裂缝扩展与输砂动态耦合的缝内支撑剂铺置特征

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2023.04.018

特种油气藏 ›› 2023, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 146-155.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2023.04.018

裂缝扩展与输砂动态耦合的缝内支撑剂铺置特征

李小刚¹, 何建冈^1,2, 黄雁红³, 易良平^1,4, 张景强¹, 杜博迪¹, 黄刘科^4,5

1.西南石油大学油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室,四川成都 610500;
2.中国石油塔里木油田分公司,新疆库尔勒 841000;
3.中国石油新疆油田分公司,新疆克拉玛依 834000;
4.西南石油大学,四川成都 610500;
5.同济大学,上海 200092

收稿日期:2022-05-18 修回日期:2023-05-09 出版日期:2023-08-25 发布日期:2023-09-18
通讯作者: 何建冈(1997—),男,2020年毕业于西南石油大学石油工程专业,2023年毕业于该校油气田开发专业,获硕士学位,现主要从事非常规油气藏增产改造理论与技术研究工作。
作者简介:李小刚(1981—),男,教授,2003年毕业于西南石油学院石油工程专业,2009年毕业于西南石油大学油气田开发工程专业,获博士学位,现主要从事油气增产改造和非常规天然气开发研究工作。
基金资助:
四川省科技计划项目“页岩压裂的损伤力学特征研究”(2020JDJQ0059);成都理工大学油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室开放基金“基于相场理论的页岩地层压裂裂缝三维延伸数值模型与定量调控方法研究”(PLC20210314)

Characteristics of Proppant Placement in Fractures Dynamically Coupled between Fracture Propagation and Sand Transport

Li Xiaogang¹, He Jiangang^1,2, Huang Yanhong³, Yi Liangping^1,4, Zhang Jingqiang¹, Du Bodi¹, Huang Liuke^4,5

1. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China;
2. PetroChina Tarim Oilfied Campany, Korla, Xinjiang 841000, China;
3. PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Karamay, Xinjiang 834000, China;
4. Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500;
5. Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

Received:2022-05-18 Revised:2023-05-09 Online:2023-08-25 Published:2023-09-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 裂缝扩展与支撑剂运移动态耦合是目前水力压裂数值模拟技术面临的挑战之一。为了探究页岩动态裂缝缝内支撑剂铺置特征,基于三维离散元方法,建立考虑层理的页岩储层裂缝扩展与支撑剂运移动态耦合数值模型,分析了不同支撑剂粒径、支撑剂密度、压裂液黏度和支撑剂注入方式下的裂缝扩展与支撑剂铺置规律。研究表明:粒径越小,支撑剂铺置范围越广,铺置越均匀,粒径为150 μm的支撑剂的铺置面积与铺置效率是粒径为600 μm的支撑剂的1.8倍;支撑剂密度不是影响裂缝扩展和支撑剂运移的主要因素;压裂液黏度越高,裂缝面积和铺置面积越小,铺置效率越高,黏度从1 mPa·s增至15 mPa·s,裂缝面积减少45%,铺置面积减少34%,铺置效率增大12%;支撑剂注入方式为阶梯注入时,压裂液造缝与携砂效果最好。该研究成果可为页岩储层有效改造提供理论指导。

关键词: 页岩, 层理, 裂缝扩展, 支撑剂, 铺置特征, 动态耦合, 离散元

Abstract: The dynamic coupling of fracture propagation and proppant migration is one of the challenges in terms of hydraulic fracturing numerical simulation technology. In order to investigate the characteristics of proppant placement in shale dynamic fractures, based on the three-dimensional discrete element method, a dynamic coupling numerical model of fracture propagation and proppant migration in shale reservoirs considering bedding was established, and the laws of fracture propagation and proppant placement under different proppant particle sizes, proppant density, fracturing fluid viscosity and proppant injection methods were analyzed. The study shows that: The smaller the particle size, the wider the proppant placement range and the more uniform placement.The placement area and placement efficiency of the proppant with a particle size of 150 μm are 1.8 times that of the proppant with a particle size of 600 μm; the proppant density was not the main factor affecting fracture propagation and proppant migration; the higher the viscosity of fracturing fluid, the smaller the fracture area and placement area, and the higher placement efficiency, the viscosity increased from 1 mPa·s to 15 mPa·s, and the fracture area decreased by 45%, and the placement area reduced by 34%, and the placement efficiency increased by 12%.When the proppant injection method is step injection, the fracturing fluid has the best effect on fracture creation and sand carrying. The study results can provide theoretical guidance for effective modification of shale reservoirs.

