特种油气藏 ›› 2020, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (4): 79-84.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2020.04.012

• 油藏工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

页岩气在矿物孔隙中的微观吸附机理差异性研究

许晨曦1,2, 薛海涛1, 李波宏3, 卢双舫1, 张剑4, 陈国辉1,5, 王帅1   

  1. 1.水利勘测设计研究院,山东 济南 250014;
    2.中国石油大学(华东),山东 青岛 266580;
    3.中国石油集团测井有限公司,陕西 西安 710000;
    4.湖北省地质局,湖北 孝感 432000;
    5.中国地质大学(武汉),湖北 武汉 430074
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-26 修回日期:2020-04-15 出版日期:2020-08-25 发布日期:2022-02-18
  • 作者简介:许晨曦(1991—),女,工程师,2015年毕业于山东科技大学地质工程专业,2019年毕业于中国石油大学(华东)地质资源与地质工程专业,获硕士学位,现从事工程地质方面的工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金“气体扩散、渗流过程中同位素分馏机理及定量表征研究”(41802157);国家自然基金面上项目 “页岩气解析过程中同位素分馏的定量表征及在页岩气关键评价参数确定中的应用”(41672130)

Microscopic Adsorption Mechanism Difference in the Mineral Pore of Shale Gas Reservoir

Xu Chenxi1,2, Xue Haitao1, Li Bohong3, Lu Shuangfang1, Zhang Jian4, Chen Guohui1,5, Wang Shuai1   

  1. 1. Water Conservancy Survey and Design Institute,Jinan,Shandong 250014, China;
    2. China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, Shandong 266580, China;
    3. China Petroleum Logging Co. Ltd.,Xi'an, Shaanxi 710000, China;
    4. Hubei Geological Bureau, Xiaogan, Hubei 432000, China;
    5. China University of Geosciences(Wuhan), Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China
  • Received:2019-11-26 Revised:2020-04-15 Online:2020-08-25 Published:2022-02-18

摘要: 针对页岩气在不同矿物孔隙中的吸附机理差异性,采用巨正则蒙特卡洛分子模拟方法(GCMC),利用Material Studio 软件模拟页岩气体在3种矿物(干酪根、黏土矿物、石英)孔隙模型中的赋存状态,研究页岩气在不同矿物孔隙中的吸附机理。结果表明:不同类型矿物的吸附能力按大小依次为干酪根、黏土矿物、石英;有机质、黏土矿物和碎屑矿物吸附能力产生巨大差异的主要原因是气体在不同矿物表面的吸附位特征(吸附质气体分布密度和吸附强度)显著不同;深入理解页岩气在不同矿物孔隙中的吸附机理差异对客观评价吸附气含量至关重要。该研究可为今后预测不同地区页岩气吸附能力提供理论基础。

关键词: 页岩气矿物孔隙, 吸附机理, 表面结构, 结合能, 吸附位

Abstract: The giant regular Monte Carlo molecular simulation method (GCMC) was used to study the microscopic adsorption mechanism difference for the shale gas in different mineral pores. Material Studio software was adopted to simulate the occurrences of shale gas in three mineral pore categories (kerogen, clay mineral, quartz) and explore the adsorption mechanism of shale gas in different mineral pore categories. Research indicates that the mineral adsorption capacity from high to low is kerogen, clay mineral and quartz. The great differences in adsorption capacity for organic matter, clay mineral and clastic mineral mainly result from the change of adsorption site (distribution density and adsorption intensity of adsorbate gas) on various mineral surfaces. An integral understanding of the adsorption mechanism differences for the shale gas in various mineral pore categories is favorable to the adsorbed gas content evaluation. This research could provide certain theoretical reference for the prediction of shale gas adsorption capacity in different regions.

Key words: mineral pore in shale gas reservoir, adsorption mechanism, surface structure, binding energy, adsorption potential

中图分类号: