塔里木盆地顺北地区超深层断控缝洞型碳酸盐岩油气成藏过程动态模拟

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2025.06.003

特种油气藏 ›› 2025, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6): 22-32.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2025.06.003

塔里木盆地顺北地区超深层断控缝洞型碳酸盐岩油气成藏过程动态模拟

刘亚洲^1,2, 黄诚³, 曾溅辉^1,2, 韩俊³, 隆辉^1,2, 张胜³, 刘畅³, 廖文毫^1,2

1.中国石油大学北京油气资源与工程国家重点实验室,北京 102249;
2.中国石油大学北京地球科学学院,北京 102249;
3.中国石化西北油田分公司,新疆乌鲁木齐 830011

收稿日期:2024-11-13 修回日期:2025-09-13 出版日期:2025-12-25 发布日期:2025-12-31
通讯作者: 曾溅辉(1962—),男,教授,博士生导师,1984年毕业于长春地质学院水文地质与工程地质专业,1994年毕业于中国地质科学院水文地质学专业,获博士学位,现主要从事油气运移和油气成藏研究工作。
作者简介:刘亚洲(1993—),男,助理研究员,2015年毕业于西南石油大学资源勘查工程专业,2023年毕业于中国石油大学(北京)地质资源与地质工程专业,获博士学位,现从事油气藏形成机理与分布规律方面的研究工作。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金企业创新发展联合基金“克拉通盆地内部走滑断裂体系成因及控藏机制研究——以塔里木盆地为例”(U21B2063);国家资助博士后研究人员计划“基于人工智能的超深层断控缝洞型碳酸盐岩油气成藏主控因素定量研究”(GZC20242002);中国石油大学(北京)科研基金资助项目“斜坡带原油混合作用对分子成熟度参数的影响机制及其成藏史重建指示作用”(2462024XKBH005)

Dynamic simulation of ultra-deep fault-controlled fracture-vuggy carbonate hydrocarbon accumulation processes in Shunbei Area,Tarim Basin

LIU Yazhou^1,2, HUANG Cheng³, ZENG Jianhui^1,2, HAN Jun³, LONG Hui^1,2, ZHANG Sheng³, LIU Chang³, LIAO Wenhao^1,2

1. State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering,China University of PetroleumBeijing,Beijing 102249,China;
2. College of Geosciences,China University of PetroleumBeijing,Beijing 102249,China;
3. Northwest Oilfield Company,Sinopec,Urumqi,Xinjiang 830011,China

Received:2024-11-13 Revised:2025-09-13 Online:2025-12-25 Published:2025-12-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 塔里木盆地顺北地区超深层油气资源丰富,但成藏地质条件时空匹配关系复杂,认识不清,为此,通过分析测试和盆地模拟技术恢复了顺北地区油气生—运—聚成藏过程,探讨油气性质差异性原因,揭示超深层油气运聚机理和成藏模式。结果表明:加里东中—晚期和海西晚期是油气运聚的关键时期,而喜马拉雅期存在油气藏再改造和分配;顺北地区烃源岩发育3种生烃模式,即油多气少双峰型、油气并举双峰型和气多油少双峰型;走滑断裂是油气运移的优势通道;盐下、盐间和盐上油气资源量存在此消彼长的关系,肖尔布拉克组和沙依里克组距离烃源岩近而优先发生运聚,低隆起区是油气再运移的中转站;横向上,顺北地区油气藏受控于主干断裂带的影响,呈现出条带状分布;纵向上,主干断裂沟通烃源岩,向上“开枝散叶”,断裂活动性越强,缝洞系统越发育;同一断裂带内,多期油气充注混合是导致不同位置油气性质差异的主控因素。顺北地区油气藏整体上表现出“多元接力式供烃,断裂优势输导,多期混合充注成藏”的特征。该研究成果对顺北地区下一步油气勘探提供了方法上的参考和借鉴。

关键词: 成藏过程, 动态模拟, 碳酸盐岩, 超深层, 顺北地区, 塔里木盆地

Abstract: The Shunbei Area of the Tarim Basin is abundant in ultra-deep hydrocarbon resources,however,the spatiotemporal correlation of the geological conditions for hydrocarbon accumulation is complex and not well understood.Therefore,by analyzing testing data and using basin modeling techniques,the processes of hydrocarbon generation,migration and accumulation in the Shunbei Area were reproduced;the causes for variability in hydrocarbon property were investigated;the mechanisms of ultra-deep hydrocarbon migration-accumulation and the reservoir-formation models were revealed.The results indicated that the Middle-Late Caledonian and Late Hercynian were the critical periods for hydrocarbon migration and accumulation,whereas during the Himalayan period,hydrocarbon reservoirs were reworked and redistributed.Three hydrocarbon-generation patterns developed in the source rocks of the Shunbei Area,namely,an oil-rich/gas-poor double-peaked pattern,a balanced oil-gas double-peaked pattern,and a gas-rich/oil-poor double-peaked pattern.Strike-slip faults served as the primary migration pathways.The hydrocarbon volumes in sub-salt,inter-salt,and supra-salt layers exhibited theinversely-proportioned relationship of"one wanes,the other waxes":the Xiaoerbulake Formation and Sayarik Formation,being closer to source rocks,preferentially experienced migration and accumulation,while low-upwelling zones acted as transfer stations for hydrocarbon re-migration.Laterally,the oil and gas fields in the Shunbei Area were controlled by the main fault belts and exhibited a belt-like distribution.Vertically,the main fault zones connected to source rocks and branched upward;the greater the fault activity was, the more developed was the fracture-vuggy system.Within the same fault zone,multi-stage mixed hydrocarbon charging was the dominant factor causing variations in hydrocarbon properties at different locations.Overall, the reservoirs in the Shunbei Area were characterized by "multi-source relay hydrocarbon supply,dominant fault-controlled migration and multi-phase mixed charging accumulation".This study provides a methodological reference for future hydrocarbon exploration in the Shunbei Area.

Key words: hydrocarbon accumulation process, dynamic simulation, carbonate reservoir, ultra-deep, the Shunbei Area, the Tarim Basin

中图分类号:

TE121

刘亚洲, 黄诚, 曾溅辉, 韩俊, 隆辉, 张胜, 刘畅, 廖文毫. 塔里木盆地顺北地区超深层断控缝洞型碳酸盐岩油气成藏过程动态模拟[J]. 特种油气藏, 2025, 32(6): 22-32.

LIU Yazhou, HUANG Cheng, ZENG Jianhui, HAN Jun, LONG Hui, ZHANG Sheng, LIU Chang, LIAO Wenhao. Dynamic simulation of ultra-deep fault-controlled fracture-vuggy carbonate hydrocarbon accumulation processes in Shunbei Area,Tarim Basin[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2025, 32(6): 22-32.