Key words: shale, bedding, fracture propagation, proppant, placement characteristics, dynamic coupling, discrete element

中图分类号:

TE357.3

李小刚, 何建冈, 黄雁红, 易良平, 张景强, 杜博迪, 黄刘科. 裂缝扩展与输砂动态耦合的缝内支撑剂铺置特征[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(4): 146-155.

Li Xiaogang, He Jiangang, Huang Yanhong, Yi Liangping, Zhang Jingqiang, Du Bodi, Huang Liuke. Characteristics of Proppant Placement in Fractures Dynamically Coupled between Fracture Propagation and Sand Transport[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2023, 30(4): 146-155.

参考文献

[1] 赵金洲,任岚,蒋廷学,等.中国页岩气压裂十年:回顾与展望[J].天然气工业,2021,41(8):121-142.
ZHAO Jinzhou,REN Lan,JIANG Tingxue,et al.Ten years of gas shale fracturing in China:review and prospect[J].Natural Gas Industry,2021,41(8):121-142.
[2] 李小刚,张博宁,陈更生,等.基于生命周期理论的美国页岩气产业发展启示[J].天然气工业,2021,41(12):81-89.
LI Xiaogang,ZHANG Boning,CHEN Gengsheng,et al.Enlightenment from the USA's shale gas industry development based on the life cycle theory[J].Natural Gas Industry,2021,41(12):81-89.
[3] 潘林华,王海波,贺甲元,等.水力压裂支撑剂运移与展布模拟研究进展[J].天然气工业,2020,40(10):54-65.
PAN Linhua,WANG Haibo,HE Jiayuan,et al.Progress of simulation study on the migration and distribution of proppants in hydraulic fractures[J].Natural Gas Industry,2020,40(10):54-65.
[4] YI L P,WAISMAN H,YANG Z Z,et al.A consistent phase field model for hydraulic fracture propagation in poroelastic media[J].Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering,2020,372:113396.
[5] YI L P,YANG C X,CHEN R,et al.Phase field model for hydraulic fracture propagation in porous medium and numerical simulation analysis of hydraulic fracture propagation in a layered reservoir[J].Arabian Journal of Geosciences,2021,14(16):1-25.
[6] DONTSOV E V,PEIRCE A P.Slurry flow,gravitational settling and a proppant transport model for hydraulic fractures[J].Journal of Fluid Mechanics,2014,760:567-590.
[7] DONTSOV E V,PEIRCE A P.Proppant transport in hydraulic fracturing:crack tip screen-out in KGD and P3D models[J].International Journal of Solids and Structures,2015,63:206-218.
[8] BOYER F,Guazzelli é,Pouliquen O.Unifying suspension and granular rheology[J].Physical review letters,2011,107(18):188301.
[9] WANG J H,ELSWORTH D.Fracture penetration and proppant transport in gas-and foam-fracturing[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2020,77:103269.
[10] SHIOZAWA S,MCCLURE M.Simulation of proppant transport with gravitational settling and fracture closure in a three-dimensional hydraulic fracturing simulator[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2016,138:298-314.
[11] SURI Y,ISlAM S Z,HOSSAIN M.Proppant transport in dynamically propagating hydraulic fractures using CFD-XFEM approach[J].International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences,2020,131:104356.
[12] CHEN M,GUO T K,ZOU Y S,et al.Numerical simulation of proppant transport coupled with multi-planar-3d hydraulic fracture propagation for multi-cluster fracturing[J].Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering,2022,55(2):565-590.
[13] CUNDALL P A.Formulation of a three-dimensional distinct element model:Part I.a scheme to detect and represent contacts in a system composed of many polyhedral blocks[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts,1988,25(3):107-116.
[14] HART R,CUNDALL P A,LEMOS J.Formulation of a three-dimensional distinct element model-Part II.Mechanical calculations for motion and interaction of a system composed of many polyhedral blocks[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts,1988,25(3):117-125.
[15] DETOURNAY C,LEMOS J,ZHANG F.Development of a proppant transport logic in 3DEC[J].Applied Numerical Modeling in Geomechanics,2016,13:573-585.
[16] RICHARDSON J F,ZAKI W N.Sedimentation and fluidisation:Part I[J].Chemical Engineering Research and Design,1997,75:S82-S100.
[17] GRAY D D,GIORGINI A.The validity of the Boussinesq approximation for liquids and gases[J].International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,1976,19(5):545-551.
[18] HUBBERT M K,WILLIS D G.Mechanics of hydraulic fracturing[J].Transactions of the AIME,1957,210(1):153-168.
[19] WANG J H,ELSWORTH D,DENISON M K.Propagation,proppant transport and the evolution of transport properties of hydraulic fractures[J].Journal of Fluid Mechanics,2018,855:503-534.
[20] 周彤,王海波,李凤霞,等.层理发育的页岩气储集层压裂裂缝扩展模拟[J].石油勘探与开发,2020,47(5):1039-1051.
ZHOU Tong,WANG Haibo,LI Fengxia,et al.Numerical simulation of hydraulic fracture propagation in laminated shale reservoirs[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2020,47(5):1039-1051.
[21] HENG S,LI X Z,LIU X,et al.Experimental study on the mechanical properties of bedding planes in shale[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2020,76:103161.
[22] ROOSTAEI M,NOURI A,FATTAHPOUR V,et al.Numerical simulation of proppant transport in hydraulic fractures[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2018,163:119-138.

