气井温度响应型自消泡智能泡排剂的合成及性能评价

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2025.04.016

特种油气藏 ›› 2025, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 136-142.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2025.04.016

气井温度响应型自消泡智能泡排剂的合成及性能评价

杜竞¹, 陈君¹, 毛玉昆¹, 许鸷宇¹, 廖丽¹, 冶克杰¹, 李刚², 侯宝峰³

1.中国石油青海油田分公司油气工艺研究院,甘肃敦煌 736202;
2.中国石油青海油田分公司采气一厂,青海格尔木 816000;
3.长江大学油气钻采工程湖北省重点实验室,湖北武汉 430100

收稿日期:2024-06-02 修回日期:2025-05-15 出版日期:2025-08-25 发布日期:2025-09-03
通讯作者: 侯宝峰(1986—),男,副教授,2009年毕业于济南大学化学工程与工艺专业,2016年毕业于中国石油大学(华东)油气田开发工程专业,获博士学位,现从事提高采收率与油气田化学相关的教学与科研工作。
作者简介:杜竞(1985—),男,高级工程师,2008年毕业于西南石油大学信息与计算科学专业,2011年毕业于该校石油工程专业,获硕士学位,现从事采气工艺研究工作。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金“纳米颗粒协同阳-非离子Gemini表活剂润湿反转体系的构筑及其机理研究”(51704036)

Synthesis and performance evaluation of a temperature-responsive self-defoaming intelligent gas drainage foaming agent for gas wells

DU Jing¹, CHEN Jun¹, MAO Yukun¹, XU Zhiyu¹, LIAO Li¹, YE Kejie¹, LI Gang², HOU Baofeng³

1. PetroChina Qinghai Oilfield Company, Oil and Gas Process Research Institute, Dunhuang, Gansu 736202, China;
2. PetroChina Qinghai Oilfield Company, No.1 Gas Production Plant, Golmud, Qinghai 816000, China;
3. Hubei Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Drilling and Production Engineering, Yangtze University, Wuhan, Hubei 430100, China

Received:2024-06-02 Revised:2025-05-15 Online:2025-08-25 Published:2025-09-03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为解决排水采气工艺中起泡剂和消泡剂用量过大、消泡不彻底、工艺复杂等问题,研制了一种气井温度响应型自消泡智能泡排剂TS-1,并对其性能进行了评价。研究表明:在温度为80 ℃、矿化度为20×10⁴ mg/L的条件下,泡排剂有较好的起泡性能和稳定性;质量分数为0.2%的泡排剂溶液能够在20 ℃左右自身完成相态的转变,由起泡性转变为消泡性,起泡体积达到420 mL,泡沫半衰期达到13 min;地层砂对泡排剂溶液的起泡能力影响较小,携液率达到84.8%,20 min后自消泡率达到84.3%;在加入增效剂ESAB后,自消泡率接近100.0%,自消泡能力提升;气井自消泡智能泡排剂在井口位置及地面管线中,受环境温度的影响,可迅速自消泡,避免了加入消泡剂的步骤,简化了操作流程,并有效提高了泡沫排水作业的效率。自消泡智能泡排剂成功应用后,平均日增产气4 000 m³,平均日增排液2.8 m³,增气排液效果明显。该成果为气井排水采气提供了一种新的技术思路,具有重要的矿场应用价值。

关键词: 泡排剂, 温度敏感型, 排水采气, 自消泡, 气井

Abstract: To solve the problems of excessive consumption of foaming agents and defoaming agents, incomplete defoaming, and complex processes in liquid drainage gas production technology, a gas well temperature-responsive self-defoaming intelligent gas drainage foaming agent TS-1 was developed, and its performance was evaluated. The study shows that the foaming agent has good foaming performance and stability at a temperature of 80 ℃ and a salinity of 20×10⁴ mg/L; a 0.2% foaming agent solution can undergo a phase transition by itself around 20 ℃, changing from foamability to defoamability, with a foam volume reaching 420 mL and a foam half-life reaching 13 minutes; formation sand has little effect on the foaming ability of the foaming agent solution, with a liquid-carrying rate of 84.8%. After 20 minutes, the self-defoaming rate reached 84.3%; after adding the synergistic agent ESAB, the self-defoaming rate approached 100%, and the self-defoaming ability was enhanced; at the wellhead position and in surface pipelines, the self-defoaming intelligent foaming agent for gas wells can rapidly self-defoam under the influence of ambient temperature, avoiding the step of adding defoaming agents, simplifying the operation process, and effectively improving the efficiency of foam drainage operations. After the successful application of the self-defoaming intelligent foaming agent, the average daily gas production increase was 4 000 m³, and the average daily liquid discharge increase was 2.8 m³, showing significant gas increase and liquid discharge effects. This achievement provides a new technical approach for gas well liquid drainage gas production and has important field application value.

Key words: gas drainage foaming agent, temperature-sensitive, liquid drainage gas production, self-defoaming, gas well

中图分类号:

TE39

杜竞, 陈君, 毛玉昆, 许鸷宇, 廖丽, 冶克杰, 李刚, 侯宝峰. 气井温度响应型自消泡智能泡排剂的合成及性能评价[J]. 特种油气藏, 2025, 32(4): 136-142.

DU Jing, CHEN Jun, MAO Yukun, XU Zhiyu, LIAO Li, YE Kejie, LI Gang, HOU Baofeng. Synthesis and performance evaluation of a temperature-responsive self-defoaming intelligent gas drainage foaming agent for gas wells[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2025, 32(4): 136-142.

参考文献

[1] 孟遥,赵一心,高泽,等.排水采气工艺研究现状及发展趋势分析[J].中国石油和化工标准与质量,2024,44(3):155-156.
MENG Yao,ZHAO Yixin,GAO Ze,et al.Analysis of research status and development trends in drainage gas recovery technologies[J].China Petroleum and Chemical Standard and Quality,2024,44(3):155-156.
[2] 陈超,陈学忠,陈满,等.页岩气井智能一体化复合排采工艺系统研究与应用[J].断块油气田,2024,31(6):1129-1139.
CHEN Chao,CHEN Xuezhong,CHEN Man,et al.Research and application of intelligent integrated composite drainage and production process system for shale gas wells[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2024,31(6):1129-1139.
[3] 葛磊,杨春旭,郭兵,等.气侵后井底初始气泡平均直径预测模型实验研究[J].石油钻探技术,2023,51(2):46-53.
GE Lei,YANG Chunxu,GUO Bing,et al.Experimental study on initial bubble size distribution after gas invading[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2023,51(2):46-53.
[4] 贾敏,张建军,李隽,等.一种气井泡沫排水采气效果模糊定量评价方法[J].中国石油勘探,2017,22(5):119-124.
JIA Min,ZHANG Jianjun,LI Jun,et al.A fuzzy method to quantitatively evaluate the effect of foam deliquification in gas wells[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2017,22(5):119-124.
[5] 赵群,赵萌,赵素平,等.美国页岩油气发展现状、成本效益危机及解决方案[J].非常规油气,2023,10(5):1-7.
ZHAO Qun,ZHAO Meng,ZHAO Suping,et al.The development status,cost-effectiveness crisis and solution of shale oil and gas in the United States[J].Unconventional Oil & Gas,2023,10(5):1-7.
[6] 滕柏路,郭为,曾晶莹,等.页岩气井生产剖面分析及预测模型[J].断块油气田,2023,30(4):586-592.
TENG Bailu,GUO Wei,ZENG Jingying,et al.An analysis and prediction model of production profile in shale gas well[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2023,30(4):586-592.
[7] 杨云鹏,贺吉庆.天然气井排水采气工艺方法探究[J].中国石油和化工标准与质量,2018,38(17):170-171.
YANG Yunpeng,HE Jiqing.Study on drainage gas recovery techniques for natural gas wells[J].China Petroleum and Chemical Standard and Quality,2018,38(17):170-171.
[8] 赵金省,康文超,吕红苗,等.双子季铵盐复合泡排剂体系构建及其泡沫性能研究[J].非常规油气,2025,12(1):61-71.
ZHAO Jinsheng,KANG Wenchao,LYU Hongmiao,et al.Investigation of formation and its foam performance of compounded foam drainage agent based on a Gemini quaternary ammonium salt[J].Unconventional Oil & Gas,2025,12(1):61-71.
[9] 景红,陈丽荣,崔建荣.天然气开采技术措施探讨[J].云南化工,2018,45(5):185-185.
JING Hong,CHEN Lirong,CUI Jianrong.Discussion on technical measures for natural gas extraction[J].Yunnan Chemical Technology,2018,45(5):185-185.
[10] 张志军,王晓超,魏俊,等.基于注采参数的地下生泡调剖效果影响因素分析[J].非常规油气,2024,11(6):58-66.
ZHANG Zhijun,WANG Xiaochao,WEI Jun,et al.Analysis of factors affecting effect of in-situ foam profile control based on injection and production parameters[J].Unconventional Oil & Gas,2024,11(6):58-66.
[11] 梁政,邓雄,吕治忠,等.泡沫排水采气消泡效果监测系统方案设计[J].石油矿场机械,2009,38(8):17-20.
LIANG Zheng,DENG Xiong,LYU Zhizhong,et al.Project design of monitoring system of defoaming effect for foaming drainage gas recovery[J].Oil Field Equipment,2009,38(8):17-20.
[12] 姚光明,郭程飞,赵聪,等.不同泡沫体系油藏适应性数值模拟[J].断块油气田,2023,30(5):868-873.
YAO Guangming,GUO Chengfei,ZHAO Cong,et al.Numerical simulation of adaptability of different foam systems in oil reservoir[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2023,30(5):868-873.
[13] 李静.某气井产出液发泡原因分析及对策[J].石油石化绿色低碳,2023,8(5):53-58.
