特种油气藏 ›› 2021, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (1): 103-110.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2021.01.015

• 油藏工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

致密油藏储层敏感性评价及主控因素研究

王晓雯1,2   

  1. 1.造山带与地壳演化教育部重点实验室,北京 100871;
    2.北京大学,北京 100871
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-02 修回日期:2020-11-13 出版日期:2021-02-25 发布日期:2021-04-27
  • 作者简介:王晓雯(1997—),女,2017年毕业于长安大学地质学专业,现为北京大学石油地质学专业在读硕士研究生,主要从事石油地质方向的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项“鄂尔多斯盆地大型低渗透岩性地层油气藏开发示范工程”(2016ZX05050)

Study on Reservoir Sensitivity Evaluation and Key Control Factors of Tight Oil Reservoirs

Wang Xiaowen1,2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Orogenic Belt and Crustal Evolution, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100871, China;
    2. Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
  • Received:2020-05-02 Revised:2020-11-13 Online:2021-02-25 Published:2021-04-27

摘要: 吴起油田致密砂岩油藏储层物性差、孔隙结构复杂、非均质性严重,导致注水效果差。针对该问题,通过高压压汞、扫描电镜和X-射线衍射等实验,分析了吴起油田长6段的孔隙结构特征和黏土矿物组成,选取9个孔隙结构参数作为特征参数,建立了基于储层孔隙结构的储层综合评价标准,将储层分为Ⅰ(好)、Ⅱ(中)和Ⅲ(差)3类,并对不同类型储层的岩样开展敏感性评价和影响因素分析。结果表明:3类储层敏感性具有明显差异,Ⅰ类储层弱速敏、弱水敏、中等偏弱盐敏、中等偏强酸敏、中等偏弱碱敏;Ⅱ类储层中等偏弱—弱速敏和水敏、中等偏弱盐敏、弱酸敏、中等偏弱碱敏;Ⅲ类储层中等偏弱速敏、弱水敏、弱盐敏、中等偏弱—弱酸敏和弱碱敏;孔隙结构和黏土矿物组成是造成储层敏感性差异的主要原因。该研究结果可为同类致密油藏优化注水和储层改造提供参考。

关键词: 致密油藏, 敏感性, 孔隙结构, 黏土矿物, 主控因素, 吴起油田

Abstract: Tight sandstone reservoir in Wuqi Oilfield is disadvantaged by poor physical properties, complex pore structure, serious heterogeneity, and poor water injection effect. In response to these shortcomings, the pore structure characteristics and clay mineral composition of Chang6 Oil-bearing Formation in Wuqi oilfield were analyzed with high-pressure mercury porosimetry, scanning electron microscope and X-ray diffraction and other tests. Nine pore structure parameters were selected as characteristic parameters, and a comprehensive evaluation standard based on reservoir pore structure was established. The reservoirs were divided into three categories: Type I (excellent), Type II (moderate) and Type III (poor). The rock samples of each type of reservoir were evaluated for sensitivity and analyzed for influencing factor. The results of the study show that the sensitivity of the three types of reservoirs was significantly different. Specifically, Type I presented low velocity sensitivity, low water sensitivity, moderately low salt sensitivity, moderately high acid sensitivity, and moderately low alkali sensitivity. Type II presented moderately low to low velocity sensitivity and water sensitivity, moderate to low salt sensitivity, low acid sensitivity, and moderate to low alkali sensitivity. Type III presented moderate to low velocity sensitivity, low water sensitivity, low salt sensitivity, moderately low to low acid sensitivity and low alkali sensitivity. The pore structure and clay mineral composition were the main reasons for the difference in reservoir sensitivity. The study results can provide a reference for optimizing water injection and reservoir stimulation for similar tight oil reservoirs.

Key words: tight oil reservoir, sensitivity, pore structure, clay minerals, key trolling factors, Wuqi Oilfield

中图分类号: