超前注水流入动态模型在低渗透油藏开发中的应用

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2020.04.014

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在超前注水低渗透油藏生产过程中,原油、注入水及脱出的溶解气在地层中会形成三相流动。为准确表征其渗流特征,将流体在地层中的渗流区域划分为油水两相渗流区和油气水三相渗流区,通过引入三相拟压力函数,考虑非达西效应(启动压力梯度、应力敏感)及油气互溶影响,建立具有拐点的三相流产能方程。研究结果表明,通过自动拟合的方法对非达西渗流参数进行拟合后,该三相流产能模型的计算结果与实测数据一致。4口井实例计算显示:当油井控制在拐点压力下生产时,可提升约195.0%的产量;在高流压阶段各因素对油井产量影响较大,其中含水率影响最为明显。研究成果对超前注水低渗透油藏合理井底流压界限的确定具有实际的指导意义。

关键词: 超前注水, 三相流, 低渗透油藏, 非达西效应, 自动拟合, 注入动态

Abstract: There is a three-phase flow between water, injection water and dissolved gas in the low permeability reservoir with advanced water injection in the production process. In order to further characterize the three-phase seepage performance, the fluid flow in the reservoir was divided into oil-water two-phase seepage zones and oil-gas-water three-phase seepage zones. Based on a three-phase quasi-pressure function, a three-phase flow productivity equation with inflection point was established by considering the non-Darcy effect (starting pressure gradient, stress sensitivity). Research indicates that the test data is consistent with the calculation of three-phase seepage model after automatic fitting of non-Darcy flow parameters. Application of 4 wells shows that the production can be enhanced by about 195.0% when the production well is controlled below the inflection pressure. Multiple factors show a significant influence on the well production in the high flowing pressure stage, and the water cut is considered as the most sensitive factor. This research could provide certain guidance for the determination of reasonable bottom hole flowing pressure limit in low permeability reservoir with advanced water injection.

Key words: advanced water injection, three-phase flow, low permeability reservoir, non-Darcy effect, automatic fitting, injection performance

中图分类号:

TE348

张芨强. 超前注水流入动态模型在低渗透油藏开发中的应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2020, 27(4): 92-97.

Zhang Jiqiang. Application of Advanced Water Injection Inflow Production Relation Model in Low-Permeability Reservoir[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2020, 27(4): 92-97.

