基于分布式光纤测温的致密油水平井产出剖面解释方法

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2023.04.013

特种油气藏 ›› 2023, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 104-112.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2023.04.013

基于分布式光纤测温的致密油水平井产出剖面解释方法

罗红文^1,2, 张琴^1,2, 李海涛^1,2, 朱涵斌³, 刘文强³, 向雨行^1,2, 马寒松^1,2, 李颖^1,2

1.西南石油大学,四川成都 610500;
2.西南石油大学油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室,四川成都 610500;
3.中国石油测井有限公司,陕西西安 710000

收稿日期:2022-05-05 修回日期:2023-04-06 出版日期:2023-08-25 发布日期:2023-09-18
通讯作者: 张琴(1999—),女,2021年毕业于成都理工大学自动化专业,现为西南石油大学石油与天然气工程专业在读硕士研究生,主要从事油气藏温度动态模拟和分布式光纤监测解释等方面的研究工作。
作者简介:罗红文(1990—),男,讲师,2014年毕业于重庆科技学院石油工程专业,2020年毕业于西南石油大学油气田开发工程专业,获博士学位,现主要从事油气藏温度动态模拟、水平井产出剖面评价及分布式光纤监测解释方面的研究工作。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金“提升CO₂地质封存泥岩盖层封堵能力的作用机制研究”(42272176);中国博士后科学基金资助项目“页岩气水平井多场耦合热变规律及产出剖面反演方法研究”(2021M702721);四川省自然科学基金“页岩气水平井多场耦合热变规律及产出剖面反演方法研究”(2022NSFSC0993)

Tight Oil Horizontal Well Production Profile Interpretation Method Based on Distributed Temperature Sensing

Luo Hongwen^1,2, Zhang Qin^1,2, Li Haitao^1,2, Zhu Hanbin³, Liu Wenqiang³, Xiang Yuxing^1,2, Ma Hansong^1,2, Li Ying^1,2

1. Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China;
3. CNPC Logging Co., Ltd., Xi'an, Shaanxi 710000, China

Received:2022-05-05 Revised:2023-04-06 Online:2023-08-25 Published:2023-09-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对致密油水平井产出剖面定量诊断技术难的问题,以致密油水平井温度剖面预测模型作为正演模型,并基于模拟退火(SA)算法建立了致密油水平井分布式光纤测温(DTS)数据反演模型,形成了一套基于DTS的致密油水平井产出剖面解释方法,实现对致密油水平井产出剖面和裂缝参数的定量反演解释。结果表明:致密油水平井温度剖面对各因素的敏感性程度由大到小依次为产液量、裂缝半长、渗透率、井筒综合传热系数、孔隙度、裂缝导流能力、储层岩石热导率,影响致密油水平井温度剖面的主控因素为裂缝半长和地层渗透率。采用建立的反演模型对1口油井3个不同生产阶段的实测DTS数据进行反演,产出剖面解释结果与商业软件解释结果平均符合率为87.39%,验证了致密油水平井产出剖面解释方法的可靠性。研究成果对致密油水平井产出剖面的定量解释具有重要指导意义。

关键词: DTS, 致密油, 产出剖面, 反演解释, 温度剖面, 井温预测

Abstract: To address the problem of difficult quantitative diagnostic techniques for tight oil horizontal well production profiles, the tight oil horizontal well temperature profile predicting model is used as the forward model, and a tight oil horizontal well distributed temperature sensing (DTS) data inversion model is established based on the simulated annealing (SA) algorithm, forming a DTS-based tight oil horizontal well production profile interpretation method, to achieve the quantitative inversion interpretation of the tight oil horizontal well production profile and fracture parameters. The result shows that the tight oil horizontal well temperature profile is sensitive to the following factors in descending order: fluid production, fracture half-length, permeability, integrated heat transfer coefficient of wellbore, porosity, fracture conductivity, and thermal conductivity of reservoir rocks, and the main controlling factors affecting the temperature profile of tight oil horizontal wells are fracture half-length and formation permeability distribution. The inversion model was used to invert the measured DTS data from three different production stages of one field well, and the average compliance rate between the production profile interpretation results and the commercial software interpretation results was 87.39%, which verified the reliability of the production profile interpretation method for tight oil horizontal wells. The study results have important guidance for the quantitative interpretation of the tight oil horizontal well production profile.

Key words: DTS, tight oil, production profile, inversion interpretation, temperature profile, well temperature prediction

中图分类号:

TE33.2

罗红文, 张琴, 李海涛, 朱涵斌, 刘文强, 向雨行, 马寒松, 李颖. 基于分布式光纤测温的致密油水平井产出剖面解释方法[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(4): 104-112.

Luo Hongwen, Zhang Qin, Li Haitao, Zhu Hanbin, Liu Wenqiang, Xiang Yuxing, Ma Hansong, Li Ying. Tight Oil Horizontal Well Production Profile Interpretation Method Based on Distributed Temperature Sensing[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2023, 30(4): 104-112.

