膏盐岩含量对成熟阶段页岩生烃影响的模拟实验

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2022.05.016

特种油气藏 ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5): 113-118.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2022.05.016

膏盐岩含量对成熟阶段页岩生烃影响的模拟实验

孟庆强^1,2, 李京洲³, 刘文汇^1,2,4, FuQi⁵, 王晓锋⁴, 王杰⁶

1.页岩油气富集机理与有效开发国家重点实验室,北京 102206;
2.中国石化石油勘探开发研究院,北京 102206;
3.中国石油冀东油田分公司,河北唐山 063200;
4.西北大学,陕西西安 710127;
5.Experimental Organic Geochemistry Laboratory,University of Houston,Houston U.S.A 77092;
6.中国石化石油勘探开发研究院,江苏无锡 214126

收稿日期:2021-12-17 修回日期:2022-05-12 发布日期:2023-01-10
作者简介:孟庆强(1978—),男,高级工程师,2000年毕业于山东科技大学地质工程专业,2009年毕业于中国石油大学(北京)矿产普查与勘探专业,获博士学位,现主要从事石油与天然气地球化学的基础理论及应用技术研究。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金“海相含膏岩盐层系烃源岩发育特征与生烃潜力评价”(U1663201)

Simulation Study on the Effect of Gypsum-salt Content on Hydrocarbon Generation in Mature Stage Shale

Meng Qingqiang^1,2, Li Jingzhou³, Liu Wenhui^1,2,4, Fu Qi⁵, Wang Xiaofeng⁴, Wang Jie⁶

1. State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development, Beijing 102206, China;
2. SINOPEC Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute, Beijing 102206, China;
3. PetroChina Jidong Oilfield Company, Tangshan, Hebei 063200, China;
4. Northwest China University, Xi′an, Shaanxi 710127, China;
5. Experimental Organic Geochemistry Laboratory, University of Houston,Houston, U.S.A 77092;
6. SINOPEC Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214126, China

Received:2021-12-17 Revised:2022-05-12 Published:2023-01-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 中国海相和陆相盆地烃源岩层系中均发育厚度不等的膏盐岩层,为探究膏盐岩含量变化对烃源岩生烃过程及产物特征的影响规律,以美国二叠盆地Eagle Ford组页岩为烃源岩,通过添加不同质量分数的天然膏盐岩开展生烃模拟实验,分析滞留于固态反应物中液态产物的特征。结果表明:随着膏盐岩质量分数的增加,海相烃源岩滞留烃产率呈现“先降低再升高”的U型曲线特征,且膏盐岩含量与饱和烃的相对含量呈线性关系,膏盐岩可显著改善原油品质;膏盐岩含量与Pr/Ph、U/R等生物标志化合物参数值正相关,参数应用时需充分考虑膏盐岩含量的影响。研究成果对精确评价页岩油储量潜力、明确页岩油品质变化主控因素具有重要参考作用。

关键词: 膏盐岩, 滞留烃, 生烃, 页岩, Eagle Ford组

Abstract: Gypsum-salt rock layers of different thicknesses are developed in the source rock strata of marine and continental basins in China. In order to investigate the influence of the variation of paste rock content on the hydrocarbon generation process and product characteristics of source rocks, taking the shale of Eagle Ford Formation in Permian Basin of the United States as source rock, hydrocarbon generation simulations were made by adding natural gypsum-salt rocks with different mass fractions to analyze the characteristics of the liquid products retained in the solid reactants. The results showed that: with the increase of the mass fraction of gypsum-salt rock, the retained hydrocarbon yield of the marine source rock presented a U-shaped curve of “decreasing then increasing”, and the content of gypsum-salt rock had a linear relationship with the relative content of saturated hydrocarbons, indicating that the gypsum-salt rock could significantly improve the quality of crude oil; the content of gypsum-salt rock was positively correlated with the parameter values of Pr/Ph, U/R and other biomarker compounds, and the influence of gypsum-salt rock content should be fully considered in the application of parameters. The results of the study are important reference for the accurate evaluation of shale oil reserve potential and the identification of the main controlling factors of shale oil quality variation.

Key words: gypsum-salt rock, residual hydrocarbon, hydrocarbon generation, shale, Eagle Ford Formation

中图分类号:

TE122.2

孟庆强, 李京洲, 刘文汇, FuQi, 王晓锋, 王杰. 膏盐岩含量对成熟阶段页岩生烃影响的模拟实验[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(5): 113-118.

Meng Qingqiang, Li Jingzhou, Liu Wenhui, Fu Qi, Wang Xiaofeng, Wang Jie. Simulation Study on the Effect of Gypsum-salt Content on Hydrocarbon Generation in Mature Stage Shale[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2022, 29(5): 113-118.

