次生水体对火驱开发效果影响的实验

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2024.02.014

特种油气藏 ›› 2024, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 120-128.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2024.02.014

次生水体对火驱开发效果影响的实验

孙梓齐¹, 赵仁保^1,2, 王田田¹, 龙海庆¹, 黄田¹, 陈昌剑¹

1.中国石油大学油气资源与探测国家重点实验室,北京 102249;
2.中国石油大学(北京),新疆克拉玛依 834000

收稿日期:2022-07-23 修回日期:2024-01-20 出版日期:2024-04-25 发布日期:2024-07-26
通讯作者: 赵仁保(1971—),男,教授,博士生导师,1994年毕业于河南大学化学化工专业,2006年毕业于中国石油大学(北京)油气田开发工程专业,获博士学位,现主要从事稠油火驱开采技术方面的研究。
作者简介:孙梓齐(1993—),男,2016年毕业于东北石油大学石油工程专业,现为中国石油大学(北京)石油与天然气工程专业在读博士研究生,主要从事稠油火驱开采技术方面的研究。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目“火线推进速度的预测和火腔在三维空间中演化的控制机制探索”(52274052);新疆维吾尔族自治区高层次人才引进项目“基于垂向火驱井网条件下超稠油的原位改质辅助开发机理研究”(JXDF0221)

Experiments on Influence of Secondary Water Bodies on Fire Flooding Development Effect

Sun Ziqi¹, Zhao Renbao^1,2, Wang Tiantian¹, Long Haiqing¹, Huang Tian¹, Chen Changjian¹

1. State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Exploration, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;
2. China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Karamay, Xinjiang 834000, China

Received:2022-07-23 Revised:2024-01-20 Online:2024-04-25 Published:2024-07-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对注蒸汽开发产生的次生水体对火驱开采效果影响尚不明确的问题,利用燃烧管实验装置,将不同含水量的油砂填充到燃烧管的中间部分,以模拟储层中的次生水体,研究次生水体对火线的传播特征和火驱开发效果的影响。结果表明:次生水体有利于提高火线的推进速度,但会降低火线的燃烧稳定性。当次生水体的含水饱和度高于75.4%时,火线穿过次生水体后难以稳定地推进至生产井,导致开发效果较差;含水饱和度低于50.0%且有一定含油量的次生水体对火驱的开发效果影响不大,火线可以穿过次生水体并稳定推进。研究结果对认识储层中次生水体对火线的稳定推进、火驱开发效果的影响具有重要意义,可为注蒸汽开发油藏火驱技术提供理论参考。

关键词: 稠油油藏, 火烧油层, 次生水体, 燃烧稳定性, 火线推进速度

Abstract: Aiming at the problem that the influence of secondary water body generated by steam injection development on fire flooding development effect is still unclear, a combustion tube experimental device was used, and oil sands of different water content were filled into the middle part of the combustion tube to simulate the secondary water body in the reservoir, and to study the influence of the secondary water body on the propagation characteristics of the fireline and the fire flooding development effect. The results show that the secondary water body is favorable for increasing the propulsion velocity of the fireline but would reduce the combustion stability of the fireline. It is difficult for the fireline to advance stably to the production well after passing through the secondary water body when the water saturation of the secondary water body is higher than 75.4%, which leads to a poor development effect; the secondary water body with water saturation lower than 50.0% and a certain amount of oil content does not have much influence on the fire flooding development effect. The fireline could pass through the secondary water body and advance stably. The study results are of great significance to understanding the influence of secondary water bodies in the reservoir on the stable advancement of the fireline and the fire flooding development effect. They could provide theoretical references for the fire flooding technology in steam injection reservoirs.

Key words: heavy oil reservoir, in-situ combustion, secondary water body, combustion stability, fireline advance velocity

中图分类号:

TE357.44

孙梓齐, 赵仁保, 王田田, 龙海庆, 黄田, 陈昌剑. 次生水体对火驱开发效果影响的实验[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(2): 120-128.

Sun Ziqi, Zhao Renbao, Wang Tiantian, Long Haiqing, Huang Tian, Chen Changjian. Experiments on Influence of Secondary Water Bodies on Fire Flooding Development Effect[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2024, 31(2): 120-128.

