基于岩心分析的稠油火驱过程中组分转化路径

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2024.03.011

特种油气藏 ›› 2024, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 85-90.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2024.03.011

基于岩心分析的稠油火驱过程中组分转化路径

孙新革¹, 杨凤祥¹, 李海波¹, 展宏洋¹, 高成国¹, 袁士宝²

1.中国石油新疆油田分公司,新疆克拉玛依 834000;
2.西安石油大学石油工程学院,陕西西安 710065

收稿日期:2023-09-03 修回日期:2024-03-05 出版日期:2024-06-25 发布日期:2024-07-26
作者简介:孙新革(1968—),男,企业首席专家,教授级高级工程师,《特种油气藏》编委,1990年毕业于石油大学(华东)煤田、油气地质与勘探专业,2016年毕业于西南石油大学石油工程专业,获博士学位,现主要从事油气田开发研究工作。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金“基于热-流-固-化多场耦合的火驱储层热次生孔道演化及盐沉析调控机理研究”(52274039);中国石油重大开发试验项目“新疆红山嘴油田红浅1井区火驱工业化试验”(2023YQX10411ZK)

Component Transformation Path in the Process of Heavy Oil Fire Flooding Based on Core Analysis

Sun Xin′ge¹, Yang Fengxiang¹, Li Haibo¹, Zhan Hongyang¹, Gao Chengguo¹, Yuan Shibao²

1. PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Karamay, Xinjiang 834000, China;
2. College of Petroleum Engineering, Xi′an Shiyou University, Xi′an, Shaanxi 710065, China

Received:2023-09-03 Revised:2024-03-05 Online:2024-06-25 Published:2024-07-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对火驱现场原油组分转化不明确的问题,以新疆油田红浅1井区稠油油藏为例,运用红外光谱和GC-MS方法,结合岩心分析结果与稠油反应机理,认为稠油组分反应变化分为烃类分子氧化、稠油组分化学键断裂和芳环自由基缩合生焦变化。将研究成果应用于稠油组分转化路径的分析,结果表明:低温阶段,稠油组分反应最集中,以缩聚和热裂解反应为主;燃烧阶段,芳环自由基聚合生焦,C-H键断裂加氧形成OH、CHO、CO等官能团;高温氧化阶段,为焦炭和重质组分(胶质、沥青质)的燃烧。研究内容验证了火驱过程中焦炭燃烧使稠油升温降黏、稠油组分转化为焦炭启动燃烧的结论,加深认识火驱过程中燃料形成和转化的意义。

关键词: 火驱, 稠油, 氧化反应, 热反应, 转化路径, 岩心分析

Abstract: To address the issues of unclear conversion of oil components in in-situ combustion process,the heavy oil reservoir in Hongqian-1 well field of Xinjiang Oilfield was taken as an example:by using infrared spectroscopy and GC-MS method, combined with core analysis results and heavy oil reaction mechanism, the reaction variation of heavy oil components are divided into hydrocarbon oxidation, chemical bond cleavage of heavy oil components and coking formed by aryl radical condensation.The research results are applied to the analysis of the conversion path of heavy oil components.The findings show that the reaction of heavy oil components is the most concentrated in the low temperature stage,which is dominated by condensation and thermal cracking reactions;in the combustion stage,the aryl radical condensation produces coke, and the C-H bond is broken and oxygenated to form oxides such as OH,CHO,and CO;at the high temperature oxidation stage,the coke and heavy components of gum and asphaltene combust.The findings of this study confirm the conclusion that coke combustion induces a rise in temperature and a decrease in viscosity of heavy oil,leading to the transformation of heavy oil components into coke during the fire drive process,thereby enhancing our understanding of the significance of fuel formation and transformation during fire flooding.

Key words: in-situ combustion, heavy oil, oxidation reaction, thermal reaction, transformation path, core analysis

中图分类号:

TE345

孙新革, 杨凤祥, 李海波, 展宏洋, 高成国, 袁士宝. 基于岩心分析的稠油火驱过程中组分转化路径[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(3): 85-90.

Sun Xin′ge, Yang Fengxiang, Li Haibo, Zhan Hongyang, Gao Chengguo, Yuan Shibao. Component Transformation Path in the Process of Heavy Oil Fire Flooding Based on Core Analysis[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2024, 31(3): 85-90.

