稠油油藏蒸汽-空气复合火驱特征分析及参数优化

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2024.01.008

特种油气藏 ›› 2024, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1): 66-73.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2024.01.008

稠油油藏蒸汽-空气复合火驱特征分析及参数优化

袁士宝^1,2, 任梓寒^1,2, 杨凤祥³, 孙新革³, 蒋海岩^1,2, 宋佳^1,2

1.西安石油大学,陕西西安 710065;
2.陕西省油气田特种增产技术重点实验室,陕西西安 710065;
3.中国石油新疆油田分公司,新疆克拉玛依 834000

收稿日期:2023-05-23 修回日期:2023-12-08 出版日期:2024-02-25 发布日期:2024-04-18
作者简介:袁士宝(1977—),男,教授,博士生导师,2001年毕业于石油大学(华东)石油工程专业,2007年毕业于中国石油大学(华东)油气田开发工程专业,获博士学位,现主要从事热采及油藏管理方面的工作。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金“基于热-流-固-化多场耦合的火驱储层热次生孔道演化及盐沉析调控机理研究”(52274039);陕西省自然科学基础研究重点项目“基于多点微波加热的油页岩原位热解开采方法研究”(2022JZ-28);西安石油大学研究生创新与实践能力培养计划“稠油油藏蒸汽-空气多介质复合火驱机理研究”(YCS23114109)

Characterization and Parameter Optimization of Steam-Air Compound Flooding in Heavy Oil Reservoirs

Yuan Shibao^1,2, Ren Zihan^1,2, Yang Fengxiang³, Sun Xin′ge³, Jiang Haiyan^1,2, Song Jia^1,2

1. Xi′an Shiyou University, Xi′an, Shaanxi 710065, China;
2. Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Advanced Stimulation Technology for Oil and Gas Reservoirs, Xi′an, Shaanxi 710065, China;
3. PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Karamay, Xinjiang 834000, China

Received:2023-05-23 Revised:2023-12-08 Online:2024-02-25 Published:2024-04-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对常规火驱存在热利用率低和高黏油启动慢的问题,以新疆红浅1井区稠油油藏为例,利用数值模拟模型对比了常规火驱和蒸汽-空气复合火驱的驱油特性和燃烧特性,通过对复合火驱各区带的温度、含油饱和度等参数进行分析,探究了蒸汽-空气复合火驱协同增效作用,并对蒸汽-空气复合火驱的注入参数进行了优化。结果表明:提产增效的主要机理是湿蒸汽吸收已燃区中滞留的热量变为过热蒸汽,并被高速流动的空气携带穿过燃烧前缘,使冷油区原油黏度大幅度降低,在提高驱油效率的同时增大了蒸汽冷凝带的宽度、燃烧波及体积和火线推进速度;注入参数的优化能提高复合火驱的开发效果,水气比越大,产能越高,而采用段塞注入会降低产能,为满足经济效益开发,最佳水气比应为3.0×10^-3m³/m³左右,最佳注汽段塞间隔应为90~120 d。该研究成果对火驱油藏提高开发效果具有借鉴意义。

关键词: 稠油油藏, 火驱, 湿式燃烧, 燃烧特征, 驱油机理

Abstract: Aiming at the problems of the low heat utilization rate and slow startup of high viscosity oil in conventional fire flooding, taking the heavy oil reservoirs in Xinjiang Hongqian 1 Well Area as an example, the numerical simulation model was used to compare the oil displacement characteristics and combustion characteristics of conventional fire flooding and steam-air compound flooding, and the synergistic effects of the steam-air compound flooding was investigated and the injection parameters of the steam-air compound flooding were optimized through the analysis of the temperatures, oil saturation, and other parameters of the compound flooding in each zone. The results show that the main mechanisms to increase production and enhance efficiency are that the moist steam absorbs the heat retained in the combustion zone, becomes superheated steam, and is carried by the high-rate air across the combustion fronts so that the viscosity of the crude oil in the cold oil zone is significantly reduced, which improves the oil displacement efficiency while increasing the width, swept volume of combustion, and burning rate of the steam condensate zone; the optimization of the slug injection parameter could improve the development effect of the compound flooding, and the higher water-air ratio could make the production capacity higher; the optimal water/gas ratio should be about 3.0, and the optimal intervals between the steam injection slugs should be 90-120 d to meet the economic benefits of development because the slug injection could decrease production capacity. The research results are of great significance to improving the development effect of the fire flooding oil reservoirs.