LI Jing.Analysis and countermeasures for the foaming of the produced fluid in a gas well[J].Green Petroleum & Petrochemicals,2023,8(5):53-58.
[14] 乔润伟,张士诚,李凤霞,等.复兴地区高含黏土页岩凝析气藏渗吸排驱及液体渗流特征研究[J].石油钻探技术,2024,52(1):96-106.
QIAO Runwei,ZHANG Shicheng,LI Fengxia,et al.Characteristics of imbibition,displacement,and fluid seepage in high clay content shale condensate gas reservoir in the Fuxing Area[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2024,52(1):96-106.
[15] 张文.湿法磷酸生产中泡沫行为调控及消泡机理研究[D].武汉:武汉工程大学,2022.
ZHANG Wen.Study on foam behavior regulation and defoaming mechanism in wet-process phosphoric acid production[D].Wuhan:Wuhan Institute of Technology,2022.
[16] 蔺嘉昊,孟海龙,郭永强,等.气井节流生产过程中天然气水合物生成风险模拟研究[J].非常规油气,2023,10(2):88-93,106.
LIN Jiahao,MENG Hailong,GUO Yongqiang,et al.Simulation study on the risk of gas hydrate formation in the process of gas well throttling production[J].Unconventional Oil & Gas,2023,10(2):88-93,106.
[17] 翁定为,江昀,易新斌,等.基于页岩气井返排特征的闷井时间优化方法[J].石油钻探技术,2023,51(5):49-57.
WENG Dingwei,JIANG Yun,YI Xinbin,et al.Optimization of shut-in time in shale gas wells based on the characteristics of fracturing flowback[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2023,51(5):49-57.
[18] 韩勇,高仕举,牟春国,等.苏里格气田固体消泡工艺优化研究[J].钻采工艺,2020,43(6):62-64.
HAN Yong,GAO Shiju,MU Chunguo,et al.Optimization research of the solid defoaming process in Sulige Gasfield[J].Drilling & Production Technology,2020,43(6):62-64.
[19] 丁乙,雷炜,刘向君,等.页岩气储层自吸-水化损伤-离子扩散相关性试验研究[J].石油钻探技术,2023,51(5):88-95.
DING Yi,LEI Wei,LIU Xiangjun,et al.Experimental research on the correlation of spontaneous imbibition-hydration damage-ion diffusion in shale gas reservoirs[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2023,51(5):88-95.
[20] FOWLER C I,JESSOP P G,CUNNINGHAM M F.Aryl amidine and tertiary amine switchable surfactants and their application in the emulsion polymerization of methyl methacrylate[J].Macromolecules,2012,45(7):2955-2962.
[21] FAMEAU A L,SAINT-JALMES A,COUSIN F,et al.Smart foams:switching reversibly between ultrastable and unstable foams[J].Angewandte Chemie International Edition,2011,50(36):8264-8269.
[22] PEI Xiaomei,WU Junhui,ZOU Xinyuan,et al.The switching behavior of CO₂/N₂ responsive emulsion systems formed by an amine functionalized quaternary ammonium surfactant[J].Journal of Molecular Liquids,2022,363(1):119915.
[23] CHEN An,WANG Duo,CHEN Jingsi,et al.A CO₂/N₂-responsive pickering emulsion stabilized by novel switchable surface-active alumina nanoparticles[J].Engineering,2022,12(1):48-54.
[24] 王秀民,崔健鹏,王志坤,等.耐温耐盐CO₂响应型叔胺泡沫的性能及响应机理[J].石油与天然气化工,2024,53(4):73-78.
WANG Xiumin,CUI Jianpeng,WANG Zhikun,et al.Performance and response mechanism of CO₂ responsive tertiary amine foam with temperature and salt tolerance[J].Chemical Engineering of Oil & Gas,2024,53(4):73-78.
[25] 高保娇,吴念,李延斌,等.水溶性高分子链中磺酸盐基团含量的电导滴定测定法[J].高分子学报,2004,1(4):605-609.
GAO Baojiao,WU Nian,LI Yanbin,et al.Determination of the content of sulfonate monomer in water-soluble copolymer by complex reaction conductometric titration[J].Acta Polymerica Sinica,2004,1(4):605-609.
[26] 陈明强.长碳链卡宾聚合共接枝改性纤维及其疏水性研究[D].苏州:苏州大学,2021.
CHEN Mingqiang.Long carbon-chain carbene polymerization co-grafting modified fibers and their hydrophobicity study[D].Suzhou:Soochow University,2021.
[27] 张盼甜.具有LCST/UCST的可降解聚合物的合成,表征及温敏性研究[D].湘潭:湘潭大学,2019.
ZHANG Pantian.Synthesis,characterization and thermoresponsive properties of degradable polymers with LCST/UCST behavior[D].Xiangtan:Xiangtan University,2019.
[28] 魏鹏.生物多糖类强化泡沫体系稳定机理及驱油特性研究[D].成都:西南石油大学,2023.
WEI Peng.Stabilization mechanism and oil displacement characteristics of bio-polysaccharide reinforced foam systems[D].Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University,2023.