参考文献

[1] 王清华,徐振平,张荣虎,等.塔里木盆地油气勘探新领域、新类型及资源潜力[J].石油学报,2024,45(1):15-32.
WANG Qinghua,XU Zhenping,ZHANG Ronghu,et al.New fields,new types of hydrocarbon explorations and their resource potentials in Tarim Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2024,45(1):15-32.
[2] 朱秀香,曹自成,隆辉,等.塔里木盆地顺北地区走滑断裂带压扭段和张扭段油气成藏实验模拟及成藏特征研究[J].地学前缘,2023,30(6):289-304.
ZHU Xiuxiang,CAO Zicheng,LONG Hui,et al.Experimental simulation and characteristics of hydrocarbon accumulation in strike-slip fault zone in Shunbei Area,Tarim Basin[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2023,30(6):289-304.
[3] 黄亚浩,汪如军,文志刚,等.塔里木盆地富满油田深层—超深层油气成藏过程[J].石油学报,2024,45(6):947-960.
HUANG Yahao,WANG Rujun,WEN Zhigang,et al.Hydrocarbon accumulation process of the deep to ultra deep reservoirs in Fuman Oilfield,Tarim Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2024,45(6):947-960.
[4] 刘宝增.塔里木盆地顺北地区油气差异聚集主控因素分析——以顺北1号、顺北5号走滑断裂带为例[J].中国石油勘探,2020,25(3):83-95.
LIU Baozeng.Analysis of main controlling factors of oil and gas differential accumulation in Shunbei Area,Tarim Basin-taking Shunbei No.1 and No.5 strike-slip fault zones as examples[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2020,25(3):83-95.
[5] 张煜,毛庆言,李海英,等.顺北中部超深层断控缝洞型油气藏储集体特征与实践应用[J].中国石油勘探,2023,28(1):1-13.
ZHANG Yu,MAO Qingyan,LI Haiying,et al.Characteristics and practical application of ultra-deep fault-controlled fracturedcavity type reservoir in central Shunbei Area[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2023,28(1):1-13.
[6] 张仲培,徐勤琪,刘士林,等.塔里木盆地巴麦地区东段北东向走滑断裂体系特征及油气地质意义[J].石油实验地质,2023,45(4):761-769.
ZHANG Zhongpei,XU Qinqi,LIU Shilin,et al.Characteristics of NE strike-slip fault system in the eastern section of Bachu-Maigaiti Area,Tarim Basin and its oil-gas geological significance[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2023,45(4):761-769.
[7] 田明智,朱超,李森明,等.湖相碳酸盐岩测井岩相识别技术与应用——以柴达木盆地英西地区为例[J].中国石油勘探,2023,28(1):135-143.
TIAN Mingzhi,ZHU Chao,LI Senming,et al.Application of logging lithofacies identification technology of lacustrine carbonate rocks:a case study of Yingxi Area,Qaidam Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2023,28(1):135-143.
[8] 王启超,刘光祥,吴疆,等.鄂尔多斯盆地旬宜地区下古生界走滑断裂特征与油气勘探意义[J].石油实验地质,2024,46(2):342-353.
WANG Qichao,LIU Guangxiang,WU Jiang,et al.Characteristics of Lower Paleozoic strike-slip faults and their significance for oil and gas exploration in Xunyi-Yijun Area,Ordos Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2024,46(2):342-353.
[9] 蒋佳兵,陈如鹤,李小刚,等.火山岩内幕型储层特征与主控因素——以准噶尔盆地滴南凸起滴水泉西断裂下盘为例[J].中国石油勘探,2023,28(2):119-132.
JIANG Jiabing,CHEN Ruhe,LI Xiaogang,et al.Characteristics and main controlling factors of inner volcanic reservoir:a case study of the footwall of West Dishuiquan Fault in Dinan Bulge, Junggar Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2023,28(2):119-132.
[10] 韩俊,尤东华,钱一雄,等.微区原位碳氧同位素分析技术对碳酸盐岩成岩流体性质的约束——以塔里木盆地寒武系—奥陶系为例[J].石油实验地质,2023,45(1):135-144.
HAN Jun,YOU Donghua,QIAN Yixiong,et al.Constraints on carbonate diagenetic fluid properties by microzone in situ analysis of carbon and oxygen isotopes:a case study of Cambrian-Ordovician,Tarim Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2023,45(1):135-144.
[11] 陈平,能源,吴鲜,等.塔里木盆地顺北5号走滑断裂带分层分段特征及构造演化[J]. 新疆石油地质,2023,44(1):33-42.