Key words: heavy oil reservoir, fire flooding, wet combustion, combustion characteristics, oil displacement mechanism

中图分类号:

TE357.44

袁士宝, 任梓寒, 杨凤祥, 孙新革, 蒋海岩, 宋佳. 稠油油藏蒸汽-空气复合火驱特征分析及参数优化[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(1): 66-73.

Yuan Shibao, Ren Zihan, Yang Fengxiang, Sun Xin′ge, Jiang Haiyan, Song Jia. Characterization and Parameter Optimization of Steam-Air Compound Flooding in Heavy Oil Reservoirs[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2024, 31(1): 66-73.

参考文献

[1]张方礼.火烧油层技术综述[J].特种油气藏,2011,18(6):1-5,65.
ZHANG Fangli.An overview of in situ combustion technology[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2011,18(6):1-5,65.
[2]YANG Min,CHAI Maojie,YU Xinran,et al.Insights into in-situ upgrading of bitumen in the hybrid of steam and combustion process: From experimental analysis aspects[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2022, 217:110894.
[3]李秋,何厚锋,关文龙,等.稠油油藏火驱驱替特征实验研究[J].油气地质与采收率,2021,28(6):79-86.
LI Qiu,HE Houfeng,GUAN Wenlong,et al.Experimental study on displacement characteristics of fire flooding in heavy oil reservoirs[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2021,28(6):79-86.
[4]蒋琪,游红娟,潘竟军,等.稠油开采技术现状与发展方向初步探讨[J].特种油气藏,2020,27(6):30-39.
JIANG Qi, YOU Hongjuan, PAN Jingjun,et al.Preliminary discussion on current status and development direction of heavy oil recovery technologies[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2020,27(6):30-39.
[5]关文龙,席长丰,陈亚平,等.稠油油藏注蒸汽开发后期转火驱技术[J].石油勘探与开发,2011,38(4):452-462.
GUAN Wenlong, XI Changfeng, CHEN Yaping,et al.Fire-flooding technologies in post-steam-injected heavy oil reservoirs[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2011,38(4):452-462.
[6]王磊.稠油油藏注蒸汽转火驱驱油机理研究及应用[D].北京:中国石油大学(北京),2018.
WANG Lei.Technology application and oil displacement mechanisms of in-situ combustion after steam injection in heavy oil reservoirs[D].Beijing:China University of Petroleum(Beijing),2018.
[7]赵洪岩,葛明曦,张鸿.辽河油田超稠油蒸汽驱技术界限研究与应用[J].特种油气藏,2022,29(2):98-103.
ZHAO Hongyan,GE Mingxi,ZHANG Hong.Research and application of steam flooding technical limit for super heavy oil in Liaohe Oilfield[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2022,29(2):98-103.
[8]石兰香,李秀峦,王宏远,等.稠油油藏蒸汽驱中后期剩余油分布特征及提高采收率方式研究[J].现代地质,2022,36(6):1585-1593.
SHI Lanxiang,LI Xiuluan,WANG Hongyuan,et al.Residual oil distribution characteristics and enhanced oil recovery methods in mid-late stages of steam flooding of heavy oil reservoirs[J].Geoscience,2022,36(6):1585-1593.
[9]关文龙,宫宇宁,唐君实,等.多层油藏火驱开发模式探讨[J].特种油气藏,2020,27(6):60-66.
GUAN Wenlong,GONG Yuning,TANG Junshi,et al.Study on fire flooding development mode of multi-layer reservoirs[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2020,27(6):60-66.
[10] YUAN Shibao,JIANG Haiyan,SHI Yaoli,et al.Study on heavy oil components transformation path based on core analysis during in-situ combustion process[J].Fuel,2019,253:72-78.
[11] IVORY J,DEROCCO M,PARADIS N.Investigation of the mechanisms involved in the steam-air injection process[J].Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology,1989,31(2):21-42.
[12] YANG Xiaomeng, IAN D G.Design of hybrid steam-in situ combustion bitumen recovery processes[J].Natural Resources Research,2009,18(3):213-233.
[13] LI Jingjing,LIANG Guojian,TANG Xiaodong,et al.The effect of low-temperature oxidation in air-assisted steam flooding process for enhancing oil recovery[J].Petroleum Science and Technology,2017,35(12):1247-1252.
[14] 孙琳,任梓寒,石彦,等.原油活性组分及相互作用对乳状液稳定性影响的研究进展[J].油田化学,2022,39(2):373-380.
SUN Lin,REN Zihan, SHI Yan,et al.Research progress of active components in crude oil and interaction on influence of emulsion stability[J].Oilfield Chemistry,2022,39(2):373-380.
[15] YANG Jian,LI Xiangfang,CHEN Zhangxin,et al.Combined steam-air flooding studies: experiments,numerical simulation and field test in Qi40 Block[J].Energy & Fuels,2016,30(3):2060-2065.
[16] 张树田.火驱+蒸汽复合驱室内实验研究[J].重庆科技学院学报(自然科科学版),2020,22(2):26-29,57.
ZHANG Shutian.Experimental study on combustion-steam combination flooding in laboratory[J].Journal of Chongqing University of Science and Technology(Natural Sciences Edition),2020,22(2):26-29,57.