参考文献

[1] 刘文汇,赵恒,刘全有,等.膏盐岩层系在海相油气成藏中的潜在作用[J].石油学报,2016,37(12):1451-1462.
LIU Wenhui,ZHAO Heng,LIU Quanyou,et al.Potential role of gypsum strata series in marine hydrocarbon accumulation[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(12):1451-1462.
[2] 金之钧,周雁,云金表,等.我国海相地层膏盐岩盖层分布与近期油气勘探方向[J].石油与天然气地质,2010,31(6):715-724.
JIN Zhijun,ZHOU Yan,YUN Jinbiao,et al.Distribution of gypsum-salt cap rocks and near-term hydrocarbon exploration targets in the marine sequences of China[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2010,31(6):715-724.
[3] 卓勤功,赵孟军,李勇,等.膏盐岩盖层封闭性动态演化特征与油气成藏——以库车前陆盆地冲断带为例[J].石油学报,2014,35(5):847-856.
ZHUO Qingong,ZHAO Mengjun,LI Yong,et al.Dynamic sealing evolution and hydrocarbon accumulation of evaporite cap rocks:an example from Kuqa foreland basin thrust belt[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2014,35(5):847-856.
[4] 孙利,余光华,李建革,等.东濮凹陷膏盐岩沉积控制因素及其对油气成藏的影响[J].油气地质与采收率,2014,21(5):27-31,112.
SUN Li,YU Guanghua,LI Jiange,et al.Controlling factors of gypsolith sedimentary and its impact on hydrocarbon reservoirs in Dongpu Sag[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2014,21(5):27-31,112.
[5] 唐德海,段金宝.四川盆地嘉陵江组嘉四段-嘉五段膏盐岩分布及油气意义[J].特征油气藏,2017,24(2):80-85.
TANG Dehai,DUAN Jinbao.Distribution and reservoir significance of gypsum salt rocks in Jia-4-Jia-5 Interval of Jialingjiang Formation in the Sichuan Basin[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2017,24(2):80-85.
[6] 李永豪,曹剑,胡文瑄,等.膏盐岩油气封盖性研究进展[J].石油与天然气地质,2016,37(5):634-643.
LI Yonghao,CAO Jian,HU Wenxuan,et al.Research advances on hydrocarbon sealing properties of gypsolyte/saline rocks[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2016,37(5):634-643.
[7] 田雨,瞿建华,何巍,等.苏伊士湾中新统蒸发岩储层特征及有利区预测[J].特种油气藏,2021,28(4):72-78.
TIAN Yu,QU Jianhua,HE Wei,et al.Characteristics of Miocene evaporite reservoir in Gulf of Suez and Prospective Zone Prediction[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2021,28(4):72-78.
[8] 王招明.塔里木盆地库车坳陷克拉苏盐下深层大气田形成机制与富集规律[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(2):153-166.
WANG Zhaoming.Formation mechanism and enrichment regularities of Kelasu Subsalt Deep Large Gas Field in Kuqa Depression,Junggar Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(2):153166.
[9] 吴小力,刘翰林,李荣西,等.中国陆相蒸发岩盆地中烃源岩的发育规律及其生排烃特征研究进展[J].地质科技情报,2017,36(4):183-192.
WU Xiaoli,LIU Hanlin,LI Rongxi,et al.Progress in researches of developmental rule and the hydrocarbon generation and expulsion characteristics of hydrocarbon source rocks in Terrestrial Evaporite Basins of China[J].Geological Science and Technology Information,2017,36(4):183-192.
[10] 樊奇,樊太亮,李清平,等.塔里木盆地寒武系膏盐岩沉积特征与发育模式[J].石油实验地质,2021,43(2):217-226.
FAN Qi,FAN Tailiang,LI Qingping,et al.Sedimentary characteristics and development model of Cambrian gypsum-salt rocks, Tarim Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2021,43(2):217-226.
[11] 马奎,胡素云,王铜山,等.膏盐岩对碳酸盐层系油气成藏的影响及勘探领域分析[J].地质科技情报,2016,35(2):169-176.
MA Kui,HU Suyun,WANG Tongshan,et al.Effect of gypsum rock on the hydrocarbon accumulation in carbonate layers and analysis of exploration field[J].Geological Science and Technology Information,2016,35(2):169-176.
[12] 支东明,曹剑,向宝力,等.玛湖凹陷风城组碱湖烃源岩生烃机理及资源量新认识[J].新疆石油地质,2016,37(5):499-506.
ZHI Dongming,CAO Jian,XIANG Baoli,et al.Fengcheng Alkaline lacustrine source rocks of Lower Permian in Mahu Sag in Junggar Basin:hydrocarbon generation mechanism and petroleum resources reestimation[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2016,37(5):499-506.
[13] 王小军,王婷婷,曹剑.玛湖凹陷风城组碱湖烃源岩基本特征及其高效生烃[J].新疆石油地质,2018,39(1):9-15.
WANG Xiaojun,WANG Tingting,CAO Jian.Basic characteristics and highly efficient hydrocarbon generation of Alkaline-Lacustrine source rocks in Fengcheng Formation of Mahu Sag[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2018,39(1):9-15.
[14] 赵恒,刘文汇,李艳杰,等.海相膏盐岩层系烃源岩形成演化特征初探[J].海相油气地质,2019,24(3):1-7.
ZHAO Heng,LIU Wenhui,LI Yanjie,et al.A preliminary study on hydrocarbon generation and evaluation of marine gypsum/salt-bearing source rocks[J].Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2019,24(3):1-7.