参考文献

[1] 张蔓,张军,叶锋,等.稠油蒸汽吞吐油汽比经济界限预测模型[J].特种油气藏,2020, 27(3):121-124.
ZHANG Man,ZHANG Jun,YE Feng,et al.Prediction model of economic oil steam ratio limit for heavy-oil stimulation[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2020,27(3):121-124.
[2] 李秋,何厚锋,关文龙,等.稠油油藏火驱驱替特征实验研究[J].油气地质与采收率,2021,28(6):79-86.
LI Qiu,HE Houfeng,GUAN Wenlong,et al.Analysis of the main control factors of in-situ combustion effect and study on the control countermeasures[J].Petroleum Geology & Recovery Efficiency,2021,28(6):79-86.
[3] 杨智,廖静,高成国,等.红浅1井区直井火驱燃烧区带特征[J].大庆石油地质与开发, 2019,38(1):89-93.
YANG Zhi,LIAO Jing,GAO Chengguo,et al.Characteristics of the in-situ-combustion zone for the vertical well in Well Block HQ1[J].Petroleum geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2019,38(1):89-93.
[4] 赵庆辉,刘其成,程海清.含油饱和度对火驱开发影响的实验研究[J].西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2019,34(5):69-72.
ZHAO Qinghui,LIU Qicheng,CHENG Haiqing.Experimental study on influence of oil saturation on development effect of in-situ combustion[J].Journal of Xi′an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition),2019,34(5):69-72.
[5] YANG M,HARDING T G,CHEN Z.Numerical investigation of the mechanisms in co-injection of steam and enriched air process using combustion tube tests[J].Fuel,2019,242:638-648.
[6] DONG X,LIU H,CHEN Z,et al.Enhanced oil recovery techniques for heavy oil and oilsands reservoirs after steam injection[J].Applied Energy,2019,239:1190-1211.
[7] 蒋海岩,李天月,杜坤,等.火驱过程中稠油组分变化特征研究[J].特种油气藏,2021,28(4):96-101.
JIANG Haiyan,LI Tianyue,DU Kun,et al.Study on the characteristics of changes in heavy oil components during in-situ combustion[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2021,28(4):96-101.
[8] 霍进,赵仁保,孙新革,等.火驱技术国内外进展及理论发展方向的思考[J].新疆石油天然气,2021,17(3):30-36.
HUO Jin,ZHAO Renbao,SUN Xin′ge,et al.Progress of ISC technology and perspective on the future work of its theoretical research[J].Xinjiang Oil & Gas,2021,17(3):30-36.
[9] 才业.水淹稠油油藏火驱开发受效特征研究[J].特种油气藏,2020,27(5):125-131.
CAI Ye.Study on the response characteristics of fire flooding in water-flooded heavy oil reservoirs[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2020,27(5):125-131.
[10] 席长丰,关文龙,蒋有伟,等.注蒸汽后稠油油藏火驱跟踪数值模拟技术——以新疆H1块火驱试验区为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(6):715-721.
XI Changfeng,GUAN Wenlong,JIANG Youwei,et al.Numerical simulation of fire flooding for heavy oil reservoirs after steam injection:a case study on Block H1 of Xinjiang Oilfield,NW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(6):715-721.
[11] MOORE R G,BELGRAVE J D M,URSENBACH M G,et al.In-situ combustion performance in steam flooded heavy oil cores[J].Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 1999,38(13):13-34.
[12] MOORE R G,BENNION D W,URSENBACH M G,et al.Experimental basis for extending the oil recovery/volume burned method to wet and superwet combustion[J].Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology,1988,27(6):1-6.
[13] JAVAD S,PAITAKHTI OSKOUEI,MAINI B B,et al.Experimental evaluation of SAGD/ISC hybrid recovery method[J].Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology,2013, 52(3):204-218.
[14] JAVAD S,OSKOUEI P,MOORE R G,et al.Feasibility of in-situ combustion in the SAGD chamber[J].Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology,2011,50(4):31-44.
[15] 王如燕,潘竟军,陈龙,等.汽窜通道对注蒸汽开采后期转火驱生产的影响[J].长江大学学报(自然科学版),2017,14(3):48-53.
WANG Ruyan,PAN Jingjun,CHEN Long,et al.The influence of steam channeling on fire-flooding production in the late period of steam flooding[J].Journal of Yangtze University(Natural Science Edition),2017,14(3):48-53.
[16] 关文龙,席长丰,陈亚平,等.稠油油藏注蒸汽开发后期转火驱技术[J].石油勘探与开发, 2011,38(4):452-462.
GUAN Wenlong,XI Changfeng,CHEN Yaping,et al.Fire-flooding technologies in post-steam-injected heavy oil reservoirs[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2011,38(4):452-462.
[17] ZHAO R,CHEN Y,HUAN R,et al.An experimental investigation of the in-situ combustion behavior of Karamay crude oil[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2015,29(127):82-92.
[18] ZHAO R,SUN Z,SUN X,et al.Effect of secondary water body on the in-situ combustion behaviors[J].Fuel,2022,316:123303.
[19] 杨俊印,闫红星,刘家林,等.杜66块火驱典型产出流体变化特征[J].特种油气藏,2020, 27(3):137-141.
YANG Junyin,YAN Hongxing,LIU Jialin,et al.Typical production fluid properties of fire-flooding in Block Du66[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2020, 27(3):137-141.
[20] 关文龙,梁金中,吴淑红,等.矿场火驱过程中火线预测与调整方法[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2011,33(5):157-161.
GUAN Wenlong,LIANG Jinzhong, WU Shuhong,et al.Prediction and controlling method of combustion front in the process of fire-flooding development[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition),2011,33(5):157-161.
[21] ZHAO R,YANG J,ZHAO C,et al.Investigation on coke zone evolution behavior during a THAI process[J].Journal of petroleum science and engineering,2020, 196:107667.
[22] ZHAO S,PU W,JIANG Q,et al.Investigation into the key factors influencing the establishment and propagation of combustion front in ultra-deep high-temperature heavy oil reservoirs[J].Energy,2023,283:129017.
[23] 王伟伟.火驱油墙技术界限判定及运移特征[J].特种油气藏,2019,26(4):131-135.
WANG Weiwei.Technical boundary determination and propagation pattern of fire-flooding oil-wall[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2019,26(4):131-135.
[24] 夏正春,赵健,刘锋,等.吐哈探区稠油油藏注气吞吐适应性评价[J]. 新疆石油地质,2023,44(3):341-346.
XIA Zhengchun,ZHAO Jian,LIU Feng,et al.Adaptability evaluation of gas huff-n-puff in heavy oil reservoirs in Tuha exploration area[J].Xinjiang Petroloeum Geology,2023,44(3):341-346.
[25] 郭小哲,赵健,高旺来,等.稠油油藏多轮次减氧空气吞吐后复合注气增油机理[J].新疆石油地质,2022,43(4):450-455.
GUO Xiaozhe,ZHAO Jian,GAO Wanglai,et al.EOR mechanism of compound gas injection after multiple cycles of oxygen-reduced air huff and puff in heavy oil reservoirs[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2022,43(4):450-455.
[26] 李晓宇,孙晓飞,蔡佳明,等.海上稠油超临界多元热流体驱油特征物理模拟[J].断块油气田,2023,30(4):545-551.
LI Xiaoyu,SUN Xiaofei,CAI Jiaming,et al.Physical simulation study on oil flooding characteristics of supercritical multiple-thermal fluids in offshore heavy oil reservoirs[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2023,30(4):545-551.
[27] 闫红星,杨俊印,姜文瑞,等.芳烃化合物在稠油火驱室内实验中的指示作用[J].石油实验地质,2022,44(5): 914-921.
YAN Hongxing,YANG Junyin,JIANG Wenrui,et al.Function of aromatic compounds as indicators in laboratory experiments of heavy oil with fire flooding[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2022,44(5):914-921.
[28] 孙梓齐,赵仁保,石兰香,等.原油黏度对火驱开采效果的影响实验[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2023,42(6):159-166.
SUN Ziqi,ZHAO Renbao,SHI Lanxiang,et al.Experiment on effect of oil viscosity on production effect of in-situ combustion[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2023,42(6):159-166.

