2015:1-21.

顶水水侵对SAGD开采效率的影响及顶水下窜速率预测

Influence of Top Water Intrusion on SAGD Production Efficiency and Prediction of Downward Channeling Rate of Top Water

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张亮, 魏虎超, 张向峰, 史振鹏, 赵泽宗, 王晓燕, 章杨, 杨红斌. 二甲醚水驱提高稠油油藏采收率实验[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(3): 97-105.
[2]	刘刚, 曹涵, 朱爱国, 李宜强, 岳航. 稠油油藏多相协同蒸汽驱物理模拟实验[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(3): 131-136.
[3]	高忠敏. SAGD采油站伴生气顶自压输油技术研究与试验[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(3): 161-167.
[4]	魏超平, 束青林, 吴光焕, 吴伟, 钟立国, 李迎春, 孙永权, 张彬. 敏感性普通稠油水驱油藏化学降黏实践[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(2): 109-115.
[5]	李爱芬, 高子恒, 景文龙, 付帅师. 基于CT扫描的蒸汽驱岩心孔隙结构特征及相渗分析[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(1): 79-86.
[6]	王凤娇, 徐贺, 刘义坤, 王永平, 吴晨宇, 李盖宇. 浅薄层普通稠油油藏聚合物驱提高采收率研究与应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(1): 107-113.
[7]	郭红霞, 解玉科, 陆建峰, 靳广兴, 赵开良, 杨勇, 张金柏, 何俊丽. 稠油改质助剂研究进展[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(6): 11-19.
[8]	刘奇鹿. 薄互层超稠油油藏蒸汽驱技术研究与试验[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(6): 97-103.
[9]	申婷婷. 浅层超稠油水平井微压裂扩容技术及应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(6): 111-118.
[10]	吴非. 投球式多功能抽油泵研制与应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(5): 149-153.
[11]	赵长虹, 王丽, 王攀, 王立龙, 姜丹, 张宝真. 碳酰胺辅助SAGD提高超稠油Ⅲ类油藏采收率技术[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(4): 107-113.
[12]	夏泊洢, 高清春, 孙立伟, 卢毓周, 平善海. 稠油热采井全井段热流耦合规律[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(4): 142-148.
[13]	王国栋. 稠油热采伴生气物质来源及影响因素[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(3): 64-68.
[14]	赵帅, 蒲万芬, 冯天, 王文科, 李一波. 超稠油低温氧化和裂解成焦实验[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(3): 69-75.
[15]	刘其成, 闫红星, 杨俊印, 程海清, 董晓东. 稠油油藏火驱取心井高温氧化区带识别方法[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(3): 76-83.