参考文献

[1] SARFRAZ A, JOKHIO S A,TIAB D.Establishing inflow performance relationship(IPR)for gas condensate wells[C].SPE75503,2002:1-20.
[2] 张亚蒲,杨正明,侯海涛,等.中东H油田不同注入水对储层渗流能力的影响[J].油气地质与采收率,2017,24(2):95-100.
ZHANGYapu,YANG Zhengming,HOU Haitao,et al.Effect of different types of injected water on reservoir seepage ability in H oilfieldof Middle East[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2017,24(2):95-100.
[3] 王俊魁,李艳华,赵贵仁.油井流入动态曲线与合理井底压力的确定[J].新疆石油地质,1999,20(5):414-417,450.
WANG Junkui,LI Yanhua,ZHAO Guiren.The determination of inflow performance curve and reasonable bottomhole pressure in oil well[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,1999,20(5):414-417,450.
[4] 杨满平,高超,杜少恩.具有拐点的油井IPR方程建立及应用[J].特种油气藏,2012,19(4):69-72.
YANG Manping,GAO Chao,DU Shaoen. Establishment and application of inflow performance relationship with an inflection point[J].Special Oil ＆ Gas Reservoirs,2012,19(4):69-72.
[5] 史云清,郑祥克,何顺利.IPR曲线解析方法在产能评价中的应用[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版),2002,26(2):41-43.
SHI Yunqing,ZHENG Xiangke,HE Shunli. Application of analytical inflow performance relationship to production capacity evaluation[J].Journal of the University of Petroleum,China,2002,26(2):41-43.
[6] 苏婷,潘志坚,李楠.低渗透油藏分类评价方法及其应用[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2019,38(2):87-92.
SU Ting,PAN Zhijian,LI Nan.Classifying and evaluating method for the low-permeability oil reservoir and its application[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2019,38 (2):87-92.
[7] 陈映赫. 低渗透油层非达西渗流单井产能计算[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2018,37(3):78-81.
CHEN Yinghe.Productivity calculation for the individual well with non-Darcy flow in low-permeability oil reservoirs[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2018,37 (3):78-81.
[8] 苏海波,于金彪,张同伍,等.低渗透储层水驱油渗流阻力特征[J].油气地质与采收率,2018,25(1):117-121.
SU Haibo,YU Jinbiao,ZHANG Tongwu,et al.Features of seepage resistance during water flooding in low permeability reservoir[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2018,25(1):117-121.
[9] 邓英尔,刘慈群.具有启动压力梯度的油水两相渗流理论与开发指标计算方法[J].石油勘探与开发,1998,25(6):36-39.
DENG Yinger,LIU Ciqun. Theory of oil-water flow through porous media and calculation of development indexes with starting pressure gradient included[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,1998,25(6):36-39.
[10] 胥元刚,刘顺.低渗透油藏油井流入动态研究[J].石油学报,2005,26(4):77-80.
XU Yuangang,LIU Shun. Study on inflow performance of oil wells in low-permeability reservoirs[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2005,26(4):77-80.
[11] 何岩峰,吴晓东,韩增军,等.低渗透油藏油井产能预测新方法[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2007,31(5):69-73.
HE Yanfeng,WU Xiaodong,HAN Zengjun. New prediction method of oil well deliverability of low permeability reservoir[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum(Science & Technology Edition)2007,31(5):69-73.
[12] 李晓良,王厉强,李彦,等.启动压力梯度动态变化对IPR方程影响分析[J].石油钻探技术,2007,35(2):70-72.
LI Xiaoliang,WANG Liqiang,LI Yan,et al. Effect of starting pressure gradient dynamic change on IPR equation[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2007,35(2):70-72.
[13] 刘顺,姚军,胥元刚.低渗透油藏垂直井未来流入动态的预测[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2008,30(5):100-103.
LIU Shun,YAO Jun,XU Yuangang. The prediction of future IPR of vertical wells in low permeability reservoirs[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition),2008,30(5):100-103.
[14] 罗天雨,曹文江,曾平.脱气变形介质油藏产能模型研究[J].特种油气藏,2004,11(6):54-56.
LUO Tianyu,CAO Wenjiang,ZENG Ping. Study of productivity model of degassed deformable medium reservoir[J].Special Oil ＆ Gas Reservoirs,2004,11(6):54-56.
[15] 寇根,王厉强,李彦,等.储层应力敏感性动态变化对低渗透油藏产能的影响[J].油气地质与采收率,2007,14(3):101-104.
KOU Gen,WANG Liqiang,LI Yan,et al. The effect of dynamical stress-sensitivity variation of reservoirs on the productivity of low permeability oil reservoir[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2007,14(3):101-104.
[16] 牛彩云,黎晓茸,郭方元,等.低渗透油藏油井合理流压确定方法探讨[J].石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报),2009,31(1):289-291.
NIU Caiyun,LI Xiaorong,GUO Fangyuan,et al. Study on the method for determining the reasonable flow pressure oil well in low permeability reservoir[J].Journal of Oil and Gas Technology,2009,31(1):289-291.
[17] 文华.低渗透应力敏感性油藏产能及影响因素[J].新疆石油地质,2009,30(3):351-354.
WEN Hua. Productivity and influencing factors of oil reservoir with low permeability and pressure sensitivity[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2009,30(3):351-354.
[18] 王海勇,王厉强,于晓杰,等.低渗透变形介质油藏流入动态关系[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2011,35(2):96-100.
WANG Haiyong,WANG Liqiang,YU Xiaojie,et al. Inflow performance relationship for low permeability & deformed media reservoir[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science),2011,35(2):96-100.
[19] 王浪波,高祥瑞,代波,等.特低渗透油藏单砂体研究及注采调整实践——以安塞油田王窑区为例[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2018, 31(2): 82-88.
WANG Langbo,GAO Xiangrui,DAI Bo,et al.Study on single sand body in ultra-low permeability reservoir and adjustment to injection-production: an example from Wangyao Area of Ansai Oilfield[J]. Journal of Petrochemical Universities, 2018, 31(2): 82-88.
[20] 王国锋.低渗透油层低黏度聚驱微观剩余油动用机理[J].断块油气田,2018,25(6):776-780.
WANG Guofeng.Microscopic residual oil utilization mechanism of low viscosity polymer flooding in low permeability reservoir[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2018,25(6):776-780.
[21] 殷代印,仲玉仓. 低渗透油藏微乳液驱非线性渗流规律研究[J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2018, 31(2): 48-52.
YIN Daiyin,ZHONG Yucang.The research on non-linear seepage regularity of microemulsion flooding in low permeability reservoirs[J].Journal of Petrochemical Universities, 2018, 31(2): 48-52.
[22] 黄亮.松辽盆地龙西地区扶余油层特低渗透储层孔隙结构[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2019,38(4):15-21.
HUANG Liang.Pore structure of Fuyu ultra-low-permeability oil reservoir in Longxi Area of Songliao Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2019,38 (4):15-21.
[23] 李晓骁,任晓娟,罗向荣.低渗透致密砂岩储层孔隙结构对渗吸特征的影响[J].油气地质与采收率,2018,25(4):115-120.
LI Xiaoxiao,REN Xiaojuan,LUO Xiangrong.Influence of pore structures on the characteristic of spontaneous imbibition in low-permeability tight sandstone reservoir[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2018,25(4):115-120.
[24] 李晓平.地下油气渗流力学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2007:54.
LI Xiaoping. Underground oil and gas seepage mechanics[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2007:54.
[25] 谭晓华,李晓平.确定含水气井流入动态关系的新方法[J].新疆石油地质,2013,34(1):66-70.
TAN Xiaohua,LI Xiaoping. New method for ascertaining water-bearing gas well inflow performance[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2013,34(1):66-70.