裂缝扩展与输砂动态耦合的缝内支撑剂铺置特征

Characteristics of Proppant Placement in Fractures Dynamically Coupled between Fracture Propagation and Sand Transport

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	赵晨旭, 李忠诚, 郭世超, 鲍志东, 魏兆胜, 李磊, 王海龙. 松辽盆地南部长岭断陷青一段陆相页岩地球化学和沉积环境特征[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(6): 55-61.
[2]	殷洪川, 胥良君, 吕泽宇, 庞进, 唐雯, 陈渝页. 页岩气井临界出砂产量预测方法[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(6): 135-140.
[3]	周忠亚. 纹层型页岩油储层裂缝扩展机理及工艺对策[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(6): 141-149.
[4]	俞天喜, 王雷, 陈蓓蓓, 孙锡泽, 李圣祥, 朱振龙. 基于盐溶和蠕变作用的含盐储层裂缝导流能力变化规律研究与应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(6): 157-164.
[5]	冯冰, 王胜, 李刚权, 蓝宝锋, 吴松, 李绍鹏. 动态速度迭代技术在复杂构造区随钻导向中的应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(5): 28-34.
[6]	周志军, 张国青, 崔春雪, 王静怡, 王娟. 不同岩性页岩油储集空间及物性特征[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(5): 42-49.
[7]	张玥, 汤济广, 胡美玲, 秦德超, 冯涛. 松辽盆地南部大安地区青山口组一段页岩储层微观孔隙结构[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(5): 58-66.
[8]	张添锦, 王延峰, 李军, 袁青. 注CO₂提高页岩吸附甲烷采收率核磁共振实验[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(5): 113-120.
[9]	张矿生, 薛小佳, 陶亮, 熊作为, 陈文斌, 武安安, 闫广. 页岩油水平井体积压裂缝网波及体积评价新方法及应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(5): 127-134.
[10]	王爱民, 王发明, 贺文卿, 王帅, 刘厚彬. 济阳坳陷油页岩力学性能特征实验[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(5): 144-150.
[11]	孟胡, 申颍浩, 朱万雨, 李小军, 雷德荣, 葛洪魁. 四川盆地昭通页岩气水平井水力压裂套管外载分析[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(5): 166-174.
[12]	钟红利, 卓自敏, 张凤奇, 张佩, 陈玲玲. 鄂尔多斯盆地甘泉地区长7页岩油储层非均质性及其控油规律[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(4): 10-18.
[13]	熊雄, 肖佃师, 雷祥辉, 李映燕, 卢双舫, 王猛, 彭悦, 郭雪燚. 吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组页岩油录井响应及“甜点”快速评价技术[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(4): 35-43.
[14]	李佳航, 李玮, 刘向君, 李星涛, 李永洲, 熊健, 梁利喜. 基于岩石薄片图像的海陆过渡相页岩纹层识别方法及应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(4): 44-53.
[15]	白立勋, 高之业, 魏维航, 杨弼鼎. 川南地区龙马溪组中深层与深层页岩孔隙结构对比研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(4): 54-62.