参考文献

[1] 胡素云,朱如凯,吴松涛,等.中国陆相致密油效益勘探开发[J].石油勘探与开发,2018,45(4):737-748.
HU Suyun,ZHU Rukai,WU Songtao,et al.Profitable exploration and development of continental tight oil in China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2018,45(4):737-748.
[2] 邱振,李建忠,吴晓智,等.国内外致密油勘探现状、主要地质特征及差异[J].岩性油气藏,2015,27(4):119-126.
QIU Zhen,LI Jianzhong,WU Xiaozhi,et al.Exploration status,main geologic characteristics and their differences of tight oil between America and China[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2015,27(4):119-126.
[3] 苏皓,雷征东,张荻萩,等.致密油藏体积压裂水平井参数优化研究[J].岩性油气藏,2018,30(4):140-148.
SU Hao,LEI Zhengdong,ZHANG Diqiu,et al.Volume fracturing parameters optimization of horizontal well in tight reservoir[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2018,30(4):140-148.
[4] 曾慧勇,陈立峰,陈亚东,等.压裂-驱油一体化工作液研究进展[J].油气地质与采收率,2022,29(3):162-170.
ZENG Huiyong,CHEN Lifeng,CHEN Yadong,et al.Research progress on fracturing-oil displacement integrated working fluid[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2022,29(3):162-170.
[5] 刘子军.基于Pearson 相关系数的低渗透砂岩油藏重复压裂井优选方法[J].油气地质与采收率,2022,29(2):140-144.
LIU Zijun.Method for selecting repeated fracturing wells in low-permeability sandstone reservoirs based on Pearson correlation coefficient[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2022,29(2):140-144.
[6] 徐中一,方思冬,张彬,等.页岩气体积压裂水平井试井解释新模型[J].油气地质与采收率,2020,27(3):120-128.
XU Zhongyi,FANG Sidong,ZHANG Bin,et al.A new well test model for horizontal wells by stimulated reservoir volume in shale gas reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2020,27(3):120-128.
[7] 马玉娟.大庆长垣油田三类油层压裂驱油提高采收率技术及其应用[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2021,40(2):103-109.
MA Yujuan.Application of fracturing-flooding EOR technique in type III oil reservoirs in Daqing Placanticline Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2021,40(2):103-109.
[8] 周海军,黄佳.渤海油气田光纤式井下压力温度监测系统的研发与应用[J].机电信息,2020,42(24):54-55.
ZHOU Haijun,HUANG Jia.Development and application of optical fiber downhole pressure and temperature monitoring system in Bohai Oil and Gas Field[J].Mechanical and Electrical Information,2020,42(24):54-55.
[9] 朱世琰.基于分布式光纤温度测试的水平井产出剖面解释理论研究[D].成都:西南石油大学,2016.
ZHU Shiyan.Horizontal well production profile interpretation based on distributed temperature sensing[D].Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University,2016.
[10] YOSHIDA N.Modeling and interpretation of downhole temperature in a horizontal well with multiple fractures[D].Texas:Texas A & M University,2016.
[11] YOHIOKA K,ZHU D,HILL A D,et al.Prediction of temperature changes caused by water or gas entry into a horizontal well[J].SPE Production & Operations,2007,22(4):425-433.
[12] YOHIOKA K,ZHU D,HILL A D.A new inversion method to interpret flow profiles from distributed temperature and pressure measurements in horizontal wells[J].SPE Production & Operations,2009,24(4):510-521.
[13] 蔡珺君.水平井井筒温度预测及解释模型研究[D].成都:西南石油大学,2016.
CAI Junjun.Research on prediction and interpretation model of wellbore temperature in horizontal well[D].Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University,2016.
[14] LI Z,ZHU D.Predicting flow profile of horizontal well by downhole pressure and distributed-temperature data for water drive-reservoir[J].SPE Production & Operations,2010,25(3):296-304.
[15] LUO Hongwen,LI Haitao,TAN Yongsheng,et al.A novel inversion approach for fracture parameters and inflow rates diagnosis in Multistage Fractured Horizontal Wells[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2020,184:106585.
[16]ZHANG Shuang,ZHU Ding.Inversion of downhole temperature measurements in multistage fracture stimulation in horizontal wells[C].SPE187322,2017:302-307.
[17] LUO Hongwen,LI Ying,LI Haitao,et al.Simulated annealing algorithm-based inversion model to Interpret flow Rate profiles and fracture parameters for horizontal wells in unconventional gas reservoirs[J].SPE Journal,2021,26(4):1679-1699.
[18] LUO Hongwen,LI Haitao,LU Yu,et al.Inversion of distributed temperature measurements to interpret the flow profile for a multistage fractured horizontal well in low-permeability gas reservoir[J].Applied Mathematical Modelling,2020,77:360-377.
[19] 丁超,王攀,秦亚东,等.基于非稳态热传导的SAGD开发指标预测模型[J].岩性油气藏,2022,35(1):160-168.
DING Chao,WANG Pan,QIN Yadong,et al.SAGD production performance prediction model based on unsteady heat transfer[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2022,35(1):160-168.
[20] BIRD R B,STEWART W E,LIGHTFOOT E N,et al.Transport phenomena[J].John Wiley & Sons,1960,28(2):338-359.
[21] 黄连忠,万晓跃,孙永刚,等.基于模拟退火算法的船舶航速优化研究[J].船舶,2018,29(增刊1):8-17.
HUANG Lianzhong,WAN Xiaoyue,SUN Yonggang,et al.Research on ship speed optimization based on simulated annealing algorithm[J].Ship & Boat,2018,29(S1):8-17.
[22] 张志伟,暴景阳,肖付民,等.利用模拟退火算法反演多波束测量声速剖面[J].武汉大学学报(信息科学版),2018,43(8):1234-1241.
ZHANG Zhiwei,BAO Jingyang,XIAO Fumin,et al.Inversion of sound velocity profile in multibeam survey based on simulated annealing algorithm[J].Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University(Edition of Information Science),2018,43(8):1234-1241.
[23] 罗红文,李海涛,李颖,等.低渗透气藏压裂水平井产出剖面与裂缝参数反演解释[J].石油学报,2021,42(7):936-947.
LUO Hongwen,LI Haitao,LI Ying,et al.Inversion and interpretation of production profile and fracture parameters of fractured horizontal wells in low-permeability gas reservoirs[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2021,42(7):936-947.
[24] 刘全新,方光建.利用模拟退火算法实现地震叠前反演[J].岩性油气藏,2010,22(1):87-92.
LIU Quanxin,FANG Guangjian.Using simulated annealing algorithm to pre-stack seismic inversion[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2010,22(1):87-92.
[25] 陈华根,吴健生,王家林,等.模拟退火算法机理研究[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2004,32(6):802-805.
CHEN Huagen,WU Jiansheng,WANG Jialin,et al.Mechanism study of simulated annealing algorithm[J].Journal of Tongji University(Natural Science),2004,32(6):802-805.