[17] 张鸿,马宝全,程海清,等.稠油油藏火烧-蒸汽复合驱开发效果实验[J].东北石油大学学报,2021,45(4):93-102.
ZHANG Hong,MA Baoquan,CHENG Haiqing,et al.Experiment on development effect by fire-steam flooding in heavy oil reservoir[J].Journal of Northeast Petroleum University,2021,45(4):93-102.
[18] 宁奎,袁士宝,蒋海岩.火烧油层理论与实践[M].东营:中国石油大学出版社,2010:98-104.
NING Kui,YUAN Shibao,JIANG Haiyan.Theory and practice of fire flooding[M].Dongying:China University of Petroleum Press,2010:98-104.
[19] 张锐,朴晶明,邓明.火烧油层段塞+蒸汽驱组合式开采技术研究[J].特种油气藏,2007,14(5):65-69.
ZHANG Rui,PIAO Jingming,DENG Ming.Compound recovery by in situ combustion slug + steam flooding[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2007,14(5):65-69.
[20] 蒋海岩,李天月,杜坤,等.火驱过程中稠油组分变化特征研究[J].特种油气藏,2021,28(4):96-101.
JIANG Haiyan, LI Tianyue, DU Kun,et al.Study on the characteristics of changes in heavy oil components during in-situ combustion[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2021,28(4):96-101.
[21] 杨智,廖静,高成国,等.红浅1井区直井火驱燃烧区带特征[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2019,38(1):89-93.
YANG Zhi,LIAO Jing,GAO Chengguo,et al.Characteristics of the in-situ-combustion zone for the vertical well in Well Block HQ1[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2019,38(1):89-93.
[22] 张霞林,关文龙,刁长军,等.新疆油田红浅1井区火驱开采效果评价[J].新疆石油地质,2015,36(4):465-469.
ZHANG Xialin,GUAN Wenlong,DIAO Zhangjun,et al.Evaluation of recovery effect in Hongqian-1 Wellblock by in-situ combustion process in Xinjiang Oilfield[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2015,36(4):465-469.
[23] 木合塔尔,高成国,袁士宝,等.红浅1井区注蒸汽后火烧油层生产特征分析[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2021,40(4):73-79.
MUHE Taer,GAO Chengguo,YUAN Shibao,et al.Analysis on the production characteristics for the in-situ combustion reservoir after steam injection in Well Block HQ1[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2021,40(4):73-79.
[24] 师忠卿,徐明明,刘云磊,等.胜利油田典型区块稠油化学降黏前后理化特征[J].油气地质与采收率,2023,30(6):104-111.
SHI Zhongqing,XU Mingming,LIU Yunlei,et al.Study on physicochemical characteristics of heavy oil before and after chemical viscosity reduction in typical blocks of Shengli Oilfield[J].Petroleum Geology & Recovery Efficiency,2023,30(6):104-111.
[25] 赵健,张娜,蒋海岩,等.稠油高压火驱氧化特性实验研究[J].油气地质与采收率,2023,30(3):145-151.
ZHAO Jian,ZHANG Na,JIANG Haiyan,et al.Experimental study on oxidation characteristics of heavy oil reservoirs by high-pressure in-situ combustion[J].Petroleum Geology & Recovery Efficiency,2023,30(3):145-151.
[26] 束青林,胡婧,林军章,等.“益生菌”提高难采稠油采收率机理与技术实践[J].油气地质与采收率,2022,29(4):76-82.
SHU Qinglin,HU Jing,LIN Junzhang,et al.Mechanism and technical practice of enhancing oil recovery of hard-to-recover heavy oil reservoirs with probiotics[J].Petroleum Geology & Recovery Efficiency,2022,29(4):76-82.
[27] 亓树成,彭小强,郝红永,等. 降黏剂及其施工工艺对火驱稠油油藏注采井间快速连通的影响[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2023,42(2):86-90.
QI Shucheng,PENG Xiaoqiang,HAO Hongyong,et al.Influence of viscosity reducer and its operation technique on rapid injector-producer connection in in-situ combustion heavy oil reservoirs[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2023,42(2):86-90.
[28] 吴飞鹏,丁步杰,张戈,等. 低渗稠油高压降黏驱高黏阻滞带形成机制与主控因素:以胜利油田王152油藏为例[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2023,42(4):139-147.
WU Feipeng,DING Bujie,ZHANG Ge,et al.Formation mechanisms and main controlling factors of high-viscosity blocked zone in low-permeability heavy oil with high-pressure viscosity reduction:taking Wang 152 reservoir of ShengLi Oilfield as an example[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2023,42(4):139-147.
[29] 何永清鲁霖懋周其勇,等. 适合中深层稠油油藏的两亲性稠油乳化降黏剂的制备及性能评价[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2023,42(5):160-167.
HE Yongqing,LU Linmao,ZHOU Qiyong,et al.Preparation and performance evaluation of amphiphilic emulsified viscosity reducer for medium-deep heavy oil reservoirs[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2023,42(5):160-167.
[30] YANG Min, THOMAS G H, CHEN Zhangxing.Numerical investigation of the mechanisms in co-injection of steam and enriched air process using combustion tube tests[J].Fuel,2019,242:638-648.