次生水体对火驱开发效果影响的实验

Experiments on Influence of Secondary Water Bodies on Fire Flooding Development Effect

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	袁士宝, 任梓寒, 杨凤祥, 孙新革, 蒋海岩, 宋佳. 稠油油藏蒸汽-空气复合火驱特征分析及参数优化[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(1): 66-73.
[2]	蒋海岩, 李天月, 杜坤, 袁士宝, 张喻鹏. 火驱过程中稠油组分变化特征研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(4): 96-101.
[3]	葛明曦. 边顶水超稠油油藏SAGD蒸汽腔描述及调控对策[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(4): 136-141.
[4]	李伟忠. 胜利油田稠油未动用储量评价及动用对策[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(2): 63-71.
[5]	杨智, 孟祥兵, 吴永彬, 赵慧龙, 罗池辉, 甘衫衫. 风城浅层超稠油油藏双水平井SAGD关键技术及发展方向[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(1): 92-97.
[6]	关文龙, 宫宇宁, 唐君实, 宋扬, 李秋. 多层油藏火驱开发模式探讨[J]. 特种油气藏, 2020, 27(6): 60-66.
[7]	李小刚, 朱静怡, 杨兆中, 谢诗意, 贾敏. 低渗透稠油微波原位加热开采数值模拟研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2020, 27(6): 120-126.
[8]	才业. 水淹稠油油藏火驱开发受效特征研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2020, 27(5): 125-131.
[9]	杨兆臣, 于兵, 吴永彬, 王丽, 张家豪, 佟娟, 姜丹, 张崇刚. 超稠油溶剂辅助SAGD启动技术油藏适应性研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2020, 27(4): 67-72.
[10]	冷冰. 火驱同心双管分层注气管柱研制及试验[J]. 特种油气藏, 2020, 27(4): 149-155.
[11]	杨光璐, 李迎环, 何慧卓 . 特稠油油藏多元热流体吞吐技术研究与应用 [J]. 特种油气藏, 2020, 27(2): 103-107.
[12]	王泰超, 朱国金, 王凯, 谭先红, 郑伟 . 海上稠油油藏多元热流体吞吐后转火驱开发研究 [J]. 特种油气藏, 2019, 26(5): 100-105.
[13]	李朋，张艳玉，孙晓飞，陈会娟, 刘洋. 稠油油藏双管水平井注汽井筒参数预测新模型[J]. 特种油气藏, 2019, 26(4): 85-.
[14]	周海燕，石洪福，刘斌，王记俊. 海上稠油油藏半衰竭水驱开发压力恢复速度研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2018, 25(4): 87-.
[15]	吴海俊，付美龙，孙晶，廖月敏，张瑶. 稠油油藏三元复合驱参数优化实验研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2018, 25(4): 138-.