气井温度响应型自消泡智能泡排剂的合成及性能评价

Synthesis and performance evaluation of a temperature-responsive self-defoaming intelligent gas drainage foaming agent for gas wells

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李朋, 邓虎成, 张楚越, 鲁杰, 张小菊, 黄亮. 考虑相态变化的高含硫气井硫析出预测模型[J]. 特种油气藏, 2025, 32(2): 123-130.
[2]	淦文杰, 吉礼东, 袁权, 刘荣和, 王永强, 张骞, 汪煜昆. 基于产能差异的气井开发早期产量劈分方法[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(6): 100-105.
[3]	伍锐东, 李元生, 马恋, 路颖, 石美雪, 廖锐全, 程阳. 高水气比气井井筒压力分布预测方法[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(5): 95-101.
[4]	商永涛, 寨硕, 林新宇, 李相亮, 李辉, 冯青. 基于XGBoost算法的低渗透致密气井动静一体化分类模型[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(5): 135-143.
[5]	庞兰苏, 王杨, 蒋薇, 王永生, 高国海, 王欣. 基于机器学习的短生产周期碳酸盐岩气井产量预测研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(2): 134-141.
[6]	崔英敏, 郭红霞, 陆建峰, 杨勇, 张金柏, 刘伟, 靳广兴, 赵开良. 非常规气井产量递减与EUR预测方法评述[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(6): 119-126.
[7]	黄斌, 王思琪, 郭轶闻, 丁琦, 张璐, 唐博强, 郭伟, 邹澈. 泡沫排水采气井强化排采装置优化设计[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(4): 156-163.
[8]	杨国红, 李秀清, 李明秋, 吴铮, 朱讯, 邹娟, 李雪松, 丰妍. 可动水对储层应力敏感性影响的实验研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(2): 89-95.
[9]	苏玉亮, 庄新宇, 李蕾, 李新雨, 李东升, 郑建阳. 致密砂岩气藏长岩心压力损失及渗透率损害评价实验[J]. 特种油气藏, 2021, 28(1): 98-102.
[10]	任冠龙，张崇，董钊，孟文波，吴江. 深水气井测试管柱内水合物沉积动态研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2019, 26(3): 169-.
[11]	陈军，刘太雷，任洪明. 考虑非达西流动影响的底水气藏产能新方法[J]. 特种油气藏, 2019, 26(2): 91-.
[12]	韩成，魏安超，黄凯文，罗鸣，张超. 莺琼盆地超高温高压气井测试技术[J]. 特种油气藏, 2018, 25(6): 150-.
[13]	李继强，胡世莱，杨棽垚，雷登生，徐放. 水驱气藏产水气井产能计算数学模型[J]. 特种油气藏, 2018, 25(5): 89-.
[14]	庞进，李尚，刘洪，梁洁，赵子元. 基于流态划分的页岩气井产量预测可靠性分析[J]. 特种油气藏, 2018, 25(2): 60-.
[15]	王景芹. 排水采气技术优选三维图版[J]. 特种油气藏, 2018, 25(1): 116-.