稠油油藏蒸汽-空气复合火驱特征分析及参数优化

Characterization and Parameter Optimization of Steam-Air Compound Flooding in Heavy Oil Reservoirs

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王田田, 赵仁保, 蒋宁宁, 李鑫, 徐晗, 王昊. 注蒸汽开发后油藏火驱原位制氢可行性[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(1): 81-86.
[2]	孙宝泉, 杨勇, 吴光焕, 赵红雨, 张民, 孙超, 张贺捷. 超稠油油藏热化学驱油水渗流特征[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(1): 87-93.
[3]	甄贵男, 王健, 吴宝成, 王炜龙, 唐杨, 路宇豪. 稠油油藏水气交替诱导泡沫油冷采提高采收率实验[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(1): 101-108.
[4]	杨洪, 苏日古, 陈莉娟, 王旭生, 陈龙, 潘竟军, 郭勇. 火驱原油活性氢组分变化规律认识[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(6): 127-132.
[5]	于雪峰. 基于数值模拟的重力火驱特征分析与调控[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(5): 88-93.
[6]	赵帅, 蒲万芬, 冯天, 王文科, 李一波. 超稠油低温氧化和裂解成焦实验[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(3): 69-75.
[7]	刘其成, 闫红星, 杨俊印, 程海清, 董晓东. 稠油油藏火驱取心井高温氧化区带识别方法[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(3): 76-83.
[8]	韩晓强, 李枭, 彭小强, 汝灿东, 张继周, 史浩, 李忠权. 稠油火驱过渡金属钴盐催化氧化实验[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(2): 135-140.
[9]	刘茜. 厚层稠油油藏直平组合火驱机理研究与试验[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(1): 128-133.
[10]	庄建, 陆灿阳, 张旭, 杨文军, 袁维彬. 塞169低渗透油藏微生物活化水驱机理及群落分布规律[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(1): 147-153.
[11]	户昶昊. 火驱高温与低温氧化转换界限研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(5): 86-92.
[12]	王泰超, 朱国金, 谭先红, 王凯, 谢昊君. 基于稠油火驱机理改进的数值模拟方程[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(5): 100-106.
[13]	刘其成, 闫红星, 杨俊印, 杨鹏成, 张崇刚. 稠油火驱产出流体色谱指纹特征燃烧状态判识方法[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(5): 140-145.
[14]	葛明曦. 边顶水超稠油油藏SAGD蒸汽腔描述及调控对策[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(4): 136-141.
[15]	李伟忠. 胜利油田稠油未动用储量评价及动用对策[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(2): 63-71.