参考文献

[1] WIEHE I.A phase-separation kinetic model for coke formation[J].Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research,1993,32(11):2447-2454.
[2] GONÇALVES M L A,TEIXEIRA M A G,PEREIRA R C L,et al.Contribution of thermal analysis for characterization of asphaltenes from brazilian crude oil[J].Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry,2001,64(2):697-706.
[3] JIA N,MOORE R G,MEHTA S A,et al.Kinetic modelling of thermal cracking and low temperature oxidation reactions[J].Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology,2003,45(9):21-28.
[4] 寇建益.温度变化对原油低温氧化过程影响研究[D].北京:中国科学院研究生院(理化技术研究所),2008.
KOU Jianyi.Research on the effect of temperature on the LTO process of crude oil[D].Beijing:Chinese Academy of Sciences Graduate School(Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry),2008.
[5] 张学彬.普通稠油氧化反应特征研究[D].广州:华南理工大学,2015.
ZHANG Xuebin.Study on the oxidation characteristics of heavy oil[D].Guangzhou:South China University of Technology,2015.
[6] SPEIGHT J G.The chemistry and technology of petroleum[J].Chemical Engineering World,2019,54(10):93-97.
[7] SPEIGHT J G,LONG R B.Spectroscopy and asphaltene structure[J].Atomic and Nuclear Methods in Fossil Energy Research,1982:295-321.
[8] KOK M V,GUNDOGAR A S.DSC study on combustion and pyrolysis behaviors of turkish crude oils[J].Fuel Processing Technology,2013,116(1):110-115.
[9] 张鸿.普通稠油火烧油层高温氧化反应动力学研究[J].石油化工应用,2014,33(4):99-101,106.
ZHANG Hong.Study on reation kinetics of high-temperature oxidation of in-situ combustion in ordinary heavy oil[J].Petrochemical Industry Application,2014,33(4):99-101,106.
[10] 李生华,刘晨光,阙国和,等.渣油热反应体系中第二液相的形成机制[J].燃料化学学报,1998,26(5):40-47.
LI Shenghua,LIU Chenguang,QUE Guohe,et al.Formation mechanisms of second liquid phases in thermal reaction systems of vacuum residua[J].Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology,1998,26(5):40-47.
[11] 江航,许强辉,马德胜,等.注空气开采过程中稠油结焦量影响因素[J].石油学报,2016,37(8):1030-1036.
JIANG Hang,XU Qianghui,MA Desheng,et al.Influence factors of coking amount during recovery of heavy oil by air injection[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(8):1030-1036.
[12] 李金涛.火烧油层过程中原油的热解动力学特征研究[D].青岛:中国石油大学(华东),2017.
LI Jintao.Study on pyrolysis kinetics characteristics of crude oil in in-situ combustion process[D].Qingdao:China University of Petroleum(East China),2017.
[13] 陈龙.烷基自由基热裂解反应机理及动力学性质的理论研究[D].西安:陕西师范大学,2017.
CHEN Long.Mechanistic and kinetic investigations of the thermal decomposition of alkyl radicals[D].Xi′an:Shaanxi Normal University,2017.
[14] 梁建军,计玲,蒋西平,等.克拉玛依油田红浅火驱先导试验区火驱开发节能效果[J].新疆石油地质,2017,38(5):599-601.
LIANG Jianjun,JI Ling,JIANG Xiping,et al.Energy-saving effect of fireflooding development in Hongqian pilot test area of Karamay Oilfield[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2017,38(5):599-601.
[15] ZHAO Renbao,ZHANG Chunhui,YANG Fengxiang,et al.Influence of temperature field on rock and heavy components variation during in-situ combustionprocess[J].Fuel,2018,230:244-257.
[16] YUAN Shibao,JIANG Haiyan,YANG Fengxiang,et al.Research on characteristics of fire flooding zones based on core analysis[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2018,170:607-610.

基于岩心分析的稠油火驱过程中组分转化路径

Component Transformation Path in the Process of Heavy Oil Fire Flooding Based on Core Analysis

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈莉娟, 李舒彤, 陈龙, 王田田, 潘竟军, 赵仁保. 压力对稠油拟组分氧化的影响[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(3): 129-135.
[2]	陈登亚, 游红娟, 陈昂, 郭文轩, 陈龙, 王旭生, 郭勇. 环烷基稠油火驱开发中焦炭生成规律及物理化学特征[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(3): 136-142.
[3]	孙梓齐, 赵仁保, 王田田, 龙海庆, 黄田, 陈昌剑. 次生水体对火驱开发效果影响的实验[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(2): 120-128.
[4]	孙新革, 罗池辉, 张胜飞, 张文胜, 罗双涵. 新疆油田浅层超稠油SAGD高效低碳开发技术研究与展望[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(1): 1-8.
[5]	张阳, 安高峰, 蒋琪, 王鼎立, 毛金成, 蒋冠辰. 稠油化学降黏剂研究进展与发展趋势[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(1): 9-19.
[6]	户昶昊. 低黏原油辅助气体吞吐稠油开采技术室内实验和技术界限[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(1): 48-56.
[7]	袁士宝, 任梓寒, 杨凤祥, 孙新革, 蒋海岩, 宋佳. 稠油油藏蒸汽-空气复合火驱特征分析及参数优化[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(1): 66-73.
[8]	李松岩, 程浩, 韩瑞, 魏耀辉, 李明鹤, 冯世博. 稠油油藏热溶剂辅助重力泄油开采机理及参数优化[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(1): 74-80.
[9]	王田田, 赵仁保, 蒋宁宁, 李鑫, 徐晗, 王昊. 注蒸汽开发后油藏火驱原位制氢可行性[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(1): 81-86.
[10]	孙宝泉, 杨勇, 吴光焕, 赵红雨, 张民, 孙超, 张贺捷. 超稠油油藏热化学驱油水渗流特征[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(1): 87-93.
[11]	赵林, 郝丽娜, 于春生, 张勇, 肖梦华, 柴细琼, 姚江, 龚恒圆. 普通稠油降黏复合驱技术研究与矿场试验[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(1): 94-100.
[12]	甄贵男, 王健, 吴宝成, 王炜龙, 唐杨, 路宇豪. 稠油油藏水气交替诱导泡沫油冷采提高采收率实验[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(1): 101-108.
[13]	于建梅, 韦涛, 杜殿发, 任利川, 郝芳彗. 稠油油藏热化学驱油体系扩散规律[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(1): 109-115.
[14]	李步林, 张胜飞, 王强, 苟燕, 沈德煌, 王红庄. 石油酸含量对稠油流体性质影响实验[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(1): 116-122.
[15]	惠瑞瑞, 张志升, 张治东, 李娜, 孟东飞, 陈娟. 薄层超稠油油藏烟道气SAGP室内实验评价[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(1): 131-136.