[15] ALNAHWI A,LOUCKS R L.Mineralogical composition and total organic carbon quantification using x-ray fluorescence data from the Upper Cretaceous Eagle Ford Group in southern Texas[J].Aapg Bulletin,2019,103(12):2891-2907.
[16] 刘金钟,唐永春.用干酪根生烃动力学方法预测甲烷生成量之一例[J].科学通报,1998,43(11):1187-1191.
LIU Jinzhong,TANG Yongchun.An example of predicting methane generation by kinetics method of kerabitumen in hydrocarbon genesis[J].Chinese Science Bulletin,1998,43(11):1187-1191.
[17] 秦建中,刘宝泉.海相不同类型烃源岩生排烃模式研究[J].石油实验地质,2005,27(1):74-80.
QIN Jianzhong,LIU Baoquan.Models of hydrocarbon generation and expulsion from various marine source rocks[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2005,27(1):74-80.
[18] CHEN X,LIU Q,MENG Q,et al.Assessing effects of sulfate minerals on petroleum generation in sedimentary basins using hydrous pyrolysis:I. light alkanes[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2019,110:737-746.
[19] SONG D,CHEN Y,WANG T,et al.Organic geochemical compositions of Mesoproterozoic source rocks in the Yanliao Rift, Northern China[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2021,123:104740.
[20] 秦建中,刘宝泉,郑伦举,等.海相碳酸盐岩烃源岩生排烃能力研究[J].石油与天然气地质,2006,27(3):348-355.
QIN Jianzhong,LIU Baoquan,ZHENG Lunju,et al.Study on capability of hydrocarbon generation and expulsion from marine carbonate source rocks[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2006,27(3):348-355.
[21] 金之钧,王冠平,刘光祥,等.中国陆相页岩油研究进展与关键科学问题[J].石油学报,2021,42(7):821-835.
JIN Zhijun,WANG Guanping,LIU Guangxiang,et al.Research progress and key scientific issues of continental shale oil in China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2021,42(7):821-835.
[22] 秦建中,申宝剑,腾格尔,等.不同类型优质烃源岩生排油气模式[J].石油实验地质,2013,35(2):179-186.
QIN Jianzhong,SHEN Baojian,Tengger,et al.Hydrocarbon generation and expulsion pattern of different types of excellent source rocks[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2013,35(2):179-186.
[23] 王娟,金强,马国政,等.高成熟阶段膏岩等盐类物质在烃源岩热解生烃过程中的催化作用[J].天然气地球科学,2009,20(1):26-31.
WANG Juan,JIN Qiang,MA Guozheng,et al.Catalytic action of sulphate evaporates in pyrolytic gas generation of source rocks[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2009,20(1):26-31.
[24] 支东明,曹剑,向宝力,等.玛湖凹陷风城组碱湖烃源岩生烃机理及资源量新认识[J].新疆石油地质,2016,37(5):499-506.
ZHI Dongming,CAO Jian,XIANG Baoli,et al.Fengcheng Alkaline lacustrine source rocks of Lower Permian in Mahu Sag in Junggar Basin:hydrocarbon generation mechanism and petroleum resources reestimation[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2016,37(5):499-506.
[25] 陈湘飞,李素梅,张洪安,等.东濮凹陷膏盐岩对烃源岩成烃演化的控制作用及其石油地质意义[J].现代地质,2018,32(6):1125-1136.
CHEN Xiangfei,LI Sumei,ZHANG Hongan,et al.Controlling effects of gypsum-salt on hydrocarbon generation of source rocks in Dongpu Sag and its significance on petroleum geology[J].Geoscience,2018,32(6):1125-1136.
[26] 陈义才,沈忠民,罗小平.石油与天然气有机地球化学[M].北京:科学出版社,2007:164-165.
CHEN Yicai,SHEN Zhongmin,LUO Xiaoping.Organic Geochemistry of Petroleum and Natural Gas [M].Beijing:Science Press,2007:164-165.
[27] 刘海波,郭绪强.原油组分的性质与结构对其黏度的影响[J].新疆石油地质,2008,29(3):347-349.
LIU Haibo,GUO Xuqiang.Influence of property and structure of crude oil on its viscosity[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2008,29(3):347-349.
[28] VENKATESAN M I,KAPLAN I R.Distribution and transport of hydrocarbons in surface sediments of the alaskan outer continental shelf[J].Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta,1982,46(11):2135-2149.
[29] WANG G,SIMONEIT B R T,SHI S,et al.A GC×GC-ToFMS investigation of the unresolved complex mixture and associated biomarkers in biodegraded petroleum[J].Acta Geologica Sinica-English Edition,2018,92(5):1959-1972.
[30] MANSUY-HUAULT L,REGIER A,FAURE P.Chemosphere analyzing hydrocarbons in sewer to help in PAH source apportionment in sewage sludges[J].Chemosphere,2009,75(8):995-1002.
[31] BERND R T S.Organic matter of the troposphere-Ⅲ.characterization and sources of petroleum and pyrogenic residues in aerosols over the western united states[J].Atmospheric Environment,1984,18(1):51-67
[32] SHUAI Y,ZHANG S,GRASBY S E,et al.Controls on biogenic gas formation in the Qaidam Basin, northwestern China[J].Chemical Geology,2013,335:36-47.