CHEN Ping,NENG Yuan,WU Xian,et al.Stratification and segmentation characteristics and tectonic evolution of Shunbei No.5 strike-slip fault zone in Tarim basin[J].Xinjiang Petroloeum Geology, 2023,44(1):33-42.
[12] 周学文,林会喜,郭景祥,等.塔里木盆地库车坳陷南斜坡新和地区白垩系亚格列木组沉积模式及油气意义[J].石油实验地质,2023,45(2):266-279.
ZHOU Xuewen,LIN Huixi,GUO Jingxiang,et al.Depositional model and petroleum significance of the Cretaceous Yageliemu Formation in Xinhe Area on the southern slope of Kuqa Depression,Tarim Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2023,45(2):266-279.
[13] 唐军,何泽,申威,等.对标产能的碳酸盐岩储集层测井分类评价:以塔里木盆地托甫台地区一间房组为例[J].新疆石油地质,2023,44(1):112-118.
TANG Jun,HE Ze,SHEN Wei,et al.Productivity-based classified logging evaluation of carbonate reservoirs:a case study on Yijianfang Formation in Tuofutai Area,Tarim basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroloeum Geology, 2023,44(1):112-118.
[14] 郭婷婷,朱碧,杨涛,等.塔里木盆地下寒武统西山布拉克组—西大山组沉积环境演化[J].石油实验地质,2023,45(2):252-265.
GUO Tingting,ZHU Bi,YANG Tao,et al.Evolution of sedimentary environment of the Lower Cambrian Xishanbulake-Xidashan formations in the Tarim Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2023,45(2):252-265.
[15] 马安来,漆立新.顺北地区四号断裂带奥陶系超深层油气地球化学特征与相态差异性成因[J].地学前缘,2023,30(6):247-262.
MA Anlai,QI Lixin.Geochemical characteristics and phase behavior of the Ordovician ultra-deep reservoir fluid,No.4 fault,northern Shuntuoguole,Tarim Basin[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2023,30(6):247-262.
[16] 刘可禹,杨鹏,杨海军,等.重新审视深层油气成藏模式:以塔里木盆地为例[J].地质学报,2023,97(9):2820-2841.
LIU Keyu,YANG Peng,YANG Haijun,et al.Deep petroleum accumulation models revisited:case studies from the Tarim Basin[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2023,97(9):2820-2841.
[17] 杨率,邬光辉,朱永峰,等.塔里木盆地北部地区超深断控油藏关键成藏期[J].石油勘探与开发,2022,49(2):249-261.
YANG Shuai,WU Guanghui,ZHU Yongfeng,et al.Key oil accumulation periods of ultra-deep fault-controlled oil reservoir in northern Tarim Basin,NW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2022,49(2):249-261.
[18] 闫磊,朱光有,陈永权,等.塔里木盆地下寒武统烃源岩分布[J].天然气地球科学,2019,30(11):1569-1578.
YAN Lei,ZHU Guangyou,CHEN Yongquan,et al.Distribution of Lower Cambrian source rocks in the Tarim Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2019,30(11):1569-1578.
[19] 朱光有,胡剑风,陈永权,等.塔里木盆地轮探1井下寒武统玉尔吐斯组烃源岩地球化学特征与形成环境[J].地质学报,2022,96(6):2116-2130.
ZHU Guangyou,HU Jianfeng,CHEN Yongquan,et al.Geochemical characteristics and formation environment of source rock of the Lower Cambrian Yuertusi Formation in Well Luntan 1 in Tarim Basin[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2022,96(6):2116-2130.
[20] 刘丽红,高永进,朱光有,等.塔里木盆地西北缘埃迪卡拉纪—寒武纪转折期黑色岩系中硅质岩成因及其环境指示意义[J].地质学报,2024,98(2):511-529.
LIU Lihong,GAO Yongjin,ZHU Guangyou,et al.Genesis of siliceous rock in the black rock series of Ediacaran-Cambrian transition and its environmental significance in northwestern Tarim Basin[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2024,98(2):511-529.
[21] 谷茸,云露,朱秀香,等.塔里木盆地顺北油田油气来源研究[J].石油实验地质,2020,42(2):248-254,262.
GU Rong,YUN Lu,ZHU Xiuxiang,et al.Oil and gas sources in Shunbei Oilfield,Tarim Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2020,42(2):248-254,262.
[22] 李峰,朱光有,吕修祥,等.塔里木盆地古生界海相油气来源争议与寒武系主力烃源岩的确定[J].石油学报,2021,42(11):1417-1436.
LI Feng,ZHU Guangyou,LYU Xiuxiang,et al.The disputes on the source of Paleozoic marine oil and gas and the determination of the Cambrian system as the main source rocks in Tarim Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2021,42(11):1417-1436.