基于分布式光纤测温的致密油水平井产出剖面解释方法

Tight Oil Horizontal Well Production Profile Interpretation Method Based on Distributed Temperature Sensing

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	崔传智, 王俊康, 吴忠维, 隋迎飞, 李静, 陆水青山. 致密油藏压驱动态裂缝模型建立及应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(4): 87-95.
[2]	宋保建, 李景全, 孙宜丽, 张薇, 刘鹏. 致密油藏CO₂吞吐参数优化数值模拟研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(4): 113-121.
[3]	王长权, 田中敬, 王晨晨, 陈亮, 王国庆. 基于应力敏感的致密油藏孔隙结构及油水两相渗流特征[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(4): 131-138.
[4]	李杰, 马明伟, 杨升峰, 王松, 李蕴哲, 徐鹏, 李佶晔. 致密砾岩油藏地层亏空区新井压裂参数优化设计[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(3): 168-174.
[5]	游婷婷, 庞雄奇, 李洪博, 袁武, 胡涛, 于飒, 施砍园, 蔡哲. 惠州凹陷流体动力场研究方法及应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(2): 86-94.
[6]	陈禹欣, 赵婷, 承宁, 马俊修, 杨升峰, 李蕴哲. 玛湖地区致密砾岩油藏小井距水平井立体井网开发研究与应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(2): 122-127.
[7]	王英伟, 张玉龙, 张景, 施雷庭, 范希彬, 王睿麒. 致密油藏含水饱和度对CO₂吞吐效果的影响[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(2): 128-133.
[8]	唐可, 赵勇, 李凯, 宁朦, 蒲万芬, 田开平. 致密油藏压裂井气驱暂堵调剖剂研制与评价[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(2): 161-167.
[9]	李婷, 谢安, 倪振, 刘永萍. 表面活性剂协同低盐度水驱提高致密油藏采收率研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(1): 114-119.
[10]	李浩, 冯玉福. 考虑黏滞性低渗透油藏数值模拟应用研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(1): 134-138.
[11]	刘美成. 致密储层测井评价技术及发展方向[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(4): 12-20.
[12]	邸士莹, 程时清, 代力, 李旺东, 缪立南, 刘琦. 致密油藏水平井注水吞吐效果评价方法[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(2): 91-97.
[13]	林志伟, 钟守明, 宋琳, 王雪刚, 林铁军, 于浩, 史涛. 体积压裂改造非对称性对套管损坏影响机理[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(6): 158-164.
[14]	卜春明. 松辽盆地北部三肇凹陷扶余致密油层浅水三角洲沉积特征及演化[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(4): 62-71.
[15]	罗红文, 李海涛, 安树杰, 辛野, 李磊, 邹顺良, 李颖, 刘畅. 致密气藏压裂水平井温度剖面影响因素分析[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(4): 150-157.