膏盐岩含量对成熟阶段页岩生烃影响的模拟实验

Simulation Study on the Effect of Gypsum-salt Content on Hydrocarbon Generation in Mature Stage Shale

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	赵晨旭, 李忠诚, 郭世超, 鲍志东, 魏兆胜, 李磊, 王海龙. 松辽盆地南部长岭断陷青一段陆相页岩地球化学和沉积环境特征[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(6): 55-61.
[2]	殷洪川, 胥良君, 吕泽宇, 庞进, 唐雯, 陈渝页. 页岩气井临界出砂产量预测方法[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(6): 135-140.
[3]	周忠亚. 纹层型页岩油储层裂缝扩展机理及工艺对策[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(6): 141-149.
[4]	冯冰, 王胜, 李刚权, 蓝宝锋, 吴松, 李绍鹏. 动态速度迭代技术在复杂构造区随钻导向中的应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(5): 28-34.
[5]	周志军, 张国青, 崔春雪, 王静怡, 王娟. 不同岩性页岩油储集空间及物性特征[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(5): 42-49.
[6]	张玥, 汤济广, 胡美玲, 秦德超, 冯涛. 松辽盆地南部大安地区青山口组一段页岩储层微观孔隙结构[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(5): 58-66.
[7]	张添锦, 王延峰, 李军, 袁青. 注CO₂提高页岩吸附甲烷采收率核磁共振实验[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(5): 113-120.
[8]	张矿生, 薛小佳, 陶亮, 熊作为, 陈文斌, 武安安, 闫广. 页岩油水平井体积压裂缝网波及体积评价新方法及应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(5): 127-134.
[9]	王爱民, 王发明, 贺文卿, 王帅, 刘厚彬. 济阳坳陷油页岩力学性能特征实验[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(5): 144-150.
[10]	孟胡, 申颍浩, 朱万雨, 李小军, 雷德荣, 葛洪魁. 四川盆地昭通页岩气水平井水力压裂套管外载分析[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(5): 166-174.
[11]	钟红利, 卓自敏, 张凤奇, 张佩, 陈玲玲. 鄂尔多斯盆地甘泉地区长7页岩油储层非均质性及其控油规律[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(4): 10-18.
[12]	王鑫, 李政, 朱日房, 黎萍, 王茹, 牛子铖, 楼达. 渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷石炭系—二叠系煤系烃源岩生烃特征研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(4): 19-27.
[13]	熊雄, 肖佃师, 雷祥辉, 李映燕, 卢双舫, 王猛, 彭悦, 郭雪燚. 吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组页岩油录井响应及“甜点”快速评价技术[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(4): 35-43.
[14]	李佳航, 李玮, 刘向君, 李星涛, 李永洲, 熊健, 梁利喜. 基于岩石薄片图像的海陆过渡相页岩纹层识别方法及应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(4): 44-53.
[15]	白立勋, 高之业, 魏维航, 杨弼鼎. 川南地区龙马溪组中深层与深层页岩孔隙结构对比研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(4): 54-62.