[23] 柳青兵,蔡忠贤,薛玉芳,等.塔里木盆地柯坪周缘地区肖尔布拉克组白云岩孔隙结构全孔径表征[J].科学技术与工程,2022,22(13):5213-5221.
LIU Qingbing,CAI Zhongxian,XUE Yufang,et al.Full pore size characterization of dolomite pore structure of Xiaolbulake Formation in the Peripheral Area of Keping,Tarim Basin[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2022,22(13):5213-5221.
[24] 李建忠,陶小晚,白斌,等.中国海相超深层油气地质条件、成藏演化及有利勘探方向[J].石油勘探与开发,2021,48(1):52-67.
LI Jianzhong,TAO Xiaowan,BAI Bin,et al.Geological conditions,reservoir evolution and favorable exploration directions of marine ultra-deep oil and gas in China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2021,48(1):52-67.
[25] 彭军,曹俊娇,李斌,等.塔北与巴楚下丘里塔格群白云岩储层特征对比[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2018,40(2):1-14.
PENG Jun,CAO Junjiao,LI Bin,et al.Comparison of dolomite reservoir characteristics between the northern Tarim Basin and lower Qiulitage Group of Bachu[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science &Technology Edition),2018,40(2):1-14.
[26] QIU Huabiao,DENG Shang,CAO Zicheng,et al.The evolution of the complex anticlinal belt with crosscutting strike-slip faults in the central Tarim Basin,NW China[J].Tectonics,2019,38(6):2087-2113.
[27] 邓尚,刘雨晴,刘军,等.克拉通盆地内部走滑断裂发育、演化特征及其石油地质意义:以塔里木盆地顺北地区为例[J].大地构造与成矿学,2021,45(6):1111-1126.
DENG Shang,LIU Yuqing,LIU Jun,et al.Structural styles and evolution models of intracratonic strike-slip faults and the implications for reservoir exploration and appraisal:a case study of the Shunbei Area,Tarim Basin[J].Geotectonica et Metallogenia,2021,45(6):1111-1126.
[28] 云露,邓尚.塔里木盆地深层走滑断裂差异变形与控储控藏特征——以顺北油气田为例[J].石油学报,2022,43(6):770-787.
YUN Lu,DENG Shang.Structural styles of deep strike-slip faults in Tarim Basin and the characteristics of their control on reservoir formation and hydrocarbon accumulation:a case study of Shunbei Oil and Gas Field[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2022,43(6):770-787.
[29] 李慧莉,高键,曹自成,等.塔里木盆地顺托果勒低隆起走滑断裂带流体时空分布及油气成藏意义[J].地学前缘,2023,30(6):316-328.
LI Huili,GAO Jian,CAO Zicheng,et al.Spatial-temporal distribution of fluid activities and its significance for hydrocarbon accumulation in the strike-slip fault zones,Shuntuoguole low-uplift,Tarim Basin[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2023,30(6):316-328.
[30] PEPPER A S,CORVI P J.Simple kinetic models of petroleum formation.Part Ⅲ:modelling an open system[J].Marine and petroleum geology,1995,12(4):417-452.
[31] LI Dan,CHANG Jian,QIU Nansheng,et al.The thermal history in sedimentary basins:a case study of the central Tarim Basin,western China[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2022,229:105149.
[32] WYGRALA B P.Integrated computer-aided basin modeling applied to analysis of hydrocarbon generation history in a Northern Italian Oil Field[J].Organic Geochemistry,1988,13(1-3):187-197.
[33] 彭平安,侯读杰,腾格尔,等.天然气成因鉴别指标体系与关键图版——理论内涵、科学意义与实践作用[J].石油勘探与开发,2025,52(3):513-525.
PENG Ping′an,HOU Dujie,TENG Geer,et al.Identification indexes and diagrams for natural gas origin:connotation,significance and application[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2025,52(3):513-525.
[34] DAHL J E,MOLDOWAN J M,PETERS K E,et al.Diamondoid hydrocarbons as indicators of natural oil cracking[J].Nature,1999,399(6731):54-57.

塔里木盆地顺北地区超深层断控缝洞型碳酸盐岩油气成藏过程动态模拟

Dynamic simulation of ultra-deep fault-controlled fracture-vuggy carbonate hydrocarbon accumulation processes in Shunbei Area,Tarim Basin

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杜赫, 冯建伟, 宛东平, 徐守余, 邢会林. 塔里木盆地奥陶系碳酸盐岩储层多期裂缝特征及期次厘定[J]. 特种油气藏, 2025, 32(6): 40-49.
[2]	唐小飞, 鲍典, 韩长城, 代金城, 刘丽鹏, 张博文. 塔里木盆地顺北地区中—下奥陶统鹰山组层序地层划分及控储效应[J]. 特种油气藏, 2025, 32(6): 58-68.
[3]	史亚红, 陈文安, 郭正权, 刘彦鑫, 王青川, 李庆波, 夏翰林, 张慧瑜. 柴达木盆地风西地区混积碳酸盐岩有效储层测井识别方法[J]. 特种油气藏, 2025, 32(5): 49-57.
[4]	罗水亮, 漆影强, 唐松, 阮基富, 高达, 刘乾乾, 李生. 基于改进Stacking算法的碳酸盐岩储层测井岩性识别方法与应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2025, 32(4): 58-67.
[5]	庞进, 霍俞辰, 许深浩, 陈林, 欧加强, 杨洋, 孔祥玲. 碳酸盐岩底水气藏见水前水侵预测方法[J]. 特种油气藏, 2025, 32(3): 86-93.
[6]	苏鹏, 黄有艺, 李渭亮, 李林涛, 董长银, 张晋毅. 顺北深层碳酸盐岩储层坍塌产物堵塞筛管机理及完井方式优选[J]. 特种油气藏, 2025, 32(3): 160-167.
[7]	丁伟俊, 张颖, 余维初, 丁飞, 杨世楚, 蒲洪兵, 段文博. 无黏土水基钻井液用超支化聚合物降滤失剂的合成及性能评价[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(4): 169-174.
[8]	陈云巧, 王琳霖, 王晓龙, 徐雯, 刘宇坤, 万泽鑫, 鲍一遥, 蔡宁波. 碳酸盐岩地层超压预测模型研究及应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(2): 76-83.
[9]	高哲, 杨国平, 彭磊, 乐露, 付国民, 石磊, 付江龙, 贺涛. 纳米颗粒改变碳酸盐岩凝析气藏储层润湿性评价[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(2): 143-151.
[10]	盖京明, 李玮, 刘刚军, 郑瑞强, 李兵, 陈子贺. 定向双齿结构对PDC钻头破岩效率及侧向力的影响[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(5): 158-165.
[11]	汪如军, 冯建伟, 李世银, 昌伦杰, 杜赫, 邓兴梁. 塔北—塔中隆起奥陶系富油气三角带断裂特征及控藏分析[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(2): 26-35.
[12]	庞兰苏, 王杨, 蒋薇, 王永生, 高国海, 王欣. 基于机器学习的短生产周期碳酸盐岩气井产量预测研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(2): 134-141.
[13]	王容, 李隆新, 刘晓旭, 罗瑜, 张娜. 深层碳酸盐岩气藏改建储气库注采能力预测方法及应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(1): 126-133.
[14]	陈建勋. 深层高压碳酸盐岩气藏孔隙结构特征及衰竭开发规律[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(5): 80-87.
[15]	于吉旺, 庞雄奇, 郑定业, 王学军, 肖惠译, 张鹏伟, 卓色强, 李宏雨. 普光地区深层碳酸盐岩气藏主控因素及有利区预测[J]. 特种油气藏, 2022, 29(3): 28-35.